Advertisement
by Tornado Queendom » Thu Feb 21, 2019 10:46 am
by Sapientia Et Bellum » Thu Feb 21, 2019 10:50 am
Mystic Warriors wrote:Fine by me. Just trying to stop people from hiding hate under different names.
"We are fascists, the heirs of fascism, the fascism of the year 2000" - Il Duce Gianfranco Fini
by Len Hyet » Thu Feb 21, 2019 10:52 am
by New Sukberia » Thu Feb 21, 2019 10:52 am
Prusenreich wrote:This will backfire and make people dislike Israel more as banning disagreeing with Israel would cause people to become more suspicious
by Free Arabian Nation » Thu Feb 21, 2019 10:52 am
by Len Hyet » Thu Feb 21, 2019 10:53 am
by Andsed » Thu Feb 21, 2019 10:57 am
Mystic Warriors wrote:Fine by me. Just trying to stop people from hiding hate under different names.
by El-Amin Caliphate » Thu Feb 21, 2019 11:04 am
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)
by Sebenica » Thu Feb 21, 2019 11:04 am
by Crylante » Thu Feb 21, 2019 11:11 am
by Proctopeo » Thu Feb 21, 2019 11:22 am
Western Vale Confederacy wrote:Vassenor wrote:So basically they want to make it illegal to protest against a political entity.
Yeah, no.
On the other hand, many are using the "it’s anti-Zionism, not anti-Semitism!" excuse to actually be anti-Semitic, so it really isn’t flowers and pink on the other side of the fence.
by Vassenor » Thu Feb 21, 2019 11:23 am
Tornado Queendom wrote:Obviously, France hates free speech. Germany is their ***kisser, when they SHOULD just scrap their relations with France. Italy and the Visegrad are the future, and I wish that Italy ran the EU. This is because Italy is the only major EU power to be able to say "No" to the stupid EU demands, and they are willing to fight back when France screws up and Germany tries to copy that screw-up.
by SD_Film Artists » Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:03 pm
Bogan Laker wrote:Is it just me, or has there been a lot of threads about freedom of speech and stuff?
Evil Dictators Happyland wrote:I'd support this law if and only if it is written so that it only prohibited using anti-Zionism as a proxy for anti-semitism. Under no circumstances should it be illegal to legitimately criticize a nation's government, but at the same time, the writers of the law do have something of a point.
by Trumptonium1 » Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:09 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:I'm sure banning criticism of Israel will totally not fuel anti-Semitic conspiracy theories and help the far right.
by Tornado Queendom » Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:11 pm
Vassenor wrote:Tornado Queendom wrote:Obviously, France hates free speech. Germany is their ***kisser, when they SHOULD just scrap their relations with France. Italy and the Visegrad are the future, and I wish that Italy ran the EU. This is because Italy is the only major EU power to be able to say "No" to the stupid EU demands, and they are willing to fight back when France screws up and Germany tries to copy that screw-up.
OK, so what do any of those things have to do with the subject of this thread?
by United Muscovite Nations » Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:13 pm
by SD_Film Artists » Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:19 pm
Sebenica wrote:Gotta love the times we live in: If you even dare criticize Israel you are a filthy, degenerate racist!
This anti-Zionist bill essentially makes it illegal to question Israel.
What the hell have we come to?
by The Sherpa Empire » Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:39 pm
by The Sherpa Empire » Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:41 pm
SD_Film Artists wrote:Sebenica wrote:Gotta love the times we live in: If you even dare criticize Israel you are a filthy, degenerate racist!
This anti-Zionist bill essentially makes it illegal to question Israel.
What the hell have we come to?
One of the MPs said that it will be centred on 'denying Israel's right to exist' rather than simply criticising the Israeli government, though they weren't clear on if you had to be specifically recorded denying Israel's right to exist or if a general anti-Israel agenda is enough to assume guilt. That and it was one MP rather than the finalised bill.
by Shofercia » Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:44 pm
SD_Film Artists wrote:Yes, anti-zionism not just anti-semitism.
https://www.france24.com/en/20190220-fr ... sm-illegalA group of French lawmakers proposed a bill on Monday that would make anti-Zionism a criminal offence in the same way that anti-Semitism is illegal in France. But many argue that opposition to Israel is not comparable to anti-Semitism.Sylvain Maillard, one of the French lawmakers behind the proposal to criminalise anti-Zionism, has rejected accusations that his bill conflates the two issues.
“You can criticise the Israeli government, but not question the state’s right to exist,” he said.“No one is questioning the France or Germany’s right to exist.”“We know that [French comic] Dieudonné and [French far-right author] Alain Soral, both of whom have been convicted for inciting hatred against Jews, have adopted the habit of substituting the word ‘Zionist’ for ‘Jew’ and ‘anti-Zionist’ for ‘anti-Semite’ to avoid legal troubles,” Vidal said.
https://www.france24.com/en/20190220-ma ... ti-zionismFrance will additionally take steps to define "anti-Zionism as a modern-day form of anti-Semitism", Macron told the French Jewish groups gathered on Wednesday. The definition is in line with that advocated by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, Macron said.
Would you support such a law?
I have mixed feelings on this as outlawing anti-zionism could go a long way to stamping out anti-semitism by removing the loophole of racists using anti-zionist movements as a safe harbour. However it's also a blunt tool as depending on how the bill is worded it could end up criminalising honest, non-racist criticism of Israel; effectively introducing a 'crime of opinion'.
For example, would protesting against illegal settlements be criminalised or would you have to specifically deny Israel's right to exist? Also would anti-zionist jews be anti-semitic?
In short, it seems well-meaning but difficult to enforce without becoming draconian.
by SD_Film Artists » Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:53 pm
The Sherpa Empire wrote:SD_Film Artists wrote:
One of the MPs said that it will be centred on 'denying Israel's right to exist' rather than simply criticising the Israeli government, though they weren't clear on if you had to be specifically recorded denying Israel's right to exist or if a general anti-Israel agenda is enough to assume guilt. That and it was one MP rather than the finalised bill.
Denying Israel's right to exist should also be allowed.
by DACOROMANIA » Thu Feb 21, 2019 1:08 pm
by The Sherpa Empire » Thu Feb 21, 2019 1:08 pm
SD_Film Artists wrote:The Sherpa Empire wrote:
Denying Israel's right to exist should also be allowed.
But then you're into the symantics of meaning the Israeli people or just the state? And if the state/territory is fair game then why even pretend to have the moral high-horse if we're just swapping land-grabs? I'm not actually directing those questions at you BTW, it's just an example of the circular logic that follows the issue.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ethel mermania, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Hurdergaryp, Ifreann, Ineva, Juristonia, La Cocina del Bodhi, Neo-Freedom, San Lumen, Shrillland, Statesburg, The Vooperian Union, Tungstan, Valles Marineris Mining co, Zadanar
Advertisement