NATION

PASSWORD

Should There Be A Right To Discriminate?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Ors Might
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7778
Founded: Nov 01, 2016
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Ors Might » Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:03 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Ors Might wrote:When the flying fuck have I suggested they ask for a cot? I’ve said that if the hotel reneges on their reservation at the check in desk, they get their money back plus extra as compensation.

Let me get this straight. Social relations are sacred enough to prevent government interference, but economic interactions can go get fucked to the point where you can be forced into it?

sorry I mixed you up with someone else. I apologize

They should not be able to renege at the desk and leave someone with no place to stay. Finding out someone is gay or black is not a valid reason to break a contract.

Its a simple concept. You as an individual can choose who you are friends with and where you shop. A business being open to the public does not have the right to pick and choose who they associate with other then very specific circumstances.

I have a question for you. Since business have a right of freedom of association should the Americans with Disabilities act be repealed too?

You understand that people aren’t slaves to contracts? If the contract doesn’t specify that they are bound to accept you regardless of your identity, they have no moral requirement to not renege.

Business owners give up their right to choose who to interact with when they start a business? Hot take.

Yes. Have I been stuttering during this thread for you? Have my words not been coming in black and fucking white? Because I’m pretty sure you already knew what my position is.
https://youtu.be/gvjOG5gboFU Best diss track of all time

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81235
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:10 pm

Ors Might wrote:
San Lumen wrote:sorry I mixed you up with someone else. I apologize

They should not be able to renege at the desk and leave someone with no place to stay. Finding out someone is gay or black is not a valid reason to break a contract.

Its a simple concept. You as an individual can choose who you are friends with and where you shop. A business being open to the public does not have the right to pick and choose who they associate with other then very specific circumstances.

I have a question for you. Since business have a right of freedom of association should the Americans with Disabilities act be repealed too?

You understand that people aren’t slaves to contracts? If the contract doesn’t specify that they are bound to accept you regardless of your identity, they have no moral requirement to not renege.

Business owners give up their right to choose who to interact with when they start a business? Hot take.

Yes. Have I been stuttering during this thread for you? Have my words not been coming in black and fucking white? Because I’m pretty sure you already knew what my position is.


I never said they where.

They can choose whoever they want to interact with outside their business. A business as a whole does not have nor should it have the right to bar people for things we've already discussed.

Wow. Just wow. A business should have the right to tell someone whose in a wheelchair, hearing or visually impaired, mentally challenged, has a stutter or any other disability to get out or they wont hire them because they don't feel like accommodating them? Shows what kind of person you truly are.

User avatar
Ors Might
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7778
Founded: Nov 01, 2016
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Ors Might » Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:17 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Ors Might wrote:You understand that people aren’t slaves to contracts? If the contract doesn’t specify that they are bound to accept you regardless of your identity, they have no moral requirement to not renege.

Business owners give up their right to choose who to interact with when they start a business? Hot take.

Yes. Have I been stuttering during this thread for you? Have my words not been coming in black and fucking white? Because I’m pretty sure you already knew what my position is.


I never said they where.

They can choose whoever they want to interact with outside their business. A business as a whole does not have nor should it have the right to bar people for things we've already discussed.

Wow. Just wow. A business should have the right to tell someone whose in a wheelchair, hearing or visually impaired, mentally challenged, has a stutter or any other disability to get out or they wont hire them because they don't feel like accommodating them? Shows what kind of person you truly are.

Yes you have.

The business is at least primarily the property of the business owner. Saying that they can’t discriminate in their business is saying they can’t discriminate in an inherently significant chunk of their interactions.

Oh spare me your fake outrage. You wouldn’t complain if a gym refused to hire a quadriplegic.
https://youtu.be/gvjOG5gboFU Best diss track of all time

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72256
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:24 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Ors Might wrote:When the flying fuck have I suggested they ask for a cot? I’ve said that if the hotel reneges on their reservation at the check in desk, they get their money back plus extra as compensation.

Let me get this straight. Social relations are sacred enough to prevent government interference, but economic interactions can go get fucked to the point where you can be forced into it?

sorry I mixed you up with someone else. I apologize

They should not be able to renege at the desk and leave someone with no place to stay. Finding out someone is gay or black is not a valid reason to break a contract.

