Can you show me pls? Also do you only get your Deen from the Holy Qur'an?
Imbalistan wrote:And my father has never in his life gotten drunk. He lived in Saudi Arabia for 10+ years, so yeah, no drinks. Nothing.
Wait, so he hasn't been drinking?
Advertisement
by El-Amin Caliphate » Thu Jun 20, 2019 6:26 am
Imbalistan wrote:And my father has never in his life gotten drunk. He lived in Saudi Arabia for 10+ years, so yeah, no drinks. Nothing.
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)
by Imbalistan » Thu Jun 20, 2019 6:29 am
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:Imbalistan wrote:Buck it says in the Koran "Dont get drunk.".
Can you show me pls? Also do you only get your Deen from the Holy Qur'an?Imbalistan wrote:And my father has never in his life gotten drunk. He lived in Saudi Arabia for 10+ years, so yeah, no drinks. Nothing.
Wait, so he hasn't been drinking?
Chan Island wrote:And I'm expecting this thread to devolve into a
racist and/or religious and/or politics shitshow within 3 pages.
by El-Amin Caliphate » Thu Jun 20, 2019 6:32 am
Imbalistan wrote:El-Amin Caliphate wrote:Can you show me pls? Also do you only get your Deen from the Holy Qur'an?
Wait, so he hasn't been drinking?
Let me explain something to you. There is a difference between getting drunk and drinking. If you drink 1 can of beer, okay fine, you may disagree with that, but, your most likely not drunk. Drink 2 or more, yeah, your drunk.
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)
by Starblaydia » Thu Jun 20, 2019 7:34 am
by El-Amin Caliphate » Thu Jun 20, 2019 12:34 pm
Diopolis wrote:El-Amin Caliphate wrote:A thorough sifting through my post history shows me and many other Muslims debunking claims of marital rape. If people don't falsely accuse you of supporting rape that'd be some dark humorous comedic irony.
OK. Let me make this clear: Islam's standards on sexual consent are fair and reasonable in the context of a marital relationship, at least considering the amount of knowledge available at the time of the relevant hadiths. I have qualms with the phrasing, but it looks like at least an attempt at a reasonable solution to the fact that 1) people getting married have presumably consented to have sex with each other, and so it is reasonable to presume consent in such a case and 2) marital rape still exists.
The problem comes with the application of the same standards to slaves. Slaves have not chosen to be slaves, let alone slaves owned by a particular master.
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)
by Ard al Islam » Thu Jun 20, 2019 12:36 pm
by El-Amin Caliphate » Thu Jun 20, 2019 12:37 pm
Ard al Islam wrote:Islam is perfect.
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)
by El-Amin Caliphate » Thu Jun 20, 2019 4:35 pm
Mostrov wrote:El-Amin Caliphate wrote:Never in any of my posts have I referenced ISIS as an example of how Islamic slavery should be practiced, or of anything in Al-Islam. You must've not read anything I said either.
It is the logical end result of what you preach, however—the same dehumanisation, the same belief what they are doing is a genuinely pious thing.
I have, and am probably the only, one to have read your long list of links and watched your videos—ironically preached by a man wearing a suit and tie and a taqiyah, the very essence of a westernised Islam—and what I can say is that: teach-yourself-islam-online.com has left you disconnected from the actual sunnah and ummah: have you tried talking about this thing you are so passionate about with your parents, your local iman or nearest mosque and seen their reaction to speaking such nonsense?
One would have thought that the notion that humans are imperfect and liable to failure would have been impressed into your Islamic education, but you persist in thinking, and that any such practises which rely on a perfect ideal are unlikely to result in a perfect reality. For all your Salafist tendencies, how was it that the ummah was led away from the shariah of 'Rashidun' in the first place? During which, it might be noted, there were already visible the problems that were so soon to cleave the Islamic world apart in times hereafter into conflict. And if the companions of the Prophet himself were unable to stop this, what makes it likely that you, a person of more fallible times, can revive this successfully? What has kept the Islamic world from following shariah 'properly' this whole time if it were as simple as doing the right thing?
You don't seem to grasp this fundamental distinction between the theoretical and the practical, that something you might hope for will in fact not be as you say in reality. This is why people are so critical of your ideas of slavery, women etc., because these same words have been used to defend historically what were abominable things and were abused. This is an empirical, not theoretical observation, and so is sounder than any hadith you can ever provide. Its rather like pointing out that murder is a major sin, and therefore there won't be any murders in an Islamic society, ignoring that that there were even in the times you most idolize. As you are unfamiliar with Islamic history, I ask, why is it that Pakistan—a nation created by people with almost identical purpose to you and indeed the origin of many of your ideals—has not become a utopia since its founding?
