NATION

PASSWORD

Cannabis is Crappy

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Should Cannabis be Legalized?

Yes
77
67%
No
30
26%
Undecided
3
3%
I didn't inhale
5
4%
 
Total votes : 115

User avatar
Novus America
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38385
Founded: Jun 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Novus America » Thu Apr 04, 2019 7:18 am

Vassenor wrote:
Aellex wrote:Cannabis is harmful to the body and that is the reason it is banned in the first place.
If people are dumb enough to ignore the risks and buy some anyway, then the extra risks are on them too in top of the regular ones.


So how many deaths annually are attributable to the direct effects of cannabis use? And how does that compare (say) to tobacco use or alcohol consumption?


In all fairness though we have been aggressively trying to discourage tobacco use.
And effectively too.
If we want to treat it like tobacco, fine. But treat it like tobacco.
___|_|___ _|__*__|_

Zombie Ike/Teddy Roosevelt 2020.

Novus America represents my vision of an awesome Atompunk near future United States of America expanded to the entire North American continent, Guyana and the Philippines. The population would be around 700 million.
Think something like prewar Fallout, minus the bad stuff.

Politically I am an independent. I support what is good for the country, which means I cannot support either party.

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45100
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Thu Apr 04, 2019 7:19 am

Ifreann wrote:Artisinal, organic marijuanas, grown with only the most natural of fertilisers.

It should come with zero surprises that this is in fact a 100% real thing. Though in an inversion, often the organic weed is cheaper because you're not offsetting the cost of the range of weird science you put in the soil. My brother's first batch was organic, then we went science and doubled the yield and potency turned out to be the way to go. But that was indoor. My buddies outdoor farm was organic and that had great yield, but he had a hard time selling it because at the time no one wanted outdoor.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163932
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Thu Apr 04, 2019 7:21 am

Heloin wrote:
Aellex wrote:In different ways, yes, I'd say.

In statistically provable ways, no.

Ifreann wrote:Those aren't actually very harmful. Alcohol and tobacco are probably more harmful. Hell, there's probably more harmful sports. Maybe you should ban rugby.

Don't you go touching my fucking rugby.

I'm just saying, maybe we move the 2023 World Cup out of France. Maybe some other country should host it while France figures out if rugby is more dangerous than weed or less dangerous than tobacco. Maybe Ireland.
Last edited by Ifreann on Thu Apr 04, 2019 7:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Heloin
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26091
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Heloin » Thu Apr 04, 2019 7:24 am

Ifreann wrote:
Heloin wrote:In statistically provable ways, no.


Don't you go touching my fucking rugby.

I'm just saying, maybe we move to 2023 World Cup out of France. Maybe some other country should host it while France figures out if rugby is more dangerous than weed or less dangerous than tobacco. Maybe Ireland.

That is acceptable.

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45100
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Thu Apr 04, 2019 7:25 am

Aellex wrote:Cannabis is harmful to the body and that is the reason it is banned in the first place.
If people are dumb enough to ignore the risks and buy some anyway, then the extra risks are on them too in top of the regular ones.

23 health benefits of marijuana.
That's Business Insider, not 420smoketheweedphishisawesome.com/twojoints.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Novus America
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38385
Founded: Jun 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Novus America » Thu Apr 04, 2019 7:26 am

Cannot think of a name wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Artisinal, organic marijuanas, grown with only the most natural of fertilisers.

It should come with zero surprises that this is in fact a 100% real thing. Though in an inversion, often the organic weed is cheaper because you're not offsetting the cost of the range of weird science you put in the soil. My brother's first batch was organic, then we went science and doubled the yield and potency turned out to be the way to go. But that was indoor. My buddies outdoor farm was organic and that had great yield, but he had a hard time selling it because at the time no one wanted outdoor.


Technophobia, chemophobia and anti science are huge right now.
People apply it to other agricultural products, so logically they would to weed as well.
Especially as I would think the demographics of those who want “organic” food also probably overlap with greater weed use.

Indoor is I would imagine cleaner and better quality.
___|_|___ _|__*__|_

Zombie Ike/Teddy Roosevelt 2020.

Novus America represents my vision of an awesome Atompunk near future United States of America expanded to the entire North American continent, Guyana and the Philippines. The population would be around 700 million.
Think something like prewar Fallout, minus the bad stuff.

