ISIS bride stripped of citizenship, banned from the UK

[Vojelneit]

She should not be executed beacuse no state should have the right to decide life or death outside of war.

The UK is at war with ISIS. So is the Syrian regime. What's your point?

[Vassenor]

She should not be executed beacuse no state should have the right to decide life or death outside of war.

The UK is at war with ISIS. So is the Syrian regime. What's your point?

So at what point did she become a combatant and not a civilian?

[Nimzonia]

Why exactly is the discussion now about executing her? As far as I'm aware, she hasn't actually done anything except travel to a war zone, marry an idiot, and hold a variety of offensive opinions. You can't go round executing people for having offensive opinions. If we did that in the UK, the streets would run red.

[The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp]

She should not be executed beacuse no state should have the right to decide life or death outside of war.

The UK is at war with ISIS. So is the Syrian regime. What's your point?

nvm then

[Conserative Morality]

Why exactly is the discussion now about executing her? As far as I'm aware, she hasn't actually done anything except travel to a war zone, marry an idiot, and hold a variety of offensive opinions. You can't go round executing people for having offensive opinions. If we did that in the UK, the streets would run red.

Wouldn't that be glorious?

[Vassenor]

Why exactly is the discussion now about executing her? As far as I'm aware, she hasn't actually done anything except travel to a war zone, marry an idiot, and hold a variety of offensive opinions. You can't go round executing people for having offensive opinions. If we did that in the UK, the streets would run red.

Something about guilt by association.

[Sicaris]

Yes. If she is to be executed, unnecessary cruelty isn’t the most humane option.

She should not be executed beacuse no state should have the right to decide life or death outside of war.

ISIS and the UK are at war, you do realize? Under your logic it would be perfectly fine.

[Vassenor]

She should not be executed beacuse no state should have the right to decide life or death outside of war.

ISIS and the UK are at war, you do realize? Under your logic it would be perfectly fine.

So when did she become a combatant and not a civilian?

[Novus America]

ISIS and the UK are at war, you do realize? Under your logic it would be perfectly fine.

So when did she become a combatant and not a civilian?

Civilians can be executed.
Though the UK does not have the death penalty.

[Purpelia]

ISIS and the UK are at war, you do realize? Under your logic it would be perfectly fine.

So when did she become a combatant and not a civilian?

The moment she willingly betrayed her country and traveled to join a foreign power at war with said country.

[Novus America]

Why exactly is the discussion now about executing her? As far as I'm aware, she hasn't actually done anything except travel to a war zone, marry an idiot, and hold a variety of offensive opinions. You can't go round executing people for having offensive opinions. If we did that in the UK, the streets would run red.

Something about guilt by association.

Joining a terrorist organization is a crime.

[Vassenor]

So when did she become a combatant and not a civilian?

The moment she willingly betrayed her country and traveled to join a foreign power at war with said country.

Doesn't make her a combatant. Just makes her a civilian in a foreign power.

[Purpelia]

The moment she willingly betrayed her country and traveled to join a foreign power at war with said country.

Doesn't make her a combatant. Just makes her a civilian in a foreign power.

What it makes her is a traitor in the absolute most basic definition of the word. Just like a spy or any other foreign agent. She joined an enemy force in times of war.

[Vassenor]

Doesn't make her a combatant. Just makes her a civilian in a foreign power.

What it makes her is a traitor. Just like a spy or any other foreign agent.

You really are desperate to make a martyr out of her, just like ISIS wants, aren't you?

[Ifreann]

Something about guilt by association.

Joining a terrorist organization is a crime.

Not one that would warrant the death penalty, even if Britain still employed capital punishment.

[Purpelia]

What it makes her is a traitor. Just like a spy or any other foreign agent.

You really are desperate to make a martyr out of her, just like ISIS wants, aren't you?

What they want is irrelevant. What they need is a good killing down to the last of them.

[Ifreann]

You really are desperate to make a martyr out of her, just like ISIS wants, aren't you?

What they want is irrelevant. What they need is a good killing down to the last of them.

Remember how you're against the death penalty and against killing in self defence?

[Washington Resistance Army]

What it makes her is a traitor. Just like a spy or any other foreign agent.

You really are desperate to make a martyr out of her, just like ISIS wants, aren't you?

You'll be delighted to know most of us are also down to kill every member of their little cult. Their wants are irrelevant.

[Novus America]

Joining a terrorist organization is a crime.

Not one that would warrant the death penalty, even if Britain still employed capital punishment.

Fair enough.
But treason would, and non combatants can still be traitors.
But yeah, you cannot execute her in the UK regardless.

[Vassenor]

I mean we didn't execute the men who actually joined the Britisches Freikorps. So why would what she's done warrant capital punishment?

[Purpelia]

I mean we didn't execute the men who actually joined the Britisches Freikorps. So why would what she's done warrant capital punishment?

The reason we study history is so that we can learn from its mistakes and not repeat them.

[Washington Resistance Army]

I mean we didn't execute the men who actually joined the Britisches Freikorps.

You should have.

[Vassenor]

I mean we didn't execute the men who actually joined the Britisches Freikorps. So why would what she's done warrant capital punishment?

The reason we study history is so that we can learn from its mistakes and not repeat them.

By massacring civilians?

[Novus America]

I mean we didn't execute the men who actually joined the Britisches Freikorps. So why would what she's done warrant capital punishment?

You did execute Lord Haw Haw.

[Nimzonia]

Why exactly is the discussion now about executing her? As far as I'm aware, she hasn't actually done anything except travel to a war zone, marry an idiot, and hold a variety of offensive opinions. You can't go round executing people for having offensive opinions. If we did that in the UK, the streets would run red.

Wouldn't that be glorious?

There'd be nobody left.