NATION

PASSWORD

UK citizen Jarrah Begum dies in Syrian refugee camp

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Yusseria
Minister
 
Posts: 2342
Founded: Feb 02, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Yusseria » Fri Mar 08, 2019 6:45 pm

Shofercia wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:Showing up with a massive warship in active war zone would mean only one thing to the Russians.

The child was also a Dutch citizen. Why aren’t they getting shit for this?


Showing up with a warship could mean at least three things: recon, unloading special forces, or that thing you're thinking of. Anyways, regarding the Dutch, you're right, they should be. And it is primarily the mother's fault. But also the fault of the Brits, even if it's just a bit. Thankfully, Yusseria's the only one, thus far, saying that it's awesome that the baby died. Gives me hope for most of NSG.

Thanks for the strawman, but I'm not saying it's awesome. I'm just saying nothing of value was lost.
Yusseria - The Prussia of NationStates
There is nothing wrong with Islamaphobia

User avatar
Terruana
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1959
Founded: Nov 18, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Terruana » Fri Mar 08, 2019 6:47 pm

Dooom35796821595 wrote:
Terruana wrote:
Are you suggesting that if a child is born to a UK citizen in a country without an embassy, that child is then stuck there forever because they can't get to an embassy?


They can get on a plane and fly back to the UK, since they won’t be in a warzone.


So if the country is in a state of war, the only legal option for the British government is to do nothing and wait for the war to end before they try to get their citizens to safety?
Political Compass Score:
Economic Left/Right: -6.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.15

User avatar
Greater Germany
Diplomat
 
Posts: 546
Founded: Mar 24, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Greater Germany » Fri Mar 08, 2019 6:48 pm

Thermodolia wrote:A shame but it’s not the UK’s fault the mother was a fucking retard

yup
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
Not a NatSoc (Nazi) nation, am influenced as a July 20 Widerstand state with a constitutional monarchy. Previously used Wirmer's "Resistance" flag but found my current one and like it.

User avatar
Dooom35796821595
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9309
Founded: Sep 11, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Dooom35796821595 » Fri Mar 08, 2019 6:48 pm

Terruana wrote:
Andsed wrote:Well yeah to issue a passport legally they need an embassy. So why should the UK break their laws to save one random ass kid?


Because the kid was a UK citizen. And I find it hard to believe that in that situation, there is nothing the government can legally do to get that citizen back to the UK


There is nothing the government could legally have done do to get that child back to the UK.
When life gives you lemons, you BURN THEIR HOUSE DOWN!
Anything can be justified if it is cool. If at first you don't succeed, destroy all in your way.
"Your methods are stupid! Your progress has been stupid! Your intelligence is stupid! For the sake of the mission, you must be terminated!”

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42051
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Fartsniffage » Fri Mar 08, 2019 6:48 pm

Terruana wrote:
Andsed wrote:Well yeah to issue a passport legally they need an embassy. So why should the UK break their laws to save one random ass kid?


Because the kid was a UK citizen. And I find it hard to believe that in that situation, there is nothing the government can legally do to get that citizen back to the UK


You do realise that the British government strongly advises against travel to countries where there is no diplomatic relationship for exactly this reason? Because there's basically fuck all they can do other than send in the gunboats if things go south?

User avatar
Shofercia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31342
Founded: Feb 22, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Shofercia » Fri Mar 08, 2019 6:48 pm

Yusseria wrote:
Shofercia wrote:
Showing up with a warship could mean at least three things: recon, unloading special forces, or that thing you're thinking of. Anyways, regarding the Dutch, you're right, they should be. And it is primarily the mother's fault. But also the fault of the Brits, even if it's just a bit. Thankfully, Yusseria's the only one, thus far, saying that it's awesome that the baby died. Gives me hope for most of NSG.

Thanks for the strawman, but I'm not saying it's awesome. I'm just saying nothing of value was lost.


I think that babies have intrinsic values. But that's just me. Weren't you a baby once?
Come, learn about Russian Culture! Bring Vodka and Ushanka. Interested in Slavic Culture? Fill this out.
Stonk Power! (North) Kosovo is (a de facto part of) Serbia and Crimea is (a de facto part of) Russia
I used pronouns until the mods made using wrong pronouns warnable, so I use names instead; if you see malice there, that's entirely on you, and if pronouns are no longer warnable, I'll go back to using them

User avatar
Christian Confederation
Senator
 
Posts: 4331
Founded: Dec 12, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Christian Confederation » Fri Mar 08, 2019 6:49 pm

Terruana wrote:
Christian Confederation wrote:Regardless of how bad it is, this thread should be renamed- "Son of ex UK citizen who defected to ISIS dies after mother was to stubborn and stupid to let her child live a normal life in the UK."

