Right Wing Discussion Thread XV: A New Hoppe

[Benuty]

Ashurism revivalist and Neo-Assyrian revanchism?

Lol...By that standard, are Globalists the most reactionary, since they can be said to take inspiration from the Tower of Babel?

Corporate globalism is hedonist degeneracy, and needs to be destroyed.

[Washington Resistance Army]

I'm a Byzantinophile, Russophile Monarchist, and an Eastern Orthodox Christian. Does it get any more reactionary than that?

Ashurism revivalist and Neo-Assyrian revanchism?

iirc there actually is an Ashurism revival movement amongst some Assyrians, combine that with some nationalist tendencies and yeah it'd be pretty reactionary

[Esheaun Stroakuss]

Imagine thinking you're a reactionary because you're a crypto-Hoppean classical liberal with eugenicist tendencies lmao.

Could you please explain to me what you mean?

[United Muscovite Nations]

Ashurism revivalist and Neo-Assyrian revanchism?

iirc there actually is an Ashurism revival movement amongst some Assyrians, combine that with some nationalist tendencies and yeah it'd be pretty reactionary

Tbh most Assyrians hate those people, who usually are the opposite of reactionary.

[Nea Byzantia]

iirc there actually is an Ashurism revival movement amongst some Assyrians, combine that with some nationalist tendencies and yeah it'd be pretty reactionary

Tbh most Assyrians hate those people, who usually are the opposite of reactionary.

How do you know, if I may ask?

[United Muscovite Nations]

Tbh most Assyrians hate those people, who usually are the opposite of reactionary.

How do you know, if I may ask?

Friends with several Assyrians on FB and IRL.

[Nea Byzantia]

How do you know, if I may ask?

Friends with several Assyrians on FB and IRL.

Makes sense.

[Napkizemlja]

Imagine thinking you're a reactionary because you're a crypto-Hoppean classical liberal with eugenicist tendencies lmao.

Could you please explain to me what you mean?

Hoppean classical liberals with a side order of negative eugenics are not conservatives nor particularly right wing. They're just liberals that are ass-mad that not everyone thinks they can shit over less fortunate people. I actually respect socialists and communists more than them. It's even more hilarious since the systems that proper reactionaries advocated often had some system of poor relief (even if considered inadequate by our own standards). For instance, when monasteries started to close down and other charitable organizations took a downturn during Elizabethan era England, they passed a poor relief law that was to be funded by parishes levying taxes on property owners in order to care for the 'deserving' poor. They only support more reactionary forms of government because they think they universally shared the same horrendous beliefs and views.

[Nea Byzantia]

Could you please explain to me what you mean?

Hoppean classical liberals with a side order of negative eugenics are not conservatives nor particularly right wing. They're just liberals that are ass-mad that not everyone thinks they can shit over less fortunate people. I actually respect socialists and communists more than them. It's even more hilarious since the systems that proper reactionaries advocated often had some system of poor relief (even if considered inadequate by our own standards). For instance, when monasteries started to close down and other charitable organizations took a downturn during Elizabethan era England, they passed a poor relief law that was to be funded by parishes levying taxes on property owners in order to care for the 'deserving' poor. They only support more reactionary forms of government because they think they universally shared the same horrendous beliefs and views.

They should've left the Monasteries be, eh?

[Napkizemlja]

Ashurism revivalist and Neo-Assyrian revanchism?

The only way to truly be reactionary is to be a world state.

The only way to truly be reactionary is to form a hunter-gatherer tribe, live in a cave, and make only vague grunting vocalizations. *nod*

[Napkizemlja]

Hoppean classical liberals with a side order of negative eugenics are not conservatives nor particularly right wing. They're just liberals that are ass-mad that not everyone thinks they can shit over less fortunate people. I actually respect socialists and communists more than them. It's even more hilarious since the systems that proper reactionaries advocated often had some system of poor relief (even if considered inadequate by our own standards). For instance, when monasteries started to close down and other charitable organizations took a downturn during Elizabethan era England, they passed a poor relief law that was to be funded by parishes levying taxes on property owners in order to care for the 'deserving' poor. They only support more reactionary forms of government because they think they universally shared the same horrendous beliefs and views.

They should've left the Monasteries be, eh?

>Tfw you fuck over one of your most important social institutions for looking after the sick and less fortunate.

[Benuty]

The only way to truly be reactionary is to be a world state.

The only way to truly be reactionary is to form a hunter-gatherer tribe, live in a cave, and make only vague grunting vocalizations. *nod*

Hunter-gatherer tribes are far too disorganized, and anti-reactionary for my liking.

[The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord]

The only way to truly be reactionary is to be a world state.

The only way to truly be reactionary is to form a hunter-gatherer tribe, live in a cave, and make only vague grunting vocalizations. *nod*

Btw, may someone please explain the appeal of anarcho-primitivism to me? I don't really see any, tbh.

[Diopolis]

The only way to truly be reactionary is to form a hunter-gatherer tribe, live in a cave, and make only vague grunting vocalizations. *nod*

Btw, may someone please explain the appeal of anarcho-primitivism to me? I don't really see any, tbh.

It's a combination of heavy, heavy revisionism on the actual conditions of hunter-gatherer life, environmentalism/hippyism, and some feminist views that hunter-gatherers lived in a mythical time of equality.

