Right Wing Discussion Thread XV: A New Hoppe

[Painisia]

Oops, it seems that I confused the word "arranged marriages" for marriages without enforcement from a third partner.


But still, the Incel phenomena is the result of both the lack of social networks and widespread promiscuity, which in turn created a some sort of a "market competition" between individuals regarding sexual capital

[Conserative Morality]

Oops, it seems that I confused the word "arranged marriages" for marriages without enforcement from a third partner.


But still, the Incel phenomena is the result of both the lack of social networks and widespread promiscuity, which in turn created a some sort of a "market competition" between individuals regarding sexual capital

Maybe if you have high standards; standards, mind, that you would be unable to enforce under a system where arranged marriages were the norm. The only real barrier to getting in a relationship is a willingness to enter and participate in that market.

[The South Falls]

But in Dostoevsky's era and region, local ties were still very strong in comparison to other modern countries?

In the countryside, yes, but Dostoevsky was largely writing about the breakdown in local ties in major cities.

Plus, now everything is fast and impersonal. Good face? MATCH! Good boobs? MATCH! 6'4"? MATCH!

[Painisia]

In the countryside, yes, but Dostoevsky was largely writing about the breakdown in local ties in major cities.

Plus, now everything is fast and impersonal. Good face? MATCH! Good boobs? MATCH! 6'4"? MATCH!

We are currently living in the Tinder era. How nice!

Let the Social Darwinist selection of partners begin!

[The South Falls]

Plus, now everything is fast and impersonal. Good face? MATCH! Good boobs? MATCH! 6'4"? MATCH!

We are currently living in the Tinder era. How nice!

Let the Social Darwinist selection of partners begin!

I'm heading to be 6'3 or 6'4. But my face is shit. I'm getting fitter though. I break the system, right?


(btw if all the ugly people get selected out, who's ugly now?)

[Washington Resistance Army]

In the countryside, yes, but Dostoevsky was largely writing about the breakdown in local ties in major cities.

Plus, now everything is fast and impersonal. Good face? MATCH! Good boobs? MATCH! 6'4"? MATCH!

All that matters tbqh

[United Muscovite Nations]

Oops, it seems that I confused the word "arranged marriages" for marriages without enforcement from a third partner.


But still, the Incel phenomena is the result of both the lack of social networks and widespread promiscuity, which in turn created a some sort of a "market competition" between individuals regarding sexual capital

Maybe if you have high standards; standards, mind, that you would be unable to enforce under a system where arranged marriages were the norm. The only real barrier to getting in a relationship is a willingness to enter and participate in that market.

Not necessarily, there are barriers to it in that it's difficult to navigate the market if you're socially inept.

[Torrocca]

Imagine pretending to have knowledge of military matters and then being completely flabbergasted by the simple fact that a defensive network established on a series of high ground that overlooks a river crossing and a set of deliberately-flooded plains is deadly to infantry and vehicles.

You're quite clearly using a strawman because we both know the point I'm making is decisive. You keep harking up the terrain as a decisive feature, but ignore the fact that actually constructing the defenses was done by amateurs and they were able to halt the Soviets despite the RKKA having professional combat engineers and control of the air to know exactly what the Germans were doing; they still got their dick stuck in a meat grinder. That's an absolute embarrassment to the RKKA that 13 year olds were better at war than the professional soldiers in Zhukov's forces.

It'd almost be impressive if it weren't so sad that you're able to continually disregard and ignore the fact that assaulting across flooded plains and a river against a defended high ground is deadly to any assaulting force regardless of who's doing the defending.

How about you try and wade through vast stretches of water and an entire river while some thirteen-year-olds and World War One veterans are shooting guns at you from a hilltop on the other side of a river and see how it goes. I'm sure you with your infinite Aryan supremacy will have no problems whatsoever seizing the day.

It doesn't take a genius to utilize terrain features like high ground, a river, and flood plains to your advantage, chief.

Sure, but that in of itself isn't a successful refutation of the point being made.

Sure it does. You're acting like terrain doesn't affect a military forces' ability to conduct battle when it quite clearly does. That's the whole fucking reason why you're wanking about children and old men besting combat veterans, because you're utterly disregarding that.

Quite evidently, I know more than you seeing as how you continually circlejerk about the superiority of a military force that couldn't even win the only war it ever truly participated in, one which it had started on its own terms at that.

Might I suggest broadcasting your insecurities just a little less? Everyone else has noticed it and pointed it out already.

Lol

As for the point being made, that's not an actual argument. Your argument, at it's core, is circular logic in that it consists of "The Wehrmacht was bad because it lost and it lost because it was bad". Not only does that ignore the specifics of the conflict and the whole spread of academic literature, it also shows an infantile ability to actually engage in debates on it, either from ignornance or simple lack of ability to actually debate.

Seems you're not doing reading too well yourself, since my point goes beyond that snip I made. Evidently, though, according to you and the other Wehraboos, it's a clear-cut case of military supremacy to defeat a bunch of tiny countries along your border, a Poland that you couldn't even properly penetrate until the Soviets arrived two weeks later, and a France that didn't expect and prepare for tanks to be shoved through the Ardennes, and none of what the Allies did could possibly be seen as the utter asswrecking of the Wehrmacht that was actually the case once the Wehrmacht lost its momentum from its stupid, infantile rush to Moscow that was only planned for a total of six weeks' worth of combat.

I'm already having that, Totally Not Oil Exporting Peoples.

An odd statement, given you were in High School just a few weeks ago.

Seems you need to take a good, hard look at my posting history, then, because you're obviously wrong here.