Because the child is not a UK citizen because he doesn't get birth right citizenship because his mother gave up her citizenship when she defected to ISIS.


Except that this thread is about the child, not the mother.

You miss my point.
The child is not a UK citizen because he doesn't get birthright citizenship because his mother gave up her citizenship when she defected to ISIS.

What happens when you renounce your citizenship.
https://www.usa.gov/renounce-lose-citizenship
Defecting is an act of treason.

lex soli: By birth in the UK or a qualified British Overseas Territory to a parent who is a British citizen at the time of the birth, or to a parent who is settled in the UK or that Overseas Territory
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/British ... _Territory

Mother is not a UK citizen so he doesn't apply. (If we were using normal logic but it's 2019 so we don't.)
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.indepe ... html%3famp
Founder of the moderate alliance
Open to new members, and embassy's.
My telagram box is always open for productive conversation.
IRL political views center right/ right.

User avatar
Terruana
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1959
Founded: Nov 18, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Terruana » Fri Mar 08, 2019 6:49 pm

Thermodolia wrote:
Terruana wrote:
If you have a link to me suggesting they send the Royal Navy to Syria, please do link it. It would at least explain why you've gotten so fixated on boats...



Terruana wrote:
Or a Royal Navy battleship diverted to bring them back to the UK...


Don’t pin this on me buddy


Where in that do I mention Syria? I'm quite clearly responding to the assertion that citizens abroad do not get transported home...
Political Compass Score:
Economic Left/Right: -6.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.15

User avatar
Sahansahiye Iran
Minister
 
Posts: 2386
Founded: May 14, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Sahansahiye Iran » Fri Mar 08, 2019 6:49 pm

Terruana wrote:
Andsed wrote:Well yeah to issue a passport legally they need an embassy. So why should the UK break their laws to save one random ass kid?


Because the kid was a UK citizen. And I find it hard to believe that in that situation, there is nothing the government can legally do to get that citizen back to the UK

Alright, question. Why should this single person have been given an exception to a policy that is clearly stated and has been in place for almost a decade?

The letter also notes that the consent of Ms. Begum was required. Did Ms. Begum make clear her consent for this?
User formerly known as United Islamic Commonwealth and al-Ismailiyya.
Also known as Khosrow, Zarhust, or Lanian Empire.
Praetorian Prefect of EMN
Senator of EMN
Legatus of the Marian Legion
Integrator of EMN
A GCR Supreme General of the Contrarians
Iranian civic/cultural nationalist
Monarchist
Zoroastrian

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42051
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Fartsniffage » Fri Mar 08, 2019 6:50 pm

Christian Confederation wrote:
Terruana wrote:
Except that this thread is about the child, not the mother.

You miss my point.
The child is not a UK citizen because he doesn't get birthright citizenship because his mother gave up her citizenship when she defected to ISIS.

What happens when you renounce your citizenship.
https://www.usa.gov/renounce-lose-citizenship
Defecting is an act of treason.

lex soli: By birth in the UK or a qualified British Overseas Territory to a parent who is a British citizen at the time of the birth, or to a parent who is settled in the UK or that Overseas Territory
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/British ... _Territory

Mother is not a UK citizen so he doesn't apply. (If we were using normal logic but it's 2019 so we don't.)
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.indepe ... html%3famp


The British government disagrees with you. The kid was a British citizen.

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 78485
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Fri Mar 08, 2019 6:50 pm

Terruana wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:



Don’t pin this on me buddy


Where in that do I mention Syria? I'm quite clearly responding to the assertion that citizens abroad do not get transported home...

Do you really think we are that stupid? We know what you implied. There’s only one place a warship could be diverted to pick up a certain kid
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Sahansahiye Iran
Minister
 
Posts: 2386
Founded: May 14, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Sahansahiye Iran » Fri Mar 08, 2019 6:50 pm

Christian Confederation wrote:
Terruana wrote:
Except that this thread is about the child, not the mother.

You miss my point.
The child is not a UK citizen because he doesn't get birthright citizenship because his mother gave up her citizenship when she defected to ISIS.

