NATION

PASSWORD

TDT 4: What the $#@! is a "womxn", anyways?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Cekoviu
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16954
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cekoviu » Fri Oct 11, 2019 11:02 am

The Emerald Legion wrote:
Cekoviu wrote:I think pretty much everybody is going to have initial attraction based on apparent sex (gender presentation), since they don't know what genitalia the other person has.


Gender presentation has little to do with apparent sex. Not that it's impossible to alter your apparent sex, but then you run back into the issue of you hiding your sex. Not you hiding your gender being what causes issues.

Definition I'm going off of for Gender Expression.
Gender expression (also called, "gender presentation") means how a person dresses, looks, and acts, in ways that might affect how other people view their gender. Someone who wears men's clothes and acts in a masculine way has a male gender expression. Someone who wears women's clothes and acts in a feminine way has a female gender expression. This is different from gender identity because people can choose to look or behave one way even if that is not how they feel inside. Sometimes people call this gender presentation or just presentation.

I meant to say "and" there, whoops.
Iciaros wrote:
Cekoviu wrote:I think pretty much everybody is going to have initial attraction based on apparent sex (gender presentation), since they don't know what genitalia the other person has.


Oh, I was referring to surface attraction as physical attraction rather than initial attraction. Personally I kind understand that, since (at least for me) when I get used to thinking of someone as a female, for instance, seeing male genitalia doesn't make me think 'guy' so much as 'girl with penis'. And vice-versa.

That's probably more true for romantic than sexual attraction.
pro: women's rights
anti: men's rights

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 204149
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Fri Oct 11, 2019 1:08 pm

Update on my friend (I think some of you know about her struggles): she’s in a new relationship and happy and has gone back to university full time. Her therapies (psychiatrically and HRT) are going well too. She’s considering SRS next year and her new partner supports her fully. I’m relieved and happy for her. So so happy. She deserves good things after the hell she went through.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Hediacrana
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1225
Founded: Nov 20, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Hediacrana » Fri Oct 11, 2019 1:34 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:Update on my friend (I think some of you know about her struggles): she’s in a new relationship and happy and has gone back to university full time. Her therapies (psychiatrically and HRT) are going well too. She’s considering SRS next year and her new partner supports her fully. I’m relieved and happy for her. So so happy. She deserves good things after the hell she went through.

Awesome. Glad things seem to be looking up!
'If you're not anti-war, then you're not fiscally conservative, and you're certainly not pro-life.'
Parent, spouse, leftist Christian and suspected witch.
She/her.

User avatar
Hediacrana
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1225
Founded: Nov 20, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Hediacrana » Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:33 pm

I appreciated Elizabeth Warren answering a 9yo old trans boy on what she's planning to offer to trans children in American schools.
'If you're not anti-war, then you're not fiscally conservative, and you're certainly not pro-life.'
Parent, spouse, leftist Christian and suspected witch.
She/her.

User avatar
Proctopeo
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12370
Founded: Sep 26, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Proctopeo » Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:51 pm

Hediacrana wrote:I appreciated Elizabeth Warren answering a 9yo old trans boy on what she's planning to offer to trans children in American schools.

>9yo
>trans
Ah, I see, child abuse is on the menu today for the WokeTM crowd.
Arachno-anarchism || NO GODS NO MASTERS || Free NSG Odreria

User avatar
Necroghastia
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 12940
Founded: May 11, 2019
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Necroghastia » Fri Oct 11, 2019 6:56 pm

Proctopeo wrote:
Hediacrana wrote:I appreciated Elizabeth Warren answering a 9yo old trans boy on what she's planning to offer to trans children in American schools.

>9yo
>trans
Ah, I see, child abuse is on the menu today for the WokeTM crowd.

:eyebrow:
The Land of Spooky Scary Skeletons!

Pronouns: she/her

User avatar
Proctopeo
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12370
Founded: Sep 26, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Proctopeo » Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:02 pm

Necroghastia wrote:
Proctopeo wrote:>9yo
>trans
Ah, I see, child abuse is on the menu today for the WokeTM crowd.

:eyebrow:

I don't believe I have stuttered.
Arachno-anarchism || NO GODS NO MASTERS || Free NSG Odreria

User avatar
Necroghastia
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 12940
Founded: May 11, 2019
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Necroghastia » Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:05 pm

Proctopeo wrote:
Necroghastia wrote: :eyebrow:

I don't believe I have stuttered.


Then please, do feel free to elaborate on how allowing children to explore their identity is child abuse.
The Land of Spooky Scary Skeletons!

