NATION

PASSWORD

Right Wing Discussion Thread XV: A New Hoppe

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

To what ethical philosophy do you subscribe?

Ethical Egoism
12
11%
Act Utilitarianism
7
6%
Rule Utilitarianism
7
6%
Kantian Ethics
6
5%
Virtue Ethics
19
17%
Nihilism/YOLO
18
16%
Radical Subjectivism
2
2%
Cultural Relativism
3
3%
Divine Command Theory
18
16%
Natural Law Theory
20
18%
 
Total votes : 112

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35880
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Democratic Socialists

Postby Benuty » Mon May 13, 2019 10:37 pm

The Xenopolis Confederation wrote:
Conserative Morality wrote:On the contrary, many of the men in the South were heirs of what is called the Counter-Enlightenment, a strain of thought arising in the early 19th century to defend slavery on philosophical grounds - they were not stupid men, though they held repugnant and vile positions. Likewise, many of the compromisers in the Republican Party were well-educated men in their own right, and not fools in the least. They simply did not care enough about the plight of African-Americans to put up resistance, when compromise offered them peace on the issue.

Intelligence is no guarantee of being correct or right.

No one who's correct or right believes this.

I hate to be that person, but let's take this rabbit hole even further. You can be a person who is right or correct, and still, be wrong on some things. For example, the man (Norman Borlaug) who pretty much prevented the Malthusian apocalypse from manifesting in the 1970s, and 1980s thought global warming was utter nonsense.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity.
Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
Minzerland II
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5589
Founded: Aug 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Minzerland II » Mon May 13, 2019 10:38 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
Minzerland II wrote:‘I went to a Catholic School ecksdee Im an expert’
‘I once read Bushido and I am an expert on japan’

>> when you never once said you were an expert or anything close, only that you knew enough for a compare and contrast of two very different and very prominent councils

I'm sorry, I literally know nothing. I feel very Socratic at the moment.

That’s really the problem, though, you know nothing, just like every other tradcat or progressive that surfs these stupid forums, but you have an obsession with pretending to be an expert on shit
Last edited by Minzerland II on Mon May 13, 2019 10:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Previous Profile: Minzerland
Donkey Advocate & Herald of Donkeydom
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76675
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Conserative Morality » Mon May 13, 2019 10:39 pm

Genivaria wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Realistic answer: in the ditch cuz both sides hate you lol
Hopeful answer: as a third faction trying to restore normalcy

That's how it ended up last time.

Okay but this time, no lend-lease to the commies.
Truman in 1941 wrote:If we see that Germany is winning we ought to help Russia and if Russia is winning we ought to help Germany, and that way let them kill as many as possible, although I don't want to see Hitler victorious under any circumstances. Neither of them thinks anything of their pledged word.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35880
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Democratic Socialists

Postby Benuty » Mon May 13, 2019 10:39 pm

Genivaria wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Realistic answer: in the ditch cuz both sides hate you lol
Hopeful answer: as a third faction trying to restore normalcy

That's how it ended up last time.

That's in part due to the fact a part of said faction decided to play "neutrality". Had either ideology taken over from the inside of the United States any attempts at a return to normalcy would have died. Instead, the world might have a nightmare cold war scenario between an extremist U.S picking off the corpses of empires, and whoever won.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity.
Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76675
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Conserative Morality » Mon May 13, 2019 10:40 pm

Minzerland II wrote:That’s really the problem, though, you know nothing, just like every other tradcat or progressive that surfs these stupid forums, but you have an obsession with pretending to be an expert on shit

Mind pointing out where I pretended I was an expert? I am sure that you can do so and are not just sore about the fact that I have a different opinion on a matter of theology than you. I am assured of this. Of this I am assured.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Kowani
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16750
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Mon May 13, 2019 10:42 pm

The Xenopolis Confederation wrote:
Conserative Morality wrote:On the contrary, many of the men in the South were heirs of what is called the Counter-Enlightenment, a strain of thought arising in the early 19th century to defend slavery on philosophical grounds - they were not stupid men, though they held repugnant and vile positions. Likewise, many of the compromisers in the Republican Party were well-educated men in their own right, and not fools in the least. They simply did not care enough about the plight of African-Americans to put up resistance, when compromise offered them peace on the issue.

