NATION

PASSWORD

TDT 4: What the $#@! is a "womxn", anyways?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Proctopeo
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12370
Founded: Sep 26, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Proctopeo » Sat Jul 20, 2019 11:02 am

Torrocca wrote:
Proctopeo wrote:The irony doesn't invalidate my point.


No, but you screaming that the idea that Lily is trans is invalid specifically because it's primarily Westerners supporting that idea does invalidate your shitty point.

Not really, since my point is based on Japanese viewers.

Well, I did provide a video of my own that basically annihilates what you had, but if you want further proof, search "星川 リリィ" on Pixiv and see what things are tagged (it's largely otokonoko and other related tags). I take the interpretation of numerous Japanese artists over a couple idiots online, especially because the writers haven't said anything yet.


Oh, so you're going to disregard the dialogue that the writers actually wrote for the show itself that explicitly makes it clear that Lily identifies as a girl and that the others accept her as a girl

While it's been about seven months since I saw Episode 8, that's... not exactly what happened. I'll definitely review it, but that's not what happened. It was actually really ambiguous IIRC, hence the firestorm.

because a couple idiots online decided to misgender her in their art?

If by "a couple idiots online" you mean "basically every Japanese artist after Episode 8 aired", and by "misgender" you mean "operate on the more likely interpretation", then yes.

That's certainly an interesting hill for you to choose to die on in the TDT of all places.

:roll:

This is such a fucking stupid argument anyway. The only people supporting the argument are, well, idiots with a track record of being wrong and trying to claim that effeminate male characters are ackshully trans women. There's no reason to believe it's different in this case, and as the interpretation of people in the original cultural context is that Lily Hoshikawa is a boy, we should operate with that.
Last edited by Proctopeo on Sat Jul 20, 2019 11:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
Arachno-anarchism || NO GODS NO MASTERS || Free NSG Odreria

User avatar
Luminesa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 61244
Founded: Dec 09, 2014
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Luminesa » Sat Jul 20, 2019 11:04 am

Torrocca wrote:
Luminesa wrote:You also used a random Tumblr person’s page. And seriously. Do you want to be represented as someone who dies from a massive stress reaction (played somewhat for laughs) from pulling a hair off your chin?


I'm fine with the representation primarily because the show, for the most part, addresses it tactfully with the character being openly accepted as a girl by the rest of the group after she explicitly makes it clear she only identifies as a girl.

This isn’t a hill that needs to be died on. And Procto did post his own video. And mentioned that (something I did not know) the writers have been mum on the issue. Which I guess is odd, but not any odder than trying to get the writers of Evangelion to explain why everyone turned to Tang in Episode 26.


You're right that it's not a hill that needs to be one to die on, which is why it's stupid that Proct's deliberately choosing to go against what the writers of the show actually wrote in terms of dialogue and story to scream about how this character who's explicitly shown to be trans somehow actually isn't.

To me-and this is from my very limited understanding of the show-what I saw and read from the Tumblr page made it seem like Lily struggled with reconciling her child idol persona with her real-life self. Think Shirley Temple. Shirley Temple being cute and 6 and curly-headed and able to dance. People go, “Dawwwwwww!” But what happens when a child-star hits puberty? Lot of panic and confusion. You don’t get to stay so cute and precious like you were when you were 6, and not every child-star grows-up to have the continual success of a Michael Jackson or a Selena Gomez or a Ron Howard. As a zombie, I would guess, she could be Lily forever because she never will grow-up. She’ll never have to go through puberty. She’ll always be the cute idol she wants to be. Could she be trans? Sure. But that’s just my uneducated take.
Catholic, pro-life, and proud of it. I prefer my debates on religion, politics, and sports with some coffee and a little Aquinas and G.K. CHESTERTON here and there. :3
Unofficial #1 fan of the Who Dat Nation.
"I'm just a singer of simple songs, I'm not a real political man. I watch CNN, but I'm not sure I can tell you the difference in Iraq and Iran. But I know Jesus, and I talk to God, and I remember this from when I was young:
faith, hope and love are some good things He gave us...
and the greatest is love."
-Alan Jackson
Help the Ukrainian people, here's some sources!
Help bring home First Nation girls! Now with more ways to help!
Jesus loves all of His children in Eastern Europe - pray for peace.
Pray for Ukraine, Wear Sunflowers In Your Hair

User avatar
Torrocca
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27793
Founded: Dec 01, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Torrocca » Sat Jul 20, 2019 11:10 am

Proctopeo wrote:
Torrocca wrote:
No, but you screaming that the idea that Lily is trans is invalid specifically because it's primarily Westerners supporting that idea does invalidate your shitty point.

