Would you seriously not wash yourself if a dog licked you if it wasn't for a rule made 1400 years ago based on Muhammad's hatred of dogs?
Advertisement
by North German Realm » Fri Jan 03, 2020 7:57 am
5 Nov, 2020
Die Morgenpost: "We will reconsider our relationship with Poland" Reichskanzler Lagenmauer says after Polish president protested North German ultimatum that made them restore reproductive freedom. | European Society votes not to persecute Hungary for atrocities committed against Serbs, "Giving a rogue state leave to commit genocide as it sees fit." North German delegate bemoans. | Negotiations still underway in Rome, delegates arguing over the extent of indemnities Turkey might be made to pay, lawful status of Turkish collaborators during occupation of Azerbaijan, Cyprus, Syria.
by Pilipinas and Malaya » Fri Jan 03, 2020 8:40 am
Isles of Metanoia wrote:Bruneian Malaya wrote:I'd rather Bangsamoro be annexed by Malaysia than stay under Philippine rule, a country which isn't even a nation.
Definition of Nation: A social community united by language, culture, history, and religion.
Everything you said is nonsensical. Why would you support a Malaysia that is directly responsible for causing the wars between Christians and Muslims in the Philippines and thus caused your poverty via war and at the same time stole the land Brunei gave to Sulu, while they also aren't even big on Muslim brotherhood either since a Christian majority State in Malaysia is their 4rth richest state.
Do you think the Malaysians will treat you guys well when they basically killed and expelled the Muslim Tausug and Badjao people in Sabah who have been living there since even before the state of Malaysia was born?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.rapple ... down-sabah
https://www.manilatimes.net/
You should stop being an ignorant person and continue on supporting the people who are turning our home into a warzone (Malaysia). They dont give a fuck if we continue on killing each other as we destroy each others' cities like the Moro Seige of Zamboanga or the Battle of Marawi. Heck they even profit by from it by selling weapons, supplies and giving loans while they just sit on their fat asses profiteering from the wars they forment elsewhere.
And you have to be realistic. If you side with Malaysia, you think 32 Million Malaysians can put up a fight againt 105 Million Filipinos? The only reason why we are not reclaiming our land from those trecherous cowardly bastards is because we respect international law (Which they dont).
Also, Malaysians are less brave than Filipinos, they didn't wage a war of independence against a Western power, they cowered under Portuguese and British control whereas the Filipinos successfully rebelled during the Philippine Revolution against Spain and even though we lost the Philippine-American war (Because we were already exhausted fighting against Spain), at least we proved our mettle in that we were willing to die even when we know we would lose, rather than what the Malaysians do, shirk from a battle yet hire goons to fight their fighting for them.
by Pilipinas and Malaya » Fri Jan 03, 2020 8:41 am
Isles of Metanoia wrote:Bruneian Malaya wrote:I'd rather Bangsamoro be annexed by Malaysia than stay under Philippine rule, a country which isn't even a nation.
Definition of Nation: A social community united by language, culture, history, and religion.
Everything you said is nonsensical. Why would you support a Malaysia that is directly responsible for causing the wars between Christians and Muslims in the Philippines and thus caused your poverty via war and at the same time stole the land Brunei gave to Sulu, while they also aren't even big on Muslim brotherhood either since a Christian majority State in Malaysia is their 4rth richest state.
Do you think the Malaysians will treat you guys well when they basically killed and expelled the Muslim Tausug and Badjao people in Sabah who have been living there since even before the state of Malaysia was born?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.rapple ... down-sabah
https://www.manilatimes.net/
You should stop being an ignorant person and continue on supporting the people who are turning our home into a warzone (Malaysia). They dont give a fuck if we continue on killing each other as we destroy each others' cities like the Moro Seige of Zamboanga or the Battle of Marawi. Heck they even profit by from it by selling weapons, supplies and giving loans while they just sit on their fat asses profiteering from the wars they forment elsewhere.
And you have to be realistic. If you side with Malaysia, you think 32 Million Malaysians can put up a fight againt 105 Million Filipinos? The only reason why we are not reclaiming our land from those trecherous cowardly bastards is because we respect international law (Which they dont).
Also, Malaysians are less brave than Filipinos, they didn't wage a war of independence against a Western power, they cowered under Portuguese and British control whereas the Filipinos successfully rebelled during the Philippine Revolution against Spain and even though we lost the Philippine-American war (Because we were already exhausted fighting against Spain), at least we proved our mettle in that we were willing to die even when we know we would lose, rather than what the Malaysians do, shirk from a battle yet hire goons to fight their fighting for them.
by Insaanistan » Fri Jan 03, 2020 10:08 am
North German Realm wrote:A m e n r i a wrote:Still, history =/ principles, so any and all historical references, even if they did happen, is irrelevant. The latter is always the true face of something, and the former is only how people interpret/act on its true face. If you want to prove how peaceful Islam is, use verses and/or hadits. Same thing for NGR, if he wants to prove otherwise, he should use verses and/or hadits.