Its a simple concept. You as an individual can choose who you are friends with and where you shop. A business being open to the public does not have the right to pick and choose who they associate with other then very specific circumstances.

I have a question for you. Since business have a right of freedom of association should the Americans with Disabilities act be repealed too?

So... those KKK guests I keep asking about... what about them?
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81235
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:30 pm

Ors Might wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
I never said they where.

They can choose whoever they want to interact with outside their business. A business as a whole does not have nor should it have the right to bar people for things we've already discussed.

Wow. Just wow. A business should have the right to tell someone whose in a wheelchair, hearing or visually impaired, mentally challenged, has a stutter or any other disability to get out or they wont hire them because they don't feel like accommodating them? Shows what kind of person you truly are.

Yes you have.

The business is at least primarily the property of the business owner. Saying that they can’t discriminate in their business is saying they can’t discriminate in an inherently significant chunk of their interactions.

Oh spare me your fake outrage. You wouldn’t complain if a gym refused to hire a quadriplegic.


How am i saying that they can't discriminate outside their their business?

Thats a absurd example. A quadriplegic is not capable of preforming the duties of the job.
Galloism wrote:
San Lumen wrote:sorry I mixed you up with someone else. I apologize

They should not be able to renege at the desk and leave someone with no place to stay. Finding out someone is gay or black is not a valid reason to break a contract.

Its a simple concept. You as an individual can choose who you are friends with and where you shop. A business being open to the public does not have the right to pick and choose who they associate with other then very specific circumstances.

I have a question for you. Since business have a right of freedom of association should the Americans with Disabilities act be repealed too?

So... those KKK guests I keep asking about... what about them?


Being part of a hate group is not a protected class. I think a hotel could legally refuse service too them.

User avatar
Hammer Britannia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5372
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Hammer Britannia » Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:32 pm

San Lumen wrote:Being part of a hate group is not a protected class. I think a hotel could legally refuse service too them.

But why? What separates a "hate-group" from a religion (in the terms of protected class)?
Last edited by Hammer Britannia on Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
All shall tremble before me

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72256
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:33 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Ors Might wrote:Yes you have.

The business is at least primarily the property of the business owner. Saying that they can’t discriminate in their business is saying they can’t discriminate in an inherently significant chunk of their interactions.

Oh spare me your fake outrage. You wouldn’t complain if a gym refused to hire a quadriplegic.


How am i saying that they can't discriminate outside their their business?

Thats a absurd example. A quadriplegic is not capable of preforming the duties of the job.
Galloism wrote:So... those KKK guests I keep asking about... what about them?


Being part of a hate group is not a protected class. I think a hotel could legally refuse service too them.

They're part a religion, the Church of the National Knights off the Ku Klux Klan, that many classify as a hate group. There's even a religious museum of the KKK classified and recognized as a 501(c)3 organization.

In Palestine, it's widely regarded that Judaism falls under basically the same category.

Let's say I'm from Palestine. Can I refuse service to Jews (on a religious, not ethnic, basis)?

After all - that's what you're doing to the KKK.
Last edited by Galloism on Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Ors Might
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7778
Founded: Nov 01, 2016
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Ors Might » Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:33 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Ors Might wrote:Yes you have.

The business is at least primarily the property of the business owner. Saying that they can’t discriminate in their business is saying they can’t discriminate in an inherently significant chunk of their interactions.

Oh spare me your fake outrage. You wouldn’t complain if a gym refused to hire a quadriplegic.


How am i saying that they can't discriminate outside their their business?

Thats a absurd example. A quadriplegic is not capable of preforming the duties of the job.
Galloism wrote:So... those KKK guests I keep asking about... what about them?


Being part of a hate group is not a protected class. I think a hotel could legally refuse service too them.

You’re saying they can’t discriminate in the majority of their interactions.

And thus one can discriminate against them? Remember, discrimination isn’t always baseless. If you just flat out won’t hire a certain demographic, that’s discriminatory.
https://youtu.be/gvjOG5gboFU Best diss track of all time

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72256
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:35 pm

Ors Might wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
How am i saying that they can't discriminate outside their their business?

Thats a absurd example. A quadriplegic is not capable of preforming the duties of the job.

