NATION

PASSWORD

Rep. Omar faces backlash from Republicans

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163885
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Tue Apr 23, 2019 5:29 am

Nakena wrote:
New Rogernomics wrote:At some point America has to get over 9/11. Haven't seen either party helping with that though. Omar made a mistake the moment she mentioned 9/11, as one brief sound bite is all you need to hurt your cause in politics.


It's a forever trauma by now.

The real question is why has the Democratic Party resort to people like Omar, do they not have ANY better candidates at all?

You know she was elected, yeah?

And also it wasnt a mistake, it was probably her actual beliefs there.

She might really believe that 9/11 was a thing that some people did? Yeah, she's probably not one of those loons who think it didn't really happen.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Estanglia
Senator
 
Posts: 3858
Founded: Dec 31, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Estanglia » Tue Apr 23, 2019 7:19 am

US-SSR wrote:
Luna Amore wrote:Are you being purposefully evasive? This topic is specifically about one of her statements and it's not the Benjamins tweets. What extra context explains her "some people did something" quote and her doubling down with follow up tweets like this: https://mobile.twitter.com/ilhanmn/stat ... 9476750337

As for the Benjamins controversy, I think this article gives a nice rundown of why some people felt her initial and follow up tweets were anti-Semitic.

I think 95% of her problem isn't the necessarily the initial statements, it's that she doubles down instead of clarifying. There are legitimate discussions buried in poor wording and confrontational replies.


But she did minimize it. Context does not change the fact that in the sentence "CAIR was founded after 9/11[sic] because they recognized that some people did something and that all of us were starting to lose access to our civil liberties." puts all the emphasis on the later part of sentence at the expense of "some people did something". The sentence is clear that the last half is the shocking part in her eyes not the beginning. "Some people did something and then our civil liberties were at risk" vs "Radical Muslims killed innocent Americans and law-abiding Muslim Americans suffered because of it."

And once again, clarification would have been a hundred times better in both cases than doubling down and getting in the mud. It distracts from the issues she was trying to talk about and instead refocuses the conversation on her.


Here is the context.

Here’s the truth. For far too long we have lived with the discomfort of being a second-class citizen and, frankly, I’m tired of it, and every single Muslim in this country should be tired of it. CAIR was founded after 9/11 because they recognized that some people did something and that all of us were starting to lose access to our civil liberties. So you can’t just say that today someone is looking at me strange and that I am trying to make myself look pleasant. You have to say that this person is looking at me strange, I am not comfortable with it, and I am going to talk to them and ask them why. Because that is the right you have.


I defy anyone to read just this paragraph, not to mention the entire speech, and formulate a valid, logical argument that what Rep. Omar was doing was minimizing a terrorist attack on the US.


Here’s the truth. For far too long we have lived with the discomfort of being a second-class citizen and, frankly, I’m tired of it, and every single Muslim in this country should be tired of it. CAIR was founded after 9/11 because they recognized that some people did something and that all of us were starting to lose access to our civil liberties. So you can’t just say that today someone is looking at me strange and that I am trying to make myself look pleasant. You have to say that this person is looking at me strange, I am not comfortable with it, and I am going to talk to them and ask them why. Because that is the right you have.


The added context doesn't seem to change much.

She's still referring to a major terrorist attack as "some people did something" which can seem to some as minimizing a terrorist attack.
Yeah: Egalitarianism, equality
Meh: Labour, the EU
Nah: pointless discrimination, authoritarianism, Brexit, Trump, both American parties, the Conservatives
I flop between "optimistic about the future" and "pessimistic about the future" every time I go on NSG.

(Taken 29/08/2020)
Political compass test:
Economic Left/Right: -6.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.05

8values thinks I'm a Libertarian Socialist.

Torrocca wrote:"Your honor, it was not mein fault! I didn't order the systematic genocide of millions of people, it was the twenty kilograms of pure-cut Bavarian cocaine that did it!"

User avatar
Seangoli
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5998
Founded: Sep 24, 2006
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Seangoli » Tue Apr 23, 2019 8:12 am

Estanglia wrote:
US-SSR wrote:
Here is the context.



I defy anyone to read just this paragraph, not to mention the entire speech, and formulate a valid, logical argument that what Rep. Omar was doing was minimizing a terrorist attack on the US.