Not really, since my point is based on Japanese viewers.


Which isn't saying much if you're only going off blatantly false artistic interpretations of the character.


Oh, so you're going to disregard the dialogue that the writers actually wrote for the show itself that explicitly makes it clear that Lily identifies as a girl and that the others accept her as a girl

While it's been about seven months since I saw Episode 8, that's... not exactly what happened. I'll definitely review it, but that's not what happened.


It's explicitly what happened.

because a couple idiots online decided to misgender her in their art?

If by "a couple idiots online" you mean "basically every Japanese artist after Episode 8 aired", and by "misgender" you mean "operate on the more likely interpretation", then yes.[/quote]

"It's okay for me to agree with blatant transphobia if I plug my ears and pretend that it's the valid interpretation of something!!1!"

10/10 as always.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
They call me Torra, but you can call me... anytime (☞⌐■_■)☞
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NOTICE 1: Anything depicted IC on this nation does NOT reflect my IRL views or values, and is not endorsed by me.
NOTICE 2: Most RP and every OOC post by me prior to 2023 are no longer endorsed nor tolerated by me. I've since put on my adult pants!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

User avatar
Proctopeo
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12370
Founded: Sep 26, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Proctopeo » Sat Jul 20, 2019 11:12 am

Torrocca wrote:
Proctopeo wrote:Not really, since my point is based on Japanese viewers.


Which isn't saying much if you're only going off blatantly false artistic interpretations of the character.

It's true, though there's no blatant interpretation here. The entire show is actually really ambiguous about the whole ordeal, if you actually watched it.
""""Blatantly false"""" is a fucking riot given how wrong your position is.

While it's been about seven months since I saw Episode 8, that's... not exactly what happened. I'll definitely review it, but that's not what happened.


It's explicitly what happened.

Nope.

If by "a couple idiots online" you mean "basically every Japanese artist after Episode 8 aired", and by "misgender" you mean "operate on the more likely interpretation", then yes.


"It's okay for me to agree with blatant transphobia if I plug my ears and pretend that it's the valid interpretation of something!!1!"

10/10 as always.

It is though, you're pretending she's trans because some jagoff on Youtube told you to and acting like it's the valid interpretation.
Your utter lack of self-awareness has no charm as always smh

Anyway, your incredibly defensive responses betray your lack of understanding.
Case in point, Lily Hoshikawa is not trans, though from certain angles (and with some cherrypicking) she does look that way. This argument is over, go and parrot lies about another character now.
Last edited by Proctopeo on Sat Jul 20, 2019 11:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
Arachno-anarchism || NO GODS NO MASTERS || Free NSG Odreria

User avatar
Torrocca
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27793
Founded: Dec 01, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Torrocca » Sat Jul 20, 2019 11:24 am

Proctopeo wrote:
Torrocca wrote:
Which isn't saying much if you're only going off blatantly false artistic interpretations of the character.

It's true, though there's no blatant interpretation here. The entire show is actually really ambiguous about the whole ordeal, if you actually watched it.
""""Blatantly false"""" is a fucking riot given how wrong your position is.


Hmm, let's see...

Lily:

  • Openly identifies as a girl
  • Exclusively uses the name Lily
  • Explicitly points out (timestamp 12:09 in the episode) that she has a deadname which she dropped
  • Experienced mental shock from outright gender dysphoria because of the appearance of facial hair
  • Literally says in the same episode in a group discussion that she's still Lily and always will be Lily, which blatantly shows her foregoing any and all identification as a boy
  • Doubles down and reemphasizes that same point about a minute later (at 13:30)
  • Literally the entire group accepts her as a girl in the very next scene

Yeah, chief, I'm gonna go with a big, fat "you're fucking wrong" here.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
They call me Torra, but you can call me... anytime (☞⌐■_■)☞
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NOTICE 1: Anything depicted IC on this nation does NOT reflect my IRL views or values, and is not endorsed by me.
NOTICE 2: Most RP and every OOC post by me prior to 2023 are no longer endorsed nor tolerated by me. I've since put on my adult pants!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

User avatar
Paleoconservative Citizens
Envoy
 
Posts: 288
Founded: Jun 22, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Paleoconservative Citizens » Sat Jul 20, 2019 12:35 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Loben The 2nd wrote:
i mean veterans only get a day.


The difference being no one expects veterans to disappear out of society after Veteran's Day.

To be fair nobody against LGBTQ+ actually respects LGBTQ+ people during pride month.

So this analogy is wrong, because Anti-LGBTQ+ want them gone all year long.