[Diopolis]

Ashurism revivalist and Neo-Assyrian revanchism?

iirc there actually is an Ashurism revival movement amongst some Assyrians

Ok, but are these actual reactionaries? Cause most pagans I've ever run into IRL are on the "crazy hippie who wants something edgier than yoga which lets them do drugs" end, and most pagans I've run into online are cut from sort of the same mold(with exceptions, but those tend to be ones I've met in places which self-segregate into more conservative types).

[Hammer Britannia]

The only way to truly be reactionary is to form a hunter-gatherer tribe, live in a cave, and make only vague grunting vocalizations. *nod*

Btw, may someone please explain the appeal of anarcho-primitivism to me? I don't really see any, tbh.

"Egalitarianism" (which I doubt these societies were truly Egalitarian outside of basic survival) and "Freetime"

Yeah, sure, you had more free time during the Caveman Era. But what exactly could you do with it? Make pots? Masturbate? Get the entire Hepatitis Alphabet?

[Diopolis]

Btw, may someone please explain the appeal of anarcho-primitivism to me? I don't really see any, tbh.

"Egalitarianism" (which I doubt these societies were truly Egalitarian outside of basic survival) and "Freetime"

Yeah, sure, you had more free time during the Caveman Era. But what exactly could you do with it? Make pots? Masturbate? Get the entire Hepatitis Alphabet?

IIRC, surviving hunter gatherer societies show the usual range of gender equality but tend to be much more violent than settled societies.

[Hammer Britannia]

"Egalitarianism" (which I doubt these societies were truly Egalitarian outside of basic survival) and "Freetime"

Yeah, sure, you had more free time during the Caveman Era. But what exactly could you do with it? Make pots? Masturbate? Get the entire Hepatitis Alphabet?

IIRC, surviving hunter gatherer societies show the usual range of gender equality but tend to be much more violent than settled societies.

tbh, I'd rather briefly sacrifice Egalitarianism for medicine and having a job rather than barely surviving

[Diopolis]

IIRC, surviving hunter gatherer societies show the usual range of gender equality but tend to be much more violent than settled societies.

tbh, I'd rather briefly sacrifice Egalitarianism for medicine and having a job rather than barely surviving

I'll sacrifice a bit of egalitarianism for watching more than fifty percent of my kids live to adulthood.

[Bienenhalde]

Catholic solidarity, I guess.

Me whenever a Brit is in close proximity

>TFW North Ireland exists

All of Ireland should be subject to the House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha. Change my mind.

[Communist Zombie Horde]

Could you please explain to me what you mean?

Hoppean classical liberals with a side order of negative eugenics are not conservatives nor particularly right wing. They're just liberals that are ass-mad that not everyone thinks they can shit over less fortunate people. I actually respect socialists and communists more than them. It's even more hilarious since the systems that proper reactionaries advocated often had some system of poor relief (even if considered inadequate by our own standards). For instance, when monasteries started to close down and other charitable organizations took a downturn during Elizabethan era England, they passed a poor relief law that was to be funded by parishes levying taxes on property owners in order to care for the 'deserving' poor. They only support more reactionary forms of government because they think they universally shared the same horrendous beliefs and views.

I may support a deregulated market- but I oppose liberalism in other ways. Socially speaking pre-enlightenment times are better in my opinion. Their monarchies were a good idea and forced obedience and not questioning the higher power helped preserve tradition. Reaction is not an economic system- anyone from Kim Jong Il’s North Korea to Pinochet’s Chile is still reactionary. Economics is another aspect. Older reactionaries support regulation because ancient systems had that. A neoreactionary must supersede such simplicity and support the most perfect and absolutely anti-left government possible. Leftism only exists because of reactionaries compromising on isssues.you just admitted you sympathize with commies- so you aren’t a true reactionary. Reactionaries can have varying beliefs- but none support tyrannical progressivism.

[Communist Zombie Horde]

Last time I took the political compass I got 9, 9.

[LiberNovusAmericae]

[LiberNovusAmericae]

Hoppean classical liberals with a side order of negative eugenics are not conservatives nor particularly right wing. They're just liberals that are ass-mad that not everyone thinks they can shit over less fortunate people. I actually respect socialists and communists more than them. It's even more hilarious since the systems that proper reactionaries advocated often had some system of poor relief (even if considered inadequate by our own standards). For instance, when monasteries started to close down and other charitable organizations took a downturn during Elizabethan era England, they passed a poor relief law that was to be funded by parishes levying taxes on property owners in order to care for the 'deserving' poor. They only support more reactionary forms of government because they think they universally shared the same horrendous beliefs and views.

I may support a deregulated market- but I oppose liberalism in other ways. Socially speaking pre-enlightenment times are better in my opinion. Their monarchies were a good idea and forced obedience and not questioning the higher power helped preserve tradition. Reaction is not an economic system- anyone from Kim Jong Il’s North Korea to Pinochet’s Chile is still reactionary. Economics is another aspect. Older reactionaries support regulation because ancient systems had that. A neoreactionary must supersede such simplicity and support the most perfect and absolutely anti-left government possible. Leftism only exists because of reactionaries compromising on isssues.you just admitted you sympathize with commies- so you aren’t a true reactionary. Reactionaries can have varying beliefs- but none support tyrannical progressivism.

Progressivism isn't the only tyranny. Unquestioned authority with a reactionary social policy is also tyrannical, as it usually involves a government that loves to get involved with people's personal lives.

[Communist Zombie Horde]

(Image)

Not based but respectable. https://www.politicalcompass.org/yourpo ... 5&soc=7.95 I got almost 8,8 but not quite.