Advertisement
by Funeral » Thu Feb 14, 2019 11:49 am
by Vassenor » Thu Feb 14, 2019 11:49 am
by Yusseria » Thu Feb 14, 2019 11:53 am
This is a gem, though (emphasis mine):"We found no evidence of offensive or racist statements by students to Mr. Phillips or members of his group," the report said. "Some students performed a 'tomahawk chop' to the beat of Mr. Phillips' drumming and some joined in Mr. Phillips' chant."
Because there's nothing offensive or racist about performing an action that Native groups have spent years trying to get teams to stop doing, and nothing mocking about joining a chant you don't understand.
by Sapientia Et Bellum » Thu Feb 14, 2019 11:53 am
"We are fascists, the heirs of fascism, the fascism of the year 2000" - Il Duce Gianfranco Fini
by Valrifell » Thu Feb 14, 2019 11:54 am
by Vassenor » Thu Feb 14, 2019 11:54 am
Yusseria wrote:Vassenor wrote:
So basically you're adhomineming me for the sake of it.
I'm pointing out your utter lack of a point and cowardice in debating.This is a gem, though (emphasis mine):"We found no evidence of offensive or racist statements by students to Mr. Phillips or members of his group," the report said. "Some students performed a 'tomahawk chop' to the beat of Mr. Phillips' drumming and some joined in Mr. Phillips' chant."
Because there's nothing offensive or racist about performing an action that Native groups have spent years trying to get teams to stop doing, and nothing mocking about joining a chant you don't understand.
I suppose you also think people shouldn't sing songs they don't know the lyrics to.
by The Grims » Thu Feb 14, 2019 11:54 am
Yusseria wrote:Vassenor wrote:
So basically you're adhomineming me for the sake of it.
I'm pointing out your utter lack of a point and cowardice in debating.This is a gem, though (emphasis mine):"We found no evidence of offensive or racist statements by students to Mr. Phillips or members of his group," the report said. "Some students performed a 'tomahawk chop' to the beat of Mr. Phillips' drumming and some joined in Mr. Phillips' chant."
Because there's nothing offensive or racist about performing an action that Native groups have spent years trying to get teams to stop doing, and nothing mocking about joining a chant you don't understand.
I suppose you also think people shouldn't sing songs they don't know the lyrics to.
by Des-Bal » Thu Feb 14, 2019 11:54 am
Vassenor wrote:
Do you?
Valrifell wrote:
Then he should be charged with whatever we want to throw, I suppose.
Though you'd have to prove that no reasonable person would actually come to his conclusion.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by Des-Bal » Thu Feb 14, 2019 11:55 am
The Grims wrote:And you see nothing offensive in people giving a Hitler salute in front of a Jew ?
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by Vassenor » Thu Feb 14, 2019 11:56 am
by Des-Bal » Thu Feb 14, 2019 11:58 am
Vassenor wrote:
Pointing out that an ethnic group has called a given action racist in the past is dictating what they can and cannot consider racist?
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by Chernoslavia » Thu Feb 14, 2019 12:00 pm
by Vassenor » Thu Feb 14, 2019 12:00 pm
by Yusseria » Thu Feb 14, 2019 12:03 pm
Vassenor wrote:Yusseria wrote:Provide me a source from a Native group saying that white people singing along with a chant is racist.
I'll wait.
So basically you're randomly changing what part of the post you're calling out.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomahawk_chop#Controversy_2
https://newsmaven.io/indiancountrytoday/archive/war-chant-and-tomahawk-chop-from-seminoles-to-republicans-_oadtktnwEOw7ctWpIoxOQ/
by Des-Bal » Thu Feb 14, 2019 12:03 pm
Vassenor wrote:So basically you're randomly changing what part of the post you're calling out.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomahawk_chop#Controversy_2
https://newsmaven.io/indiancountrytoday/archive/war-chant-and-tomahawk-chop-from-seminoles-to-republicans-_oadtktnwEOw7ctWpIoxOQ/
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by Chernoslavia » Thu Feb 14, 2019 12:03 pm
by Vassenor » Thu Feb 14, 2019 12:03 pm
Yusseria wrote:Vassenor wrote:
So basically you're randomly changing what part of the post you're calling out.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomahawk_chop#Controversy_2
https://newsmaven.io/indiancountrytoday/archive/war-chant-and-tomahawk-chop-from-seminoles-to-republicans-_oadtktnwEOw7ctWpIoxOQ/
You highlighted two different parts of the post. If you didn't want me to respond to that one then why highlight it and then state "emphasis mine"?
Your sources say it has led to some controversy. None of them say it's been denounced by Native groups.
Next.
by Yusseria » Thu Feb 14, 2019 12:05 pm
Vassenor wrote:Yusseria wrote:You highlighted two different parts of the post. If you didn't want me to respond to that one then why highlight it and then state "emphasis mine"?
Your sources say it has led to some controversy. None of them say it's been denounced by Native groups.
Next.
You asked for examples of Natives calling it racist. I provided examples of both acts being called racist. Now put those goalposts back.
And I am still waiting for your explanation of what authority this law firm has to conclusively declare these acts not racist.
by Vassenor » Thu Feb 14, 2019 12:07 pm
Yusseria wrote:Vassenor wrote:
You asked for examples of Natives calling it racist. I provided examples of both acts being called racist. Now put those goalposts back.
I said Native groups. Reading comprehension is important.And I am still waiting for your explanation of what authority this law firm has to conclusively declare these acts not racist.
The authority of being a licensed law firm with no connections to the school that was hired by them to investigate if the students did anything racist.
by Yusseria » Thu Feb 14, 2019 12:08 pm
Vassenor wrote:Yusseria wrote:I said Native groups. Reading comprehension is important.
The authority of being a licensed law firm with no connections to the school that was hired by them to investigate if the students did anything racist.
That doesn't explain what authority they have to actually make that call. So we're back to white people dictating what ethnic groups can and cannot find racist.
And still running away with those goalposts, I see.
by Vassenor » Thu Feb 14, 2019 12:08 pm
Yusseria wrote:Vassenor wrote:
That doesn't explain what authority they have to actually make that call. So we're back to white people dictating what ethnic groups can and cannot find racist.
And still running away with those goalposts, I see.
You have evidence this firm was made up of exclusively white people?
by Chernoslavia » Thu Feb 14, 2019 12:09 pm
Vassenor wrote:Yusseria wrote:I said Native groups. Reading comprehension is important.
The authority of being a licensed law firm with no connections to the school that was hired by them to investigate if the students did anything racist.
That doesn't explain what authority they have to actually make that call. So we're back to white people dictating what ethnic groups can and cannot find racist.
And still running away with those goalposts, I see.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Omphalos, Philjia, The Holy Therns, Tungstan, Zadanar
Advertisement