No. I objectively should not. The very fact that Arabia became Muslim at the business end of the scimitar -and the fact that it fell to civil war trying to leave that invasive religion the moment Muhammad kicked the bucket- alone is enough of a proof that Islam as a religion is not built on, nor does it aspire for, peace. Hell, it's even in the name: Submission. No matter what an ideology says, if literally every single iteration of its implementation did the opposite, what the ideology says is moot.
by A m e n r i a » Fri Jan 03, 2020 11:21 am
by Hammer Britannia » Fri Jan 03, 2020 11:34 am
A m e n r i a wrote:North German Realm wrote:Would you seriously not wash yourself if a dog licked you if it wasn't for a rule made 1400 years ago based on Muhammad's hatred of dogs?
You realize that's not how the multiverse works, right? Oh, wait..
Anyways, I would, but maybe not the way we're supposed to in this timeline.
by A m e n r i a » Fri Jan 03, 2020 11:49 am
Hammer Britannia wrote:A m e n r i a wrote:
You realize that's not how the multiverse works, right? Oh, wait..
Anyways, I would, but maybe not the way we're supposed to in this timeline.
You know, I promised that I would never go to this thread after ol' El-Amin was nuked from orbit, but what the fuck?
First off, what does the Multiverse theory (though, calling it a 'theory' is very weak as there is little to no evidence to back it other than speculation as far as my knowledge goes) have to do with this?
Secondly... are you implying that an all-powerful God's rules would not apply if we just magically teleported to another universe? Way to spit in Allah's face.
Thirdly, do you think this whole NS thing is IC or something? What does 'Oh, it applies in this timeline' even mean? Are you having problems telling what is reality and what is not?
This is just... why though?
by Hammer Britannia » Fri Jan 03, 2020 11:58 am
A m e n r i a wrote:Hammer Britannia wrote:You know, I promised that I would never go to this thread after ol' El-Amin was nuked from orbit, but what the fuck?
First off, what does the Multiverse theory (though, calling it a 'theory' is very weak as there is little to no evidence to back it other than speculation as far as my knowledge goes) have to do with this?
Secondly... are you implying that an all-powerful God's rules would not apply if we just magically teleported to another universe? Way to spit in Allah's face.
Thirdly, do you think this whole NS thing is IC or something? What does 'Oh, it applies in this timeline' even mean? Are you having problems telling what is reality and what is not?
This is just... why though?
1. Divine rules come from God, not a prophet's personal views. No prophet's personal views matter when it comes to divine laws, Muhammad or the ones before him.
2. He might give different rules, I dunno. Never been to other universes.
3. Uh, no. I just think what this me has to go through is different than what thw other mes have to go through.
by A m e n r i a » Fri Jan 03, 2020 12:22 pm
Hammer Britannia wrote:A m e n r i a wrote:
1. Divine rules come from God, not a prophet's personal views. No prophet's personal views matter when it comes to divine laws, Muhammad or the ones before him.
2. He might give different rules, I dunno. Never been to other universes.
3. Uh, no. I just think what this me has to go through is different than what thw other mes have to go through.
B-but
WHY? Why to all of this? The first one doesn't even answer my question for God's sake. The second one is an entire theological and scientific debate within itself. And the third one is just... What in Uranus's severed ballsack? Yes, if the multiverse theory is true you would do different things. But that still has nothing to do with anything. You are not the other yous, you are this universe's you.
by Jolthig » Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:18 pm
by A m e n r i a » Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:22 pm
Jolthig wrote:Oh boy. IDT's toxic era has returned.
So let me be the mediator in this debate before it gets out of hand, but you two are simply going to talk past one another and you both will be wasting your respective times. It's best to not debate at all if no one will change their views or statements.
by Jolthig » Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:27 pm
A m e n r i a wrote:Jolthig wrote:Oh boy. IDT's toxic era has returned.
So let me be the mediator in this debate before it gets out of hand, but you two are simply going to talk past one another and you both will be wasting your respective times. It's best to not debate at all if no one will change their views or statements.
Still wondering about the wolves though.
by A m e n r i a » Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:38 pm
by Negarakita » Mon Jan 06, 2020 10:26 am
by A m e n r i a » Mon Jan 06, 2020 11:39 am
Negarakita wrote:Amenria I'm gonna presume that you're a Chafi'i given that youre indonesian at base.
Dog lick, which does include wolves like even more than domestic dogs cos they're wild and dirtier, breaks wudu. More that that, anywhere which is touched by a dog's saliva must be purified so if you don't change clothes but make wudu it is still broken. Malikis are less strict and permit something with work dogs, while ironically the salafis seem to be the most liberal.
https://islamqa.info/en/answers/5212/to ... y-wudoo146
But yeah, as wolves and foxes are biologically classed in the same family as dogs whatever ruling you follow would be extended to them.
by Cappuccina » Mon Jan 06, 2020 1:48 pm
by Jolthig » Mon Jan 06, 2020 4:54 pm
Cappuccina wrote:Are we really talking about the dog stuff again......
by Samudera Darussalam » Mon Jan 06, 2020 6:55 pm
Jolthig wrote:Oh boy. IDT's toxic era has returned.
