An alliance between neoconservatives and anti-soviet left-wingers to sabotage left-wing policies and encourage austerity and privatization?
Is anyone else confused as fuck?
Advertisement

by Valrifell » Sat Apr 13, 2019 1:09 pm

by Liriena » Sat Apr 13, 2019 1:10 pm
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Ostroeuropa » Sat Apr 13, 2019 1:10 pm

by Ostroeuropa » Sat Apr 13, 2019 1:11 pm

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Sat Apr 13, 2019 1:13 pm
Valrifell wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
They collaborated with them and understood that when a soviet reared its head, they were to present a united front with the conservatives.
An alliance between neoconservatives and anti-soviet left-wingers to sabotage left-wing policies and encourage austerity and privatization?
Is anyone else confused as fuck?

by Liriena » Sat Apr 13, 2019 1:14 pm
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Ostroeuropa » Sat Apr 13, 2019 1:17 pm
Valrifell wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
They collaborated with them and understood that when a soviet reared its head, they were to present a united front with the conservatives.
An alliance between neoconservatives and anti-soviet left-wingers to sabotage left-wing policies and encourage austerity and privatization?
Is anyone else confused as fuck?

by Vassenor » Sat Apr 13, 2019 1:17 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:Liriena wrote:Really?
Dude.
Clement Atlee, founder of the NHS?
Socialist?
Used the fucking army to shoot at communist led strikes. In Britain. At British communists.
(Non-communist led strikes? No prob.).
Labour, even during its full tilt to the left, was explicitly an anti-communist party. That's why the purges during the 80s were allowed to go ahead, because they were infiltrators. (Or so goes the accusation at least.).

by Liriena » Sat Apr 13, 2019 1:21 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:Now it's a matter of collaborating against social extremists.
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Sat Apr 13, 2019 1:21 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:Valrifell wrote:
An alliance between neoconservatives and anti-soviet left-wingers to sabotage left-wing policies and encourage austerity and privatization?
Is anyone else confused as fuck?
No, it's more that from 1945 until about 1980, the left and the right collaborated against the extremes, and from 1980 til about 2008, collaborated with neoliberals until they were revealed to be crap at economics.
Now it's a matter of collaborating against social extremists.

by Ostroeuropa » Sat Apr 13, 2019 1:24 pm

by Liriena » Sat Apr 13, 2019 1:27 pm
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Ifreann » Sat Apr 13, 2019 1:30 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:Sargon will be a good MEP and I wish him the best, cmv.
He opposes corruption, feminism, and government power while supporting welfare, the bus, and so on. He opposes porn bans,drug bans and the like. He understands the threat posed by multiculturalism and Saudi influence, has MRM sympathies though not as many as i would prefer, and so on. He will be better than 99% of politicians. His opposition to the EU is unfortunate, but I trust him to do his duty if elected and we remain rather than being a wrecker.
Souseiseki wrote:my only exposure to sargon is the time he refused to watch a video on why he was misreading a study because it wasn't 5 minutes long and various other examples of him failing to read articles. it's possible he is a secret good guy and i have merely been poisoned by the left, but i would be very very surprised if that was actually the case.
i do remember him making a "why the tories are ruining your country" video though which was v funny because it pissed off his tory audience.
e: holy shit when you realize that sargon of akkad is now ontopic for UK politics aahahahaha current year

by Ostroeuropa » Sat Apr 13, 2019 1:33 pm
Ifreann wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:Sargon will be a good MEP and I wish him the best, cmv.
He opposes corruption, feminism, and government power while supporting welfare, the bus, and so on. He opposes porn bans,drug bans and the like. He understands the threat posed by multiculturalism and Saudi influence, has MRM sympathies though not as many as i would prefer, and so on. He will be better than 99% of politicians. His opposition to the EU is unfortunate, but I trust him to do his duty if elected and we remain rather than being a wrecker.
Best of luck to Carl of Swindon in overcoming his long history of saying shit that plays well with his audience of internet edgelords, but also having literally no other basis on which to appeal to British voters. Should be fun to see him try to explain that it was actually a good thing when he told Jess Phillips he wouldn't even rape her, prompting a barrage of rape threats against her, or that it was actually very smart and rational to send people gay porn on Twitter and very unfair for him to be banned for doing that, or maybe he'll have another go at diagnosing feminists with Autism. Truly we are in for some very mad bantz indeed.Souseiseki wrote:my only exposure to sargon is the time he refused to watch a video on why he was misreading a study because it wasn't 5 minutes long and various other examples of him failing to read articles. it's possible he is a secret good guy and i have merely been poisoned by the left, but i would be very very surprised if that was actually the case.
i do remember him making a "why the tories are ruining your country" video though which was v funny because it pissed off his tory audience.
e: holy shit when you realize that sargon of akkad is now ontopic for UK politics aahahahaha current year
Truly we live in the worst of all possible timelines.