Intelligence is no guarantee of being correct or right.

No one who's correct or right believes this.

Oh, is morality objective again?
Narcissistic (Hedonistic) Nihilist. Yes, I am edgy. I know.
Atheist and still proud of it. Spanish Expat.
Post-Capitalist, Post-Nationalist.
Rights are functionally just privileges society has deemed important.
Prydania wrote:
As a Canadian? I find Americans and their deep, deep distrust of the government to be fundamentally, critically, laughably flawed. I find some aspects of your country completely absurd. The distrust of anything remotely resembling authority is one. The gun problem that stems from that is another.

Seangoli wrote:You are spouting nonsensical drivel with no coherent thought, little logic, and at the end of it all just angry opining at the clouds based on a truly astonishly low level of knowledge or understanding of the subject matter.

0% Capitalism

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63297
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Genivaria » Mon May 13, 2019 10:43 pm

Minzerland II wrote:
Conserative Morality wrote:>> when you never once said you were an expert or anything close, only that you knew enough for a compare and contrast of two very different and very prominent councils

I'm sorry, I literally know nothing. I feel very Socratic at the moment.

That’s really the problem, though, you know nothing, just like every other tradcat or progressive that surfs these stupid forums, but you have an obsession with pretending to be an expert on shit

When did insulting people you disagree with become a valid argument?
General Sherman did nothing wrong, fact.
Liberal Social Democrat.

Proud denouncer of the Taliban.

User avatar
Kowani
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16750
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Mon May 13, 2019 10:44 pm

Genivaria wrote:
Minzerland II wrote:That’s really the problem, though, you know nothing, just like every other tradcat or progressive that surfs these stupid forums, but you have an obsession with pretending to be an expert on shit

When did insulting people you disagree with become a valid argument?

Whenever you don’t have an actual argument, obviously.
Narcissistic (Hedonistic) Nihilist. Yes, I am edgy. I know.
Atheist and still proud of it. Spanish Expat.
Post-Capitalist, Post-Nationalist.
Rights are functionally just privileges society has deemed important.
Prydania wrote:
As a Canadian? I find Americans and their deep, deep distrust of the government to be fundamentally, critically, laughably flawed. I find some aspects of your country completely absurd. The distrust of anything remotely resembling authority is one. The gun problem that stems from that is another.

Seangoli wrote:You are spouting nonsensical drivel with no coherent thought, little logic, and at the end of it all just angry opining at the clouds based on a truly astonishly low level of knowledge or understanding of the subject matter.

0% Capitalism

User avatar
Minzerland II
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5589
Founded: Aug 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Minzerland II » Mon May 13, 2019 10:45 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
Minzerland II wrote:That’s really the problem, though, you know nothing, just like every other tradcat or progressive that surfs these stupid forums, but you have an obsession with pretending to be an expert on shit

Mind pointing out where I pretended I was an expert? I am sure that you can do so and are not just sore about the fact that I have a different opinion on a matter of theology than you. I am assured of this. Of this I am assured.

‘Let me tell you about the VII, japanese lady, it’s really progressive and I only “know” enough to compare with VI but I’m certain my qualifications, that is, my grandmamas library, will attest to the accuracy of my opinion on VII’
Previous Profile: Minzerland
Donkey Advocate & Herald of Donkeydom
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)

User avatar
Minzerland II
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5589
Founded: Aug 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Minzerland II » Mon May 13, 2019 10:46 pm

Genivaria wrote:
Minzerland II wrote:That’s really the problem, though, you know nothing, just like every other tradcat or progressive that surfs these stupid forums, but you have an obsession with pretending to be an expert on shit

When did insulting people you disagree with become a valid argument?