What happens when you renounce your citizenship.
https://www.usa.gov/renounce-lose-citizenship
Defecting is an act of treason.

lex soli: By birth in the UK or a qualified British Overseas Territory to a parent who is a British citizen at the time of the birth, or to a parent who is settled in the UK or that Overseas Territory
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/British ... _Territory

Mother is not a UK citizen so he doesn't apply. (If we were using normal logic but it's 2019 so we don't.)
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.indepe ... html%3famp

Legally, he was a citizen, mate. She never formally renounced her citizenship and it was take after the child had already been born.
User formerly known as United Islamic Commonwealth and al-Ismailiyya.
Also known as Khosrow, Zarhust, or Lanian Empire.
Praetorian Prefect of EMN
Senator of EMN
Legatus of the Marian Legion
Integrator of EMN
A GCR Supreme General of the Contrarians
Iranian civic/cultural nationalist
Monarchist
Zoroastrian

User avatar
Terruana
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1959
Founded: Nov 18, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Terruana » Fri Mar 08, 2019 6:50 pm

Christian Confederation wrote:
Terruana wrote:
Except that this thread is about the child, not the mother.

You miss my point.
The child is not a UK citizen because he doesn't get birthright citizenship because his mother gave up her citizenship when she defected to ISIS.

What happens when you renounce your citizenship.
https://www.usa.gov/renounce-lose-citizenship
Defecting is an act of treason.

lex soli: By birth in the UK or a qualified British Overseas Territory to a parent who is a British citizen at the time of the birth, or to a parent who is settled in the UK or that Overseas Territory
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/British ... _Territory

Mother is not a UK citizen so he doesn't apply. (If we were using normal logic but it's 2019 so we don't.)
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.indepe ... html%3famp


Cool, but all mainstream sources (and the UK government) acknowledge that he was a U.K. Citizen so I'm not going to change the title.
Political Compass Score:
Economic Left/Right: -6.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.15

User avatar
Shofercia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31342
Founded: Feb 22, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Shofercia » Fri Mar 08, 2019 6:51 pm

Thermodolia wrote:
Shofercia wrote:
Why didn't the Brits or Dutch work through the Red Crescent to rescue the kid? Not sure if you want the Kurdish one though... Erdogan.

The refugee camp was apparently operated by the Kurdish Red Crescent. So that’s why I said that. And I don’t know why they didn’t. It’s not like the don’t do back chanel deals with terrorists


Operation: Sneak the Kid In, now commencing! Starring Alexa Vega...
Come, learn about Russian Culture! Bring Vodka and Ushanka. Interested in Slavic Culture? Fill this out.
Stonk Power! (North) Kosovo is (a de facto part of) Serbia and Crimea is (a de facto part of) Russia
I used pronouns until the mods made using wrong pronouns warnable, so I use names instead; if you see malice there, that's entirely on you, and if pronouns are no longer warnable, I'll go back to using them

User avatar
Novum Imperium Atlanticum
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 108
Founded: Mar 21, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Novum Imperium Atlanticum » Fri Mar 08, 2019 6:54 pm

She has committed treason by joining IS, therefore as tragic as the child's death is, it can be laid at her feet. As for her husband, he too is a traitor to his own state for joining a terrorist organisation. Their "marriage" is null and void, for it has been done under the umbrella of the IS caliphate which no one recognised and they were both still minors when they got married, or at least she was. Therefore, let the Kurds string them all up and give those brave warriors their own state as a reward. They were the boots on the ground in this war. As for her and the whole of the leftovers of IS or whatever other name they went by, something pertaining to a rope and a powl... Back in Nuremberg they knew how to take care of those Nazi bigwigs. Why not do the same with this vermin? Any children should be adopted by gay couples after having undergone a de-islamisation, just to stick it to the survivors, who will be left to rot in the desert. No returning to Europe for them. Let them stew in their own muck and filth.

User avatar
Terruana
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1959
Founded: Nov 18, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Terruana » Fri Mar 08, 2019 6:54 pm

Thermodolia wrote:
Terruana wrote:
Where in that do I mention Syria? I'm quite clearly responding to the assertion that citizens abroad do not get transported home...