Pronouns: she/her

User avatar
Proctopeo
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12370
Founded: Sep 26, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Proctopeo » Fri Oct 11, 2019 7:23 pm

Necroghastia wrote:
Proctopeo wrote:I don't believe I have stuttered.


Then please, do feel free to elaborate on how allowing children to explore their identity is child abuse.

Something about your language suggests that you won't be open to an actual elaboration, but I will oblige regardless.

It's rarely the child's personal decision to "explore their identity", but the parent's. Especially when they're as young as five. Yes, five, that's when it started in this case. It shouldn't have to be said that five-year-olds, and three-year-olds for that matter (an age mentioned in the "open letter" from 2015), know pretty much nothing about themselves or the world, or what it means to be something.
Arachno-anarchism || NO GODS NO MASTERS || Free NSG Odreria

User avatar
Cekoviu
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16954
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cekoviu » Fri Oct 11, 2019 8:07 pm

Proctopeo wrote:
Necroghastia wrote:
Then please, do feel free to elaborate on how allowing children to explore their identity is child abuse.

Something about your language suggests that you won't be open to an actual elaboration, but I will oblige regardless.

It's rarely the child's personal decision to "explore their identity", but the parent's. Especially when they're as young as five. Yes, five, that's when it started in this case. It shouldn't have to be said that five-year-olds, and three-year-olds for that matter (an age mentioned in the "open letter" from 2015), know pretty much nothing about themselves or the world, or what it means to be something.

Gender dysphoria routinely manifests in children who are figuring out what gender is. 5 is not at all implausible for someone to start figuring out that they're transgender.
Not that you care.
pro: women's rights
anti: men's rights

User avatar
Auzkhia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28957
Founded: Mar 11, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Auzkhia » Fri Oct 11, 2019 8:07 pm

Hediacrana wrote:I appreciated Elizabeth Warren answering a 9yo old trans boy on what she's planning to offer to trans children in American schools.

Gods, I quite like Warren, sometimes I debate about picking her over Bernie.
Proctopeo wrote:
Necroghastia wrote:
Then please, do feel free to elaborate on how allowing children to explore their identity is child abuse.

Something about your language suggests that you won't be open to an actual elaboration, but I will oblige regardless.

It's rarely the child's personal decision to "explore their identity", but the parent's. Especially when they're as young as five. Yes, five, that's when it started in this case. It shouldn't have to be said that five-year-olds, and three-year-olds for that matter (an age mentioned in the "open letter" from 2015), know pretty much nothing about themselves or the world, or what it means to be something.

Would a kid be too young to be cis? Why should that be the null hypothesis?

A lot of trans people end up reporting the Signs™ from their childhood that match up their current identity. I may be not be an expert on children, but I'm pretty sure letting a trans child wearing a gender affirming outfit, picking a new name and pronouns, etc isn't abusive.
Me irl. (she/her/it)
IC name: Celestial Empire of the Romans
Imperial-Royal Statement on NS Stats
Factbook Embassy App
Trans Lesbian Non-binary Lady Greco-Roman Pagan Socialist

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 164249
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Fri Oct 11, 2019 8:13 pm

Proctopeo wrote:
Necroghastia wrote:
Then please, do feel free to elaborate on how allowing children to explore their identity is child abuse.

Something about your language suggests that you won't be open to an actual elaboration, but I will oblige regardless.

It's rarely the child's personal decision to "explore their identity", but the parent's. Especially when they're as young as five. Yes, five, that's when it started in this case. It shouldn't have to be said that five-year-olds, and three-year-olds for that matter (an age mentioned in the "open letter" from 2015), know pretty much nothing about themselves or the world, or what it means to be something.

So how long have you spent observing this child and his parents interacting? How many interviews did you conduct? You must surely be intimately familiar with these people to be so confident that they are abusing their son.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Northwestern Elizabeth
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 12
Founded: Aug 29, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Northwestern Elizabeth » Fri Oct 11, 2019 8:16 pm

Hediacrana wrote:I appreciated Elizabeth Warren answering a 9yo old trans boy on what she's planning to offer to trans children in American schools.

It's really fortunate to see someone running for president who's gonna try to offer extra protection to trans children in school. These kids have enough to deal with, knowing that a lot of the country hates them for something they have no control over, and it would be nice to have someone in office who went out of their way to not only protect these kids, but to celebrate them and make sure they know that they're normal kids and shouldn't feel apologetic for feeling the way that they naturally do.

