Advertisement
by The Black Party » Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:50 pm
by Grater Tovakia » Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:50 pm
New Rogernomics wrote:It doesn't surprise me that NATO would be trounced conventionally in Europe. This has always been the case. Effectively tactical nuclear weapons would have to be a first response.
The China situation is more complex though, as it depends who gets involved. China would lose in a wider regional conflict as it would be attacked by all its neighbors, which it has territorial claims on.
Though I'd call this fear mongering for weapons sales more than anything. It assumes the worst case, and assumes the US wouldn't launch nuclear armageddon in a catastrophic military collapse.
by Papalotltlan » Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:51 pm
Grater Tovakia wrote:United Muscovite Nations wrote:Yes they are actually, Russia has better air-defense than any other country in the world and the best artillery in the world. Russia's been spending a disproportionate amount of its government spending on bringing its military capabilities up to date, and this spending has been effective.
"Best Air Defense" not sure about that one mate.
by Trollzyn the Infinite » Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:51 pm
Sneudal wrote:I don't see the problem, a single superpower isn't healthy.
by Trollzyn the Infinite » Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:52 pm
United Muscovite Nations wrote:Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:
Have you seen Russia's arsenal? They're not exactly "up-to-date" either.
Yes they are actually, Russia has better air-defense than any other country in the world and the best artillery in the world. Russia's been spending a disproportionate amount of its government spending on bringing its military capabilities up to date, and this spending has been effective.
by Trollzyn the Infinite » Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:53 pm
by Grater Tovakia » Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:55 pm
by United Muscovite Nations » Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:55 pm
by United Muscovite Nations » Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:55 pm
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:United Muscovite Nations wrote:Yes they are actually, Russia has better air-defense than any other country in the world and the best artillery in the world. Russia's been spending a disproportionate amount of its government spending on bringing its military capabilities up to date, and this spending has been effective.
ROFL
They've been improving I'll admit, but they sure as hell aren't the best at anything. Not yet, anyway. They'll get there eventually.
by New Rogernomics » Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:56 pm
Neither China or Russia would do a first strike, so the scenario is nonsense regardless, and if anything this Rand report is more cold war style fear mongering. The Russians are coming!Grater Tovakia wrote:New Rogernomics wrote:It doesn't surprise me that NATO would be trounced conventionally in Europe. This has always been the case. Effectively tactical nuclear weapons would have to be a first response.
The China situation is more complex though, as it depends who gets involved. China would lose in a wider regional conflict as it would be attacked by all its neighbors, which it has territorial claims on.
Though I'd call this fear mongering for weapons sales more than anything. It assumes the worst case, and assumes the US wouldn't launch nuclear armageddon in a catastrophic military collapse.
I don't think it would. Russia can not fight for more than two weeks, reasons being logistics, shit reserves, and economy. Soviet and Russian Doctrine has always been that the war needs to be fast
by Trollzyn the Infinite » Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:58 pm
by Grater Tovakia » Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:59 pm
by Grater Tovakia » Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:01 pm
New Rogernomics wrote:Neither China or Russia would do a first strike, so the scenario is nonsense regardless, and if anything this Rand report is more cold war style fear mongering. The Russians are coming!Grater Tovakia wrote:
I don't think it would. Russia can not fight for more than two weeks, reasons being logistics, shit reserves, and economy. Soviet and Russian Doctrine has always been that the war needs to be fast
by Trollzyn the Infinite » Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:02 pm
by Internationalist Bastard » Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:02 pm
by Trollzyn the Infinite » Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:02 pm
by Saiwania » Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:04 pm
by El-Amin Caliphate » Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:04 pm
Sneudal wrote:I don't see the problem, a single superpower isn't healthy.
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)
by VoVoDoCo » Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:04 pm
by Grater Tovakia » Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:05 pm
by The Galactic Liberal Democracy » Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:08 pm
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:Pls no
The first was a product of it's time, the second was a disaster - though it would have been better if they hadn't wussed out with making China the big bad instead of fucking North Korea of all countries.
Cossack Khanate wrote:This shall forever be known as World War Sh*t: Newark Aggression. Now if I see one more troop deployed, I will call on the force of all the Hindu gods to reverse time and wipe your race of the face of the planet. Cease.
The Black Party wrote:(TBP kamikaze's into all 99999999999 nukes before they hit our territory because we just have that many pilots ready to die for dah blak regime, we also counter-attack into your nation with our entire population of 45 million because this RP allows it.)
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:Galatic Liberal Democracy short-circuits all of NS with FACTS and LOGIC
by Great Aletia » Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:08 pm
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:Well, to be frank: no shit.
It'd be kinda hard for a nation to defends other nations half-way across the world that border a hostile nation. All we could do is mount liberation efforts later on. Thing is, we don't have to worry about going to war with either country. Beijing is economically dependant on us and vice versa; Russia would have to fight all of NATO, and while they could knock out the Baltics with ease they'd get bogged down in Poland. Europe and Asia would be on high alert in the event of an invasion of the Republic of China or a Baltic State - with the latter being an act of war against all NATO countries, as a matter of fact.
This is all assuming no nukes are involved.
Regardless, neither scenario is even remotely likely.
by Trollzyn the Infinite » Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:09 pm
Saiwania wrote:A saying goes that it's impossible to stay #1 for forever. It was a good run but it looks like there are real rivals now.
Russia became more powerful under the brilliant leadership of Vladimir Putin whilst China becoming powerful was the US' fault to some extent. This is what we get for buying Chinese products, we made China too rich and they invested their money in all the right places to become even more powerful.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, Cerula, Dreadton, Eahland, Elejamie, Epic bannana, Ferelith, Floofybit, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Google [Bot], Ifreann, Immoren, Ineva, Lans Isles, Poorly made goods, Sicario Mercenary Corps, Southland, Stellar Colonies, Tape, The Black Forrest, The Great Nevada Overlord, The Jamesian Republic, Valrifall, Zurkerx
Advertisement