Here’s the truth. For far too long we have lived with the discomfort of being a second-class citizen and, frankly, I’m tired of it, and every single Muslim in this country should be tired of it. CAIR was founded after 9/11 because they recognized that some people did something and that all of us were starting to lose access to our civil liberties. So you can’t just say that today someone is looking at me strange and that I am trying to make myself look pleasant. You have to say that this person is looking at me strange, I am not comfortable with it, and I am going to talk to them and ask them why. Because that is the right you have.


The added context doesn't seem to change much.

She's still referring to a major terrorist attack as "some people did something" which can seem to some as minimizing a terrorist attack.


Man, talk about digging deep to get offended by something.

Everybody knows what happened in 9/11. There is virtually no need to spell abilities go over what she said with a fine-toothed comb and require people to articulate exactly how you feel it needs articulating.

User avatar
Gormwood
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14727
Founded: Mar 25, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Gormwood » Tue Apr 23, 2019 8:38 am

Seangoli wrote:
Estanglia wrote:


The added context doesn't seem to change much.

She's still referring to a major terrorist attack as "some people did something" which can seem to some as minimizing a terrorist attack.


Man, talk about digging deep to get offended by something.

Everybody knows what happened in 9/11. There is virtually no need to spell abilities go over what she said with a fine-toothed comb and require people to articulate exactly how you feel it needs articulating.

Contrary to screams of straw man, the crime here is Rep. Omar blaspheming the memory of 9/11 by not using a remorseful tone and begging forgiveness for what some people did on behalf of all Muslims.
Bloodthirsty savages who call for violence against the Right while simultaneously being unarmed defenseless sissies who will get slaughtered by the gun-toting Right in a civil war.
Breath So Bad, It Actually Drives People Mad

User avatar
Estanglia
Senator
 
Posts: 3858
Founded: Dec 31, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Estanglia » Tue Apr 23, 2019 8:44 am

Seangoli wrote:
Estanglia wrote:


The added context doesn't seem to change much.

She's still referring to a major terrorist attack as "some people did something" which can seem to some as minimizing a terrorist attack.


Man, talk about digging deep to get offended by something.

Everybody knows what happened in 9/11. There is virtually no need to spell abilities go over what she said with a fine-toothed comb and require people to articulate exactly how you feel it needs articulating.


Firstly, I didn't find the statement that bad. I'm pointing out how some people can see it as minimising.

'Some people did something', even if everyone knows what that something is, can still come off as minimising the attack, especially when we have the name of the attack.
"9/11 occured" expresses pretty much what "some people did something" and taking it as minimising is a bigger stretch than with "some people did something".
"Some people did something" makes the incident sound minor. After all, you probably wouldn't call a murder "someone did something", but your friend goofing off might just be "someone did something".

Gormwood wrote:
Seangoli wrote:
Man, talk about digging deep to get offended by something.

Everybody knows what happened in 9/11. There is virtually no need to spell abilities go over what she said with a fine-toothed comb and require people to articulate exactly how you feel it needs articulating.

Contrary to screams of straw man, the crime here is Rep. Omar blaspheming the memory of 9/11 by not using a remorseful tone and begging forgiveness for what some people did on behalf of all Muslims.


Still a strawman.
Last edited by Estanglia on Tue Apr 23, 2019 8:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
Yeah: Egalitarianism, equality
Meh: Labour, the EU
Nah: pointless discrimination, authoritarianism, Brexit, Trump, both American parties, the Conservatives
I flop between "optimistic about the future" and "pessimistic about the future" every time I go on NSG.

(Taken 29/08/2020)
Political compass test:
Economic Left/Right: -6.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.05

8values thinks I'm a Libertarian Socialist.

Torrocca wrote:"Your honor, it was not mein fault! I didn't order the systematic genocide of millions of people, it was the twenty kilograms of pure-cut Bavarian cocaine that did it!"

User avatar
Druulis
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 105
Founded: Mar 10, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Druulis » Tue Apr 23, 2019 10:44 am

Estanglia wrote:
US-SSR wrote:
Here is the context.



I defy anyone to read just this paragraph, not to mention the entire speech, and formulate a valid, logical argument that what Rep. Omar was doing was minimizing a terrorist attack on the US.


Here’s the truth. For far too long we have lived with the discomfort of being a second-class citizen and, frankly, I’m tired of it, and every single Muslim in this country should be tired of it. CAIR was founded after 9/11 because they recognized that some people did something and that all of us were starting to lose access to our civil liberties. So you can’t just say that today someone is looking at me strange and that I am trying to make myself look pleasant. You have to say that this person is looking at me strange, I am not comfortable with it, and I am going to talk to them and ask them why. Because that is the right you have.


