Actually after the Samurai charge at Shiroyama the Japanese were impressed with the Samurai bravery and devotion to a cause so they implemented parts of Bushido into the army and in everyday life.
Advertisement
by Andsed » Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:17 am
by Ifreann » Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:21 am
by Orange-Transvaal » Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:23 am
KnightInLand wrote:Orange-Transvaal wrote:Hey, I was just wondering what the NS community thought about how an Axis victory in WW2
My only rule for this discussion is that I want an at least good answer, not "HiTlEr DuMb. jUSt dONt iNvaDe rUsSiA iN WiNteR."
Otherwise, post anything you want, as I am interested in your answers.
Really the only way they could’ve won was by not invading Russia and by possibly expanding the African theatre of the war.
by Sicaris » Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:23 am
KnightInLand wrote:Orange-Transvaal wrote:Hey, I was just wondering what the NS community thought about how an Axis victory in WW2
My only rule for this discussion is that I want an at least good answer, not "HiTlEr DuMb. jUSt dONt iNvaDe rUsSiA iN WiNteR."
Otherwise, post anything you want, as I am interested in your answers.
Really the only way they could’ve won was by not invading Russia and by possibly expanding the African theatre of the war.
by The New California Republic » Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:24 am
Internationalist Bastard wrote:Baltenstein wrote:
On several occasions, Japanese forces left their own entrenched positions to banzai charge the American positions, with predictably desastrous results.
Pretty much the only thing these charges achieved was a brief initial phase of shock from the American forces - who didn't expect their enemies to act so suicidally insane - before they were usually killed to a man.
Honestly suicide charges are the the worst thing you can do tactically.
by United Universal Union » Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:24 am
by Orange-Transvaal » Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:24 am
by Infected Mushroom » Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:36 am
by United Universal Union » Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:37 am
Infected Mushroom wrote:^
So are you telling me that even I would/could have made better political decisions as head of state of Germany/Japan????
No way right?
by Alvecia » Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:40 am
Infected Mushroom wrote:^
So are you telling me that even I would/could have made better political decisions as head of state of Germany/Japan????
No way right?
by Infected Mushroom » Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:41 am
Alvecia wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:^
So are you telling me that even I would/could have made better political decisions as head of state of Germany/Japan????
No way right?
Hindsight is 20/20
Besides, given your obsession with honor, I reckon you probably would've made many of the same decisions or worse. Particularly as Japan.
by Grenartia » Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:53 am
by Free Arabian Nation » Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:56 am
by Prusenreich » Mon Feb 25, 2019 9:00 am
by Washington Resistance Army » Mon Feb 25, 2019 9:01 am
KnightInLand wrote:Orange-Transvaal wrote:Hey, I was just wondering what the NS community thought about how an Axis victory in WW2
My only rule for this discussion is that I want an at least good answer, not "HiTlEr DuMb. jUSt dONt iNvaDe rUsSiA iN WiNteR."
Otherwise, post anything you want, as I am interested in your answers.
Really the only way they could’ve won was by not invading Russia and by possibly expanding the African theatre of the war.
by United Universal Union » Mon Feb 25, 2019 9:04 am
Washington Resistance Army wrote:KnightInLand wrote:
Really the only way they could’ve won was by not invading Russia and by possibly expanding the African theatre of the war.
Invading the USSR absolutely was the right call, giving the Red Army more time to modernize and launch their own attack on Europe would have been foolhardy in the extreme. Even up until 42/43 the war in the east was very plausibly winnable for the Germans but a few big strategic mistakes sealed their fate.
by Andsed » Mon Feb 25, 2019 9:04 am
Washington Resistance Army wrote:KnightInLand wrote:
Really the only way they could’ve won was by not invading Russia and by possibly expanding the African theatre of the war.
Invading the USSR absolutely was the right call, giving the Red Army more time to modernize and launch their own attack on Europe would have been foolhardy in the extreme. Even up until 42/43 the war in the east was very plausibly winnable for the Germans but a few big strategic mistakes sealed their fate.
by Grenartia » Mon Feb 25, 2019 9:06 am
United Universal Union wrote:Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Invading the USSR absolutely was the right call, giving the Red Army more time to modernize and launch their own attack on Europe would have been foolhardy in the extreme. Even up until 42/43 the war in the east was very plausibly winnable for the Germans but a few big strategic mistakes sealed their fate.
No it wasn't, there was physically no way Germany could win, it was running out of oil and was fighting a zealous enemy that got stronger every day, it was a fight of attrition that Germany could not have won under any circumstance, that is, unless they stopped being Nazis.
by United Universal Union » Mon Feb 25, 2019 9:08 am
Grenartia wrote:United Universal Union wrote:No it wasn't, there was physically no way Germany could win, it was running out of oil and was fighting a zealous enemy that got stronger every day, it was a fight of attrition that Germany could not have won under any circumstance, that is, unless they stopped being Nazis.
I literally just outlined a scenario where they could defeat the USSR without stopping being Nazis.
by Washington Resistance Army » Mon Feb 25, 2019 9:08 am
United Universal Union wrote:Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Invading the USSR absolutely was the right call, giving the Red Army more time to modernize and launch their own attack on Europe would have been foolhardy in the extreme. Even up until 42/43 the war in the east was very plausibly winnable for the Germans but a few big strategic mistakes sealed their fate.
No it wasn't, there was physically no way Germany could win, it was running out of oil and was fighting a zealous enemy that got stronger every day, it was a fight of attrition that Germany could not have won under any circumstance, that is, unless they stopped being Nazis.
by Germanyt » Mon Feb 25, 2019 9:08 am
by United Universal Union » Mon Feb 25, 2019 9:10 am
Washington Resistance Army wrote:United Universal Union wrote:No it wasn't, there was physically no way Germany could win, it was running out of oil and was fighting a zealous enemy that got stronger every day, it was a fight of attrition that Germany could not have won under any circumstance, that is, unless they stopped being Nazis.
It being a war of attrition really isn't a strong point against Germany. Even up until Berlin itself the Wehrmacht and SS were still killing the Soviets at factors of 2-1 more often than not. Oil could have been an easy enough to rectify problem if Case Blue hadn't been bungled entirely.
Germany's biggest problem is the US coming along with Little Boy and Fat Man because there's no defense they have against that.
by The New California Republic » Mon Feb 25, 2019 9:10 am
Germanyt wrote:By not gassing people and focusing those resources on the war effort. Or just by not invading neighbors.
by Inmeria » Mon Feb 25, 2019 9:18 am
by Grenartia » Mon Feb 25, 2019 9:19 am
You realize how hard it is to keep such an army supplied, aye? They wouldn't have anything to eat since the Soviet Bread basket was the Ukraine, good luck reaching it, they would run out of oil and die.
Sorry, but that scenario is impossible, and it still makes them stop being Nazis, because Nazis wanted Danzig back, they cannot avoid invading Poland unless they stop being Nazis.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Great United States, Niemence, Philjia, Tesseris, The New South Hardwick, UMi-NazKapp Group, Will Burtz
Advertisement