I’m a tradcat you dunce
Previous Profile: Minzerland
Donkey Advocate & Herald of Donkeydom
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76675
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Conserative Morality » Mon May 13, 2019 10:48 pm

Minzerland II wrote:‘Let me tell you about the VII, japanese lady, it’s really progressive

I didn't say that. I didn't say anything close to that. But I see you are very sore about the issue of me having an opinion on anything related to Catholicism.
and I only “know” enough to compare with VI but I’m certain my qualifications, that is, my grandmamas library, will attest to the accuracy of my opinion on VII’

Sorry that you think that reading isn't a valid source of general knowledge.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
North German Realm
Minister
 
Posts: 2789
Founded: Jan 27, 2019
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby North German Realm » Mon May 13, 2019 10:48 pm

The Xenopolis Confederation wrote:
Conserative Morality wrote:On the contrary, many of the men in the South were heirs of what is called the Counter-Enlightenment, a strain of thought arising in the early 19th century to defend slavery on philosophical grounds - they were not stupid men, though they held repugnant and vile positions. Likewise, many of the compromisers in the Republican Party were well-educated men in their own right, and not fools in the least. They simply did not care enough about the plight of African-Americans to put up resistance, when compromise offered them peace on the issue.

Intelligence is no guarantee of being correct or right.

No one who's correct or right believes this.

Or, alternatively, you're not correct and people who do believe this are.
------------------
------------------
------------------
North Germany
Norddeutschland

North German Realm will go through a massive overhaul in the next few months. Please stand by.
Homepage || Overview | Sovereign | Chancellor | Legislature || The World
28 August, 1912
Norddeutsche Morgenpost: North German forces engage Papaun native separatist forces in Kaiser-Wilhelmsland, 179 natives killed and one North German marine lightly injured in chaotic battle. || Jewish Community in Russia accepts North German offer of free passage to British Palestine and North German Rift Valley colony. 135,000 Russian Jews to be resettled in Rift Valley Colony in the next 3 years. || Chinese forces repelled from Tibet after British Indian intervention. Treaty to be signed in Lhasa. || Alaska given limited self-government as a US territory on August 24.

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76675
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Conserative Morality » Mon May 13, 2019 10:49 pm

Minzerland II wrote:
Genivaria wrote:When did insulting people you disagree with become a valid argument?

I’m a tradcat you dunce

Wait... so then... by the standards of your own post, you know nothing as well?

This is getting too Socratic for me. How can you dispute knowledge of an issue if you lack knowledge on the issue?
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35880
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Democratic Socialists

Postby Benuty » Mon May 13, 2019 10:50 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
Minzerland II wrote:I’m a tradcat you dunce

Wait... so then... by the standards of your own post, you know nothing as well?

This is getting too Socratic for me. How can you dispute the knowledge of an issue if you lack knowledge on the issue?

By that measure lack of knowledge is generally considered the supreme form of knowledge as we all know.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity.
Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
Minzerland II
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5589
Founded: Aug 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Minzerland II » Mon May 13, 2019 10:51 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
Minzerland II wrote:‘Let me tell you about the VII, japanese lady, it’s really progressive

I didn't say that. I didn't say anything close to that. But I see you are very sore about the issue of me having an opinion on anything related to Catholicism.
and I only “know” enough to compare with VI but I’m certain my qualifications, that is, my grandmamas library, will attest to the accuracy of my opinion on VII’

Sorry that you think that reading isn't a valid source of general knowledge.

Hmmm ‘liberal reformation of Catholicism’

went to Catholic school tier shit mate
Previous Profile: Minzerland
Donkey Advocate & Herald of Donkeydom
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)

User avatar
Kowani
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16750
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Mon May 13, 2019 10:51 pm

Benuty wrote:
Conserative Morality wrote:Wait... so then... by the standards of your own post, you know nothing as well?

This is getting too Socratic for me. How can you dispute the knowledge of an issue if you lack knowledge on the issue?

By that measure lack of knowledge is generally considered the supreme form of knowledge as we all know.

I love the Socratic method, but god do I hate that particular idea.
Narcissistic (Hedonistic) Nihilist. Yes, I am edgy. I know.
Atheist and still proud of it. Spanish Expat.
Post-Capitalist, Post-Nationalist.
Rights are functionally just privileges society has deemed important.
Prydania wrote:
As a Canadian? I find Americans and their deep, deep distrust of the government to be fundamentally, critically, laughably flawed. I find some aspects of your country completely absurd. The distrust of anything remotely resembling authority is one. The gun problem that stems from that is another.

Seangoli wrote:You are spouting nonsensical drivel with no coherent thought, little logic, and at the end of it all just angry opining at the clouds based on a truly astonishly low level of knowledge or understanding of the subject matter.