So let me be the mediator in this debate before it gets out of hand, but you two are simply going to talk past one another and you both will be wasting your respective times. It's best to not debate at all if no one will change their views or statements.
Negarakita wrote:Amenria I'm gonna presume that you're a Chafi'i given that youre indonesian at base.
Dog lick, which does include wolves like even more than domestic dogs cos they're wild and dirtier, breaks wudu. More that that, anywhere which is touched by a dog's saliva must be purified so if you don't change clothes but make wudu it is still broken. Malikis are less strict and permit something with work dogs, while ironically the salafis seem to be the most liberal.
https://islamqa.info/en/answers/5212/to ... y-wudoo146
But yeah, as wolves and foxes are biologically classed in the same family as dogs whatever ruling you follow would be extended to them.
by Insaanistan » Tue Jan 07, 2020 6:27 am
Samudera Darussalam wrote:Jolthig wrote:Oh boy. IDT's toxic era has returned.
So let me be the mediator in this debate before it gets out of hand, but you two are simply going to talk past one another and you both will be wasting your respective times. It's best to not debate at all if no one will change their views or statements.
At least we get to enjoy the peace.
It lasted *shrugs*Negarakita wrote:Amenria I'm gonna presume that you're a Chafi'i given that youre indonesian at base.
Dog lick, which does include wolves like even more than domestic dogs cos they're wild and dirtier, breaks wudu. More that that, anywhere which is touched by a dog's saliva must be purified so if you don't change clothes but make wudu it is still broken. Malikis are less strict and permit something with work dogs, while ironically the salafis seem to be the most liberal.
https://islamqa.info/en/answers/5212/to ... y-wudoo146
But yeah, as wolves and foxes are biologically classed in the same family as dogs whatever ruling you follow would be extended to them.
It makes me wonder. Personally, I don't identify as a Sunni, but I was raised in a Sunni Muslim family, and taught about Islam that is undoubtedly....Sunni in character. Is that makes me a Sunni although I don't identify as one?
by Negarakita » Tue Jan 07, 2020 10:05 am
Samudera Darussalam wrote:Jolthig wrote:Oh boy. IDT's toxic era has returned.
So let me be the mediator in this debate before it gets out of hand, but you two are simply going to talk past one another and you both will be wasting your respective times. It's best to not debate at all if no one will change their views or statements.
At least we get to enjoy the peace.
It lasted *shrugs*Negarakita wrote:Amenria I'm gonna presume that you're a Chafi'i given that youre indonesian at base.
Dog lick, which does include wolves like even more than domestic dogs cos they're wild and dirtier, breaks wudu. More that that, anywhere which is touched by a dog's saliva must be purified so if you don't change clothes but make wudu it is still broken. Malikis are less strict and permit something with work dogs, while ironically the salafis seem to be the most liberal.
https://islamqa.info/en/answers/5212/to ... y-wudoo146
But yeah, as wolves and foxes are biologically classed in the same family as dogs whatever ruling you follow would be extended to them.
It makes me wonder. Personally, I don't identify as a Sunni, but I was raised in a Sunni Muslim family, and taught about Islam that is undoubtedly....Sunni in character. Is that makes me a Sunni although I don't identify as one?
by A m e n r i a » Wed Jan 08, 2020 5:26 am
Negarakita wrote:Samudera Darussalam wrote:At least we get to enjoy the peace.
It lasted *shrugs*
It makes me wonder. Personally, I don't identify as a Sunni, but I was raised in a Sunni Muslim family, and taught about Islam that is undoubtedly....Sunni in character. Is that makes me a Sunni although I don't identify as one?
It depends if that's a deliberate identification or not. However, I would say yes, given that you don't exactly follow Shi'ite teachings or Ibadi.
by Samudera Darussalam » Wed Jan 08, 2020 5:31 am
Insaanistan wrote:Samudera Darussalam wrote:At least we get to enjoy the peace.
It lasted *shrugs*
It makes me wonder. Personally, I don't identify as a Sunni, but I was raised in a Sunni Muslim family, and taught about Islam that is undoubtedly....Sunni in character. Is that makes me a Sunni although I don't identify as one?
Not unless you follow Islamic practices that are strictly Sunni.
by Jolthig » Sun Jan 12, 2020 10:19 pm
by Paddy O Fernature » Mon Jan 13, 2020 10:25 am
by Jolthig » Mon Jan 13, 2020 12:36 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Likhinia, Neu California, New haven america
Advertisement