This isn't hate BTW, just stating the analogy is wrong.
Lutheran, Conservative. An ancient puppet brought to you by The Sladerstan
Good works do not make a good man, but a good man does good works, likewise, bad works do not make a bad man, but a bad man does bad works.

Chris White, leader of AAPC

Disclaimer: I often use gender and sex as interchangeable terms.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Sat Jul 20, 2019 12:52 pm

Paleoconservative Citizens wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
The difference being no one expects veterans to disappear out of society after Veteran's Day.

To be fair nobody against LGBTQ+ actually respects LGBTQ+ people during pride month.

So this analogy is wrong, because Anti-LGBTQ+ want them gone all year long.

This isn't hate BTW, just stating the analogy is wrong.


So who's hating on veterans here? Because otherwise your correction makes no sense.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Paleoconservative Citizens
Envoy
 
Posts: 288
Founded: Jun 22, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Paleoconservative Citizens » Sat Jul 20, 2019 1:50 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Paleoconservative Citizens wrote:To be fair nobody against LGBTQ+ actually respects LGBTQ+ people during pride month.

So this analogy is wrong, because Anti-LGBTQ+ want them gone all year long.

This isn't hate BTW, just stating the analogy is wrong.


So who's hating on veterans here? Because otherwise your correction makes no sense.

They said no expects veterans to disappear after veterans day, so pretty much everyone loves veterans on veterans day. This is not so with LGBTQ+, as haters don't simply celebrate pride month and go back to hating.

In a simpler term, haters don't love LGBTQ+ during Pride Month, and veteran haters don't love veterans during veterans day. This is saying that haters love them during pride month and then afterwards hate them, which isn't the case.

I explained best as I could.

This explanation is horrible though
Last edited by Paleoconservative Citizens on Sat Jul 20, 2019 1:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Lutheran, Conservative. An ancient puppet brought to you by The Sladerstan
Good works do not make a good man, but a good man does good works, likewise, bad works do not make a bad man, but a bad man does bad works.

Chris White, leader of AAPC

Disclaimer: I often use gender and sex as interchangeable terms.

User avatar
Nakena
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15010
Founded: May 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Nakena » Sat Jul 20, 2019 1:54 pm

Paleoconservative Citizens wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
So who's hating on veterans here? Because otherwise your correction makes no sense.

They said no expects veterans to disappear after veterans day, so pretty much everyone loves veterans on veterans day. This is not so with LGBTQ+, as haters don't simply celebrate pride month and go back to hating.

In a simpler term, haters don't love LGBTQ+ during Pride Month, and veteran haters don't love veterans during veterans day. This is saying that haters love them during pride month and then afterwards hate them, which isn't the case.

I explained best as I could.

This explanation is horrible though


The modified rainbow flags were cool though.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Sat Jul 20, 2019 1:55 pm

Paleoconservative Citizens wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
So who's hating on veterans here? Because otherwise your correction makes no sense.

They said no expects veterans to disappear after veterans day, so pretty much everyone loves veterans on veterans day. This is not so with LGBTQ+, as haters don't simply celebrate pride month and go back to hating.

In a simpler term, haters don't love LGBTQ+ during Pride Month, and veteran haters don't love veterans during veterans day. This is saying that haters love them during pride month and then afterwards hate them, which isn't the case.

I explained best as I could.

This explanation is horrible though


...Why are you referring to me in the third person when talking to me?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45990
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Sat Jul 20, 2019 2:22 pm

Nakena wrote:
Paleoconservative Citizens wrote:They said no expects veterans to disappear after veterans day, so pretty much everyone loves veterans on veterans day. This is not so with LGBTQ+, as haters don't simply celebrate pride month and go back to hating.

In a simpler term, haters don't love LGBTQ+ during Pride Month, and veteran haters don't love veterans during veterans day. This is saying that haters love them during pride month and then afterwards hate them, which isn't the case.

I explained best as I could.

This explanation is horrible though


The modified rainbow flags were cool though.


Some were superior to others, of course.
Are these "human rights" in the room with us right now?
★彡 Professional pessimist. Reactionary socialist and gamer liberationist. Coffee addict. Fun at parties 彡★
Freedom is when people agree with you, and the more people you can force to act like they agree the freer society is
You are the trolley problem's conductor. You could stop the train in time but you do not. Nobody knows you're part of the equation. You satisfy your bloodlust and get away with it every time

User avatar
Nakena
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15010
Founded: May 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Nakena » Sat Jul 20, 2019 2:25 pm

Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Nakena wrote:
The modified rainbow flags were cool though.


Some were superior to others, of course.