Politically I am an independent. I support what is good for the country, which means I cannot support either party.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163932
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Thu Apr 04, 2019 7:30 am

Heloin wrote:
Ifreann wrote:I'm just saying, maybe we move to 2023 World Cup out of France. Maybe some other country should host it while France figures out if rugby is more dangerous than weed or less dangerous than tobacco. Maybe Ireland.

That is acceptable.

Excellent.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45100
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Thu Apr 04, 2019 7:31 am

Novus America wrote:
Cannot think of a name wrote:It should come with zero surprises that this is in fact a 100% real thing. Though in an inversion, often the organic weed is cheaper because you're not offsetting the cost of the range of weird science you put in the soil. My brother's first batch was organic, then we went science and doubled the yield and potency turned out to be the way to go. But that was indoor. My buddies outdoor farm was organic and that had great yield, but he had a hard time selling it because at the time no one wanted outdoor.


Technophobia, chemophobia and anti science are huge right now.
People apply it to other agricultural products, so logically they would to weed as well.
Especially as I would think the demographics of those who want “organic” food also probably overlap with greater weed use.

Indoor is I would imagine cleaner and better quality.

And more expensive. Honestly, that's the divide. No one who sells to dispensaries uses pesticides. For indoor use you just make sure your area is fucking clean, outdoor you either roll the dice or use other means to keep pests off it because it will effect the smoke, it's not like you can rinse weed like an apple.

But the widely accepted concoction of stuff you put in the soil to effect yield and potency are expensive, so that weed is more expensive (as opposed to the opposite being true with food). I'm blanking on what it's called because organic is also less popular so the default is common enough that you don't name it, except 'top shelf.'

Once it went completely legal in California one of the requirements was that it had to be tested before sale, so now you pretty much buy it based on THC or CBD levels depending on what you need.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Novus America
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38385
Founded: Jun 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Novus America » Thu Apr 04, 2019 7:32 am

Cannot think of a name wrote:
Aellex wrote:Cannabis is harmful to the body and that is the reason it is banned in the first place.
If people are dumb enough to ignore the risks and buy some anyway, then the extra risks are on them too in top of the regular ones.

23 health benefits of marijuana.
That's Business Insider, not 420smoketheweedphishisawesome.com/twojoints.


Well true, THC has legitimate medical uses. But it has downsides too.
I definitely support the AMA in that we should move it from Schedule 1 to Schedule 3.
I would think they are a reliable source on how drugs should be treated.

Much more than either the “devil’s lettuce weed teh ebul” crowd OR “weed is teh awesome, what day is it, elephants are really monkeys if you think about it man” crowd.
Last edited by Novus America on Thu Apr 04, 2019 7:46 am, edited 2 times in total.
___|_|___ _|__*__|_

Zombie Ike/Teddy Roosevelt 2020.

Novus America represents my vision of an awesome Atompunk near future United States of America expanded to the entire North American continent, Guyana and the Philippines. The population would be around 700 million.
Think something like prewar Fallout, minus the bad stuff.

Politically I am an independent. I support what is good for the country, which means I cannot support either party.

User avatar
Petrolheadia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11388
Founded: May 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Petrolheadia » Thu Apr 04, 2019 7:37 am

Aellex wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Lots of things are harmful to the body and also fun. It'd be an awful shame to ban them all.

No one is talking about banning them all. Just the most harmful ones like ecstasy, cannabis, LSD, etc.

Why can't we actually let people take responsibility of their actions for once?
Capitalism, single-payer healthcare, pro-choice, LGBT rights, progressive personal taxation, low corporate tax, pro-business law, welfare for those in need.
Nazism, edgism, dogmatic statements, most of Abrahamic-derived morality (esp. as law), welfare for those not in need.
We are not Albania and I am not Albanian, FFS!
Male, gearhead, classic rock fan, gamer, agnostic.
Not sure if left-libertarian, ex-libertarian or without a damn clue.
Where you can talk about cars!
"They're always saying I'm a Capitalist pig. I suppose I am, but, ah...it ah...it's good for my drumming, I think." - Keith Moon,
If a Porsche owner treats it like a bicycle, he's a gentleman. And if he prays to it, he's simply a moron. - Jan Nowicki.