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)
by Khataiy » Thu Jun 20, 2019 5:14 pm
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:Mostrov wrote:It is the logical end result of what you preach, however—the same dehumanisation, the same belief what they are doing is a genuinely pious thing.
I have, and am probably the only, one to have read your long list of links and watched your videos—ironically preached by a man wearing a suit and tie and a taqiyah, the very essence of a westernised Islam—and what I can say is that: teach-yourself-islam-online.com has left you disconnected from the actual sunnah and ummah: have you tried talking about this thing you are so passionate about with your parents, your local iman or nearest mosque and seen their reaction to speaking such nonsense?
One would have thought that the notion that humans are imperfect and liable to failure would have been impressed into your Islamic education, but you persist in thinking, and that any such practises which rely on a perfect ideal are unlikely to result in a perfect reality. For all your Salafist tendencies, how was it that the ummah was led away from the shariah of 'Rashidun' in the first place? During which, it might be noted, there were already visible the problems that were so soon to cleave the Islamic world apart in times hereafter into conflict. And if the companions of the Prophet himself were unable to stop this, what makes it likely that you, a person of more fallible times, can revive this successfully? What has kept the Islamic world from following shariah 'properly' this whole time if it were as simple as doing the right thing?
You don't seem to grasp this fundamental distinction between the theoretical and the practical, that something you might hope for will in fact not be as you say in reality. This is why people are so critical of your ideas of slavery, women etc., because these same words have been used to defend historically what were abominable things and were abused. This is an empirical, not theoretical observation, and so is sounder than any hadith you can ever provide. Its rather like pointing out that murder is a major sin, and therefore there won't be any murders in an Islamic society, ignoring that that there were even in the times you most idolize. As you are unfamiliar with Islamic history, I ask, why is it that Pakistan—a nation created by people with almost identical purpose to you and indeed the origin of many of your ideals—has not become a utopia since its founding?
1: It's "imaam/imam" not "iman". That's 2 different words
2: I don't have Salafi leanings
3: I never said anything would be perfect
4: I don't know a lot about Pakistan so I can't say
5: No, I haven't really talked to anybody irl about this
6: There is no western and eastern Islam
7: Can you show how I am away from the Sunnah?
8: The logical result of doing anything in Al-Islam correctly is being rightly guided, not something perverted from the religion
by El-Amin Caliphate » Thu Jun 20, 2019 5:20 pm
Khataiy wrote:El-Amin Caliphate wrote:1: It's "imaam/imam" not "iman". That's 2 different words
2: I don't have Salafi leanings
3: I never said anything would be perfect
4: I don't know a lot about Pakistan so I can't say
5: No, I haven't really talked to anybody irl about this
6: There is no western and eastern Islam
7: Can you show how I am away from the Sunnah?
8: The logical result of doing anything in Al-Islam correctly is being rightly guided, not something perverted from the religion
"One would have thought that the notion that humans are imperfect and liable to failure would have been impressed into your Islamic education, but you persist in thinking, and that any such practises which rely on a perfect ideal are unlikely to result in a perfect reality. For all your Salafist tendencies, how was it that the ummah was led away from the shariah of 'Rashidun' in the first place? During which, it might be noted, there were already visible the problems that were so soon to cleave the Islamic world apart in times hereafter into conflict. And if the companions of the Prophet himself were unable to stop this, what makes it likely that you, a person of more fallible times, can revive this successfully? What has kept the Islamic world from following shariah 'properly' this whole time if it were as simple as doing the right thing?"
Even though the Sahaba and the Salaf were the best of humanity, they were exactly that, humans not angles or perfect they were prone to mistakes and error just as anyone else, the Prophet (SAWS) was perfect in morals and character but not in a physical sense he was once asked for advise regarding agriculture and the advice he gave wasn't useful and he explained it was because he wasn't an expert on the topic and he himself was imperfect in this regard.
In Islam emphasis is put on oneself, evidence for this is found in both the Quran and Hadiths in which it is said no one may intercede for another on the day of judgement, this means you alone are responsible for yourself you will not be collectively punished/judged by Allah and the day of judgement is the only day that matters, though Allah does promise the replace a group of people if they disobey him and fail him, but that is only in this life and not the day of judgement.
"You don't seem to grasp this fundamental distinction between the theoretical and the practical, that something you might hope for will in fact not be as you say in reality. This is why people are so critical of your ideas of slavery, women etc., because these same words have been used to defend historically what were abominable things and were abused. This is an empirical, not theoretical observation, and so is sounder than any hadith you can ever provide. Its rather like pointing out that murder is a major sin, and therefore there won't be any murders in an Islamic society, ignoring that that there were even in the times you most idolize. As you are unfamiliar with Islamic history, I ask, why is it that Pakistan—a nation created by people with almost identical purpose to you and indeed the origin of many of your ideals—has not become a utopia since its founding?"
