Agreed - you did not say him (or wikileaks) were conscious agents. It's why I added "willingly or wittingly or not" in my post, but I should have made that clearer in the original version.Novus America wrote:I never said he was a conscious Russian agent.
More a useful idiot or fellow traveler.
And at some point we have to use Occam’s razor.
2+2+x=5 if x is one, and we see all evidence to pointing to x as one.
Certainly one cannot dispute Assange is decidedly biased in favor of Russia, she how he denied the DNC data came from Russia.
And criticisms of the US justice system do not apply to Sweden.
And Occam’s razor is useful enough, but I personally would rather see actual evidence than supposition.
And I've already gone on record as saying I believe the extradition to Sweden is nothing to do with his occupation as a journalist/whistleblower/Russian agent, so why I might cynically think this extradition is more likely to lead to the one to America (with absolutely no evidence to support that belief), it is only right he stand trial and his guilt be proven...or not, as the case may be.
You really are that desperate to avoid basic reading and comprehension aren't you? No, I'm really not that concerned about defending a gentleman I disagree with on many, many things. You just don't like that your own flaky and logic deficient standards for apparently being labelled a stooge were turned around on glorious leader and demonstrated how utterly and consistently useless you are in even basic discussion and debate. All you've got is playing dumb, sticking your fingers in your ears and continuously misrepresenting your fellow posters.Vassenor wrote:You really are that desperate to defend George Galloway's honour, aren't you?
And I'm delighted that you keep giving people the opportunity to see it.