User avatar
Novus America
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38385
Founded: Jun 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Novus America » Thu Apr 04, 2019 7:52 am

Cannot think of a name wrote:
Novus America wrote:
Technophobia, chemophobia and anti science are huge right now.
People apply it to other agricultural products, so logically they would to weed as well.
Especially as I would think the demographics of those who want “organic” food also probably overlap with greater weed use.

Indoor is I would imagine cleaner and better quality.

And more expensive. Honestly, that's the divide. No one who sells to dispensaries uses pesticides. For indoor use you just make sure your area is fucking clean, outdoor you either roll the dice or use other means to keep pests off it because it will effect the smoke, it's not like you can rinse weed like an apple.

But the widely accepted concoction of stuff you put in the soil to effect yield and potency are expensive, so that weed is more expensive (as opposed to the opposite being true with food). I'm blanking on what it's called because organic is also less popular so the default is common enough that you don't name it, except 'top shelf.'

Once it went completely legal in California one of the requirements was that it had to be tested before sale, so now you pretty much buy it based on THC or CBD levels depending on what you need.


It would seem to be more expensive on a dollar per pound of plant, but is it more expensive on a dollar per THC basis?
If you are buying lower quality at a lower price per pound you are not necessarily saving money.

And that is a great point, rats, bugs and their turds are all natural and all organic.
You get that with your “all natural organic” stuff.

Though I would think the best, but most expensive approach would be to extract the THC so you no longer have the other plant matter in the way.

If I did smoke I would definitely want the indoor science stuff, over the outdoor organic stuff.
Even if you pay more you are not smoking literal shit.
___|_|___ _|__*__|_

Zombie Ike/Teddy Roosevelt 2020.

Novus America represents my vision of an awesome Atompunk near future United States of America expanded to the entire North American continent, Guyana and the Philippines. The population would be around 700 million.
Think something like prewar Fallout, minus the bad stuff.

Politically I am an independent. I support what is good for the country, which means I cannot support either party.

User avatar
The Greater Ohio Valley
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7080
Founded: Jan 19, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Greater Ohio Valley » Thu Apr 04, 2019 7:58 am

Aellex wrote:Cannabis is harmful to the body and that is the reason it is banned in the first place.

Monumentally less so than alcohol, tobacco and legal prescription & over the counter drugs.
Occasionally the Neo-American States
"Choke on the ashes of your hate."
Authoritarian leftist as a means to a libertarian socialist end. Civic nationalist and American patriot. Democracy is non-negotiable. Uniting humanity, fixing our planet and venturing out into the stars is the overarching goal. Jaded and broken yet I persist.

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45100
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Thu Apr 04, 2019 8:48 am

Novus America wrote:
Cannot think of a name wrote:And more expensive. Honestly, that's the divide. No one who sells to dispensaries uses pesticides. For indoor use you just make sure your area is fucking clean, outdoor you either roll the dice or use other means to keep pests off it because it will effect the smoke, it's not like you can rinse weed like an apple.

But the widely accepted concoction of stuff you put in the soil to effect yield and potency are expensive, so that weed is more expensive (as opposed to the opposite being true with food). I'm blanking on what it's called because organic is also less popular so the default is common enough that you don't name it, except 'top shelf.'

Once it went completely legal in California one of the requirements was that it had to be tested before sale, so now you pretty much buy it based on THC or CBD levels depending on what you need.


It would seem to be more expensive on a dollar per pound of plant, but is it more expensive on a dollar per THC basis?
If you are buying lower quality at a lower price per pound you are not necessarily saving money.

And that is a great point, rats, bugs and their turds are all natural and all organic.
You get that with your “all natural organic” stuff.

Though I would think the best, but most expensive approach would be to extract the THC so you no longer have the other plant matter in the way.

If I did smoke I would definitely want the indoor science stuff, over the outdoor organic stuff.
Even if you pay more you are not smoking literal shit.

Well, that's the evolution of every smoker when they go from realizing a zip of shwag doesn't get you as high as an eighth of sticky green. Usually that's also a process of graduating to a better 'guy.' With legalization you skip the shwag stage unless you're underage.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
An Alan Smithee Nation
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7623
Founded: Apr 18, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby An Alan Smithee Nation » Thu Apr 04, 2019 9:01 am

Cannot think of a name wrote:
Novus America wrote:
It would seem to be more expensive on a dollar per pound of plant, but is it more expensive on a dollar per THC basis?
If you are buying lower quality at a lower price per pound you are not necessarily saving money.

