Unithonia wrote:Know who else wanted to make everyone follow his ideology? Hitler
If you truly are advocating for forcing everyone to adhere to your ideology and/or its rules, you have reached a level of authoritarianism that can be only found in ideologies such as Stalinism, Fascism, Maoism, etc. Please, keep your 20th century dictatorial ideas away from me.
Yes, really,
Hitler. The famous
radical who wanted to eliminate sexism and racism...
No.You know what the Nazis stood for?
Treating women as second-class citizens, good for nothing but homemaking and birthing new settlers. Not only were you
barred from most jobs, but you would be
fired even if you were capable. Hell, some of the shit reads like it came out of
The Handmaid's Tale.That said, I won't deny this is
authoritiarian. Because
you're right. It is. But progressives wouldn't have gotten very far if every time they were confronted, they would've waited for the other party to finally drop their reactionary views. (Slavery, Universal Suffrage, Marriage Equality, etc.)
And really, this is all very typical. A group expects to be treated as
human beings judged only on their ability and content of their character, and reactionaries will cry it's a totalitarian dictatorship and their god-given rights are being infringed...
It also speaks volumes that no one that opposes this has so far tried to justify the temple's stance
rationally. Only falling back on it being a "private" space (it isn't).