Advertisement

by An Alan Smithee Nation » Mon Jul 08, 2019 2:54 am

by Vassenor » Mon Jul 08, 2019 2:55 am

by Dumb Ideologies » Mon Jul 08, 2019 3:22 am
Vassenor wrote:Also looks like Richard Bacon is getting brigaded on Twitter because he criticised Farage and Co and the snowflake squad can't take it.

by Hirota » Mon Jul 08, 2019 3:55 am
Since they've only stood in one election it's pretty difficult to say with any certainty what their party base is, so this probably unverifiable (and therefore we shouldn't make conclusions at this stage) but here you go.Souseiseki wrote:Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Perhaps before leaping to judgement about something of which you know absolutely nothing, you should wait until the platform is released? It's vastly different from that of ukip under Farage, as the Brexit party takes its support from many wings of British politics.
i have seen zero evidence that the brexit party's base is not mostly UKIP voters and disillusioned conservative voters. perhaps that's what you meant? another party rebranding to attract conservatives after UKIP again tragically had its reputation ruined due to various scandals?


by Ifreann » Mon Jul 08, 2019 4:25 am
An Alan Smithee Nation wrote:So Liam Fox is going to apologise to Ivanka for the leaked diplomatic emails. Is he admitting guilt?
My guess would be it was someone in Boris's camp trying to embarrass and undermine Jeremy Hunt.

by Duhon » Mon Jul 08, 2019 5:30 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:A report on the far-right has said that basically the reason the far-right is surging across the world is that almost nobody except the far-right is engaged in theoretical discussion, thought generation, argument generation and so on, on the issues of migration, because everyone else has been terrorized into silence on the topic and doesn't talk about it beyond repeating the same tired and failing nonsense in order to avoid being called racist.
It doesn't matter that the far-rights discourse is shite, it's still a discourse, and thus driving the discussion. On the other side there is no discourse, only thought terminating maxims and cliches alongside vilifying anyone who tries to actually start a discourse.
Like if our entire discussion of the economy was between a bunch of highly aggressive and abusive people who just screamed in your face that you're a fucking Nazi, tried to get you fired, threatened you with violence and so on, if you didn't just bleat "capitalism good. work harder. capitalism good." over and over, and on the other side was;
"All these problems? Jews. You see those low wages? Jews. Here's the mechanism by which they do it.".
The latter begins to dominate thought on the topic and discussion of it, because the former is not an actual discourse, but a demand for the total absence of one.

by Duhon » Mon Jul 08, 2019 5:36 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:Salandriagado wrote:
Please, stop this bullshit of referring to things without fucking linking to them.
https://www.isdglobal.org/wp-content/up ... by-ISD.pdfThe far right is able to take ownership of the ‘grey zone’ around contentious issues like migration because politicians and society are less willing to take on the role of thought leaders in these areas for fear of public outcry and outrage

by Dumb Ideologies » Mon Jul 08, 2019 5:48 am
Duhon wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:A report on the far-right has said that basically the reason the far-right is surging across the world is that almost nobody except the far-right is engaged in theoretical discussion, thought generation, argument generation and so on, on the issues of migration, because everyone else has been terrorized into silence on the topic and doesn't talk about it beyond repeating the same tired and failing nonsense in order to avoid being called racist.
It doesn't matter that the far-rights discourse is shite, it's still a discourse, and thus driving the discussion. On the other side there is no discourse, only thought terminating maxims and cliches alongside vilifying anyone who tries to actually start a discourse.
Like if our entire discussion of the economy was between a bunch of highly aggressive and abusive people who just screamed in your face that you're a fucking Nazi, tried to get you fired, threatened you with violence and so on, if you didn't just bleat "capitalism good. work harder. capitalism good." over and over, and on the other side was;
"All these problems? Jews. You see those low wages? Jews. Here's the mechanism by which they do it.".
The latter begins to dominate thought on the topic and discussion of it, because the former is not an actual discourse, but a demand for the total absence of one.
That the far-right talks about migration doesn't mean that "everyone else has been "terrified into silence" by the "tired and failing nonsense" on the issue -- that just means they both have the virtue of novelty and have the backing of people now entrenching themselves in power and are using the rhetoric and politics of tribalism to divvy up their nations, making it easier for them to govern in pieces.
Also, yes, you cannot be against xenophobia and yet be for policies that would promote said xenophobia or at least penalize foreigners for their foreignness, over and above any quality they may happen to have or not have.

by Duhon » Mon Jul 08, 2019 6:10 am
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Duhon wrote:
That the far-right talks about migration doesn't mean that "everyone else has been "terrified into silence" by the "tired and failing nonsense" on the issue -- that just means they both have the virtue of novelty and have the backing of people now entrenching themselves in power and are using the rhetoric and politics of tribalism to divvy up their nations, making it easier for them to govern in pieces.
Also, yes, you cannot be against xenophobia and yet be for policies that would promote said xenophobia or at least penalize foreigners for their foreignness, over and above any quality they may happen to have or not have.
You can, however, be against xenophobia and in favour of pro-integration policies rather than self-segregating multiculturalism which widens racial divides.

by Dumb Ideologies » Mon Jul 08, 2019 6:24 am
Duhon wrote:Dumb Ideologies wrote:
You can, however, be against xenophobia and in favour of pro-integration policies rather than self-segregating multiculturalism which widens racial divides.
I see nothing wrong with that in principle, despite my own inclination to live and let live. My pique is with the emphasis.

by Ifreann » Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:23 am

by Hurdergaryp » Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:34 am
Ifreann wrote:The idea that the far-right are the only ones having discussions about migration issues is like saying that Saiwania is the only one discussing labour rights. No one else is interested in enslaving people again, just like no one outside the far-right is interested in banning foreigners. Taking an extreme position and finding that almost everyone rejects your proposals outright doesn't mean that they are all mindless sheep are you are the only one generating thoughts.

by Dumb Ideologies » Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:36 am

by An Alan Smithee Nation » Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:49 am

by An Alan Smithee Nation » Mon Jul 08, 2019 8:17 am

by The Huskar Social Union » Mon Jul 08, 2019 8:35 am
An Alan Smithee Nation wrote:Kate Hooey not standing in the next general election. Good.

by 5 kingdoms of Britannia » Mon Jul 08, 2019 8:39 am

by Nakena » Mon Jul 08, 2019 8:41 am
Duhon wrote:Also, yes, you cannot be against xenophobia and yet be for policies that would promote said xenophobia or at least penalize foreigners for their foreignness, over and above any quality they may happen to have or not have.

by The Huskar Social Union » Mon Jul 08, 2019 8:46 am

by Bear Stearns » Mon Jul 08, 2019 8:50 am

by Vassenor » Mon Jul 08, 2019 8:55 am

by The Free Joy State » Mon Jul 08, 2019 8:57 am

by Bear Stearns » Mon Jul 08, 2019 8:59 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Arval Va, Galloism, Giovanniland, Ifreann, Maryland-Delaware, The Jamesian Republic, Tunzei, Valyxias, Vassenor
Advertisement