This was one of the best Cekoviu created this when I suggested to make one with a flame in order to celebrate wrath month

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45990
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Sat Jul 20, 2019 2:27 pm

Nakena wrote:
Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Some were superior to others, of course.


This was one of the best Cekoviu created this when I suggested to make one with a flame in order to celebrate wrath month


Pride burning is a delightfully ambiguous message fit for the whole ideological family.
Are these "human rights" in the room with us right now?
★彡 Professional pessimist. Reactionary socialist and gamer liberationist. Coffee addict. Fun at parties 彡★
Freedom is when people agree with you, and the more people you can force to act like they agree the freer society is
You are the trolley problem's conductor. You could stop the train in time but you do not. Nobody knows you're part of the equation. You satisfy your bloodlust and get away with it every time

User avatar
Nakena
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15010
Founded: May 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Nakena » Sat Jul 20, 2019 2:35 pm

Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Nakena wrote:
This was one of the best Cekoviu created this when I suggested to make one with a flame in order to celebrate wrath month


Pride burning is a delightfully ambiguous message fit for the whole ideological family.


An interesting interpretation. That thought didn crossed my mind before.

What do you think so far of the ideological family?

User avatar
Cekoviu
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16954
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cekoviu » Sat Jul 20, 2019 2:42 pm

Nakena wrote:
Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Some were superior to others, of course.


This was one of the best Cekoviu created this when I suggested to make one with a flame in order to celebrate wrath month

:blush:
pro: women's rights
anti: men's rights

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45990
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Sat Jul 20, 2019 2:46 pm

Nakena wrote:
Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Pride burning is a delightfully ambiguous message fit for the whole ideological family.


An interesting interpretation. That thought didn crossed my mind before.

What do you think so far of the ideological family?


An odd hybrid of buddy comedy and gritty mafia flick.
Are these "human rights" in the room with us right now?
★彡 Professional pessimist. Reactionary socialist and gamer liberationist. Coffee addict. Fun at parties 彡★
Freedom is when people agree with you, and the more people you can force to act like they agree the freer society is
You are the trolley problem's conductor. You could stop the train in time but you do not. Nobody knows you're part of the equation. You satisfy your bloodlust and get away with it every time

User avatar
Paleoconservative Citizens
Envoy
 
Posts: 288
Founded: Jun 22, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Paleoconservative Citizens » Sat Jul 20, 2019 2:55 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Paleoconservative Citizens wrote:They said no expects veterans to disappear after veterans day, so pretty much everyone loves veterans on veterans day. This is not so with LGBTQ+, as haters don't simply celebrate pride month and go back to hating.

In a simpler term, haters don't love LGBTQ+ during Pride Month, and veteran haters don't love veterans during veterans day. This is saying that haters love them during pride month and then afterwards hate them, which isn't the case.

I explained best as I could.

This explanation is horrible though


...Why are you referring to me in the third person when talking to me?

Oh hell I forgot you were the one who wrote it...
Lutheran, Conservative. An ancient puppet brought to you by The Sladerstan
Good works do not make a good man, but a good man does good works, likewise, bad works do not make a bad man, but a bad man does bad works.

Chris White, leader of AAPC

Disclaimer: I often use gender and sex as interchangeable terms.

User avatar
The Xenopolis Confederation
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9474
Founded: Aug 11, 2017
Anarchy

Postby The Xenopolis Confederation » Sat Jul 20, 2019 7:01 pm

Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Nakena wrote:
An interesting interpretation. That thought didn crossed my mind before.

What do you think so far of the ideological family?


An odd hybrid of buddy comedy and gritty mafia flick.

Sounds about right.
Pro: Liberty, Liberalism, Capitalism, Secularism, Equal opportunity, Democracy, Windows Chauvinism, Deontology, Progressive Rock, LGBT+ Rights, Live and let live tbh.
Against: Authoritarianism, Traditionalism, State Socialism, Laissez-Faire Capitalism, Autocracy, (A)Theocracy, Apple, "The ends justify the means," Collectivism in all its forms.
Nationality: Australian
Gender: MTF trans woman (she/her)
Political Ideology: If "milktoast liberalism" had a baby with "bleeding-heart libertarianism."
Discord: mellotronyellow

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 203930
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sun Jul 21, 2019 1:52 am

I was recently watching a video depicting the transition journey of a transgender man. He was talking about breast removal and SRS, as well as some of the questions he still gets from people, curious about his experience. One of the questions struck me. He has been asked if he was a pretty girl pre-transition. This made me pensive and I wanted to ask, for those of you who are mid or far along on your transition, or for those wishing to weigh in, if you have ever got people asking you something like this and what was your reaction (real or hypothetical in case this is not something you’ve experienced)?
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Cekoviu
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16954
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cekoviu » Sun Jul 21, 2019 11:16 am

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:I was recently watching a video depicting the transition journey of a transgender man. He was talking about breast removal and SRS, as well as some of the questions he still gets from people, curious about his experience. One of the questions struck me. He has been asked if he was a pretty girl pre-transition. This made me pensive and I wanted to ask, for those of you who are mid or far along on your transition, or for those wishing to weigh in, if you have ever got people asking you something like this and what was your reaction (real or hypothetical in case this is not something you’ve experienced)?

