Should There Be A Right To Discriminate?

[Ors Might]

Just like how that minority chose to live in a small town filled with bigots, right?

That is not the same.

It is exactly the same.

[The Man Who Shot Jiminy Cricket]

If you don't want to shine someone's shoes, you shouldn't be compelled to.

Let us take it further: if prostitution were legal, should prostitutes be allowed to refuse service?

why not?

I dont know. Considering that prostitution is a sexual act I dont think the government could or should compel someone to have intimate relations with someone they dont want too.

What does it being sexual have to do with it?

[San Lumen]

That is not the same.

It is exactly the same.

No not really. a business has a right to chose where they want to be. Open for business means open to all not just some.

[Free Arabian Nation]

It is exactly the same.

No not really. a business has a right to chose where they want to be. Open for business means open to all not just some.

And why not? Because it hurts your feelings?

Forcing businesses to waste their money and time on customers they don't want is wrong, whether it be forcing them to build somewhere or forcing them to serve someone.

[Ors Might]

It is exactly the same.

No not really. a business has a right to chose where they want to be. Open for business means open to all not just some.

Irrelevant. A minority that can’t find service in a small town is in the exact same position as someone else that can’t find service in a small town insofar as how much it impacts them.

Your response to the latter is that they should move. Apparently inconveniences only matter if discrimination is the cause.

[Telconi]

If you don't want to shine someone's shoes, you shouldn't be compelled to.

Let us take it further: if prostitution were legal, should prostitutes be allowed to refuse service?

why not?

I dont know. Considering that prostitution is a sexual act I dont think the government could or should compel someone to have intimate relations with someone they dont want too.

Because making people do work they dont want is bad.

Why would that business receive an exception?

[San Lumen]

No not really. a business has a right to chose where they want to be. Open for business means open to all not just some.

And why not? Because it hurts your feelings?

Forcing businesses to waste their money and time on customers they don't want is wrong, whether it be forcing them to build somewhere or forcing them to serve someone.

Because no one should be less of a person because of their race, religion, ethnicity or sexual orientation or gender. someone who is LGBT in New York should not have less rights in Florida.

[Free Arabian Nation]

And why not? Because it hurts your feelings?

Forcing businesses to waste their money and time on customers they don't want is wrong, whether it be forcing them to build somewhere or forcing them to serve someone.

Because no one should be less of a person because of their race, religion, ethnicity or sexual orientation or gender. someone who is LGBT in New York should not have less rights in Florida.

Nobody is taking away their rights. You never had a right to eat at McDonald's.

They are not a right in the same way life and liberty are, you are not entitled to a meal at McDonald's, you are not entitled to a bus ride, you are not entitled to a wedding cake, and you're not entitled to a hotel room.

[San Lumen]

No not really. a business has a right to chose where they want to be. Open for business means open to all not just some.

Irrelevant. A minority that can’t find service in a small town is in the exact same position as someone else that can’t find service in a small town insofar as how much it impacts them.

Your response to the latter is that they should move. Apparently inconveniences only matter if discrimination is the cause.

You really think its plausible or practical for every chain restaurant or store to have a location in every municipality in the country?

Not having a service is not the same as being refused service.

[Telconi]

And why not? Because it hurts your feelings?

Forcing businesses to waste their money and time on customers they don't want is wrong, whether it be forcing them to build somewhere or forcing them to serve someone.

Because no one should be less of a person because of their race, religion, ethnicity or sexual orientation or gender. someone who is LGBT in New York should not have less rights in Florida.

Everyone I choose not to associate with is less of a person?

[San Lumen]

Because no one should be less of a person because of their race, religion, ethnicity or sexual orientation or gender. someone who is LGBT in New York should not have less rights in Florida.

Everyone I choose not to associate with is less of a person?

I didn't say that.

[San Lumen]

Because no one should be less of a person because of their race, religion, ethnicity or sexual orientation or gender. someone who is LGBT in New York should not have less rights in Florida.

Nobody is taking away their rights. You never had a right to eat at McDonald's.

They are not a right in the same way life and liberty are, you are not entitled to a meal at McDonald's, you are not entitled to a bus ride, you are not entitled to a wedding cake, and you're not entitled to a hotel room.

African Americans in the South should have just accepted they would never be equal and just moved North?. MLK should have just shut up and moved like the rest of them?

[Telconi]

Everyone I choose not to associate with is less of a person?

I didn't say that.

