Advertisement
by The Huskar Social Union » Sun May 12, 2019 4:56 am
by The Xenopolis Confederation » Sun May 12, 2019 5:13 am
Definitely Not Trumptonium wrote:First time a party to the right of the Conservatives has surpassed them in the history of polling (20% vs 19%)
Like Melanie Philipps said, perhaps Brexit simply was the expiry date of the Tory party. It's not really conservative anymore and people are looking for something different. There's a great big hole in the area where Thatcher won 44% of the population.
by Little Tin Hat » Sun May 12, 2019 5:13 am
Souseiseki wrote:Westminster voting intention:
LAB: 27% (-6)
BREX: 20% (+6)
CON: 19% (-4)
LDEM: 14% (+7)
CHUK: 7% (-2)
GRN: 5% (+2)
UKIP: 3% (-2)
via @ComRes
by Definitely Not Trumptonium » Sun May 12, 2019 5:17 am
The Xenopolis Confederation wrote:Definitely Not Trumptonium wrote:First time a party to the right of the Conservatives has surpassed them in the history of polling (20% vs 19%)
Like Melanie Philipps said, perhaps Brexit simply was the expiry date of the Tory party. It's not really conservative anymore and people are looking for something different. There's a great big hole in the area where Thatcher won 44% of the population.
To which poll are you referring?
by The Xenopolis Confederation » Sun May 12, 2019 5:23 am
Definitely Not Trumptonium wrote:The Xenopolis Confederation wrote:To which poll are you referring?
The one in the post just below yours.
Since the 1990s the Conservatives turned more authoritarian, more globalist, more socially liberal, anti-family and more pro-regulation. Core conservative voters want just the opposite of all that.
They want more privacy and independence in their lives, not less. They don't see themselves responsible for funding other countries with aid at quintuple the GDP% that the US does, they don't see the Tory party as something that protects conservative values especially with feminists like Rudd, they don't protect the nuclear family and enhance ludicrous 50/50 divorce laws and they regulate more and more of the economy except for large business.
by Vassenor » Sun May 12, 2019 5:50 am
Definitely Not Trumptonium wrote:The Xenopolis Confederation wrote:To which poll are you referring?
The one in the post just below yours.
Since the 1990s the Conservatives turned more authoritarian, more globalist, more socially liberal, anti-family and more pro-regulation. Core conservative voters want just the opposite of all that.
They want more privacy and independence in their lives, not less. They don't see themselves responsible for funding other countries with aid at quintuple the GDP% that the US does, they don't see the Tory party as something that protects conservative values especially with feminists like Rudd, they don't protect the nuclear family and enhance ludicrous 50/50 divorce laws and they regulate more and more of the economy except for large business.
by Philjia » Sun May 12, 2019 6:04 am
Vassenor wrote:Definitely Not Trumptonium wrote:
The one in the post just below yours.
Since the 1990s the Conservatives turned more authoritarian, more globalist, more socially liberal, anti-family and more pro-regulation. Core conservative voters want just the opposite of all that.
They want more privacy and independence in their lives, not less. They don't see themselves responsible for funding other countries with aid at quintuple the GDP% that the US does, they don't see the Tory party as something that protects conservative values especially with feminists like Rudd, they don't protect the nuclear family and enhance ludicrous 50/50 divorce laws and they regulate more and more of the economy except for large business.
How are we defining "anti-family" today?
by Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States » Sun May 12, 2019 6:22 am
Definitely Not Trumptonium wrote:The Xenopolis Confederation wrote:To which poll are you referring?
The one in the post just below yours.
Since the 1990s the Conservatives turned more authoritarian, more globalist, more socially liberal, anti-family and more pro-regulation. Core conservative voters want just the opposite of all that.
They want more privacy and independence in their lives, not less. They don't see themselves responsible for funding other countries with aid at quintuple the GDP% that the US does, they don't see the Tory party as something that protects conservative values especially with feminists like Rudd, they don't protect the nuclear family and enhance ludicrous 50/50 divorce laws and they regulate more and more of the economy except for large business.
by Souseiseki » Sun May 12, 2019 7:31 am
by Philjia » Sun May 12, 2019 7:34 am
Souseiseki wrote:Little Tin Hat wrote:
was this accidentally on purpose CHUKa Umuna or does the bloke have as big an ego as Bliar?
the party is called Change UK. under normal circumstances such a party would be called CUK. pollsters and commentators have taken to calling it CHUK or UKC in order to avoid referring to it as CUK. and yes, it's for exactly the reason you think it is. this is not a joke. welcome to british politics.
by The Huskar Social Union » Sun May 12, 2019 7:37 am
Souseiseki wrote:Little Tin Hat wrote:
was this accidentally on purpose CHUKa Umuna or does the bloke have as big an ego as Bliar?
the party is called Change UK. under normal circumstances such a party would be called CUK. pollsters and commentators have taken to calling it CHUK or UKC in order to avoid referring to it as CUK. and yes, it's for exactly the reason you think it is. this is not a joke. welcome to british politics.
by Philjia » Sun May 12, 2019 7:47 am
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Souseiseki wrote:
the party is called Change UK. under normal circumstances such a party would be called CUK. pollsters and commentators have taken to calling it CHUK or UKC in order to avoid referring to it as CUK. and yes, it's for exactly the reason you think it is. this is not a joke. welcome to british politics.
You brits what are you like
your decisions effect me
Fuck.
by Chan Island » Sun May 12, 2019 8:12 am
Souseiseki wrote:Little Tin Hat wrote:
was this accidentally on purpose CHUKa Umuna or does the bloke have as big an ego as Bliar?
the party is called Change UK. under normal circumstances such a party would be called CUK. pollsters and commentators have taken to calling it CHUK or UKC in order to avoid referring to it as CUK. and yes, it's for exactly the reason you think it is. this is not a joke. welcome to british politics.
