Advertisement
by Cappuccina » Wed Jan 15, 2020 10:52 pm
by Necroghastia » Thu Jan 16, 2020 12:32 am
by Grenartia » Thu Jan 16, 2020 12:32 am
Thermodolia wrote:Grenartia wrote:
You said, unironically after using the word "ok", which was a word that was made up out of the blue.
Honestly. Enlighten us what that difference is. All "actual words" were made up out of the blue at one point.
No they where not just made up out of the blue.
Words develop organically along linguistic, cultural, and social trends. For example the English word Milk came about do to centuries of change from the Proto-Proto-Germanic meluks. Which is why the English, Dutch, and German words for milk are all similar.
Forcibly changing language to suit your needs doesn’t make the rest of language made up.
This just in, thermo says kinsey scales 1,2, 4, and 5 are completely invalid. Who's being "captain pedantic" now?
Its you. The answer is you. Look in a mirror. You are the very thing you criticized Auzi for being.
Looks like a stuck a nerve.
Also that’s a lot of straw you got there.
First off I think the Kinsey scale is a stupid metric and I refuse to recognize the validity of such.
But if you must 1,2,3,4 and 5 are all the same thing, bisexuality just different variations of the same.
I refer you to the previous that the Kinsey scale is an outmoded piece of shit. But if you must no a lesbian is not a 5, that would be a bisexual.
This. Damned if we do, damned if we don't.
You really don’t have a leg to stand on as you claim to be pansexual, yet also you claim to not be attracted to men.
Cappuccina wrote:There is a difference between organic language evolution and Newspeak, kids.
Cekoviu wrote:Hanafuridake wrote:This is hard to express without sounding snarky or hostile, but words have meaning, and "pansexual lesbian" is mutually exclusive. Sexuality is much more fluid and hard to categorize in neat little boxes like some in the thread want to do, and there are women who don't fully fit either of the three on the spectrum but might consider themselves one of the three, but if you identify as bisexual or pansexual, then you aren't a lesbian. It's not "policing other people's identities" to expect them to use words in their universally agreed upon definition.
I don't know where I would fully fit on the spectrum, but I consider myself a lesbian because I'm exclusively romantically attracted to women and would only date another woman (whether trans or cis).
I'd be willing to accept that a woman who is attracted to multiple genders but exclusively or near-exclusively dates women (intentionally) is functionally a lesbian while being technically bisexual, so identifying herself as both might be justified.
Fahran wrote:There's no such thing as a meaningfully non-binary man or woman.
by Neu California » Thu Jan 16, 2020 12:36 am
by Vassenor » Thu Jan 16, 2020 12:43 am
by Crockerland » Thu Jan 16, 2020 1:56 am
Grenartia wrote:Said the person who is unironically triggered by a pansexual transbian.
by Jack Thomas Lang » Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:04 am
Necroghastia wrote:So intersex people do not exist. Gotcha.
by Vassenor » Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:21 am
Crockerland wrote:
Actually, it says right there in the source you linked that what the law would actually do is "make it a felony for doctors to perform surgeries or administer hormone therapy to help minors change gender." That is definitely different from a law that would "make it flat out illegal to affirm trans kids or support them to transition in any way."Grenartia wrote:Said the person who is unironically triggered by a pansexual transbian.
le triggered ur triggered, u got owned epic style
edit: thanks 4 the gold kind stranger
by Necroghastia » Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:31 am
by Jack Thomas Lang » Thu Jan 16, 2020 2:45 am
Necroghastia wrote:I'd say the disingenuousness only comes in when you call a group of people aberrations in order to justify ignorance.
by Ifreann » Thu Jan 16, 2020 8:04 am
Cappuccina wrote:Ifreann wrote:They totes were tho
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakespea ... VocabularyAmong Shakespeare's greatest contributions to the English language must be the introduction of new vocabulary and phrases which have enriched the language making it more colourful and expressive. Some estimates at the number of words coined by Shakespeare number in the several thousands. Warren King clarifies by saying that, "In all of his work – the plays, the sonnets and the narrative poems – Shakespeare uses 17,677 words: Of those, 1,700 were first used by Shakespeare."[32] He is also well known for borrowing from the classical literature and foreign languages.[21] He created these words by "changing nouns into verbs, changing verbs into adjectives, connecting words never before used together, adding prefixes and suffixes, and devising words wholly original."[33]
Yes, Newspeak is an attempt to make certain ideas impossible to express, and thus destroy them entirely, by way of an ever shrinking vocabulary and by words only ever having one meaning. Coining new words and phrases and using words and phrases in different senses than their literal meaning are literally the opposite of Newspeak. It's not a coincidence that the authoritarian is the one saying that "lesbian" means one and only one thing and that new words can't just be invented.
Lesbian does only mean one thing....a woman, trans or not...who is attracted to other women.
I don't know how you read my post, but I wasn't disagreeing with the majority opinion of the thread, not necessarily. I was simply pointing out that, people are taking this way too seriously.
by Rojava Free State » Thu Jan 16, 2020 8:06 am
Rojava Free State wrote:Listen yall. I'm only gonna say it once but I want you to remember it. This ain't a world fit for good men. It seems like you gotta be monstrous just to make it. Gotta have a little bit of darkness within you just to survive. You gotta stoop low everyday it seems like. Stoop all the way down to the devil in these times. And then one day you look in the mirror and you realize that you ain't you anymore. You're just another monster, and thanks to your actions, someone else will eventually become as warped and twisted as you. Never forget that the best of us are just the best of a bad lot. Being at the top of a pile of feces doesn't make you anything but shit like the rest. Never forget that.
by Kowani » Thu Jan 16, 2020 8:09 am
Aberration has a negative connotation, so try again.Jack Thomas Lang wrote:Necroghastia wrote:I'd say the disingenuousness only comes in when you call a group of people aberrations in order to justify ignorance.
Saying that Humans are either male and female is not ignorance but fact. A small deviation of the norm (which is what aberration literally means) does not make that fact any less true.
There are people who are born without limbs, does that make the statement that Humans are a four-limbed mammal wrong?
by Ifreann » Thu Jan 16, 2020 8:11 am
by Page » Thu Jan 16, 2020 8:24 am
by Cappuccina » Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:01 am
by Cappuccina » Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:05 am
by Auzkhia » Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:07 am
by The New California Republic » Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:09 am
by The Blaatschapen » Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:11 am
by Fahran » Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:16 am
Cekoviu wrote:This thought process is dependent on having a very simplistic understanding of the nature of gender and sex, but more importantly: why is this relevant in this discussion?
by Fahran » Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:19 am
Necroghastia wrote:So intersex people do not exist. Gotcha.
by Cappuccina » Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:22 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Google [Bot], Spirit of Hope, The Lone Alliance, Umeria
Advertisement