Saiwania wrote:Heloin wrote:So if I'm reading the OP correctly Vic Mignogna is either a serial rapist who eats babies, or is a saint among men who is being targeted by an evil conspiracy for reasons?
I'll admit as much that I love binary choices. Because in part, it forces people to take a strong position on a given issue or topic. One famous saying in life is that "you can't have it both ways." While its possible for Vic Mignogna to have characteristics of both innocence and guilt in this case, I'm also interested in what side someone leans towards if they had to choose one extreme or the other?
Part of making a decision is to usually, to weigh the reasons why and commit to what direction you want to go in.
Ok, that's actually a lot clearer to me for what the OP was about then reading through it myself, thanks.
I generally avoid the idea of there being an extreme for these kind of situations especially since it's real people, both the victims and accused, so I go off what we know. And what we know is he has been seen to be overly touchy-feely in ways that are not considered appropriate for most and has been fired as a result of all this. Everything beyond that point is speculation and only encourages the kind of exclusionary behaviour that arguments on the internet so often end in.