Conserative Morality wrote:"It's not time yet" is a tactic used by reactionaries in every era. "It's not time for democracy, it's not time for capitalism, it's not time for emancipation." Of course it's not time. It's never time, not on its own. You make it time. If you're under fire in the no-man's land of WW1, you start digging a foxhole even if the ideal time would be when you *aren't* being bombarded, because once you wait for it to be 'time', other situations will need your attention, assuming you survive that long. If the fields aren't furrowed, plow them. If the iron is not hot, make it so. If society is not ready, change it.
by The Xenopolis Confederation » Sun May 12, 2019 8:28 am
Valrifell wrote:Before I was all for a Change UK and Liberal-Democrat coalition, but now my dreams of CUK-LD have died.
by Chan Island » Sun May 12, 2019 8:36 am
The Xenopolis Confederation wrote:Valrifell wrote:Before I was all for a Change UK and Liberal-Democrat coalition, but now my dreams of CUK-LD have died.
Can someone get me the lowdown on the UK Lib Dems because I don't know much about them, and they appear to be very different from the Australian Lib Dems.
Conserative Morality wrote:"It's not time yet" is a tactic used by reactionaries in every era. "It's not time for democracy, it's not time for capitalism, it's not time for emancipation." Of course it's not time. It's never time, not on its own. You make it time. If you're under fire in the no-man's land of WW1, you start digging a foxhole even if the ideal time would be when you *aren't* being bombarded, because once you wait for it to be 'time', other situations will need your attention, assuming you survive that long. If the fields aren't furrowed, plow them. If the iron is not hot, make it so. If society is not ready, change it.
by Thermodolia » Sun May 12, 2019 8:38 am
Souseiseki wrote:Westminster voting intention:
LAB: 27% (-6)
BREX: 20% (+6)
CON: 19% (-4)
LDEM: 14% (+7)
CHUK: 7% (-2)
GRN: 5% (+2)
UKIP: 3% (-2)
via @ComResFPTP Projection: Labour majority government
Lab : 330 (+68)
Con : 112 (-206)
LDem : 79 (+67)
SNP : 53 (+18)
BRX : 51 (+51)
PC : 4 (=)
Grn : 2 (+1)
Ind : 1 (+1)
lmao look at this shit
27% of the vote welp guess you run the fucking country now
PEOPLE WILL ACTUALLY DEFEND THIS SYSTEM
If the system was PR:
LAB: 176 (-70)
BREX: 130 (+130)
CON: 124 (-189)
LDEM: 91 (+80)
CHUK: 46 (+46)
GRN: 33 (+32)
SNP: 30 (-5)
UKIP: 20 (+22)
by The Huskar Social Union » Sun May 12, 2019 8:39 am
by The Xenopolis Confederation » Sun May 12, 2019 8:41 am
Chan Island wrote:The Xenopolis Confederation wrote:Can someone get me the lowdown on the UK Lib Dems because I don't know much about them, and they appear to be very different from the Australian Lib Dems.
The Liberal Democrats are a socially liberal but economically conservative third party that traditionally has always been the party of protest in the UK (backed in part by taking radical stances on constitutional questions like the electoral system and the house of lords). That status died though when in 2010 they entered a coalition with the Conservative party and during the coalition voted for a rise in university tuition fees (the single biggest promise they had in 2010).
In 2015 they were almost wiped out but have have since been making big gains being the most unapologetically pro-EU party (though that status now is contested with 2 other parties) in the parliament. Currently their leader is Vince Cable, who was the business secretary during the 2010-15 coalition government (though he has announced plans to retire).
by An Alan Smithee Nation » Sun May 12, 2019 8:44 am
by Phoenicaea » Sun May 12, 2019 8:45 am
by An Alan Smithee Nation » Sun May 12, 2019 8:46 am
The Xenopolis Confederation wrote:Chan Island wrote:
The Liberal Democrats are a socially liberal but economically conservative third party that traditionally has always been the party of protest in the UK (backed in part by taking radical stances on constitutional questions like the electoral system and the house of lords). That status died though when in 2010 they entered a coalition with the Conservative party and during the coalition voted for a rise in university tuition fees (the single biggest promise they had in 2010).
In 2015 they were almost wiped out but have have since been making big gains being the most unapologetically pro-EU party (though that status now is contested with 2 other parties) in the parliament. Currently their leader is Vince Cable, who was the business secretary during the 2010-15 coalition government (though he has announced plans to retire).
I don't understand. If they're fiscally conservative but socially liberal, why are they the most pro-EU party there is?
by Ostroeuropa » Sun May 12, 2019 9:02 am
Chan Island wrote:Souseiseki wrote:
the party is called Change UK. under normal circumstances such a party would be called CUK. pollsters and commentators have taken to calling it CHUK or UKC in order to avoid referring to it as CUK. and yes, it's for exactly the reason you think it is. this is not a joke. welcome to british politics.
The really sad part of the whole CHUK business is that now in the next general election, we can't have something utterly magnificent if one of the 11 holds their seat.
CUK - HOLD.
Now it'll just be CHUK - HOLD
Truly we live in the darkest timeline.
by The Xenopolis Confederation » Sun May 12, 2019 9:06 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: 0rganization, Aggicificicerous, Cerula, Dimetrodon Empire, Elejamie, Floofybit, Hypron, Ifreann, Kowani, Plan Neonie, Shrillland, The Kharkivan Cossacks, Tungstan, Valrifall
Advertisement