Murders will exist as long as there is humanity even in the most perfect and just of Islamic States this is why Allah has given us rules regarding how to deal with such people, Pakistan is irrelevant in any discussion relating to Islamic governance or values.
I have, and am probably the only, one to have read your long list of links and watched your videos—ironically preached by a man wearing a suit and tie and a taqiyah, the very essence of a westernised Islam—and what I can say is that: teach-yourself-islam-online.com has left you disconnected from the actual sunnah and ummah: have you tried talking about this thing you are so passionate about with your parents, your local iman or nearest mosque and seen their reaction to speaking such nonsense?
More irrelevant nonsense Islam is Islam either you follow it correctly or not and only Allah knows best who is on the path of Haqq and the path of Batil the only thing you can do is try your best with the resources you have, it is definitely possible for the Shuyukh to be corrupt and ignorant themselves and follow distorted beliefs and for the laymen to be better, for numerous reasons with the biggest one being intent, it is better for the layman to do his best to serve Allah and call others to Islam than it is to be the most knowledgeable Sheikh and call people to falsehood and saying what is Halal is Haram and what is Haram is Halal, and try to alter our religion for PR reasons or appease modern understandings of things, as Islam is timeless and perfect and needs no 'help' or alteration of understanding and the people who have done this are the people whom Allah has condemned promising to replace them whether they are from the Khawarij, the Mutazilia, or the Murjiah it doesn't matter how learned this person is or their source of knowledge is, as Allah will guide whom he wills and whom Allah has guided can never be misguided and whom Allah has led astray will remain astray as they have disease in their hearts, and as stated Allah knows best in all affairs.
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)
by Khataiy » Thu Jun 20, 2019 5:27 pm
Imbalistan wrote:El-Amin Caliphate wrote:Can you show me pls? Also do you only get your Deen from the Holy Qur'an?
Wait, so he hasn't been drinking?
Let me explain something to you. There is a difference between getting drunk and drinking. If you drink 1 can of beer, okay fine, you may disagree with that, but, your most likely not drunk. Drink 2 or more, yeah, your drunk.
by Khataiy » Thu Jun 20, 2019 5:31 pm
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:Khataiy wrote:
"One would have thought that the notion that humans are imperfect and liable to failure would have been impressed into your Islamic education, but you persist in thinking, and that any such practises which rely on a perfect ideal are unlikely to result in a perfect reality. For all your Salafist tendencies, how was it that the ummah was led away from the shariah of 'Rashidun' in the first place? During which, it might be noted, there were already visible the problems that were so soon to cleave the Islamic world apart in times hereafter into conflict. And if the companions of the Prophet himself were unable to stop this, what makes it likely that you, a person of more fallible times, can revive this successfully? What has kept the Islamic world from following shariah 'properly' this whole time if it were as simple as doing the right thing?"
Even though the Sahaba and the Salaf were the best of humanity, they were exactly that, humans not angles or perfect they were prone to mistakes and error just as anyone else, the Prophet (SAWS) was perfect in morals and character but not in a physical sense he was once asked for advise regarding agriculture and the advice he gave wasn't useful and he explained it was because he wasn't an expert on the topic and he himself was imperfect in this regard.
In Islam emphasis is put on oneself, evidence for this is found in both the Quran and Hadiths in which it is said no one may intercede for another on the day of judgement, this means you alone are responsible for yourself you will not be collectively punished/judged by Allah and the day of judgement is the only day that matters, though Allah does promise the replace a group of people if they disobey him and fail him, but that is only in this life and not the day of judgement.
"You don't seem to grasp this fundamental distinction between the theoretical and the practical, that something you might hope for will in fact not be as you say in reality. This is why people are so critical of your ideas of slavery, women etc., because these same words have been used to defend historically what were abominable things and were abused. This is an empirical, not theoretical observation, and so is sounder than any hadith you can ever provide. Its rather like pointing out that murder is a major sin, and therefore there won't be any murders in an Islamic society, ignoring that that there were even in the times you most idolize. As you are unfamiliar with Islamic history, I ask, why is it that Pakistan—a nation created by people with almost identical purpose to you and indeed the origin of many of your ideals—has not become a utopia since its founding?"
Murders will exist as long as there is humanity even in the most perfect and just of Islamic States this is why Allah has given us rules regarding how to deal with such people, Pakistan is irrelevant in any discussion relating to Islamic governance or values.
I have, and am probably the only, one to have read your long list of links and watched your videos—ironically preached by a man wearing a suit and tie and a taqiyah, the very essence of a westernised Islam—and what I can say is that: teach-yourself-islam-online.com has left you disconnected from the actual sunnah and ummah: have you tried talking about this thing you are so passionate about with your parents, your local iman or nearest mosque and seen their reaction to speaking such nonsense?