Do you really think we are that stupid? We know what you implied. There’s only one place a warship could be diverted to pick up a certain kid


As I have already explained, I was referencing past events in Libya as an example of UK citizens abroad getting transported home by the Royal Navy. This was in response to the assertion that UK citizens abroad would not get "a plane ticket home" courtesy of the government. I was not talking about Syria, or I would have specifically said "I think they should have sent the Royal Navy to Syria".
Are you intentionally misrepresenting what I've said because it's easier than actually responding to my points?
Political Compass Score:
Economic Left/Right: -6.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.15

User avatar
Dooom35796821595
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9309
Founded: Sep 11, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Dooom35796821595 » Fri Mar 08, 2019 6:56 pm

Terruana wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:



Don’t pin this on me buddy


Where in that do I mention Syria? I'm quite clearly responding to the assertion that citizens abroad do not get transported home...


https://www.gov.uk/government/publicati ... ad-summary

2. Summary
We expect British people to take responsibility for themselves and their safety while overseas. This guide highlights some of the main things you can do to prepare for your travel and stay safe abroad and what help we can provide if you do get into difficulty.
3. Staying safe overseas
Ensure you check travel advice and sign up for country specific travel advice updates. Our travel advice will help you to form your own judgements about travelling or living in a particular country, and alert you to any new information. Keep an eye on news reports of any problems in the area you are visiting. Follow @FCOtravel on Twitter and @FCOtravel on Facebook for updates from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO)
Choosing to go to a country against our travel advice may seriously restrict any help we can provide and may also mean that your travel insurance is not valid2

This is from the British government guide to consular assistance available to citizens overseas. Notice it said you should take responsibility for your own safety, and that travailing to dangerous areas could severely limit the assistance that an be provided.
When life gives you lemons, you BURN THEIR HOUSE DOWN!
Anything can be justified if it is cool. If at first you don't succeed, destroy all in your way.
"Your methods are stupid! Your progress has been stupid! Your intelligence is stupid! For the sake of the mission, you must be terminated!”

User avatar
Terruana
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1959
Founded: Nov 18, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Terruana » Fri Mar 08, 2019 6:56 pm

Sahansahiye Iran wrote:
Terruana wrote:
Because the kid was a UK citizen. And I find it hard to believe that in that situation, there is nothing the government can legally do to get that citizen back to the UK

Alright, question. Why should this single person have been given an exception to a policy that is clearly stated and has been in place for almost a decade?

The letter also notes that the consent of Ms. Begum was required. Did Ms. Begum make clear her consent for this?


Ms Begum was never presented with the choice, because the government refused to consider the family's request for help because it was "the wrong department".

And why should a child be left to die just because he can't physically get to an embassy?
Political Compass Score:
Economic Left/Right: -6.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.15

User avatar
Terruana
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1959
Founded: Nov 18, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Terruana » Fri Mar 08, 2019 6:57 pm

Dooom35796821595 wrote:
Terruana wrote:
Where in that do I mention Syria? I'm quite clearly responding to the assertion that citizens abroad do not get transported home...


https://www.gov.uk/government/publicati ... ad-summary

2. Summary
We expect British people to take responsibility for themselves and their safety while overseas. This guide highlights some of the main things you can do to prepare for your travel and stay safe abroad and what help we can provide if you do get into difficulty.
3. Staying safe overseas
Ensure you check travel advice and sign up for country specific travel advice updates. Our travel advice will help you to form your own judgements about travelling or living in a particular country, and alert you to any new information. Keep an eye on news reports of any problems in the area you are visiting. Follow @FCOtravel on Twitter and @FCOtravel on Facebook for updates from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO)
Choosing to go to a country against our travel advice may seriously restrict any help we can provide and may also mean that your travel insurance is not valid2

This is from the British government guide to consular assistance available to citizens overseas. Notice it said you should take responsibility for your own safety, and that travailing to dangerous areas could severely limit the assistance that an be provided.


It's hard to see how that would apply to a 3 week old baby who had no choice in being born abroad
Political Compass Score:
Economic Left/Right: -6.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.15

User avatar
Sahansahiye Iran
Minister
 
Posts: 2386
Founded: May 14, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Sahansahiye Iran » Fri Mar 08, 2019 6:59 pm

Terruana wrote:
Sahansahiye Iran wrote:Alright, question. Why should this single person have been given an exception to a policy that is clearly stated and has been in place for almost a decade?

The letter also notes that the consent of Ms. Begum was required. Did Ms. Begum make clear her consent for this?


Ms Begum was never presented with the choice, because the government refused to consider the family's request for help because it was "the wrong department".

And why should a child be left to die just because he can't physically get to an embassy?

No. They didn't. They told them to go to a different department because they have no bloody legal authority to help them. The government as a whole never refused anything.