Well you said no one should be less of a person, and this is evidently a result of someone not associating with them?

[Free Arabian Nation]

Nobody is taking away their rights. You never had a right to eat at McDonald's.

They are not a right in the same way life and liberty are, you are not entitled to a meal at McDonald's, you are not entitled to a bus ride, you are not entitled to a wedding cake, and you're not entitled to a hotel room.

African Americans in the South should have just accepted they would never be equal and just moved North?. MLK should have just shut up and moved like the rest of them?

I mean, he shouldn't have shut up, but he shouldn't have forced the Government's hand in business.

Instead, he should have boycotted these businesses until it becomes their policy to serve all. It's called economics.

[Telconi]

Nobody is taking away their rights. You never had a right to eat at McDonald's.

They are not a right in the same way life and liberty are, you are not entitled to a meal at McDonald's, you are not entitled to a bus ride, you are not entitled to a wedding cake, and you're not entitled to a hotel room.

African Americans in the South should have just accepted they would never be equal and just moved North?. MLK should have just shut up and moved like the rest of them?

Daily reminder, this is your position towards others.

[San Lumen]

I didn't say that.

Well you said no one should be less of a person, and this is evidently a result of someone not associating with them?

who you have relationships with is not the same thing as a business transaction.

African Americans in the South should have just accepted they would never be equal and just moved North?. MLK should have just shut up and moved like the rest of them?

I mean, he shouldn't have shut up, but he shouldn't have forced the Government's hand in business.

Instead, he should have boycotted these businesses until it becomes their policy to serve all. It's called economics.

That was never going to happen in Alabama or Mississippi.

African Americans in the South should have just accepted they would never be equal and just moved North?. MLK should have just shut up and moved like the rest of them?

Daily reminder, this is your position towards others.

No it isnt

[Free Arabian Nation]

That was never going to happen in Alabama or Mississippi.

So be it, don't give money to racists and let them starve.

[Telconi]

Well you said no one should be less of a person, and this is evidently a result of someone not associating with them?

who you have relationships with is not the same thing as a business transaction.

I mean, he shouldn't have shut up, but he shouldn't have forced the Government's hand in business.

Instead, he should have boycotted these businesses until it becomes their policy to serve all. It's called economics.

That was never going to happen in Alabama or Mississippi.

Daily reminder, this is your position towards others.

No it isnt

Business relationships are relationships, you can tell because it says "relationship"

Go move to Mogadishu then.

Yes it is, you have stated this on more than one occasion.

[Athonuna]

If you don't want to shine someone's shoes, you shouldn't be compelled to.

Let us take it further: if prostitution were legal, should prostitutes be allowed to refuse service?

why not?

I dont know. Considering that prostitution is a sexual act I dont think the government could or should compel someone to have intimate relations with someone they dont want too.

What makes that business different from any other business? At its most basic level, it's a trade for something, however disgusting or horrible that is. It's your money for a service, and if you've taken the time to build up your service, you should have the right to refuse that service just because you don't like someone because it's your service and you don't owe any of your work to anyone.

[San Lumen]

That was never going to happen in Alabama or Mississippi.

So be it, don't give money to racists and let them starve.

And nothing would have changed in many business in those places. The bus boycott in Montgomery forced change because the overwhelming majority of riders were black. A court also ruled segregated buses were unconstitutional

[Free Arabian Nation]

So be it, don't give money to racists and let them starve.

And nothing would have changed in many business in those places. The bus boycott in Montgomery forced change because the overwhelming majority of riders were black.

You just accidentally proved my point, don't give money to racists and they will either starve or surrender.

[Telconi]

So be it, don't give money to racists and let them starve.

And nothing would have changed in many business in those places. The bus boycott in Montgomery forced change because the overwhelming majority of riders were black. A court also ruled segregated buses were unconstitutional

So let me get this straight, nothing would have changed, but the bus boycott was effective?

[San Lumen]

And nothing would have changed in many business in those places. The bus boycott in Montgomery forced change because the overwhelming majority of riders were black.

You just accidentally proved my point, don't give money to racists and they will either starve or surrender.

It would not have changed much in many other business across the South. The bus company was different

[Athonuna]

But it's the same thing: If I don't like you, I don't have to have a relationship with you, nor do I have to serve you. You are not entitled to my relationship OR my services.

[San Lumen]

But it's the same thing: If I don't like you, I don't have to have a relationship with you, nor do I have to serve you. You are not entitled to my relationship OR my services.

Open a private club then