Page 501 of 501

PostPosted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 6:37 pm
by Kowani
Chernoslavia wrote:
Kowani wrote:Compelling.


Likewise.

Well, Xeno knows my views on freedom. I see no reason to bore her explaining everything again.

PostPosted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 6:37 pm
by Torrocca
Kowani wrote:
Jean-Paul Sartre wrote:I vote Kowani

Noppetty nope nope.


Torrocca wrote:
I also vote Kowani o/

Not happening.


Ah, shit, our next OP's not accepting the outcome of our spontaneous electoral system of governance. It's time for a revolution against this blatant display of tyranny!

PostPosted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 6:37 pm
by New haven america
I vote for Kowani.

PostPosted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 6:38 pm
by Kowani
Torrocca wrote:
Kowani wrote:Noppetty nope nope.



Not happening.


Ah, shit, our next OP's not accepting the outcome of our spontaneous electoral system of governance. It's time for a revolution against this blatant display of tyranny!

If I’m doing it, nobody complain about how absolutely crappy it turns out.

PostPosted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 6:38 pm
by LiberNovusAmericae
Jean-Paul Sartre wrote:
LiberNovusAmericae wrote:Not in my case. I said "humanly and reasonably possible," I don't think having a system run by megadoners is reasonable. It is just legalized corruption.

What if I were to shift my definition of "reasonable" further south, so to speak? Would that be, in your mind, acceptable?

I don't know what you view as reasonable. Maybe or maybe not. Either way, I don't support megadoners controlling politics and I support restrictions on donations as a result, and if my language is imprecise, I'll fix it.

PostPosted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 6:39 pm
by Chernoslavia
Kowani wrote:
Chernoslavia wrote:
Likewise.

Well, Xeno knows my views on freedom. I see no reason to bore her explaining everything again.

Who..?

PostPosted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 6:40 pm
by New haven america
LiberNovusAmericae wrote:
Jean-Paul Sartre wrote:What if I were to shift my definition of "reasonable" further south, so to speak? Would that be, in your mind, acceptable?

I don't know what you view as reasonable. Maybe or maybe not. Either way, I don't support megadoners controlling politics and I support restrictions on donations as a result, and if my language is imprecise, I'll fix it.

Why?

They're not controlling politics, they're simply spending their money as they please, as private citizens are allowed to do.

PostPosted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 6:41 pm
by Kowani
Chernoslavia wrote:
Kowani wrote:Well, Xeno knows my views on freedom. I see no reason to bore her explaining everything again.

Who..?

…Actually, that should say Jean Paul Sartre. My bad.

But the point remains.

PostPosted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 6:41 pm
by LiberNovusAmericae
Kowani wrote:
Torrocca wrote:
Ah, shit, our next OP's not accepting the outcome of our spontaneous electoral system of governance. It's time for a revolution against this blatant display of tyranny!

If I’m doing it, nobody complain about how absolutely crappy it turns out.

I'm thinking of quoting Torrocca into a new thread OP as a temp OP, and editing out the finer points of a new OP later. Assuming no one else wants to be OP.

PostPosted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 6:42 pm
by Jean-Paul Sartre
viewtopic.php?f=20&t=470883

Suggestions for the OP title/poll/whatever are welcome there. I'm also comfortable with the OP being transferred to someone else.

PostPosted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 6:49 pm
by Pacomia
Goodnight thread.

PostPosted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 6:51 pm
by Chernoslavia
Kowani wrote:
Chernoslavia wrote:Who..?

…Actually, that should say Jean Paul Sartre. My bad.

But the point remains.


Ah ok but nah I don't really care to debate anything that much today, it's Friday so I'm just having some Jack tonite.

PostPosted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 7:34 pm
by Newark Aristocracy
Almost Heaven,West Virginia.