The Xenopolis Confederation wrote:Communal concils wrote:Simply because the nation has many aspects that rojava has. Women can go into the military, minorities are not discriminated, and it's secular.
However, Syria is a threat to Neo-conservativism, and it does have a more realistic ideology.
"More realistic" doesn't equal "better." If it did, you would have simply said "better." So you're left with the only reason for supporting Assad over Rojava being... anti-imperialism. Opposing US intervention is all well and good but doing so does non necessitate personally preferring dictators over democracies.
well, there are allegations that Rojava kills dissidence, so I see this state as a big contradiction. There are Arabs, Christians and Assyrians that don't want to live under the Kurds, so it's democracy is against the will of others.
Another reason for my support of Assad is that he has done more harm to ISIS than rojava. Not only that, he obviously does not ignore rebel groups that use the word democracy as a shield from claims of jihadism.