And that is a great point, rats, bugs and their turds are all natural and all organic.
You get that with your “all natural organic” stuff.

Though I would think the best, but most expensive approach would be to extract the THC so you no longer have the other plant matter in the way.

If I did smoke I would definitely want the indoor science stuff, over the outdoor organic stuff.
Even if you pay more you are not smoking literal shit.

Well, that's the evolution of every smoker when they go from realizing a zip of shwag doesn't get you as high as an eighth of sticky green. Usually that's also a process of graduating to a better 'guy.' With legalization you skip the shwag stage unless you're underage.


Is there less weed paranoia if you are somewhere where you don't have to be worried about being arrested for it? Or do you just get paranoid about something other than cops battering down your door?
Everything is intertwinkled

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 78486
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Thu Apr 04, 2019 9:19 am

Ifreann wrote:
Aellex wrote:Cannabis is harmful to the body and that is the reason it is banned in the first place.
If people are dumb enough to ignore the risks and buy some anyway, then the extra risks are on them too in top of the regular ones.

Lots of things are harmful to the body and also fun. It'd be an awful shame to ban them all.

I guess we can start with the internet
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 78486
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Thu Apr 04, 2019 9:21 am

Petrolheadia wrote:
Aellex wrote:No one is talking about banning them all. Just the most harmful ones like ecstasy, cannabis, LSD, etc.

Why can't we actually let people take responsibility of their actions for once?

Non
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Thu Apr 04, 2019 9:22 am

An Alan Smithee Nation wrote:
Cannot think of a name wrote:Well, that's the evolution of every smoker when they go from realizing a zip of shwag doesn't get you as high as an eighth of sticky green. Usually that's also a process of graduating to a better 'guy.' With legalization you skip the shwag stage unless you're underage.


Is there less weed paranoia if you are somewhere where you don't have to be worried about being arrested for it? Or do you just get paranoid about something other than cops battering down your door?


Nobody really got paranoid, this is in California, where the punishment for recreational use, even before official legalization was "Hey, put your roach out, I'm a cop".
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45100
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Thu Apr 04, 2019 9:22 am

An Alan Smithee Nation wrote:
Cannot think of a name wrote:Well, that's the evolution of every smoker when they go from realizing a zip of shwag doesn't get you as high as an eighth of sticky green. Usually that's also a process of graduating to a better 'guy.' With legalization you skip the shwag stage unless you're underage.


Is there less weed paranoia if you are somewhere where you don't have to be worried about being arrested for it? Or do you just get paranoid about something other than cops battering down your door?

Well, if you overdo it (like with edibles) you can end up worrying you look like a spaced out freak, but only if looking like a spaced out freak bothers you. But now that it's legal folks are a tad too brazen. Like, c'mon guys. Let's meet the non-smokers halfway. They got off our back, maybe not just light up everywhere like dicks blowing vape in crowds etc. Pet peeve that I think is going to ruin it for everyone. It just got outlawed on LA's beaches.

I can only be anecdotal, my paranoia was entirely centered on 'being caught' so yeah, for me sure. But the increased paranoia as a side effect I can't really speak to.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Thu Apr 04, 2019 9:26 am

Cannot think of a name wrote:
An Alan Smithee Nation wrote:
Is there less weed paranoia if you are somewhere where you don't have to be worried about being arrested for it? Or do you just get paranoid about something other than cops battering down your door?

Well, if you overdo it (like with edibles) you can end up worrying you look like a spaced out freak, but only if looking like a spaced out freak bothers you. But now that it's legal folks are a tad too brazen. Like, c'mon guys. Let's meet the non-smokers halfway. They got off our back, maybe not just light up everywhere like dicks blowing vape in crowds etc. Pet peeve that I think is going to ruin it for everyone. It just got outlawed on LA's beaches.

I can only be anecdotal, my paranoia was entirely centered on 'being caught' so yeah, for me sure. But the increased paranoia as a side effect I can't really speak to.


