Grenartia wrote:He needs to try harder, specifically regarding LGB people in general. We're a package deal.
He may have left it out, but don’t forget the T.
Advertisement
by Soviet Computocracy » Fri Apr 05, 2019 8:49 pm
Grenartia wrote:He needs to try harder, specifically regarding LGB people in general. We're a package deal.
by United Muscovite Nations » Fri Apr 05, 2019 8:50 pm
Grenartia wrote:United Muscovite Nations wrote:1) Unless you acknowledge the transwoman as a woman.
2) I'm don't think the Orthodox Church should allow lesbian marriage, so I'm fine with that.
3) The word has evolved to mean something else.
4) Yes.
1. You specifically cited anal as sodomy, and agree that oral counts as sodomy, too. How is a pre-SRS or non-SRS trans woman supposed to consummate her marriage without engaging in sodomy?
2. That's precisely the problem.
3. Its about damn time it revert back, then.
by United Muscovite Nations » Fri Apr 05, 2019 8:50 pm
by Grenartia » Fri Apr 05, 2019 8:50 pm
by Salus Maior » Fri Apr 05, 2019 8:51 pm
by Soviet Computocracy » Fri Apr 05, 2019 8:51 pm
United Muscovite Nations wrote:1) Ideally the surgery would be widely available, so this wouldn't be necessary, but alternatively I'm sure there are other ways without getting too explicit.
by United Muscovite Nations » Fri Apr 05, 2019 8:52 pm
by Soviet Computocracy » Fri Apr 05, 2019 8:54 pm
Salus Maior wrote:Out of the goodness of his heart he's saying and believing that trans people have a fair shot of participating faithfully in his religion without going through mental gymnastics.
by Soviet Computocracy » Fri Apr 05, 2019 8:55 pm
United Muscovite Nations wrote:I don't know why I would.
by United Muscovite Nations » Fri Apr 05, 2019 8:56 pm
by Grenartia » Fri Apr 05, 2019 8:57 pm
United Muscovite Nations wrote:Grenartia wrote:
1. You specifically cited anal as sodomy, and agree that oral counts as sodomy, too. How is a pre-SRS or non-SRS trans woman supposed to consummate her marriage without engaging in sodomy?
2. That's precisely the problem.
3. Its about damn time it revert back, then.
1) Ideally the surgery would be widely available, so this wouldn't be necessary, but alternatively I'm sure there are other ways without getting too explicit.
2) I don't see how that's really a problem.
by Salus Maior » Fri Apr 05, 2019 8:58 pm
by Grenartia » Fri Apr 05, 2019 8:59 pm
Salus Maior wrote:Grenartia wrote:
He needs to try harder, specifically regarding LGB people in general. We're a package deal.
Daily reminder that you're owed literally nothing and are entitled to nothing. UMN doesn't have to do anything for you.
Out of the goodness of his heart he's saying and believing that trans people have a fair shot of participating faithfully in his religion without going through mental gymnastics. And he doesn't have to believe that way, but he's doing it because he cares both about people who suffer through that condition and about practicing his religion faithfully.
And you wonder why the intersectional movement gets so much hate and distrust.
by Bienenhalde » Fri Apr 05, 2019 8:59 pm
United Muscovite Nations wrote:3) The word has evolved to mean something else.
4) Yes.
by Salus Maior » Fri Apr 05, 2019 8:59 pm
by United Muscovite Nations » Fri Apr 05, 2019 8:59 pm
Grenartia wrote:United Muscovite Nations wrote:1) Ideally the surgery would be widely available, so this wouldn't be necessary, but alternatively I'm sure there are other ways without getting too explicit.
2) I don't see how that's really a problem.
1. And what of those of us who don't want the surgery, or have complicated reasons why we can't get it? And from where I'm looking, there's no real alternatives that wouldn't count as sodomy, since it pretty much includes everything that isn't PIV.
2. Which is, in and of itself, a problem.
by United Muscovite Nations » Fri Apr 05, 2019 9:00 pm
Grenartia wrote:Salus Maior wrote:
Daily reminder that you're owed literally nothing and are entitled to nothing. UMN doesn't have to do anything for you.
Out of the goodness of his heart he's saying and believing that trans people have a fair shot of participating faithfully in his religion without going through mental gymnastics. And he doesn't have to believe that way, but he's doing it because he cares both about people who suffer through that condition and about practicing his religion faithfully.
And I don't owe him anything for half-assing an attempt to accept us.And you wonder why the intersectional movement gets so much hate and distrust.
And you wonder why Christianity is a dying religion.
by Salus Maior » Fri Apr 05, 2019 9:02 pm
Grenartia wrote:
And you wonder why Christianity is a dying religion.
by Grenartia » Fri Apr 05, 2019 9:02 pm
United Muscovite Nations wrote:Grenartia wrote:
1. And what of those of us who don't want the surgery, or have complicated reasons why we can't get it? And from where I'm looking, there's no real alternatives that wouldn't count as sodomy, since it pretty much includes everything that isn't PIV.
2. Which is, in and of itself, a problem.
1) Well, I'd rather not make this convo explicit, but there's a way I can think of which isn't.
As for those who don't want it, that is a problem for them, but I don't really know how non-binary people fit into the Christian conception of sex and gender, and frankly I haven't given it much thought.
by Bienenhalde » Fri Apr 05, 2019 9:02 pm
by Grenartia » Fri Apr 05, 2019 9:02 pm
And regardless, intersectionalism will have its time.
by Soviet Computocracy » Fri Apr 05, 2019 9:04 pm
by Grenartia » Fri Apr 05, 2019 9:05 pm
by Bienenhalde » Fri Apr 05, 2019 9:06 pm
by Washington Resistance Army » Fri Apr 05, 2019 9:08 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Cannot think of a name, Experina, Hwiteard, ML Library, The Huskar Social Union, The Notorious Mad Jack, The Selkie, Yasuragi
Advertisement