by Ifreann » Sat Apr 13, 2019 1:46 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:Ifreann wrote:Best of luck to Carl of Swindon in overcoming his long history of saying shit that plays well with his audience of internet edgelords, but also having literally no other basis on which to appeal to British voters. Should be fun to see him try to explain that it was actually a good thing when he told Jess Phillips he wouldn't even rape her, prompting a barrage of rape threats against her, or that it was actually very smart and rational to send people gay porn on Twitter and very unfair for him to be banned for doing that, or maybe he'll have another go at diagnosing feminists with Autism. Truly we are in for some very mad bantz indeed.
Truly we live in the worst of all possible timelines.
You appear to be laboring under the impression that this little islington set style of progressive crap is normal.
This is not normal. This is a cultural pathology.
The polls are very consistent on the matter, everyone is sick of feminism, of progressivism, and so on. It is only through insularity, gatekeeping, and infiltration of institutions that it persists.
The public will side with people like Trump rather than people like Jess Phillips, let alone Benjamin. The press will smugly do what you have just now, bring up all this crap about him and argue it makes him unacceptable, and the public will do what they did the last dozen times progressive journalists tried that shit.
Vote for it.
I think what needs to be said, what people don't have the courage to say, is that nobody cares. Nobody cares about what your faction has to say anymore. You'd think backing Nazis would have delivered the message but apparently not. Pick someone you disagree with, and that's our boy, back em up to the hilt, even if it's something like brexit. We're sick of you.
We're sick of you talking. We're sick of you dominating the discussion.
You're driving society fucking insane, like "Let's do Brexit, fuck it" insane.
How about this.
Sack half of the feminists in the country and replace them with an alternative.
Then maybe people might listen to what you have to say for once instead of being like "Okay well those people occupying our country and forcing us to do what they say without alternative have picked another front for us to fight on."


by Vassenor » Sat Apr 13, 2019 1:49 pm
Ifreann wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
You appear to be laboring under the impression that this little islington set style of progressive crap is normal.
This is not normal. This is a cultural pathology.
The polls are very consistent on the matter, everyone is sick of feminism, of progressivism, and so on. It is only through insularity, gatekeeping, and infiltration of institutions that it persists.
The public will side with people like Trump rather than people like Jess Phillips, let alone Benjamin. The press will smugly do what you have just now, bring up all this crap about him and argue it makes him unacceptable, and the public will do what they did the last dozen times progressive journalists tried that shit.
Re-elect Jess Phillips?Vote for it.
Don't know if you've noticed, the EU doesn't have an electoral college. Carl can't win by following in the footsteps of Trump and getting fewer votes.I think what needs to be said, what people don't have the courage to say, is that nobody cares. Nobody cares about what your faction has to say anymore. You'd think backing Nazis would have delivered the message but apparently not. Pick someone you disagree with, and that's our boy, back em up to the hilt, even if it's something like brexit. We're sick of you.
We're sick of you talking. We're sick of you dominating the discussion.
You're driving society fucking insane, like "Let's do Brexit, fuck it" insane.
How about this.
Sack half of the feminists in the country and replace them with an alternative.
Then maybe people might listen to what you have to say for once instead of being like "Okay well those people occupying our country and forcing us to do what they say without alternative have picked another front for us to fight on."

