Should There Be A Right To Discriminate?

[Telconi]

Only if we assume that "ending private business discrimination for particularly defined traits" is the only use of laws.

The purpose of laws is to improve the physical well-being of the public.

Agreed.

[San Lumen]

So why have it at all then?

To eliminate discrimination by publicly funded entities.

and why not private business?

[Telconi]

To eliminate discrimination by publicly funded entities.

and why not private business?

Because that's wrong.

[Kowani]

The purpose of laws is to improve the physical well-being of the public.

Agreed.

Therefore, the hypothetical CRA that did not address private discrimination would be a failure a law.

[New haven america]

You and one other person does not constitute "others."

You need one more person.

Lucky for me I'm not responsible for teaching you to count.

You've really only had 1 other person in this thread who feels as strongly about this as you do. "Others" denotes multiple people are/were involved, when that's not the case.

English is not that hard, do better.

[Telconi]

Agreed.

Therefore, the hypothetical CRA that did not address private discrimination would be a failure a law.

Why?

[Telconi]

Lucky for me I'm not responsible for teaching you to count.

You've really only had 1 other person in this thread who feels as strongly about this as you do. "Others" denotes multiple people are/were involved, when that's not the case.

English is not that hard, do better.

I never specified some arbitrary magnitude of agreement. And yet you've managed to fabricate one. English isnt that hard, as long as you can separate written word from delusion.

[San Lumen]

and why not private business?

Because that's wrong.

Why is wrong and what is a publicity funded entity?

[Kowani]

Therefore, the hypothetical CRA that did not address private discrimination would be a failure a law.

Why?

Because the problem was private discrimination first and foremost.

[Telconi]

Because that's wrong.

Why is wrong and what is a publicity funded entity?

Because the necessary measures to implement the policy cause more harm than the policy causes benefit.

An entity funded entirely, it in part, by tax money.

[San Lumen]

Why is wrong and what is a publicity funded entity?

Because the necessary measures to implement the policy cause more harm than the policy causes benefit.

An entity funded entirely, it in part, by tax money.

How does it cause more harm?

Give an example

[New haven america]

You've really only had 1 other person in this thread who feels as strongly about this as you do. "Others" denotes multiple people are/were involved, when that's not the case.

English is not that hard, do better.

I never specified some arbitrary magnitude of agreement.

Yes you have, or else you wouldn't have add that "Me and others" bit.

But sure, gaslighting will totally get you out of this situation you've boxed yourself into~

[Kowani]

Why is wrong and what is a publicity funded entity?

Because the necessary measures to implement the policy cause more harm than the policy causes benefit.

Oh look, outright falsehoods.

[Telconi]

Because the necessary measures to implement the policy cause more harm than the policy causes benefit.

Oh look, outright falsehoods.

Your opinions aren't fact.

[Telconi]

I never specified some arbitrary magnitude of agreement.

Yes you have, or else you wouldn't have add that "Me and others" bit.

But sure, gaslighting will totally get you out of this situation you've boxed yourself into~

That doesnt specify a magnitude of agreement, only a binary qualification.

To be literate is not gaslighting the illiterate.

[Kowani]

Oh look, outright falsehoods.

Your opinions aren't fact.

Ignoring the hypocrisy for a moment, the economic harm caused by the widespread discrimination is tangible and very, very negative. It harms nobody to not allow it.

[Telconi]

Your opinions aren't fact.

Ignoring the hypocrisy for a moment, the economic harm caused by the widespread discrimination is tangible and very, very negative. It harms nobody to not allow it.

Cant ignore what doesnt exist.
It harms every single business owner now deprived of the right to free association.

[New haven america]

Yes you have, or else you wouldn't have add that "Me and others" bit.

But sure, gaslighting will totally get you out of this situation you've boxed yourself into~

That doesnt specify a magnitude of agreement.

Except when it does, like right now.

[Kowani]

Ignoring the hypocrisy for a moment, the economic harm caused by the widespread discrimination is tangible and very, very negative. It harms nobody to not allow it.

Cant ignore what doesnt exist.
It harms every single business owner now deprived of the right to free association.

Rights only exist when guaranteed by a force. The government gives rights, it can take them away.

[New haven america]

Ignoring the hypocrisy for a moment, the economic harm caused by the widespread discrimination is tangible and very, very negative. It harms nobody to not allow it.

Cant ignore what doesnt exist.
It harms every single business owner now deprived of the right to free association.

If they own a business that's open to the public, then they don't get to discriminate, and if they want to then tough shit.

[Holy Tedalonia]

Because the necessary measures to implement the policy cause more harm than the policy causes benefit.

An entity funded entirely, it in part, by tax money.

How does it cause more harm?

Give an example

Because the only real way to judge if someone is racist is through statistics, sometimes thinking a company or organization is racist.

"I am looking to hire a new employee, I got this white American that is well educated in this field and a promising, and a black american whos overall ok, but not great.

If I hire the white guy, ill likely have a better performing member, but due to a lack of corporate diversity we could have a scandal"

Hows that for a scenario?

[San Lumen]

Ignoring the hypocrisy for a moment, the economic harm caused by the widespread discrimination is tangible and very, very negative. It harms nobody to not allow it.

Cant ignore what doesnt exist.
It harms every single business owner now deprived of the right to free association.

a right of free association does not exist for business and what is an example of a publicity funded entity?

[Holy Tedalonia]

Cant ignore what doesnt exist.
It harms every single business owner now deprived of the right to free association.

a right of free association does not exist for business and what is an example of a publicity funded entity?

As does a right to privacy. America tends to have nonexisting rights does it not?

[San Lumen]

How does it cause more harm?

Give an example

Because the only real way to judge if someone is racist is through statistics, sometimes thinking a company or organization is racist.

"I am looking to hire a new employee, I got this white American that is well educated in this field and a promising, and a black american whos overall ok, but not great.

If I hire the white guy, ill likely have a better performing member, but due to a lack of corporate diversity we could have a scandal"

Hows that for a scenario?

There is no mandate for a company to have x number of people of y race.

[Lanorth]

I do not know.