Nea Byzantia wrote:The Mujaheddin were backed by the United States to screw over the Soviets
We're they actually mujaahidoon tho?
Conserative Morality wrote:Nea Byzantia wrote:You mean a Puppet Regime...You can dress a pig up in makeup (ie. call a Puppet Regime, a "less hostile, sovereign, native government), but a pig will always be a pig.
Puppet regimes don't openly announce that in a conflict between two allies, they'd side against their 'puppeteers'. Puppet regimes don't kick out our forces because negotiations about their status break down. Puppet regimes are more the CIA's shtick, not the US military.
How about instead of imperialism and the serious high possibility of war crimes (considering America it's probably already happened) we actually help them out?
Of Leben wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:Right now, the CIA isn't in charge of the situation, though it may be quietly exploiting it, and if we had any sense we'd disband them and the NSA because the institutional culture is so fucking corrupt.
Espionage is like a sausage. If you want to keep your taste for, it you don't ask how its done.
In your opinion, how do you believe we should gather intelligence on foreign nations? Do you believe that gathering vital information on foreign enemies is important in any nation worried about self defense? How do you propose we manage the domestic espionage conducted against the U.S.A by our "allies" and by our enemies?
Spying is Haraam and we shouldn't be doing that, at least not when we aren't at war with anyone. We should focus of developing our own country and helping out/working with others if they want it.