Being part of a hate group is not a protected class. I think a hotel could legally refuse service too them.

You’re saying they can’t discriminate in the majority of their interactions.

And thus one can discriminate against them? Remember, discrimination isn’t always baseless. If you just flat out won’t hire a certain demographic, that’s discriminatory.

If you get right down to it, the fact I won't hire a doctor without a medical degree is discriminatory. It's just eminently reasonable discrimination.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81235
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:35 pm

Ors Might wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
How am i saying that they can't discriminate outside their their business?

Thats a absurd example. A quadriplegic is not capable of preforming the duties of the job.

Being part of a hate group is not a protected class. I think a hotel could legally refuse service too them.

You’re saying they can’t discriminate in the majority of their interactions.

And thus one can discriminate against them? Remember, discrimination isn’t always baseless. If you just flat out won’t hire a certain demographic, that’s discriminatory.

A gym not hiring a quadriplegic because they arent capable of preforming the job responsibilities is not discrimination

If a business wanted to fire a white supremacist or neo nazi they have every right too which is what happened to many of those who marched in Charlottesville
Last edited by San Lumen on Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:37 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72256
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:36 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Ors Might wrote:You’re saying they can’t discriminate in the majority of their interactions.

And thus one can discriminate against them? Remember, discrimination isn’t always baseless. If you just flat out won’t hire a certain demographic, that’s discriminatory.

A gym not hiring a quadriplegic because they arent capable of preforming the job responsibilities is not discrimination

Actually it very specifically is discrimination. It's just a kind that is both reasonable and allowable.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Ors Might
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7778
Founded: Nov 01, 2016
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Ors Might » Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:38 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Ors Might wrote:You’re saying they can’t discriminate in the majority of their interactions.

And thus one can discriminate against them? Remember, discrimination isn’t always baseless. If you just flat out won’t hire a certain demographic, that’s discriminatory.

A gym not hiring a quadriplegic because they arent capable of preforming the job responsibilities is not discrimination

If a a business wanted to fire a white supremacist or neo nazi they have every right too which is what happened to many of those who marched in Charlottesville

It’s discrimination in every sense of the word, just like firing someone for their political beliefs is discrimination.
https://youtu.be/gvjOG5gboFU Best diss track of all time

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81235
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:39 pm

Ors Might wrote:
San Lumen wrote: A gym not hiring a quadriplegic because they arent capable of preforming the job responsibilities is not discrimination

If a a business wanted to fire a white supremacist or neo nazi they have every right too which is what happened to many of those who marched in Charlottesville

It’s discrimination in every sense of the word, just like firing someone for their political beliefs is discrimination.


There is a difference between political beliefs and being a Neo Nazi. A business does not have to condone that kind of reprehensible belief and would be totally within their rights to fire them

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72256
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:40 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Ors Might wrote:It’s discrimination in every sense of the word, just like firing someone for their political beliefs is discrimination.


There is a difference between political beliefs and being a Neo Nazi. A business does not have to condone that kind of reprehensible belief and would be totally within their rights to fire them

Just to be clear, a business should be within their rights to fire someone that has reprehensible beliefs?
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Hammer Britannia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5372
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Hammer Britannia » Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:41 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Ors Might wrote:It’s discrimination in every sense of the word, just like firing someone for their political beliefs is discrimination.


There is a difference between political beliefs and being a Neo Nazi.

Not really, no

And the KKK is not a Neo-Nazi organization.
All shall tremble before me

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72256
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:42 pm

Hammer Britannia wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
There is a difference between political beliefs and being a Neo Nazi.

Not really, no

And the KKK is not a Neo-Nazi organization.

Technically they are a church that predates the nazis, yes.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81235
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:42 pm

Galloism wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
There is a difference between political beliefs and being a Neo Nazi. A business does not have to condone that kind of reprehensible belief and would be totally within their rights to fire them

Just to be clear, a business should be within their rights to fire someone that has reprehensible beliefs?

Well a fair number of those who marched in Charlottesville lost their jobs. So the answer is yes. They are under no obligation to condone it.

User avatar
Ors Might
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7778
Founded: Nov 01, 2016
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Ors Might » Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:43 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Ors Might wrote:It’s discrimination in every sense of the word, just like firing someone for their political beliefs is discrimination.


