Hence the maybe.
Advertisement
by Dogmeat » Tue Mar 19, 2019 10:21 am
by Jebslund » Tue Mar 19, 2019 10:47 am
by Free Arabian Nation » Tue Mar 19, 2019 11:04 am
by Free Arabian Nation » Tue Mar 19, 2019 11:09 am
by The New California Republic » Tue Mar 19, 2019 11:57 am
by Free Arabian Nation » Tue Mar 19, 2019 11:59 am
by Kaystein » Wed Mar 20, 2019 7:05 pm
by Infected Mushroom » Wed Mar 20, 2019 7:07 pm
by Abarri » Wed Mar 20, 2019 7:32 pm
by Infected Mushroom » Wed Mar 20, 2019 7:33 pm
by Neanderthaland » Wed Mar 20, 2019 7:34 pm
Abarri wrote:More than a thousand bloodthirsty dogs - no matter how good I get as a marksman I probably could not do it. Stability under pressure would get difficult, coupled with the occasional checks at my allies.
Would I accept this mission?
Hell, no, I won't go.
by Infected Mushroom » Wed Mar 20, 2019 7:36 pm
by Farnhamia » Wed Mar 20, 2019 7:42 pm
by Idzequitch » Wed Mar 20, 2019 7:42 pm
by Heloin » Wed Mar 20, 2019 7:48 pm
Infected Mushroom wrote:Can someone explain to me why some posters voted to do the mission but not with the maximum number of allowed allies?
For instance, the votes for 3 allies...
by Infected Mushroom » Wed Mar 20, 2019 8:01 pm
Heloin wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:Can someone explain to me why some posters voted to do the mission but not with the maximum number of allowed allies?
For instance, the votes for 3 allies...
It may just be not everyone reading the OP fully. Or some of the people may not know that many people they'd trust to be able to handle this sort of thing. I don't really got a good answer there though.
by Valtrona » Wed Mar 20, 2019 8:06 pm
by Libertas Omnium Maximus » Wed Mar 20, 2019 8:45 pm
Heloin wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:Can someone explain to me why some posters voted to do the mission but not with the maximum number of allowed allies?
For instance, the votes for 3 allies...
It may just be not everyone reading the OP fully. Or some of the people may not know that many people they'd trust to be able to handle this sort of thing. I don't really got a good answer there though.
by Jebslund » Wed Mar 20, 2019 8:56 pm
Infected Mushroom wrote:Can someone explain to me why some posters voted to do the mission but not with the maximum number of allowed allies?
For instance, the votes for 3 allies...
by Libertas Omnium Maximus » Wed Mar 20, 2019 9:03 pm
Jebslund wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:Can someone explain to me why some posters voted to do the mission but not with the maximum number of allowed allies?
For instance, the votes for 3 allies...
Not wanting to risk the life of anyone I trust that much is all. I don't see myself having even ok odds. I just don't care. If I succeed, I'm set for life. If I fail, I go to heaven. Literally no significant downside.
by Jebslund » Wed Mar 20, 2019 9:21 pm
Libertas Omnium Maximus wrote:Jebslund wrote:Not wanting to risk the life of anyone I trust that much is all. I don't see myself having even ok odds. I just don't care. If I succeed, I'm set for life. If I fail, I go to heaven. Literally no significant downside.
I. Wouldn’t bet on heaven. Remember, you are literally committing mass murder of a life for the exclusive purpose of making money.
by Woodfiredpizzas » Wed Mar 20, 2019 10:02 pm
Advertisement
Advertisement