User avatar
Cappuccina
Minister
 
Posts: 2905
Founded: Jun 05, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Cappuccina » Fri Oct 11, 2019 11:20 pm

Northwestern Elizabeth wrote:
Hediacrana wrote:I appreciated Elizabeth Warren answering a 9yo old trans boy on what she's planning to offer to trans children in American schools.

It's really fortunate to see someone running for president who's gonna try to offer extra protection to trans children in school. These kids have enough to deal with, knowing that a lot of the country hates them for something they have no control over, and it would be nice to have someone in office who went out of their way to not only protect these kids, but to celebrate them and make sure they know that they're normal kids and shouldn't feel apologetic for feeling the way that they naturally do.


As if she'd actually do anything were she elected. Let's wait before we get all starry eyed over Pocahontas.
Muslim, Female, Trans, Not white..... oppression points x4!!!!
"Latinx" isn't a real word. :^)
Automobile & Music fan!!! ^_^
Also, an everything 1980s fan!!!
Left/Right: -5.25
SocLib/Auth: 2.46

Apparently, I'm an INFP

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 112590
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Fri Oct 11, 2019 11:25 pm

Cappuccina wrote:
Northwestern Elizabeth wrote:It's really fortunate to see someone running for president who's gonna try to offer extra protection to trans children in school. These kids have enough to deal with, knowing that a lot of the country hates them for something they have no control over, and it would be nice to have someone in office who went out of their way to not only protect these kids, but to celebrate them and make sure they know that they're normal kids and shouldn't feel apologetic for feeling the way that they naturally do.


As if she'd actually do anything were she elected. Let's wait before we get all starry eyed over Pocahontas.

*** Warned for political nicknaming. ***
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Cappuccina
Minister
 
Posts: 2905
Founded: Jun 05, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Cappuccina » Fri Oct 11, 2019 11:47 pm

Seems like I forgot about that rule, oh well.
Muslim, Female, Trans, Not white..... oppression points x4!!!!
"Latinx" isn't a real word. :^)
Automobile & Music fan!!! ^_^
Also, an everything 1980s fan!!!
Left/Right: -5.25
SocLib/Auth: 2.46

Apparently, I'm an INFP

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Sat Oct 12, 2019 3:24 am

Auzkhia wrote:
Hediacrana wrote:I appreciated Elizabeth Warren answering a 9yo old trans boy on what she's planning to offer to trans children in American schools.

Gods, I quite like Warren, sometimes I debate about picking her over Bernie.
Proctopeo wrote:Something about your language suggests that you won't be open to an actual elaboration, but I will oblige regardless.

It's rarely the child's personal decision to "explore their identity", but the parent's. Especially when they're as young as five. Yes, five, that's when it started in this case. It shouldn't have to be said that five-year-olds, and three-year-olds for that matter (an age mentioned in the "open letter" from 2015), know pretty much nothing about themselves or the world, or what it means to be something.

Would a kid be too young to be cis? Why should that be the null hypothesis?

A lot of trans people end up reporting the Signs™ from their childhood that match up their current identity. I may be not be an expert on children, but I'm pretty sure letting a trans child wearing a gender affirming outfit, picking a new name and pronouns, etc isn't abusive.


I wish Liz and Bernie would be on the same ticket.

And another thing Proct conveniently fails to acknowledge, is the scientific community is in firm agreement that children as young as 3 or 4 can, in fact, know their gender identity.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Auzkhia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28957
Founded: Mar 11, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Auzkhia » Sat Oct 12, 2019 6:33 am

Grenartia wrote:
Auzkhia wrote:Gods, I quite like Warren, sometimes I debate about picking her over Bernie.

Would a kid be too young to be cis? Why should that be the null hypothesis?

A lot of trans people end up reporting the Signs™ from their childhood that match up their current identity. I may be not be an expert on children, but I'm pretty sure letting a trans child wearing a gender affirming outfit, picking a new name and pronouns, etc isn't abusive.


I wish Liz and Bernie would be on the same ticket.

And another thing Proct conveniently fails to acknowledge, is the scientific community is in firm agreement that children as young as 3 or 4 can, in fact, know their gender identity.

Definitely, they're the only candidates I like, everyone else can go home.

It's the same energy of "how do I explain this to my children" or "won't someone think of the children!" the same thing was said of gay people a few years ago. Transphobia in 2019 feels like the homophobia of 1999.
Me irl. (she/her/it)
IC name: Celestial Empire of the Romans
Imperial-Royal Statement on NS Stats
Factbook Embassy App
Trans Lesbian Non-binary Lady Greco-Roman Pagan Socialist

User avatar
Proctopeo
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12370
Founded: Sep 26, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Proctopeo » Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:00 am

Cekoviu wrote:
Proctopeo wrote:Something about your language suggests that you won't be open to an actual elaboration, but I will oblige regardless.

