Posted: Tue May 14, 2019 10:43 pmI believe it was how vaccines prevent disease and herd immunity and vaccines
I believe it was how vaccines prevent disease and herd immunity and vaccines
NationStates
Because sometimes even national leaders just want to hang out
https://forum.nationstates.net/
Hundreds quarantined for measles in 2 CA universities.
Page 18 of 39
Posted: Tue May 14, 2019 10:43 pmI believe it was how vaccines prevent disease and herd immunity and vaccines
Posted: Tue May 14, 2019 10:47 pmThe Aria wrote:
I found it ironic that one of your sources says you need to give vaccines to baby's while another one of your sources says you cant give vaccines to babies because there immunity system cant handle it
The CDC says "by age two" (kind of stretching the definition of a baby), while the herd immunity article mentions vaccinating babies of 15-18 months (while babies under three months are most susceptible to pertussis).
I fail to see either irony or contradiction.
Posted: Tue May 14, 2019 10:47 pmPosted: Tue May 14, 2019 10:49 pmGalloism wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
When did you get the vaccine? Work in areas where it was still an issue at the time?
At the time, it was a requirement to attend college. Public schools had eliminated it as a requirement, but my chosen college still required it before you could attend, so I got it when I was like... 16 or 17. Something like that.
Was that before WWII?
They retired it about 6 years before I entered high school. I don't think I ever had it.....
Posted: Tue May 14, 2019 10:51 pmThe Free Joy State wrote:The Aria wrote:
I found it ironic that one of your sources says you need to give vaccines to baby's while another one of your sources says you cant give vaccines to babies because there immunity system cant handle it
The CDC says "by age two" (kind of stretching the definition of a baby), while the herd immunity article mentions babies of 15-18 months.
I fail to see either irony or contradiction.
Yeah "by age 2" which means before.
I need to go now. talk tomorrow
Posted: Tue May 14, 2019 10:54 pmThe Black Forrest wrote:Galloism wrote:At the time, it was a requirement to attend college. Public schools had eliminated it as a requirement, but my chosen college still required it before you could attend, so I got it when I was like... 16 or 17. Something like that.
Was that before WWII?
They retried it about 6 years before I entered high school. I don't think I ever had it.....
Well, it kinda sucked.
Lymph nodes in my armpits hurt - felt like I was lugging around two big watermelons.
I might be exaggerating a bit with time.
A bit.
Posted: Tue May 14, 2019 10:57 pm15-18 months is before age 2. 2 is 24 months.
Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 3:17 pmNanocyberia wrote:Even mandatory vaccination is making people mad; just ask the French or the Swiss...
Too fucking bad. You don't want to be vaccinated and you don't have a medical reason for it, then you can't be where you can spread it to others.
Good luck if you have a car accident -- can't bring you to the ER where you could infect all sorts of injured, sick, and immuno-deficient people.
Oh, but that's cruel. We should probably charge you what it costs to keep you in total isolation so you don't spread anything to others.
Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 8:29 pmThis ^^
Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 9:25 pmAccording to https://www.answers.com/Q/What_do_vaccines_contain vaccines contain weakened or dead version of what its supposed to prevent.
So you are saying you believe injecting weakened or dead disease should be mandatory because bringing back dead diseases is bad.
Huh?
Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 9:26 pmThe Aria wrote:LiberNovusAmericae wrote:This ^^
According to https://www.answers.com/Q/What_do_vaccines_contain vaccines contain weakened or dead version of what its supposed to prevent.
So you are saying you believe injecting weakened or dead disease should be mandatory because bringing back dead diseases is bad.
Huh?
If you're that nostalgic for the Black Plague...
Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 9:27 pmGormwood wrote:The Aria wrote:
According to https://www.answers.com/Q/What_do_vaccines_contain vaccines contain weakened or dead version of what its supposed to prevent.
So you are saying you believe injecting weakened or dead disease should be mandatory because bringing back dead diseases is bad.
Huh?
If you're that nostalgic for the Black Plague...
We don’t vaccinate against that.
Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 9:28 pmThe Aria wrote:LiberNovusAmericae wrote:This ^^
According to https://www.answers.com/Q/What_do_vaccines_contain vaccines contain weakened or dead version of what its supposed to prevent.
