Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Bring back the black death
You folk can share it amongst yourselves.
Advertisement
by Conserative Morality » Mon Apr 29, 2019 3:08 am
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Bring back the black death
by Greater vakolicci haven » Mon Apr 29, 2019 3:09 am
by Conserative Morality » Mon Apr 29, 2019 3:10 am
by The New California Republic » Mon Apr 29, 2019 3:40 am
by Greater vakolicci haven » Mon Apr 29, 2019 3:46 am
by The New California Republic » Mon Apr 29, 2019 3:50 am
by Andsed » Mon Apr 29, 2019 3:59 am
by The New California Republic » Mon Apr 29, 2019 3:59 am
by Purpelia » Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:10 am
The New California Republic wrote:Aclion wrote:Are you vaccinated?
Yes but that's irrelevant, as herd immunity is required for many diseases to be prevented, as vaccinations are not 100% effective at preventing even vaccinated individuals from being infected if there are a large number of infected individuals in the community.
by The New California Republic » Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:13 am
Purpelia wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Yes but that's irrelevant, as herd immunity is required for many diseases to be prevented, as vaccinations are not 100% effective at preventing even vaccinated individuals from being infected if there are a large number of infected individuals in the community.
What worse, having non vaccinated individuals get sick forces them to treat the illness with medicine to which the pathogen can than become immune to (given that the sort of idiot that won't take a shot is also unlikely to finish his treatment properly). And this can lead to all sorts of ugly and undesirable mutations such as those that might eventually render vaccination worthless.
by Purpelia » Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:15 am
The New California Republic wrote:Purpelia wrote:What worse, having non vaccinated individuals get sick forces them to treat the illness with medicine to which the pathogen can than become immune to (given that the sort of idiot that won't take a shot is also unlikely to finish his treatment properly). And this can lead to all sorts of ugly and undesirable mutations such as those that might eventually render vaccination worthless.
Yes. Prevention is better than cure, especially in light of the dearth in any new antibiotics etc being created in recent decades.
by Katganistan » Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:24 am
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:How on earth does a university have the authority to kidnap people?
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Sanctum and Ultima wrote:Well, we should do what other nations did, but we'll be one step ahead of them: ban non-vaccinated children from schools and public places and jail/execute anti-vaxx parents
Yeah let's deny children an education because their parents never got them vaccinated.
I'm quite happy that I don't live in your world, since the only jab I've ever had was prior to removing a tooth.
by LiberNovusAmericae » Mon Apr 29, 2019 5:13 am
by Greater vakolicci haven » Mon Apr 29, 2019 7:41 am
Katganistan wrote:Greater vakolicci haven wrote:How on earth does a university have the authority to kidnap people?
Probably the CDC's mandate.Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Yeah let's deny children an education because their parents never got them vaccinated.
I'm quite happy that I don't live in your world, since the only jab I've ever had was prior to removing a tooth.Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Bring back the black death
Already did.Greater vakolicci haven wrote:I don't believe in quarantine though really. Sounds a lot like false imprisonment.
For 21 days, until you can't spread it anymore. Remember it's virulent AND airborne. People who spread it can leave their little viral loads floating in the air for up to two hours after they have left, which is why doctor's offices DON'T want people suspected of having measles in their waiting rooms spreading it to everyone else.
It's not 'false imprisonment' if you're a disease vector. It's protecting the rest of society.
Hey, let's provide OTHER PEOPLE with protection from virulent and possibly fatal diseases.
by Andsed » Mon Apr 29, 2019 8:30 am
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Katganistan wrote:Probably the CDC's mandate.
Already did.
For 21 days, until you can't spread it anymore. Remember it's virulent AND airborne. People who spread it can leave their little viral loads floating in the air for up to two hours after they have left, which is why doctor's offices DON'T want people suspected of having measles in their waiting rooms spreading it to everyone else.
It's not 'false imprisonment' if you're a disease vector. It's protecting the rest of society.
Hey, let's provide OTHER PEOPLE with protection from virulent and possibly fatal diseases.
I don't really hold an interest in the protection of society though, I care far more about individual freedom.
by Thermodolia » Mon Apr 29, 2019 11:17 am
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Katganistan wrote:Probably the CDC's mandate.
Already did.
For 21 days, until you can't spread it anymore. Remember it's virulent AND airborne. People who spread it can leave their little viral loads floating in the air for up to two hours after they have left, which is why doctor's offices DON'T want people suspected of having measles in their waiting rooms spreading it to everyone else.
It's not 'false imprisonment' if you're a disease vector. It's protecting the rest of society.
Hey, let's provide OTHER PEOPLE with protection from virulent and possibly fatal diseases.
I don't really hold an interest in the protection of society though, I care far more about individual freedom.
by The Black Forrest » Mon Apr 29, 2019 11:35 am
by The Black Forrest » Mon Apr 29, 2019 11:41 am
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Katganistan wrote:Probably the CDC's mandate.
Already did.
For 21 days, until you can't spread it anymore. Remember it's virulent AND airborne. People who spread it can leave their little viral loads floating in the air for up to two hours after they have left, which is why doctor's offices DON'T want people suspected of having measles in their waiting rooms spreading it to everyone else.
It's not 'false imprisonment' if you're a disease vector. It's protecting the rest of society.
Hey, let's provide OTHER PEOPLE with protection from virulent and possibly fatal diseases.
I don't really hold an interest in the protection of society though, I care far more about individual freedom.
by Greater vakolicci haven » Mon Apr 29, 2019 12:19 pm
by Thermodolia » Mon Apr 29, 2019 12:22 pm
by Greater vakolicci haven » Mon Apr 29, 2019 12:39 pm
by Shofercia » Mon Apr 29, 2019 12:50 pm
Katganistan wrote:Shofercia wrote:take the money away from Union Pensions; it's ok, I think they can survive on $60,000 a year, I don't think they need all $120,000.
So basically, steal the money people earned through their working lives because you don't think they're entitled to it.
Classy.
Let alone that pensions certainly do not guarantee anyone "$120,000 a year".
CalPERS was, by its own calculations, 100 percent funded during the 1990s and into the first decade of the 21st century – so healthy, in fact, that state and local officials felt free to sharply increase pension benefits retroactively. However, pension funds took immense hits during the Great Recession – CalPERS alone lost $100 billion – and most have not fully recovered.
In fact, between 2007 and 2016, before the 2017-18 stock market surge, CalPERS’ total liabilities increased by a startling 76 percent, from $248 billion to $436 billion, while its assets increased by just 19 percent, from $251 billion to $298 billion, sharply increasing the fund’s unfunded liabilities. The earnings surge, plus big increases in mandatory “contributions” from state and local governments, did raise CalPERS’ official funded level slightly to 70 percent, but that was still a long way from 100 percent – and now it’s declining again.
Very quietly, CalPERS officials told its governing board last month that the trust fund actually lost 3.9 percent during 2018, apparently due to the sharp stock market decline late in the year, pushing its funded level back down to about 67 percent.
Last week Transparent California released data showing that more than 62,000 retired California public workers earn at least six figures in annual retirement benefits.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ariskaschton, Ineva, Keltionialang, New haven america, Perchan
Advertisement