More irrelevant nonsense Islam is Islam either you follow it correctly or not and only Allah knows best who is on the path of Haqq and the path of Batil the only thing you can do is try your best with the resources you have, it is definitely possible for the Shuyukh to be corrupt and ignorant themselves and follow distorted beliefs and for the laymen to be better, for numerous reasons with the biggest one being intent, it is better for the layman to do his best to serve Allah and call others to Islam than it is to be the most knowledgeable Sheikh and call people to falsehood and saying what is Halal is Haram and what is Haram is Halal, and try to alter our religion for PR reasons or appease modern understandings of things, as Islam is timeless and perfect and needs no 'help' or alteration of understanding and the people who have done this are the people whom Allah has condemned promising to replace them whether they are from the Khawarij, the Mutazilia, or the Murjiah it doesn't matter how learned this person is or their source of knowledge is, as Allah will guide whom he wills and whom Allah has guided can never be misguided and whom Allah has led astray will remain astray as they have disease in their hearts, and as stated Allah knows best in all affairs.
Jazakallah Khairan Habeebi
by Jolthig » Thu Jun 20, 2019 8:01 pm
by El-Amin Caliphate » Thu Jun 20, 2019 8:41 pm
Jolthig wrote:If anyone wants to know where brother Zizou went. His computer apparently broke so that's why we haven't seen him in a while
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)
by El-Amin Caliphate » Thu Jun 20, 2019 11:03 pm
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)
by Galloism » Thu Jun 20, 2019 11:20 pm
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:I have a topic to discuss:
What do y'all brothers and sisters think about the Iran-US tensions? War or no war? Who's side are you on? What else do you think on the situation? More importantly, what will this mean for our Ummah? Also, can someone explain yo me what this shooting down a plane business is all about?
by Samudera Darussalam » Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:27 am
Jolthig wrote:If anyone wants to know where brother Zizou went. His computer apparently broke so that's why we haven't seen him in a while
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:I have a topic to discuss:
What do y'all brothers and sisters think about the Iran-US tensions? War or no war? Who's side are you on? What else do you think on the situation? More importantly, what will this mean for our Ummah? Also, can someone explain yo me what this shooting down a plane business is all about?
by El-Amin Caliphate » Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:41 am
Samudera Darussalam wrote:Jolthig wrote:If anyone wants to know where brother Zizou went. His computer apparently broke so that's why we haven't seen him in a while
Thanks for the info. I do wonder why I see him less in the forums.
May his computer got fixed soon.El-Amin Caliphate wrote:I have a topic to discuss:
What do y'all brothers and sisters think about the Iran-US tensions? War or no war? Who's side are you on? What else do you think on the situation? More importantly, what will this mean for our Ummah? Also, can someone explain yo me what this shooting down a plane business is all about?
The tensions between Iran and the U.S. are not something new to begin with, so I'm not really that surprised with the recent events, though I hope for the better for the two nations. Personally, I'm against war because of the unnecessary damage that wars more likely to cause, and that the Middle Eastern region specifically needs some stability.
Regarding which side that I'm going to take, I won't take either the American or Iranian side.
About the plane, do you mean the Iranian passenger plane, or the U.S. drone?
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)
by Jolthig » Fri Jun 21, 2019 2:26 am
by Al Mumtahanah » Sat Jun 22, 2019 5:02 pm
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:I have a topic to discuss:
What do y'all brothers and sisters think about the Iran-US tensions? War or no war? Who's side are you on? What else do you think on the situation? More importantly, what will this mean for our Ummah? Also, can someone explain yo me what this shooting down a plane business is all about?
by Al Mumtahanah » Mon Jun 24, 2019 8:22 am
by Jolthig » Mon Jun 24, 2019 10:26 am
Al Mumtahanah wrote:El-Amin Caliphate wrote:I have a topic to discuss:
What do y'all brothers and sisters think about the Iran-US tensions? War or no war? Who's side are you on? What else do you think on the situation? More importantly, what will this mean for our Ummah? Also, can someone explain yo me what this shooting down a plane business is all about?
Against war but if it comes to it Iran is the enemy of the Ummah
by Jolthig » Mon Jun 24, 2019 10:49 am
by Al Mumtahanah » Mon Jun 24, 2019 10:54 am
Jolthig wrote:Al Mumtahanah wrote:What, why, how?
Because they both present false interpretations of Islam and commit numerous crimes against humanity that is prohibited by the Holy quran and sunnah. The saudis kill women and children in Yemen, and Pakistan persecutes ahmadi muslims.
They also both have a monopoly on the Ummah.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Big Eyed Animation, Cheblonsk, Duvniask, Emotional Support Crocodile, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Umeria
Advertisement