It’s disingenuous to not mention the Christian countries with such laws, or India
Advertisement
by Internationalist Bastard » Tue Mar 26, 2019 9:06 am
by Gormwood » Tue Mar 26, 2019 9:07 am
by El-Amin Caliphate » Tue Mar 26, 2019 9:07 am
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)
by Zizou » Tue Mar 26, 2019 9:09 am
Parxland wrote:It might somehow give me STDs through the computer screen with how often you hop between different groups of people.
by Internationalist Bastard » Tue Mar 26, 2019 9:09 am
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:IB no one should let people insult them. That's bullying, and bullying is bad.
by Hanafuridake » Tue Mar 26, 2019 9:10 am
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:IB no one should let people insult them. That's bullying, and bullying is bad.
Suriyanakhon's alt, finally found my old account's password李贽 wrote:There is nothing difficult about becoming a sage, and nothing false about transcending the world of appearances.
by Darussalam » Tue Mar 26, 2019 9:11 am
by Darussalam » Tue Mar 26, 2019 9:24 am
by Handecanistan » Tue Mar 26, 2019 9:29 am
by Handecanistan » Tue Mar 26, 2019 9:32 am
Darussalam wrote:Gormwood wrote:Also disingenuous to talk like blasphemy laws are exclusively an Islamic phenomenon.
It's a strictly Islamic phenomenon in Malaysia.
For the rest of the world, most blasphemy cases are prosecuted in Muslim countries.Astoriya wrote:6 out of 20 countries , aka 30%
But wait - that image was from 2015, so things change
try again?
Astounded by this high IQ math
Assuming (roflmao) that your math is right, you seriously think 30% of Muslims supporting killing apostates is an acceptable small minority?
by Astoriya » Tue Mar 26, 2019 9:33 am
Darussalam wrote:Gormwood wrote:Also disingenuous to talk like blasphemy laws are exclusively an Islamic phenomenon.
It's a strictly Islamic phenomenon in Malaysia.
For the rest of the world, most blasphemy cases are prosecuted in Muslim countries.Astoriya wrote:6 out of 20 countries , aka 30%
But wait - that image was from 2015, so things change
try again?
Astounded by this high IQ math
Assuming (roflmao) that your math is right, you seriously think 30% of Muslims supporting killing apostates is an acceptable small minority?
Handecanistan wrote:Astoriya wrote:6 out of 20 countries , aka 30%
But wait - that image was from 2015, so things change
try again?
Ok so, let's look at these stats properly shall we?
The graph shows that 42.8% of Muslims asked support executing converts; this is the average taken from all the 20 countries in the graph, so more than 30%. This could show that the majority is in favour of the opposite, however the graph doesn't show the results of those that answered "no", or "unsure", meaning that it could still potentially be the majority.
On to the other graph you haven't mentioned about Sharia law, this one had 38 countries (onto that in a minute). This graph demonstrated that 56.8% of Muslims asked in these 38 countries (average) are in favour of Sharia law. Even if it doesn't show the "no" and the "unsure" answers.
Make of these stats as you will, but I also want to point out that, in the graph that had almost twice the sample size, the results showed a majority of radical Islam values. This brings me to the question that, maybe the results of the first graph would show a different value if they used the same sample size (note that it shouldn't be the same sample). Conversely, the opposite could be true, I just hope the stats that were collected didn't purposely skew the results in favour of a particular opinion.
by El-Amin Caliphate » Tue Mar 26, 2019 9:38 am
Handecanistan wrote:Darussalam wrote:It's a strictly Islamic phenomenon in Malaysia.
For the rest of the world, most blasphemy cases are prosecuted in Muslim countries.
Astounded by this high IQ math
Assuming (roflmao) that your math is right, you seriously think 30% of Muslims supporting killing apostates is an acceptable small minority?
The argument is about the majority and therefore mainstream Islamic belief. Don't shift the goal posts because it just acknowledges his point.
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)
by El-Amin Caliphate » Tue Mar 26, 2019 9:44 am
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)
by Handecanistan » Tue Mar 26, 2019 9:48 am
by Liriena » Tue Mar 26, 2019 9:49 am
New Sukberia wrote:"Finally, has the Left, specifically the intersectional Third Wave feminist Western Left, turned its back on free speech, atheists (particularly ex-Muslim atheists) and critics of Islam, even when it involves people being sentenced to ten years in prison and mental health “counseling” for a perceived slight against a particular religion that,"
Finnally someone said it.