There is a difference between political beliefs and being a Neo Nazi. A business does not have to condone that kind of reprehensible belief and would be totally within their rights to fire them

Neo-Nazism isn’t a political belief?
https://youtu.be/gvjOG5gboFU Best diss track of all time

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81235
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:44 pm

Ors Might wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
There is a difference between political beliefs and being a Neo Nazi. A business does not have to condone that kind of reprehensible belief and would be totally within their rights to fire them

Neo-Nazism isn’t a political belief?

It technically is and I dont think its covered under the laws that protect against discrimination for political beliefs

User avatar
Ors Might
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7778
Founded: Nov 01, 2016
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Ors Might » Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:46 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Ors Might wrote:Neo-Nazism isn’t a political belief?

It technically is and I dont think its covered under the laws that protect against discrimination for political beliefs

There’s no “technically” about it. It’s a political belief. It not being covered under that law is pure hypocrisy. Then again, I’m not the one who thinks discrimination should be forbidden.
https://youtu.be/gvjOG5gboFU Best diss track of all time

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81235
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:48 pm

Ors Might wrote:
San Lumen wrote:It technically is and I dont think its covered under the laws that protect against discrimination for political beliefs

There’s no “technically” about it. It’s a political belief. It not being covered under that law is pure hypocrisy. Then again, I’m not the one who thinks discrimination should be forbidden.

Those that were fired after Charlottesville were wrongly terminated?

Have we not established that I think it should be. Are there circumstances were it should be allowed? Yes and I gave one in the example you gave regarding a gym

User avatar
Ors Might
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7778
Founded: Nov 01, 2016
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Ors Might » Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:50 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Ors Might wrote:There’s no “technically” about it. It’s a political belief. It not being covered under that law is pure hypocrisy. Then again, I’m not the one who thinks discrimination should be forbidden.

Those that were fired after Charlottesville were wrongly terminated?

Have we not established that I think it should be. Are there circumstances were it should be allowed? Yes and I gave one in the example you gave regarding a gym

Not at all. I want people to be able to be fired for their beliefs, along with everything else.

You’ve established it many times, to the point of word for word repetition.
https://youtu.be/gvjOG5gboFU Best diss track of all time

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81235
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:53 pm

Ors Might wrote:
San Lumen wrote:Those that were fired after Charlottesville were wrongly terminated?

Have we not established that I think it should be. Are there circumstances were it should be allowed? Yes and I gave one in the example you gave regarding a gym

Not at all. I want people to be able to be fired for their beliefs, along with everything else.

You’ve established it many times, to the point of word for word repetition.


at least we agree on that what I do not agree on is someone being fired for being LGBT or a interracial relationship.

Why should they have to hide it out of fear of losing their job? That makes no sense to me. And you will of course say its forcing them to continue a relationship they dont want to be in or something like that.

User avatar
Ors Might
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7778
Founded: Nov 01, 2016
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Ors Might » Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:53 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Ors Might wrote:Not at all. I want people to be able to be fired for their beliefs, along with everything else.

You’ve established it many times, to the point of word for word repetition.


at least we agree on that what I do not agree on is someone being fired for being LGBT or a interracial relationship.

Why should they have to hide it out of fear of losing their job? That makes no sense to me. And you will of course say its forcing them to continue a relationship they dont want to be in or something like that.

Is it or is it not wrong to force relationships upon those that don’t want them?
https://youtu.be/gvjOG5gboFU Best diss track of all time

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81235
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Sun Feb 24, 2019 3:56 pm

Ors Might wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
at least we agree on that what I do not agree on is someone being fired for being LGBT or a interracial relationship.

Why should they have to hide it out of fear of losing their job? That makes no sense to me. And you will of course say its forcing them to continue a relationship they dont want to be in or something like that.

Is it or is it not wrong to force relationships upon those that don’t want them?

In a non business setting yes. The government is not and should not be the thought police.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Celritannia, Forsher, Habsburg Mexico, Hurdergaryp, Hurtful Thoughts, Lativs, Port Caverton, The Jamesian Republic, The Pirateariat, Valyxias, Vertillia, Violetist Britannia, Washington Resistance Army, World Anarchic Union

Advertisement

Remove ads