It's rarely the child's personal decision to "explore their identity", but the parent's. Especially when they're as young as five. Yes, five, that's when it started in this case. It shouldn't have to be said that five-year-olds, and three-year-olds for that matter (an age mentioned in the "open letter" from 2015), know pretty much nothing about themselves or the world, or what it means to be something.

Gender dysphoria routinely manifests in children who are figuring out what gender is. 5 is not at all implausible for someone to start figuring out that they're transgender.

[citation needed]

Not that you care.

:roll:

Auzkhia wrote:
Proctopeo wrote:Something about your language suggests that you won't be open to an actual elaboration, but I will oblige regardless.

It's rarely the child's personal decision to "explore their identity", but the parent's. Especially when they're as young as five. Yes, five, that's when it started in this case. It shouldn't have to be said that five-year-olds, and three-year-olds for that matter (an age mentioned in the "open letter" from 2015), know pretty much nothing about themselves or the world, or what it means to be something.

Would a kid be too young to be cis? Why should that be the null hypothesis?

wOuLd A kId Be ToO yOuNg To Be CiS

A lot of trans people end up reporting the Signs™ from their childhood that match up their current identity. I may be not be an expert on children, but I'm pretty sure letting a trans child wearing a gender affirming outfit, picking a new name and pronouns, etc isn't abusive.

[x] to doubt

Ifreann wrote:
Proctopeo wrote:Something about your language suggests that you won't be open to an actual elaboration, but I will oblige regardless.

It's rarely the child's personal decision to "explore their identity", but the parent's. Especially when they're as young as five. Yes, five, that's when it started in this case. It shouldn't have to be said that five-year-olds, and three-year-olds for that matter (an age mentioned in the "open letter" from 2015), know pretty much nothing about themselves or the world, or what it means to be something.

So how long have you spent observing this child and his parents interacting? How many interviews did you conduct? You must surely be intimately familiar with these people to be so confident that they are abusing their son.

"you must OBSERVE the child to PROVE it's ABUSE instead of just using your BRAIN, BIGOT!"
wew lad

Grenartia wrote:And another thing Proct conveniently fails to acknowledge, is the scientific community is in firm agreement that children as young as 3 or 4 can, in fact, know their gender identity.

[citation needed] here as well.

Auzkhia wrote:It's the same energy of "how do I explain this to my children" or "won't someone think of the children!" the same thing was said of gay people a few years ago. Transphobia in 2019 feels like the homophobia of 1999.

I see that opposing child abuse makes you a transphobe in CURRENT YEAR.
What a time to alive.

Though I do imagine, given previous incidents that won't be named, that child abuse isn't on the list of concerns for some of y'all, as long as it's Woke.
Last edited by Proctopeo on Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
Arachno-anarchism || NO GODS NO MASTERS || Free NSG Odreria

User avatar
Cekoviu
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16954
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cekoviu » Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:04 am

Anybody have experience with combining Prometrium, spironolactone, and estradiol? My doctor suggested reducing the amount of spironolactone I take and adding some Prometrium, but I don't know if I should do that.
pro: women's rights
anti: men's rights

User avatar
Auzkhia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28957
Founded: Mar 11, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Auzkhia » Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:23 am

Cekoviu wrote:Anybody have experience with combining Prometrium, spironolactone, and estradiol? My doctor suggested reducing the amount of spironolactone I take and adding some Prometrium, but I don't know if I should do that.

I'm taking that as well, albeit generic, not branded. I started it about a month ago. My spiro hasn't gone up since starting, but my E has threefold. My levels are good, I wonder what progesterone would do for that.

My doctor said progesterone may or may not help, nothing confirmed among endocrinologists yet, progesterone in feminizing HRT is anecdotal, I think it has mildly increased my libido and has gave a little growth spurt for breasts. It did make me really sleepy, so do take at night. I'm just doing 100mg mind you.
Me irl. (she/her/it)
IC name: Celestial Empire of the Romans
Imperial-Royal Statement on NS Stats
Factbook Embassy App
Trans Lesbian Non-binary Lady Greco-Roman Pagan Socialist

User avatar
Mettaton-EX
Diplomat
 
Posts: 731
Founded: Sep 24, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Mettaton-EX » Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:42 am

Proctopeo wrote:
Cekoviu wrote:Gender dysphoria routinely manifests in children who are figuring out what gender is. 5 is not at all implausible for someone to start figuring out that they're transgender.