The added context doesn't seem to change much.

She's still referring to a major terrorist attack as "some people did something" which can seem to some as minimizing a terrorist attack.


Only to dishonest racists who use 9/11 to attack a Somali Muslim woman who has already revived death threats (which Luna Amore has yet to condemn). However those of us who are acting in good faith are able to see this faux pearl clutching for what it is: islamophobic fearmongering.

User avatar
Andsed
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13443
Founded: Aug 24, 2017
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Andsed » Tue Apr 23, 2019 10:46 am

Druulis wrote:
Estanglia wrote:


The added context doesn't seem to change much.

She's still referring to a major terrorist attack as "some people did something" which can seem to some as minimizing a terrorist attack.


Only to dishonest racists who use 9/11 to attack a Somali Muslim woman who has already revived death threats (which Luna Amore has yet to condemn). However those of us who are acting in good faith are able to see this faux pearl clutching for what it is: islamophobic fearmongering.

Again please stop trying to dismiss everyone who has criticized Omar on this as a racist. It is getting really old.
I do be tired


LOVEWHOYOUARE~

User avatar
Druulis
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 105
Founded: Mar 10, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Druulis » Tue Apr 23, 2019 11:00 am

Andsed wrote:
Druulis wrote:
Only to dishonest racists who use 9/11 to attack a Somali Muslim woman who has already revived death threats (which Luna Amore has yet to condemn). However those of us who are acting in good faith are able to see this faux pearl clutching for what it is: islamophobic fearmongering.

Again please stop trying to dismiss everyone who has criticized Omar on this as a racist. It is getting really old.


Yeah the guys threatening to kill her and telling her to 'go back to Somalia' just disagree with her policies, I'm sure. :roll:

User avatar
Loben
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1996
Founded: Sep 27, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Loben » Tue Apr 23, 2019 11:02 am

Druulis wrote:
Andsed wrote:Again please stop trying to dismiss everyone who has criticized Omar on this as a racist. It is getting really old.


Yeah the guys threatening to kill her and telling her to 'go back to Somalia' just disagree with her policies, I'm sure. :roll:

She could always use that to do something inspired instead of making tone deaf comments on a world changing event.

User avatar
Andsed
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13443
Founded: Aug 24, 2017
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Andsed » Tue Apr 23, 2019 11:02 am

Druulis wrote:
Andsed wrote:Again please stop trying to dismiss everyone who has criticized Omar on this as a racist. It is getting really old.


Yeah the guys threatening to kill her and telling her to 'go back to Somalia' just disagree with her policies, I'm sure. :roll:

Oh have those here on this thread who have criticized Omar done that? Yes there are those who have attacked Omar for racist reasons but to suggest everyone who attacked Omar are do it for racist reasons is simple bullshit.
Last edited by Andsed on Tue Apr 23, 2019 11:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
I do be tired


LOVEWHOYOUARE~

User avatar
Holy Tedalonia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12455
Founded: Nov 14, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Holy Tedalonia » Tue Apr 23, 2019 11:06 am

Druulis wrote:
Andsed wrote:Again please stop trying to dismiss everyone who has criticized Omar on this as a racist. It is getting really old.


Yeah the guys threatening to kill her and telling her to 'go back to Somalia' just disagree with her policies, I'm sure. :roll:

Or they are just people who experienced 9/11 and its horrors, and to hear it be referred as “something somebody did” is considerably insulting to them. It does beg the question also why did Omar use “somebody” as opposed to “Al Quada”. People tell me she used this sentence to avoid linking Muslims to the attack, but I don’t think it does at all.
Name: Ted
I have hot takes, I like roasting the fuck out of bad takes, and I don't take shit way too seriously.
I M P E R I A LR E P U B L I C

User avatar
Druulis
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 105
Founded: Mar 10, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Druulis » Tue Apr 23, 2019 11:23 am

Holy Tedalonia wrote:
Druulis wrote:
Yeah the guys threatening to kill her and telling her to 'go back to Somalia' just disagree with her policies, I'm sure. :roll:

Or they are just people who experienced 9/11 and its horrors, and to hear it be referred as “something somebody did” is considerably insulting to them.


