Liriena wrote:Cekoviu wrote:The funny thing about 'nonconformists' is that they're very conformist within their own clique.
Anyone who tries to act as a cultural gatekeeper or elitist for nonconformist clout, regardless of the artform, is doing art a disservice.
Not to mention the fact that this idea that "good" art is the arcane, carefully cultivated and exclusive art, while popular art, the art of the masses, is "bad" art, is pure liberalism (more specifically, classical bourgeois liberalism).
The art of the masses can be for the people, not just the liberal bourgeoisie. It just isn’t.