I'm not openly trans except in the specifically LGBT spaces I go to, so I haven't had much opportunity for that to be said to me. I'd probably be visibly taken aback, but I'd likely just answer it with "no" because that's the truth.
pro: women's rights
anti: men's rights

User avatar
The New California Republic
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35483
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The New California Republic » Sun Jul 21, 2019 12:13 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:I was recently watching a video depicting the transition journey of a transgender man. He was talking about breast removal and SRS, as well as some of the questions he still gets from people, curious about his experience. One of the questions struck me. He has been asked if he was a pretty girl pre-transition. This made me pensive and I wanted to ask, for those of you who are mid or far along on your transition, or for those wishing to weigh in, if you have ever got people asking you something like this and what was your reaction (real or hypothetical in case this is not something you’ve experienced)?

I don't see why that kind of question needs to be asked. It just seems like a really odd thing to ask.
Last edited by Sigmund Freud on Sat Sep 23, 1939 2:23 am, edited 999 times in total.

The Irradiated Wasteland of The New California Republic: depicting the expanded NCR, several years after the total victory over Caesar's Legion, and the annexation of New Vegas and its surrounding areas.

White-collared conservatives flashing down the street
Pointing their plastic finger at me
They're hoping soon, my kind will drop and die
But I'm going to wave my freak flag high
Wave on, wave on
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
Esheaun Stroakuss
Minister
 
Posts: 2023
Founded: May 23, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Esheaun Stroakuss » Sun Jul 21, 2019 12:16 pm

After months away from Nationstates, I have come to the conclusion that trans people deserve more respect both on and offline.
For: Socialism, Democracy, LGBT+, BLM, Freedom of Speech, Marxist Theory, Atheism, Freedom of/from Religion, Universal Healthcare
Against: Religious Fundamentalism, Nationalism, Fascism/Nazism, Authoritarianism, TERFs, Tankies, Neoliberalism, Conservatism, Capitalism

Esheaun Stroakuss is leaderless.

User avatar
Cekoviu
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16954
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cekoviu » Sun Jul 21, 2019 12:33 pm

Esheaun Stroakuss wrote:After months away from Nationstates, I have come to the conclusion that trans people deserve more respect both on and offline.

I don't really remember interacting with you before. Were you transphobic then or are you just saying trans people need more respect in general?
pro: women's rights
anti: men's rights

User avatar
Esheaun Stroakuss
Minister
 
Posts: 2023
Founded: May 23, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Esheaun Stroakuss » Sun Jul 21, 2019 1:04 pm

The latter. I have never been transphobic.
For: Socialism, Democracy, LGBT+, BLM, Freedom of Speech, Marxist Theory, Atheism, Freedom of/from Religion, Universal Healthcare
Against: Religious Fundamentalism, Nationalism, Fascism/Nazism, Authoritarianism, TERFs, Tankies, Neoliberalism, Conservatism, Capitalism

Esheaun Stroakuss is leaderless.

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 203930
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sun Jul 21, 2019 2:53 pm

Cekoviu wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:I was recently watching a video depicting the transition journey of a transgender man. He was talking about breast removal and SRS, as well as some of the questions he still gets from people, curious about his experience. One of the questions struck me. He has been asked if he was a pretty girl pre-transition. This made me pensive and I wanted to ask, for those of you who are mid or far along on your transition, or for those wishing to weigh in, if you have ever got people asking you something like this and what was your reaction (real or hypothetical in case this is not something you’ve experienced)?

I'm not openly trans except in the specifically LGBT spaces I go to, so I haven't had much opportunity for that to be said to me. I'd probably be visibly taken aback, but I'd likely just answer it with "no" because that's the truth.


He was taken aback. I honestly don’t know why it would matter. In the end, you’re not that person anymore. He said that it wasn’t a denial of his past but rather that it doesn’t matter for his present or future self.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, Almighty Biden, Godular, Highway Eighty-Eight, Kostane, New Fortilla, Rusozak, Shrillland, Socialist Lop, Statesburg, The H Corporation

Advertisement

Remove ads