So you are saying you believe injecting weakened or dead disease should be mandatory because bringing back dead diseases is bad.
Huh?
…The body can fight off the weakened/dead ones easily, and in doing so, grant immunity. Without them, those chances drop faster than a fat guy out a window.
Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 9:29 pmPosted: Wed May 15, 2019 9:31 pmThe Aria wrote:LiberNovusAmericae wrote:This ^^
According to https://www.answers.com/Q/What_do_vaccines_contain vaccines contain weakened or dead version of what its supposed to prevent.
So you are saying you believe injecting weakened or dead disease should be mandatory because bringing back dead diseases is bad.
Huh?
You are misstating the use. You are basically suggesting people are being injected with the disease.
If the disease is extinct; there isn't a need for the vaccine anymore. Small pox is extinct. We don't give out the vaccines anymore. That ended 48 years ago.
Measles, mumps and rubella are still very much around.
Body autonomy brought measles back to the US.
Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 9:31 pmGormwood wrote:The Aria wrote:
According to https://www.answers.com/Q/What_do_vaccines_contain vaccines contain weakened or dead version of what its supposed to prevent.
So you are saying you believe injecting weakened or dead disease should be mandatory because bringing back dead diseases is bad.
Huh?
If you're that nostalgic for the Black Plague...
How am I nostalgic for the black plague black plague?
Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 9:32 pmKatganistan wrote:Nanocyberia wrote:Even mandatory vaccination is making people mad; just ask the French or the Swiss...
Too fucking bad. You don't want to be vaccinated and you don't have a medical reason for it, then you can't be where you can spread it to others.
Good luck if you have a car accident -- can't bring you to the ER where you could infect all sorts of injured, sick, and immuno-deficient people.
Oh, but that's cruel. We should probably charge you what it costs to keep you in total isolation so you don't spread anything to others.
Agreed.
Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 9:32 pmPosted: Wed May 15, 2019 9:46 pmThe Aria wrote:LiberNovusAmericae wrote:This ^^
According to https://www.answers.com/Q/What_do_vaccines_contain vaccines contain weakened or dead version of what its supposed to prevent.
So you are saying you believe injecting weakened or dead disease should be mandatory because bringing back dead diseases is bad.
Huh?
You need the virus as an ingredient so that the immune system recognizes that it's a threat and so develop antibodies for future attempts at infection.
Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 9:47 pmThe Aria wrote:LiberNovusAmericae wrote:This ^^
According to https://www.answers.com/Q/What_do_vaccines_contain vaccines contain weakened or dead version of what its supposed to prevent.
So you are saying you believe injecting weakened or dead disease should be mandatory because bringing back dead diseases is bad.
Huh?
You see contradictions where they don't exist. Both here and in the 2 years thing.
Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 9:48 pmNeanderthaland wrote:The Aria wrote:
According to https://www.answers.com/Q/What_do_vaccines_contain vaccines contain weakened or dead version of what its supposed to prevent.
So you are saying you believe injecting weakened or dead disease should be mandatory because bringing back dead diseases is bad.
Huh?
You see contradictions where they don't exist. Both here and in the 2 years thing.
Some people are determined to see vaccines as bad and unnecessary.
Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 9:49 pmPosted: Wed May 15, 2019 9:52 pmNeanderthaland wrote:Galloism wrote:We don’t vaccinate against that.
We generally don't, but you can.
SCP-049 would like to know your location.
Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 9:52 pm.You are misstating the use. You are basically suggesting people are being injected with the disease
How am i misstating the use?
If the disease is extinct; there isn't a need for the vaccine anymore. Small pox is extinct. We don't give out the vaccines anymore. That ended 48 years ago.
Then why are we talking about it?
Body autonomy brought measles back to the US.
I disagree. Can you prove it?
Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 10:00 pmNeanderthaland wrote:The Aria wrote:
According to https://www.answers.com/Q/What_do_vaccines_contain vaccines contain weakened or dead version of what its supposed to prevent.
So you are saying you believe injecting weakened or dead disease should be mandatory because bringing back dead diseases is bad.
Huh?
You see contradictions where they don't exist. Both here and in the 2 years thing.
How can you say that they dont exist are you blind? Please explain how they dont exist