[The South Falls]

Plus, now everything is fast and impersonal. Good face? MATCH! Good boobs? MATCH! 6'4"? MATCH!

All that matters tbqh

Ok, boobs over ass, though that debate can be taken elsewhere.

[United Muscovite Nations]

The face is the most important part.

[Genivaria]

The face is the most important part.

Best part for royal portraits amirite?

[United Muscovite Nations]

The face is the most important part.

Best part for royal portraits amirite?

No, the most important part as to whether a woman is attractive is the face, without trying to sound like a boar.

[Valrifell]

Plus, now everything is fast and impersonal. Good face? MATCH! Good boobs? MATCH! 6'4"? MATCH!

All that matters tbqh

Uncultured

[Washington Resistance Army]

All that matters tbqh

Uncultured

no u

[El-Amin Caliphate]

Exactly. I agree with all that you said.

And hence, the enemy themselves take advantage of this by enemy countries, only to themselves become the oppressors.

That's right. And I think we're definitely seeing a Power Shift back towards Eurasia; and like most declining Powers, America is desperately trying to hold on to its power by the edge of its fingers. Hence its aggressive and increasingly arrogant policies. Its a collapsing empire doubling down on its illusion of power.

AlHamdulillah

I see your bid and I raise you this:

Not enough, m8. First the Americas, then the World!

Nah, this is better:

Remind me yet again why we are debating a bunch of individuals who are deeply disappointed that they were born too late to join the fifth columnist organisation named HIAG?

What's HIAG?

Can I just ask one question.

Does most of the right wing deny climate change, or is that just a bunch of nut jobs who either think it's something to do with "dem globalists" or they're tea party/corporate shills?

The latter.

Well, It seems that I am a fan of making predictions about the future. Both in the societal and political context. So I am going to ask you all about something.

It seems that left-wing students have adopted an almost authoritarian attitude towards other students whose views do not correspond to their own. We are seeing the growth of echo-chambers everywhere. Some universities, in the UK and other countries, have allowed the creation of ideological "safe-spaces". There is also a great marginalization of persons with political views deemed "unmodern" and "incorrect". Of course I do not belong to the alt-right, but now many social liberals and socialists are deeming thinkers such as Jordan Peterson as "far-right". Look at the recent events in New Zealand, and you will see that I am not rambling conspiracy theories here.

As a result of this pluralism of ideological viewpoints being shattered, many have flocked to their own echo-chambers as well. As the rhetoric is getting more aggressive from the Left, the more the Right will strike back. I have observed that far-right echo-chambers have seduced a huge chunk of people into its abyss, mainly young men, whom they feel that everybody in this world have rejected them. I could write more about incels being the result of a harsh market-competition as a result of the Sexual Revolution. But this post will not be dedicated to that. Back to the post, we can already see that far-right echo-chambers are experiencing a huge influx of supporters. As the echo-chambers will inflate, so will the resistance. The progressive Left will try to issue more restrictions and end up looking like autocrats to many people.

After all, millennial socialism is not alone:
https://www.europenowjournal.org/2018/0 ... he-future/

At last, my question will be:

Will there eventually be a huge conflict between far-right authoritarians and progressive socialists in the future?

The thread "Is Fascism Inevitable?" got me thinking a bit. Of course my generation is not prone to far-right seduction. But I think the future will bring many events (mostly climate change, which will have social implications as well) which will cause my next generations to doubt democracy.

Conflict? Yes. Huge conflict? No.

Oh boy, is it time for posters to indirectly fantasize about my brutal murder?

[Torrocca]

All that matters tbqh

Uncultured

The barbaric sexualization vs the cultured facechad

[Conserative Morality]

Not necessarily, there are barriers to it in that it's difficult to navigate the market if you're socially inept.

There is something to be said for plowing ahead despite being inept. t. have seen people somehow enter into relationships against all logic and probability

It helps to not know your own limits I suppose. In any case, that's primarily an entry barrier.

The face is the most important part.

N O S E

[The South Falls]

Not necessarily, there are barriers to it in that it's difficult to navigate the market if you're socially inept.

There is something to be said for plowing ahead despite being inept. t. have seen people somehow enter into relationships against all logic and probability

It helps to not know your own limits I suppose. In any case, that's primarily an entry barrier.

The face is the most important part.

N O S E

For us guys, it's the forehead and nose.

[Luminesa]

Plus, now everything is fast and impersonal. Good face? MATCH! Good boobs? MATCH! 6'4"? MATCH!

We are currently living in the Tinder era. How nice!

Let the Social Darwinist selection of partners begin!

> Tinder era
I want off this ride.

[Ulrich Schmid]

You say tinder era buuut...

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/ar ... on/573949/

[The South Falls]

We are currently living in the Tinder era. How nice!

Let the Social Darwinist selection of partners begin!

> Tinder era
I want off this ride.

Whee bitch, it's E-girl time!

[Luminesa]

> Tinder era
I want off this ride.

Whee bitch, it's E-girl time!

Cease this degeneracy! CEASE I SAY!

[El-Amin Caliphate]

You say tinder era buuut...

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/ar ... on/573949/

AlHamdulillah. Now we just need to get my generation to reclaim abstinence until marriage.

[Conserative Morality]

You say tinder era buuut...

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/ar ... on/573949/

>> millennials are destroying sex too now

Add it to paper towels, cable TV, and diamonds.

[The South Falls]

Whee bitch, it's E-girl time!

Cease this degeneracy! CEASE I SAY!

"Pussy pics in my DM didn't even ask for those"
-The One and Only, Blueface