Intersectionalism reaching full madness?

[Chessmistress]

So, using me as an example, you wouldn't have a problem with an LGBT person that is in a monogamous relationship?

I wouldn't have a problem with it, maybe personally, but I don't think there should be any discrimination against it outside of religious institutions, and I think there should be affirming religious institutions to meet the needs of LGB people.

The T is different because I really don't think it's that related to LGB, and I'm a lot more open to T being not only morally permissible, but also religiously permissible.

This is exactly the same position on the matter that they have in Iran.

[United Muscovite Nations]

I wouldn't have a problem with it, maybe personally, but I don't think there should be any discrimination against it outside of religious institutions, and I think there should be affirming religious institutions to meet the needs of LGB people.

The T is different because I really don't think it's that related to LGB, and I'm a lot more open to T being not only morally permissible, but also religiously permissible.

This is exactly the same position on the matter that they have in Iran.

And?

[RiderSyl]

I wouldn't have a problem with it, maybe personally, but I don't think there should be any discrimination against it outside of religious institutions, and I think there should be affirming religious institutions to meet the needs of LGB people.

The T is different because I really don't think it's that related to LGB, and I'm a lot more open to T being not only morally permissible, but also religiously permissible.

This is exactly the same position on the matter that they have in Iran.

No, it's not. It's only seen as religiously permissible. Morally, it's still frowned upon.