[citation needed]

Not that you care.

:roll:

Auzkhia wrote:Would a kid be too young to be cis? Why should that be the null hypothesis?

wOuLd A kId Be ToO yOuNg To Be CiS

A lot of trans people end up reporting the Signs™ from their childhood that match up their current identity. I may be not be an expert on children, but I'm pretty sure letting a trans child wearing a gender affirming outfit, picking a new name and pronouns, etc isn't abusive.

[x] to doubt

Ifreann wrote:So how long have you spent observing this child and his parents interacting? How many interviews did you conduct? You must surely be intimately familiar with these people to be so confident that they are abusing their son.

"you must OBSERVE the child to PROVE it's ABUSE instead of just using your BRAIN, BIGOT!"
wew lad

Grenartia wrote:And another thing Proct conveniently fails to acknowledge, is the scientific community is in firm agreement that children as young as 3 or 4 can, in fact, know their gender identity.

[citation needed] here as well.

Auzkhia wrote:It's the same energy of "how do I explain this to my children" or "won't someone think of the children!" the same thing was said of gay people a few years ago. Transphobia in 2019 feels like the homophobia of 1999.

I see that opposing child abuse makes you a transphobe in CURRENT YEAR.
What a time to alive.

Though I do imagine, given previous incidents that won't be named, that child abuse isn't on the list of concerns for some of y'all, as long as it's Woke.


here and here. now stop calling people child abusers just because they're not as transphobic as you.
THIS ROBOT IS TRANS | AND THERE'S NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT | هٰذه الآلة تقتل الفاشيين
(prefer it/its but any pronouns are acceptable)

User avatar
Luminesa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 61272
Founded: Dec 09, 2014
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Luminesa » Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:46 am

“Since the study’s launch, Olson has also heard from the parents of gender-nonconforming kids, who consistently defy gender stereotypes but have not socially transitioned. They might include boys who like wearing dresses or girls who play with trucks, but who have not, for example, changed the pronouns they use.“

Uhhhh I played with race-cars as a kid and wore pants a lot, did that mean I was a gender nonconforming kid? Pardon me for asking, but this term seems to be more and more vague the more I see it.
Catholic, pro-life, and proud of it. I prefer my debates on religion, politics, and sports with some coffee and a little Aquinas and G.K. CHESTERTON here and there. :3
Unofficial #1 fan of the Who Dat Nation.
"I'm just a singer of simple songs, I'm not a real political man. I watch CNN, but I'm not sure I can tell you the difference in Iraq and Iran. But I know Jesus, and I talk to God, and I remember this from when I was young:
faith, hope and love are some good things He gave us...
and the greatest is love."
-Alan Jackson
Help the Ukrainian people, here's some sources!
Help bring home First Nation girls! Now with more ways to help!
Jesus loves all of His children in Eastern Europe - pray for peace.
Pray for Ukraine, Wear Sunflowers In Your Hair

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:49 am

Luminesa wrote:“Since the study’s launch, Olson has also heard from the parents of gender-nonconforming kids, who consistently defy gender stereotypes but have not socially transitioned. They might include boys who like wearing dresses or girls who play with trucks, but who have not, for example, changed the pronouns they use.“

Uhhhh I played with race-cars as a kid and wore pants a lot, did that mean I was a gender nonconforming kid? Pardon me for asking, but this term seems to be more and more vague the more I see it.


Yes, gender-nonconformity covers cis people as well as trans people. I could make a big, complicated Venn Diagram about it, but I don't feel like it right now.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Mettaton-EX
Diplomat
 
Posts: 731
Founded: Sep 24, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Mettaton-EX » Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:51 am

Luminesa wrote:“Since the study’s launch, Olson has also heard from the parents of gender-nonconforming kids, who consistently defy gender stereotypes but have not socially transitioned. They might include boys who like wearing dresses or girls who play with trucks, but who have not, for example, changed the pronouns they use.“

Uhhhh I played with race-cars as a kid and wore pants a lot, did that mean I was a gender nonconforming kid? Pardon me for asking, but this term seems to be more and more vague the more I see it.

gender-nonconforming has always been a pretty broad term and has never meant the same thing as trans.
THIS ROBOT IS TRANS | AND THERE'S NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT | هٰذه الآلة تقتل الفاشيين
(prefer it/its but any pronouns are acceptable)

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Corporate Collective Salvation, Daphomir, Emotional Support Crocodile, Ifreann, Lothria, Oceasia, Partybus, Saiwana, Shrillland, Statesburg, Vassenor, Washington-Columbia

Advertisement

Remove ads