0% Capitalism

User avatar
Hanafuridake
Senator
 
Posts: 3747
Founded: Sep 09, 2018
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Hanafuridake » Mon May 13, 2019 10:52 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
Hanafuridake wrote:Are all Catholics and Muslims conservatives?

Is there a point to this question?


Yes, considering it's strange to bring up all religious people when we're specifically talking about conservatives.
Conserative Morality wrote:For someone who talks so much about eastern religions, you seem to know precious little about them. Five of the six OG schools of Hinduism are very compatible with liberal modernity.


You didn't just claim that they were compatible with liberalism, you claimed they were liberal.
That's because Hinduism has had liberal schools from the start,


Which I have a hard time believing because it sounds like the claim that Jesus was a Communist.
Conserative Morality wrote:As they say in modern Japan, born Shinto, marry Christian, die Buddhist. I notice as well that you left out the biggest and most modern Buddhist majority country, in which over half of all Buddhists live. There wouldn't happen to be a reason for that, would there? =^^^)


I'm not actually going to bother getting into the history of the concept of Shintoism and why I think it's an historical meme that's harmful to understanding Japanese history, and how the concept itself developed from Buddhism, because it would be wasted effort.

Because I don't know that much about China's historical relationship with Buddhism past the 9th century? I also left out Korea, Mongolia, etc.
Conserative Morality wrote:I don't know much about the countries listed, so you could be right. But I doubt it.


The Sri Lankan constitution enshrines Buddhism a special place similar to the Church of England in the United Kingdom, Sinhalese nationalism comes from the belief that the Buddha entrusted pure Theravada Buddhism to them and not other countries. Theravada Buddhism in Thailand has been closely tied with the concept of Thainess and there have been calls for it to be made the state religion, one of the duties of the Thai monarchy is to defend the sangha (the Buddhist community). The birth of Burmese nationalism is closely tied to the Young Men's Buddhist Association, and I don't even think I have to get into how Tibet has been ruled for hundreds of years by the avatar of a Buddhist deity.
Time traveling Heian princess trapped in the 21st century
Buddhist Nationalist, Pan-Asianist, Neo-Confucian, Economic Collectivist

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76675
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Conserative Morality » Mon May 13, 2019 10:52 pm

Benuty wrote:
Conserative Morality wrote:Wait... so then... by the standards of your own post, you know nothing as well?

This is getting too Socratic for me. How can you dispute the knowledge of an issue if you lack knowledge on the issue?

By that measure lack of knowledge is generally considered the supreme form of knowledge as we all know.

But if you understand that you lack knowledge, do you no longer lack knowledge?
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35880
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Democratic Socialists

Postby Benuty » Mon May 13, 2019 10:53 pm

Kowani wrote:
Benuty wrote:By that measure lack of knowledge is generally considered the supreme form of knowledge as we all know.

I love the Socratic method, but god do I hate that particular idea.

I mean if Jennifer McCarthy can convince people her son's autism was cured, and totally caused by vaccines then why not? Of course, she could be a misanthrope in disguise wanting to maim, hurt, and kill tens of thousands of people for the absurdity of it all.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity.
Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
Minzerland II
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5589
Founded: Aug 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Minzerland II » Mon May 13, 2019 10:55 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
Minzerland II wrote:I’m a tradcat you dunce

Wait... so then... by the standards of your own post, you know nothing as well?

This is getting too Socratic for me. How can you dispute knowledge of an issue if you lack knowledge on the issue?

duh

we all waste our time talking about this shit and especially progressive, because they know the least
Previous Profile: Minzerland
Donkey Advocate & Herald of Donkeydom
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)

User avatar
Kowani
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16750
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Mon May 13, 2019 10:56 pm

Benuty wrote:
Kowani wrote:I love the Socratic method, but god do I hate that particular idea.

I mean if Jennifer McCarthy can convince people her son's autism was cured, and totally caused by vaccines then why not? Of course, she could be a misanthrope in disguise wanting to maim, hurt, and kill tens of thousands of people for the absurdity of it all.

