Aclion wrote:Aeritai wrote:Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., finds herself embroiled in another controversy after a comment she made about the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and Muslim civil rights.
Speaking last month at an event hosted by the Council on American-Islamic Relations' Los Angeles chapter, Omar mistakenly said the organization was founded in response to the terrorist attacks, adding "because they recognized that some people did something" — a phrasing that some in conservative media have interpreted as a too-flippant reference to the attack.
"CAIR was founded after 9/11, because they recognized that some people did something and that all of us were starting to lose access to our civil liberties," Omar said.
Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congre ... ts-n993326
While taking things out of context always happens in politics I do think the Republicans and media are overrecting and taking things out of context. Do note I am not defending Omar mostly because I found it strange that she put 9/11 into her speech and the way she said it. So I'm neutral on this until I know who's more guilty.
The Republicans and its media need to look into the context of words Omar said. On the other hand Omar should've chosen her words carefully went it came to talking about 9/11.
So NSG what are your thoughts? Is it just a simple misunderstanding from the Republicans or is Omar in the wrong here?
The context is Ilhan Omar is the Representative of a district with a large Muslim demographic, and has often engaged in dog-whistling by saying antisemitic things and making light of terrorist attacks in such a way as to make it just ambiguous enough for people who agree with it to defend her, while associating with overtly antisemitic people and groups that have committed terrorist attacks; and then shouting about Islamophobia and sexism when she gets called out for her bullshit.
So what dogwhistles would those be?