According to the FBI, yes.
From what I know zero.
Advertisement
by Washington Resistance Army » Thu Mar 21, 2019 12:44 pm
by The Black Forrest » Thu Mar 21, 2019 12:45 pm
by The Black Forrest » Thu Mar 21, 2019 12:46 pm
by Washington Resistance Army » Thu Mar 21, 2019 12:49 pm
by Licana » Thu Mar 21, 2019 12:51 pm
In the 1980s, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) defined mass murderer as someone who “kills four or more people in a single incident (not including himself), typically in a single location” (Krouse and Richardson, 2015). However, the government has never defined mass shooting as a separate category, and there is not yet a universally accepted definition of the term.
Puzikas wrote:Gulf War One was like Slapstick: The War. Except, you know, up to 40,000 people died.
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Never in all my years have I seen someone actually quote the dictionary and still get the definition wrong.
Senestrum wrote:How are KEPs cowardly? Surely the "real man" would in fact be the one firing giant rods of nuclear waste at speeds best described as "hilarious".
by The Black Forrest » Thu Mar 21, 2019 12:52 pm
by The Black Forrest » Thu Mar 21, 2019 12:54 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
Ok. Linky?
No link handy atm, but the FBI definition is 4 or more people killed in a spree attack in a public place.
The 10 bajillion mass shootings a second meme needs to die, it was started by a redditor who openly admitted he loved propaganda and wanted to spread misinformation.
by Washington Resistance Army » Thu Mar 21, 2019 12:58 pm
The Black Forrest wrote:Washington Resistance Army wrote:
No link handy atm, but the FBI definition is 4 or more people killed in a spree attack in a public place.
The 10 bajillion mass shootings a second meme needs to die, it was started by a redditor who openly admitted he loved propaganda and wanted to spread misinformation.
Well? That link I listed showed the numbers of dead and or injured at 4 or more per incident.
by The Black Forrest » Thu Mar 21, 2019 1:03 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
Well? That link I listed showed the numbers of dead and or injured at 4 or more per incident.
The underlined represents the big problem with that definition and how its been used to spread misinformation. Mass Shooting Tracker and GVA for example have used silly ass incidents like kids shooting BB guns at people as "mass shootings" because well they're injuries right?
And god forbid if you ever look into their school shooting numbers, half of them don't even happen on school grounds and most of them don't even involve staff or students.
by Yusseria » Thu Mar 21, 2019 1:43 pm
The Black Forrest wrote:Loben wrote:
2 in how many decades?
oh but by all means, begin limiting rights because its the virtuous thing to do.
Three decades.
We have had 65 since the start of the year.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_m ... es_in_2019
by Licana » Thu Mar 21, 2019 1:44 pm
Yusseria wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
Three decades.
We have had 65 since the start of the year.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_m ... es_in_2019
65? What exactly is Wiki defining as a mass shooting?
There are many definitions of a mass shooting:
Mass Shooting Tracker: 4+ shot in one incident, at one location, at roughly the same time.[4]
Gun Violence Archive: 4+ shot in one incident, excluding the perpetrator(s), at one location, at roughly the same time.[5]
Vox: 4+ shot in one incident, excluding the perpetrator(s), at one location, at roughly the same time.[6][7]
USA Today: 4+ shot and killed in one incident, at one location, at roughly the same time (same as the FBI's "mass killing" definition).[8]
Mother Jones: 3+ shot and killed in one incident, excluding the perpetrator(s), at a public place, excluding gang-related killings.[9]
The Washington Post: 4+ shot and killed in one incident, excluding the perpetrator(s), at a public place, excluding gang-related killings.[10]
Only incidents considered mass shootings by at least two of the above definitions are listed.
Puzikas wrote:Gulf War One was like Slapstick: The War. Except, you know, up to 40,000 people died.
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Never in all my years have I seen someone actually quote the dictionary and still get the definition wrong.
Senestrum wrote:How are KEPs cowardly? Surely the "real man" would in fact be the one firing giant rods of nuclear waste at speeds best described as "hilarious".
by Proctopeo » Thu Mar 21, 2019 1:44 pm
Yusseria wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
Three decades.
We have had 65 since the start of the year.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_m ... es_in_2019
65? What exactly is Wiki defining as a mass shooting?
by The Black Forrest » Thu Mar 21, 2019 1:45 pm
Yusseria wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
Three decades.
We have had 65 since the start of the year.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_m ... es_in_2019
65? What exactly is Wiki defining as a mass shooting?
by Farnhamia » Thu Mar 21, 2019 3:43 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Almonaster Nuevo, Bracadun, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Ineva, Love Peace and Friendship, Rusrunia, The Archregimancy, The Jamesian Republic, The Notorious Mad Jack, Tlizja, Valyxias
Advertisement