I did know one guy who would get like cripplingly paranoid, every set of headlights was a cop, every phone call was a disaster, etc. He stopped smoking long before the legalization passed though, so IDK if it'd be better now.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45100
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Thu Apr 04, 2019 9:42 am

Telconi wrote:
Cannot think of a name wrote:Well, if you overdo it (like with edibles) you can end up worrying you look like a spaced out freak, but only if looking like a spaced out freak bothers you. But now that it's legal folks are a tad too brazen. Like, c'mon guys. Let's meet the non-smokers halfway. They got off our back, maybe not just light up everywhere like dicks blowing vape in crowds etc. Pet peeve that I think is going to ruin it for everyone. It just got outlawed on LA's beaches.

I can only be anecdotal, my paranoia was entirely centered on 'being caught' so yeah, for me sure. But the increased paranoia as a side effect I can't really speak to.


I did know one guy who would get like cripplingly paranoid, every set of headlights was a cop, every phone call was a disaster, etc. He stopped smoking long before the legalization passed though, so IDK if it'd be better now.

They'll know we want a pizza!
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
LiberNovusAmericae
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6942
Founded: Mar 10, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby LiberNovusAmericae » Thu Apr 04, 2019 9:44 am

Aellex wrote:Cannabis is harmful to the body and that is the reason it is banned in the first place.
If people are dumb enough to ignore the risks and buy some anyway, then the extra risks are on them too in top of the regular ones.

If we banned everything that was harmful, we'd be living in a literal nanny state. Let people take their own risks by not arresting them for putting a substance in their own body.

User avatar
Dogmeat
Senator
 
Posts: 3639
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Dogmeat » Thu Apr 04, 2019 10:22 am

Aellex wrote:Cannabis is harmful to the body and that is the reason it is banned in the first place.
If people are dumb enough to ignore the risks and buy some anyway, then the extra risks are on them too in top of the regular ones.

That isn't the reason it was banned in the first place.
Immortal God Dog
Hey boy, know any tricks?
天狗

User avatar
The New California Republic
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35483
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The New California Republic » Thu Apr 04, 2019 12:06 pm

LiberNovusAmericae wrote:
Aellex wrote:Cannabis is harmful to the body and that is the reason it is banned in the first place.
If people are dumb enough to ignore the risks and buy some anyway, then the extra risks are on them too in top of the regular ones.

If we banned everything that was harmful, we'd be living in a literal nanny state. Let people take their own risks by not arresting them for putting a substance in their own body.

And cannabis is further down the list than alcohol and tobacco.
Last edited by Sigmund Freud on Sat Sep 23, 1939 2:23 am, edited 999 times in total.

The Irradiated Wasteland of The New California Republic: depicting the expanded NCR, several years after the total victory over Caesar's Legion, and the annexation of New Vegas and its surrounding areas.

White-collared conservatives flashing down the street
Pointing their plastic finger at me
They're hoping soon, my kind will drop and die
But I'm going to wave my freak flag high
Wave on, wave on
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Thu Apr 04, 2019 12:36 pm

Dumb Ideologies wrote:I don't approve of the habit, but I wouldn't go so far as "eat shit and die".

Regardless, there's a strong correlation between cannabis use and both mental illness and low economic activity so we don't want use becoming more widespread. Users shouldn't go to prison as that's how you get people into crime and acquaintance with more dealers - confiscate the drugs and mandate regular visits from social services and compulsory participation in a treatment program.

Don't legalise, but stop it being a criminal/police matter except as last resort.

Wrong. There's a modest to weak correlation between heavy Cannabis use and certain mental illnesses. Importantly, however, there is no proven causative factor that demonstrates that Cannabis is responsible for the development or progression of mental illness. So, you're jumping the gun here. The correlation could mean that there's a causative relationship or it could just as likely mean that Cannabis provides some measure of relief from the symptoms of certain mental disorders, thus meaning that people with those conditions are more likely to self medicate with Cannabis.
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Thu Apr 04, 2019 12:37 pm

Aellex wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Lots of things are harmful to the body and also fun. It'd be an awful shame to ban them all.

No one is talking about banning them all. Just the most harmful ones like ecstasy, cannabis, LSD, etc.

Ironically, the drugs you listed all occupy the space of least harm, as far as drugs go.
Insert trite farewell here

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ask Jeeves [Bot], Duvniask, Google [Bot]

Advertisement

Remove ads

cron