Because the UK has clearly stated for a decade now that if you get fucked in Syria, they can't help you. It's really not that hard. Why are you so intent on blaming the British government instead of those actually responsible for it?
User formerly known as United Islamic Commonwealth and al-Ismailiyya.
Also known as Khosrow, Zarhust, or Lanian Empire.
Praetorian Prefect of EMN
Senator of EMN
Legatus of the Marian Legion
Integrator of EMN
A GCR Supreme General of the Contrarians
Iranian civic/cultural nationalist
Monarchist
Zoroastrian

User avatar
Terruana
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1959
Founded: Nov 18, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Terruana » Fri Mar 08, 2019 6:59 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Terruana wrote:
Because the kid was a UK citizen. And I find it hard to believe that in that situation, there is nothing the government can legally do to get that citizen back to the UK


You do realise that the British government strongly advises against travel to countries where there is no diplomatic relationship for exactly this reason? Because there's basically fuck all they can do other than send in the gunboats if things go south?


It's not like the 3 week old baby was ignoring their advice though. It's not his fault he was born in a shitty situation, and the fact that the government advises against travel to countries without diplomatic relations seem fairly irrelevant to him personally
Political Compass Score:
Economic Left/Right: -6.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.15

User avatar
Christian Confederation
Senator
 
Posts: 4331
Founded: Dec 12, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Christian Confederation » Fri Mar 08, 2019 7:00 pm

Terruana wrote:
Christian Confederation wrote:You miss my point.
The child is not a UK citizen because he doesn't get birthright citizenship because his mother gave up her citizenship when she defected to ISIS.

What happens when you renounce your citizenship.
https://www.usa.gov/renounce-lose-citizenship
Defecting is an act of treason.

lex soli: By birth in the UK or a qualified British Overseas Territory to a parent who is a British citizen at the time of the birth, or to a parent who is settled in the UK or that Overseas Territory
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/British ... _Territory

Mother is not a UK citizen so he doesn't apply. (If we were using normal logic but it's 2019 so we don't.)
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.indepe ... html%3famp


Cool, but all mainstream sources (and the UK government) acknowledge that he was a U.K. Citizen so I'm not going to change the title.

Still it is insane that people think people who left there Country to join a enemy are intitled to be let back in, as far as I m councerned this wouldn't have happened if the mom wasn't a LITARAL idiot and move to Syria to Mary a terorists and join ISIS.
Founder of the moderate alliance
Open to new members, and embassy's.
My telagram box is always open for productive conversation.
IRL political views center right/ right.

User avatar
Terruana
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1959
Founded: Nov 18, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Terruana » Fri Mar 08, 2019 7:01 pm

Sahansahiye Iran wrote:
Terruana wrote:
Ms Begum was never presented with the choice, because the government refused to consider the family's request for help because it was "the wrong department".

And why should a child be left to die just because he can't physically get to an embassy?

No. They didn't. They told them to go to a different department because they have no bloody legal authority to help them. The government as a whole never refused anything.

Because the UK has clearly stated for a decade now that if you get fucked in Syria, they can't help you. It's really not that hard. Why are you so intent on blaming the British government instead of those actually responsible for it?


So you're saying it's the baby's fault for ignoring the government advice?
I fully acknowledge that his mother is also responsible for his death, but the UK government also has blood on their hands for refusing to help.
Political Compass Score:
Economic Left/Right: -6.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.15

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42051
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Fartsniffage » Fri Mar 08, 2019 7:01 pm

Terruana wrote:
Sahansahiye Iran wrote:Alright, question. Why should this single person have been given an exception to a policy that is clearly stated and has been in place for almost a decade?

The letter also notes that the consent of Ms. Begum was required. Did Ms. Begum make clear her consent for this?


Ms Begum was never presented with the choice, because the government refused to consider the family's request for help because it was "the wrong department".

And why should a child be left to die just because he can't physically get to an embassy?


That isn't true. They directed the family solicitor to the correct department and told him what information would be needed to make the request. They also pointed out that there hadn't been diplomatic relations with Syria since 2011 so the British government was very limited in terms of what help could be provided.

https://twitter.com/MohammedAkunjee/sta ... 5943268353

User avatar
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34994
Founded: Dec 18, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Fri Mar 08, 2019 7:04 pm

A small soul dies beacuse of government incompetence.

May she rest in peace.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Big Eyed Animation, Cerespasia, Kreushia, Nanatsu no Tsuki, The Celtics, The Greater Ohio Valley, The Vooperian Union, Uvolla

Advertisement

Remove ads