Advertisement
by Esternial » Mon Apr 29, 2019 2:34 pm
by Czechoslovakia and Zakarpattia » Mon Apr 29, 2019 2:34 pm
by Torrocca » Mon Apr 29, 2019 2:34 pm
by Skarten » Mon Apr 29, 2019 2:35 pm
by Torrocca » Mon Apr 29, 2019 2:36 pm
Kragholm Free States wrote:Torrocca wrote:
It's like it's almost impossible to read manifestos, articles, or books written by white supremacists! Clearly, no, obviously the only true way to know how they determine who belongs to what race is to talk to them firsthand.
You realise not every white supremacist has written a manifesto, article, or book, right? If their definitions of race are as fickle and arbitrary as you say, you have no way of knowing that there aren't white supremacists who consider sub-saharan Africans to be white and Europeans to be non-white.
by Czechoslovakia and Zakarpattia » Mon Apr 29, 2019 2:36 pm
Skarten wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
And we are still waiting for your argument how the information is false.
You're not supposed to trust an source that's quite obviously biased on itself- If the sources are just so easy to find, then why don't you link the original sites themselves? If you just link me the wikipedia page, i'm going to read the wikipedia page.
by Skarten » Mon Apr 29, 2019 2:37 pm
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:Skarten wrote:
Well, as much as that's a crackpot theory right there (One i've never really heard of), i don't think that's really enough to classify people as nazis. A lot of the people who the nazis hate might as well say the same. Being against jews is not just a nazi thing.
If you read Mein Kampf, you would know that is what Hitler thought of communism.
Can't get much more nazi then Mein Kampf.
by Nakena » Mon Apr 29, 2019 2:37 pm
Esternial wrote:It's a dangerous and generalized statement to make.
I'm sure there are some fringe groups within the alt-right that claim they would like nothing less than to kill a bunch of muslims or jew. A lot of that is peacocking, I believe. Though we shouldn't just brush it all away - sometimes you just need one or two triggers to push someone over the edge. A momentary lapse of reasoning that makes someone believe the stuff they've been cockily espousing is actually a good idea, that they might be more respected by their community, put some twisted meaning in their 'meaningless lives', etc.
There's a lot of underlying factors that's feeding the mindset of these people. For instance a lot of young people today have been fostered to believe they can achieve great things. If that doesn't happen, some turn into whiny cunts and some turn into crazy whiny cunts that want the praise of other whiny cunts on the internet and are completely detached from reality.
by Skarten » Mon Apr 29, 2019 2:39 pm
Czechoslovakia and Zakarpattia wrote:Skarten wrote:
You're not supposed to trust an source that's quite obviously biased on itself- If the sources are just so easy to find, then why don't you link the original sites themselves? If you just link me the wikipedia page, i'm going to read the wikipedia page.
The list of references and sources is at the bottom of every single page currently available on Wikipedia or any website that uses the Mediawiki software. All you need to do is scroll down, read every one of them one by one, and then you will understand where Wikipedia got it's info from.
by Kragholm Free States » Mon Apr 29, 2019 2:39 pm
by Costa Fierro » Mon Apr 29, 2019 2:40 pm
Esternial wrote:There's a lot of underlying factors that's feeding the mindset of these people. For instance a lot of young people today have been fostered to believe they can achieve great things. If that doesn't happen, some turn into whiny cunts and some turn into crazy whiny cunts that want the praise of other whiny cunts on the internet and are completely detached from reality.
by The Black Forrest » Mon Apr 29, 2019 2:40 pm
Skarten wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
And we are still waiting for your argument how the information is false.
You're not supposed to trust an source that's quite obviously biased on itself- If the sources are just so easy to find, then why don't you link the original sites themselves? If you just link me the wikipedia page, i'm going to read the wikipedia page.
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Mon Apr 29, 2019 2:40 pm
Skarten wrote:The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:
If you read Mein Kampf, you would know that is what Hitler thought of communism.
Can't get much more nazi then Mein Kampf.
Read my statements. Not everyone who's against jews is an nazi. I mean, last time i checked a lot of Muslims are pretty anti-jew, but are they considered nazis
by Esternial » Mon Apr 29, 2019 2:40 pm
Costa Fierro wrote:Esternial wrote:There's a lot of underlying factors that's feeding the mindset of these people. For instance a lot of young people today have been fostered to believe they can achieve great things. If that doesn't happen, some turn into whiny cunts and some turn into crazy whiny cunts that want the praise of other whiny cunts on the internet and are completely detached from reality.
Care to explain more about those factors that turn them into "whiny cunts"?
by Bezkoshtovnya » Mon Apr 29, 2019 2:41 pm
Skarten wrote:Czechoslovakia and Zakarpattia wrote:The list of references and sources is at the bottom of every single page currently available on Wikipedia or any website that uses the Mediawiki software. All you need to do is scroll down, read every one of them one by one, and then you will understand where Wikipedia got it's info from.
Then just... link the original sites if it's that easy?
Dante Alighieri wrote:There is no greater sorrow than to recall happiness in times of misery
Charlie Chaplin wrote:Nothing is permanent in this wicked world, not even our troubles.
by Costa Fierro » Mon Apr 29, 2019 2:41 pm
by -MAFDET- » Mon Apr 29, 2019 2:43 pm
by Torrocca » Mon Apr 29, 2019 2:44 pm
by Bear Stearns » Mon Apr 29, 2019 2:44 pm
by Skarten » Mon Apr 29, 2019 2:45 pm
-MAFDET- wrote:Kragholm Free States wrote:
White colonialism is not context for things that were happening centuries before white colonialism.
I don’t see your point. Not only were Europeans adept at colonizing other civilizations, but they were also highly proficient at murdering each other. Here’s a fantastical scenario; imagine that some non-white empire across the sea had developed maritime technology advanced enough to reach Europe, and began their own slave trade. Are the Europeans in this fantasy world at fault for having something done to them that they have committed against each other for centuries?
To place the fault for slavery on the backs of black collaborators rather than the white Europeans who orchestrated the slave trade in the first place is a way of deflecting responsibility.
by Bear Stearns » Mon Apr 29, 2019 2:46 pm
-MAFDET- wrote:Kragholm Free States wrote:
White colonialism is not context for things that were happening centuries before white colonialism.
I don’t see your point. Not only were Europeans adept at colonizing other civilizations, but they were also highly proficient at murdering each other. Here’s a fantastical scenario; imagine that some non-white empire across the sea had developed maritime technology advanced enough to reach Europe, and began their own slave trade. Are the Europeans in this fantasy world at fault for having something done to them that they have committed against each other for centuries?
To place the fault for slavery on the backs of black collaborators rather than the white Europeans who orchestrated the slave trade in the first place is a way of deflecting responsibility.
by Nakena » Mon Apr 29, 2019 2:46 pm
by Gormwood » Mon Apr 29, 2019 2:48 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Click Ests Vimgalevytopia, Herador, Keltionialang, Kenmoria, Kowani, Maximum Imperium Rex, Nanatsu no Tsuki, Plan Neonie, Talibanada, The Two Jerseys
Advertisement