Maybe they should get over themselves.

User avatar
Loben
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1996
Founded: Sep 27, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Loben » Tue Apr 23, 2019 11:24 am

Druulis wrote:
Holy Tedalonia wrote:Or they are just people who experienced 9/11 and its horrors, and to hear it be referred as “something somebody did” is considerably insulting to them.


Maybe they should get over themselves.

Funny, let’s see you say the same thing to say...a victim of general butt naked or the holocaust.

User avatar
Druulis
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 105
Founded: Mar 10, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Druulis » Tue Apr 23, 2019 11:26 am

Loben wrote:
Druulis wrote:
Yeah the guys threatening to kill her and telling her to 'go back to Somalia' just disagree with her policies, I'm sure. :roll:

She could always use that to do something inspired instead of making tone deaf comments on a world changing event.


You people would still find an excuse to attack her.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Tue Apr 23, 2019 11:27 am

Andsed wrote:
Druulis wrote:
Yeah the guys threatening to kill her and telling her to 'go back to Somalia' just disagree with her policies, I'm sure. :roll:

Oh have those here on this thread who have criticized Omar done that? Yes there are those who have attacked Omar for racist reasons but to suggest everyone who attacked Omar are do it for racist reasons is simple bullshit.


That's not what we've been doing. Or is specifically calling out the people attacking and threatening her for racist reasons calling out everyone who's criticised her now?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Loben
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1996
Founded: Sep 27, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Loben » Tue Apr 23, 2019 11:27 am

Druulis wrote:
Loben wrote:She could always use that to do something inspired instead of making tone deaf comments on a world changing event.


You people would still find an excuse to attack her.

That we will.

User avatar
Druulis
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 105
Founded: Mar 10, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Druulis » Tue Apr 23, 2019 11:27 am

Loben wrote:
Druulis wrote:
Maybe they should get over themselves.

Funny, let’s see you say the same thing to say...a victim of general butt naked or the holocaust.


Do holocaust survivors frequently threaten to kill politicians they don't like?

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Tue Apr 23, 2019 11:28 am

Druulis wrote:
Loben wrote:She could always use that to do something inspired instead of making tone deaf comments on a world changing event.


You people would still find an excuse to attack her.


Well she's awfully good at providing reasons to justify it.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Loben
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1996
Founded: Sep 27, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Loben » Tue Apr 23, 2019 11:28 am

Druulis wrote:
Loben wrote:Funny, let’s see you say the same thing to say...a victim of general butt naked or the holocaust.


Do holocaust survivors frequently threaten to kill politicians they don't like?

I bet mossad typically takes care of it.

User avatar
Druulis
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 105
Founded: Mar 10, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Druulis » Tue Apr 23, 2019 11:28 am

Loben wrote:
Druulis wrote:
You people would still find an excuse to attack her.

That we will.


And the truth comes out at last! This is about attacking Omar personally not because of anything she did or did not say.

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Tue Apr 23, 2019 11:29 am

Druulis wrote:
Loben wrote:Funny, let’s see you say the same thing to say...a victim of general butt naked or the holocaust.


Do holocaust survivors frequently threaten to kill politicians they don't like?


Do 9/11 survivors frequently do so?
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Loben
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1996
Founded: Sep 27, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Loben » Tue Apr 23, 2019 11:29 am

Druulis wrote:
Loben wrote:That we will.


And the truth comes out at last! This is about attacking Omar personally not because of anything she did or did not say.

Maybe she should get a better personality?

User avatar
Druulis
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 105
Founded: Mar 10, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Druulis » Tue Apr 23, 2019 11:29 am

Telconi wrote:
Druulis wrote:
You people would still find an excuse to attack her.


We are awfully good at manufacturing reasons to justify it.


Fixed.

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Tue Apr 23, 2019 11:30 am

Druulis wrote:
Loben wrote:That we will.


And the truth comes out at last! This is about attacking Omar personally not because of anything she did or did not say.


You realize personal attacks are often related to things people did or did not say? ... Right?
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Loben
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1996
Founded: Sep 27, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Loben » Tue Apr 23, 2019 11:30 am

Druulis wrote:
Telconi wrote:
We are awfully good at manufacturing reasons to justify it.


Fixed.

What are you, her pr manager?

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cerula, Hidrandia, Ifreann, Ineva, Juristonia, Singaporen Empire, Tiami

Advertisement

Remove ads