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by El-Amin Caliphate » Tue Mar 26, 2019 9:54 am
Handecanistan wrote:El-Amin Caliphate wrote:I mean the majority of Muslims believing something doesn't make said belief Islamic.
So they're not real Muslims believing in Islam? Even though they are probably more classic believers and moderate Islamic beliefs are a relatively recent thing? Both moderate and extremist Islamic views are Islamic beliefs, you can argue that one of them isn't "truly Islamic", but that is up for debate, and in that case, which belief must be forced to rename themselves? The conservative and classical belief, or the new, more moderate belief?
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)
by Internationalist Bastard » Tue Mar 26, 2019 9:54 am
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:Does anyone know what he said?
by Handecanistan » Tue Mar 26, 2019 9:55 am
Astoriya wrote:Darussalam wrote:It's a strictly Islamic phenomenon in Malaysia.
For the rest of the world, most blasphemy cases are prosecuted in Muslim countries.
Astounded by this high IQ math
Assuming (roflmao) that your math is right, you seriously think 30% of Muslims supporting killing apostates is an acceptable small minority?
Not 30% of Muslims - where did you even get that from
As said earlier, how about getting something that isn't 4 years out of date, eh ?Handecanistan wrote:
Ok so, let's look at these stats properly shall we?
The graph shows that 42.8% of Muslims asked support executing converts; this is the average taken from all the 20 countries in the graph, so more than 30%. This could show that the majority is in favour of the opposite, however the graph doesn't show the results of those that answered "no", or "unsure", meaning that it could still potentially be the majority.
On to the other graph you haven't mentioned about Sharia law, this one had 38 countries (onto that in a minute). This graph demonstrated that 56.8% of Muslims asked in these 38 countries (average) are in favour of Sharia law. Even if it doesn't show the "no" and the "unsure" answers.
Make of these stats as you will, but I also want to point out that, in the graph that had almost twice the sample size, the results showed a majority of radical Islam values. This brings me to the question that, maybe the results of the first graph would show a different value if they used the same sample size (note that it shouldn't be the same sample). Conversely, the opposite could be true, I just hope the stats that were collected didn't purposely skew the results in favour of a particular opinion.
With that one, it's anyone's guess
by El-Amin Caliphate » Tue Mar 26, 2019 9:56 am
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)
by New Sukberia » Tue Mar 26, 2019 9:59 am
Gormwood wrote:So how does a thread discussing the serious problem of blasphemy laws turn into a vitriolic diatribe on Islam of the sort that down the road has a chance of setting off another New Zealand?
by Astoriya » Tue Mar 26, 2019 9:59 am
Handecanistan wrote:Astoriya wrote:Not 30% of Muslims - where did you even get that from
As said earlier, how about getting something that isn't 4 years out of date, eh ?
With that one, it's anyone's guess
You can't argue that the extreme views are a minority though, that's my main point and takeaway from these stats. I have nothing against moderate Islam, but when people defend any extreme belief and dismiss it as "not all (insert name here)" the real issue and problem is ignored. If the majority of Christians were extreme, I'd complain about Christianity way more than I already do.
If you look at other religions it's the same, I believe Hinduism also has quite a few issues, seeing how it literally justifies and explains the class system, cementing it and forcing the poor to stay poor as "punishment from a past life of sin". And don't get me started on the poor Tibetans under the Buddhist priests.
Also as a sidenote, 4 years old isn't that unreliable, not that much will change in terms of beliefs and morals over a 4 year period in a whole country without something drastic occurring.
by Internationalist Bastard » Tue Mar 26, 2019 10:00 am
by New Sukberia » Tue Mar 26, 2019 10:00 am
Liriena wrote:New Sukberia wrote:"Finally, has the Left, specifically the intersectional Third Wave feminist Western Left, turned its back on free speech, atheists (particularly ex-Muslim atheists) and critics of Islam, even when it involves people being sentenced to ten years in prison and mental health “counseling” for a perceived slight against a particular religion that,"
Finnally someone said it.
"Finally someone made the strawman"?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Almighty Biden, Bovad, Godular, Ineva, Kostane, Neanderthaland, New Temecula, Shrillland, Statesburg
Advertisement