by Ostroeuropa » Sat Apr 13, 2019 1:50 pm
Ifreann wrote: *snip*

by Ifreann » Sat Apr 13, 2019 2:18 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:Ifreann wrote: *snip*
Cute picture, but it's more a case of not allowing you to dictate the conversation without reciprocation anymore, rejecting the "No rules for the lion and many for the sheep" dynamic.
When a misandrist and anti-white movement throws out objections, they're not ones we should pay attention to. It's like deciding; "Oh wow, all those misandrists and racists hate this person? They sound good."
This is the problem. It's why fascism is rising. Your faction has actively brought about a set of situations where racism and sexism are guaranteed, and it's a matter of demographic conflict and self-interest.
Your picture may as well be mocking the notion that someone is "Making others go to war with them." by shooting at them.

by Kavagrad » Sat Apr 13, 2019 2:22 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:Ifreann wrote: *snip*
Cute picture, but it's more a case of not allowing you to dictate the conversation without reciprocation anymore, rejecting the "No rules for the lion and many for the sheep" dynamic.
When a misandrist and anti-white movement throws out objections, they're not ones we should pay attention to. It's like deciding; "Oh wow, all those misandrists and racists hate this person? They sound good."
This is the problem. It's why fascism is rising. Your faction has actively brought about a set of situations where racism and sexism are guaranteed, and it's a matter of demographic conflict and self-interest.
Your picture may as well be mocking the notion that someone is "Making others go to war with them." by shooting at them.

by Juristonia » Sat Apr 13, 2019 2:36 pm

Liriena wrote:Say what you will about fascists: they are remarkably consistent even after several decades of failing spectacularly elsewhere.
Ifreann wrote:Indeed, as far as I can recall only one poster has ever supported legalising bestiality, and he was fucking his cat and isn't welcome here any more, in no small part, I imagine, because he kept going on about how he was fucking his cat.
Cannot think of a name wrote:Anyway, I'm from gold country, we grow up knowing that when people jump up and down shouting "GOLD GOLD GOLD" the gold is gone and the only money to be made is in selling shovels.
And it seems to me that cryptocurrency and NFTs and such suddenly have a whooooole lot of shovel salespeople.

by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Sat Apr 13, 2019 2:38 pm
Juristonia wrote:Oh goodie, I was wondering when we were gonna get another "Hurrdurr fenunemists" temper tantrum. :roll:

by The Greater Ohio Valley » Sat Apr 13, 2019 2:43 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:The polls are very consistent on the matter, everyone is sick of feminism, of progressivism, and so on.

by Greater vakolicci haven » Sat Apr 13, 2019 2:48 pm
Kavagrad wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
Cute picture, but it's more a case of not allowing you to dictate the conversation without reciprocation anymore, rejecting the "No rules for the lion and many for the sheep" dynamic.
When a misandrist and anti-white movement throws out objections, they're not ones we should pay attention to. It's like deciding; "Oh wow, all those misandrists and racists hate this person? They sound good."
This is the problem. It's why fascism is rising. Your faction has actively brought about a set of situations where racism and sexism are guaranteed, and it's a matter of demographic conflict and self-interest.
Your picture may as well be mocking the notion that someone is "Making others go to war with them." by shooting at them.
That you'd rather jump into bed with fascists and the far-right than progressives tells us all we need to know.

by The Huskar Social Union » Sat Apr 13, 2019 2:50 pm
Juristonia wrote:Oh goodie, I was wondering when we were gonna get another "Hurrdurr fenunemists" temper tantrum.

by Juristonia » Sat Apr 13, 2019 2:50 pm
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Who are doing more harm to society at present?
Liriena wrote:Say what you will about fascists: they are remarkably consistent even after several decades of failing spectacularly elsewhere.
Ifreann wrote:Indeed, as far as I can recall only one poster has ever supported legalising bestiality, and he was fucking his cat and isn't welcome here any more, in no small part, I imagine, because he kept going on about how he was fucking his cat.
Cannot think of a name wrote:Anyway, I'm from gold country, we grow up knowing that when people jump up and down shouting "GOLD GOLD GOLD" the gold is gone and the only money to be made is in selling shovels.
And it seems to me that cryptocurrency and NFTs and such suddenly have a whooooole lot of shovel salespeople.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Avstrikland, Corporate Collective Salvation, Dakran, Dimetrodon Empire, Fartsniffage, Galactic Powers, Greater Guantanamo, Ifreann, Piscina, Pizza Friday Forever91, Port Caverton, Rary, Tarsonis, Tropical Isles, Trump Almighty, Twenty Community, Utquiagvik
Advertisement