You see, this is why I hate people. ‘Cause idiots.
Narcissistic (Hedonistic) Nihilist. Yes, I am edgy. I know.
Atheist and still proud of it. Spanish Expat.
Post-Capitalist, Post-Nationalist.
Rights are functionally just privileges society has deemed important.
Prydania wrote:
As a Canadian? I find Americans and their deep, deep distrust of the government to be fundamentally, critically, laughably flawed. I find some aspects of your country completely absurd. The distrust of anything remotely resembling authority is one. The gun problem that stems from that is another.

Seangoli wrote:You are spouting nonsensical drivel with no coherent thought, little logic, and at the end of it all just angry opining at the clouds based on a truly astonishly low level of knowledge or understanding of the subject matter.

0% Capitalism

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35880
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Democratic Socialists

Postby Benuty » Mon May 13, 2019 10:57 pm

Kowani wrote:
Benuty wrote:I mean if Jennifer McCarthy can convince people her son's autism was cured, and totally caused by vaccines then why not? Of course, she could be a misanthrope in disguise wanting to maim, hurt, and kill tens of thousands of people for the absurdity of it all.

You see, this is why I hate people. ‘Cause idiots.

Wait till you read up on the people who "literally eat" air. Those are a fun lot especially since their diets seem to come to a killer conclusion.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity.
Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76675
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Conserative Morality » Mon May 13, 2019 11:00 pm

Minzerland II wrote:Hmmm ‘liberal reformation of Catholicism’

Compared to Vatican I? In a big way. All things are relative.
Hanafuridake wrote:Yes, considering it's strange to bring up all religious people when we're specifically talking about conservatives.

First the conversation is conservatives, then its liberal reformations, now it's conservatives again. I think there's some form of miscommunication here. My point stands, however, as very few conservative Catholics even wish to adhere to Vatican I (although some are still none-too-pleased with Vatican II); conservative Islam in the modern day is deeply inspired by Ottoman ideology or 19th century revivalism from a nationalist and modern point of view; etc, etc.
You didn't just claim that they were compatible with liberalism, you claimed they were liberal.

That's because Hinduism has had liberal schools from the start,


Which I have a hard time believing because it sounds like the claim that Jesus was a Communist.

I misspoke then. I didn't mean to project liberal values onto schools that far predate it, only that there was no need to liberalize something that's already compatible with liberalism.
Last edited by Conserative Morality on Mon May 13, 2019 11:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Kowani
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16750
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Mon May 13, 2019 11:00 pm

Benuty wrote:
Kowani wrote:You see, this is why I hate people. ‘Cause idiots.

Wait till you read up on the people who "literally eat" air. Those are a fun lot especially since their diets seem to come to a killer conclusion.

I had a teacher who drank chlorophyll once. Thought she was a plant.
Narcissistic (Hedonistic) Nihilist. Yes, I am edgy. I know.
Atheist and still proud of it. Spanish Expat.
Post-Capitalist, Post-Nationalist.
Rights are functionally just privileges society has deemed important.
Prydania wrote:
As a Canadian? I find Americans and their deep, deep distrust of the government to be fundamentally, critically, laughably flawed. I find some aspects of your country completely absurd. The distrust of anything remotely resembling authority is one. The gun problem that stems from that is another.

Seangoli wrote:You are spouting nonsensical drivel with no coherent thought, little logic, and at the end of it all just angry opining at the clouds based on a truly astonishly low level of knowledge or understanding of the subject matter.

0% Capitalism

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76675
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Conserative Morality » Mon May 13, 2019 11:00 pm

Minzerland II wrote:
Conserative Morality wrote:Wait... so then... by the standards of your own post, you know nothing as well?

This is getting too Socratic for me. How can you dispute knowledge of an issue if you lack knowledge on the issue?

duh

we all waste our time talking about this shit and especially progressive, because they know the least

0 > 0 > 0

Hmm...
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Bear Stearns, Bloodshade, Cerinda, Diarcesia, Duhon, Geneviev, Gormwood, Greater La Habana Cuba and Miami Shores, Gun Manufacturers, Ifreann, Independent Tunbridge Wells, Kingdom Of The UN, Liriena, Lost Memories, Luminesa, Nakena, Napkizemlja, PR0F1T, Shrillland, South Odreria 2, Stellar Colonies, Telconi, The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp, The New California Republic, The Two Jerseys, Valrifell, Vassenor, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads