NATION

PASSWORD

Should Anti-Discrimination Laws Apply to Religious Entities?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20764
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Sun Feb 17, 2019 1:29 pm

Crylante wrote:If I were to form a religion, and declare the shed in my garden to be its holy site, and I were to ban heterosexual males from said holy site, should I be allowed to?

Because in a truly secular society, that is, one where all religions and a lack of religion receive equal treatment, if a Christian or Hindu site can refuse to let women in, surely I could do this?

First of all, you would be allowed to do this regardless, because your garden shed is your private property. Second of all, if you're sincere in your religion, yes.
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts Eastern Orthodox Christian. Christian Anarchist and Monarchist. Supporter of Pan-Arabism. 22-year old Doomer
Even the apologists of industrialism have been obliged to admit that some economic evils follow in the wake of the machines. These are such as overproduction, unemployment, and a growing inequality in the distribution of wealth. But the remedies proposed by the apologists are always homeopathic. They expect the evils to disappear when we have bigger and better machines, and more of them. Their remedial programs, therefore, look forward to more industrialism.
Pro and Anti: https://www.nationstates.net/nation=uni ... id=1166847

User avatar
Kowani
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16592
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Sun Feb 17, 2019 1:29 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
Kowani wrote:Inherently wrong? No.

>> when the nihilist supports the spread of absolute truth despite the fact that absolute truth would not be useful

w e w

I support their prevention on rational grounds, not on any supposed wrongness.
Narcissistic (Hedonistic) Nihilist. Yes, I am edgy. I know.
Atheist and still proud of it. Spanish Expat.
Post-Capitalist, Post-Nationalist.
Rights are functionally just privileges society has deemed important.
Prydania wrote:
As a Canadian? I find Americans and their deep, deep distrust of the government to be fundamentally, critically, laughably flawed. I find some aspects of your country completely absurd. The distrust of anything remotely resembling authority is one. The gun problem that stems from that is another.

Seangoli wrote:You are spouting nonsensical drivel with no coherent thought, little logic, and at the end of it all just angry opining at the clouds based on a truly astonishly low level of knowledge or understanding of the subject matter.

0% Capitalism

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20764
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Sun Feb 17, 2019 1:29 pm

Kowani wrote:
United Muscovite Nations wrote:You don't even support the spread of the idea that murder, rape, slavery, etc. are wrong?

Inherently wrong? No.

So we have a moral obligation to promote the truth?
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts Eastern Orthodox Christian. Christian Anarchist and Monarchist. Supporter of Pan-Arabism. 22-year old Doomer
Even the apologists of industrialism have been obliged to admit that some economic evils follow in the wake of the machines. These are such as overproduction, unemployment, and a growing inequality in the distribution of wealth. But the remedies proposed by the apologists are always homeopathic. They expect the evils to disappear when we have bigger and better machines, and more of them. Their remedial programs, therefore, look forward to more industrialism.
Pro and Anti: https://www.nationstates.net/nation=uni ... id=1166847

User avatar
DACOROMANIA
Envoy
 
Posts: 215
Founded: Mar 02, 2014
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby DACOROMANIA » Sun Feb 17, 2019 1:30 pm

Unithonia wrote:
DACOROMANIA wrote:If religious entities promote a harmful breaking of the laws such as slavery over night or a suppression of the human rights because of a religious view (even aka "jihad") then the Anti-Discrimination Laws must apply compulsory.

Private religious entities should be allowed to ban anyone they wish from their place of worship. Atheist organizations should be allowed to ban religious people from their premises.

1. In their place of worship? They can do whatever they do.
2. Killing or raping people from outside of their place of worship? killing a minister just because he's different? That's completely different.
Leader of DACOROMANIA, Founder of Roman Byzantine Union.

I want to save human race and to build a new nation/state, with ideals like human rights, peace and prosperity for all despite of any difference, avoiding the tyranny and preserving the liberty. Also you and we can save and unite the Earth, then going interstellar. Now I'm left alone even by family. Perhaps nobody cares. I wanted to do something important in life before to die, something that may really count.
I'm so alone man on Earth and I see how the world may fall into chaos. All looks irrational and immoral. It's a pain to not be able to do anything and to be surrounded by barbarians.

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20764
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Sun Feb 17, 2019 1:30 pm

Kowani wrote:
Conserative Morality wrote:>> when the nihilist supports the spread of absolute truth despite the fact that absolute truth would not be useful

w e w

I support their prevention on rational grounds, not on any supposed wrongness.

There isn't a rational grounds to be against a taboo on murder unless you're a murderer. If anything such a taboo is beneficial to you, so you have a rational grounds to promote such a taboo.
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts Eastern Orthodox Christian. Christian Anarchist and Monarchist. Supporter of Pan-Arabism. 22-year old Doomer
Even the apologists of industrialism have been obliged to admit that some economic evils follow in the wake of the machines. These are such as overproduction, unemployment, and a growing inequality in the distribution of wealth. But the remedies proposed by the apologists are always homeopathic. They expect the evils to disappear when we have bigger and better machines, and more of them. Their remedial programs, therefore, look forward to more industrialism.
Pro and Anti: https://www.nationstates.net/nation=uni ... id=1166847

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76675
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Conserative Morality » Sun Feb 17, 2019 1:31 pm

Kowani wrote:
I support their prevention on rational grounds, not on any supposed wrongness.

You're supporting a sense of rationality over rational concerns, which would result in the conclusion that rationality is of no inherent benefit.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Kowani
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16592
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Sun Feb 17, 2019 1:31 pm

United Muscovite Nations wrote:
Kowani wrote:Inherently wrong? No.

So we have a moral obligation to promote the truth?

No. There is no moral obligation to do anything. It isn’t self-interest.
Narcissistic (Hedonistic) Nihilist. Yes, I am edgy. I know.
Atheist and still proud of it. Spanish Expat.
Post-Capitalist, Post-Nationalist.
Rights are functionally just privileges society has deemed important.
Prydania wrote:
As a Canadian? I find Americans and their deep, deep distrust of the government to be fundamentally, critically, laughably flawed. I find some aspects of your country completely absurd. The distrust of anything remotely resembling authority is one. The gun problem that stems from that is another.

Seangoli wrote:You are spouting nonsensical drivel with no coherent thought, little logic, and at the end of it all just angry opining at the clouds based on a truly astonishly low level of knowledge or understanding of the subject matter.

0% Capitalism

User avatar
Unithonia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 515
Founded: Jan 08, 2018
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Unithonia » Sun Feb 17, 2019 1:33 pm

DACOROMANIA wrote:
Unithonia wrote:Private religious entities should be allowed to ban anyone they wish from their place of worship. Atheist organizations should be allowed to ban religious people from their premises.

1. In their place of worship? They can do whatever they do.
2. Killing or raping people from outside of their place of worship? killing a minister just because he's different? That's completely different.

That's not what the discussion is about tho. It's about banning people from their place of worship. Read the OP my lad
Trying to clean up the 'ol Flaming Act. Angry exactly 45.6% of the day.
Pro: IRA, GOP, Equal Rights, Libertarianism, Low Tax Rates, Militarism, Legalism, Fianna Fail, Brexit, LGBT rights
Anti: BLM, Violent protests, Socialism, Nazism, Alt-Right Groups.
Extremely Pro: United Ireland, Armed Forces, Free Markets, Scottish Independence, MAGA, Republic of Ireland.
Extremely Anti: Terrorism, Antifa, United Kingdom, PIRA, Communism, Socialism, Social Justice
STRAIGHT OUTTA DUBLIN
I SUPPORT A UNITED IRELAND
This
Conserative Morality wrote:You're supporting a sense of rationality over rational concerns, which would result in the conclusion that rationality is of no inherent benefit.

User avatar
Unithonia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 515
Founded: Jan 08, 2018
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Unithonia » Sun Feb 17, 2019 1:34 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
Kowani wrote:
I support their prevention on rational grounds, not on any supposed wrongness.

You're supporting a sense of rationality over rational concerns, which would result in the conclusion that rationality is of no inherent benefit.

I'm stealing this for my sig
Trying to clean up the 'ol Flaming Act. Angry exactly 45.6% of the day.
Pro: IRA, GOP, Equal Rights, Libertarianism, Low Tax Rates, Militarism, Legalism, Fianna Fail, Brexit, LGBT rights
Anti: BLM, Violent protests, Socialism, Nazism, Alt-Right Groups.
Extremely Pro: United Ireland, Armed Forces, Free Markets, Scottish Independence, MAGA, Republic of Ireland.
Extremely Anti: Terrorism, Antifa, United Kingdom, PIRA, Communism, Socialism, Social Justice
STRAIGHT OUTTA DUBLIN
I SUPPORT A UNITED IRELAND
This
Conserative Morality wrote:You're supporting a sense of rationality over rational concerns, which would result in the conclusion that rationality is of no inherent benefit.

User avatar
Kowani
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16592
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Sun Feb 17, 2019 1:37 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
Kowani wrote:
I support their prevention on rational grounds, not on any supposed wrongness.

You're supporting a sense of rationality over rational concerns, which would result in the conclusion that rationality is of no inherent benefit.

Okay, I have to go, but, when I get back, I have a rebuttal for this.
Narcissistic (Hedonistic) Nihilist. Yes, I am edgy. I know.
Atheist and still proud of it. Spanish Expat.
Post-Capitalist, Post-Nationalist.
Rights are functionally just privileges society has deemed important.
Prydania wrote:
As a Canadian? I find Americans and their deep, deep distrust of the government to be fundamentally, critically, laughably flawed. I find some aspects of your country completely absurd. The distrust of anything remotely resembling authority is one. The gun problem that stems from that is another.

Seangoli wrote:You are spouting nonsensical drivel with no coherent thought, little logic, and at the end of it all just angry opining at the clouds based on a truly astonishly low level of knowledge or understanding of the subject matter.

0% Capitalism

User avatar
Unithonia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 515
Founded: Jan 08, 2018
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Unithonia » Sun Feb 17, 2019 1:42 pm

Kowani wrote:
Conserative Morality wrote:You're supporting a sense of rationality over rational concerns, which would result in the conclusion that rationality is of no inherent benefit.

Okay, I have to go, but, when I get back, I have a rebuttal for this.

LOL
Trying to clean up the 'ol Flaming Act. Angry exactly 45.6% of the day.
Pro: IRA, GOP, Equal Rights, Libertarianism, Low Tax Rates, Militarism, Legalism, Fianna Fail, Brexit, LGBT rights
Anti: BLM, Violent protests, Socialism, Nazism, Alt-Right Groups.
Extremely Pro: United Ireland, Armed Forces, Free Markets, Scottish Independence, MAGA, Republic of Ireland.
Extremely Anti: Terrorism, Antifa, United Kingdom, PIRA, Communism, Socialism, Social Justice
STRAIGHT OUTTA DUBLIN
I SUPPORT A UNITED IRELAND
This
Conserative Morality wrote:You're supporting a sense of rationality over rational concerns, which would result in the conclusion that rationality is of no inherent benefit.

User avatar
Bear Stearns
Senator
 
Posts: 4311
Founded: Dec 02, 2018
Corporate Bordello

Postby Bear Stearns » Sun Feb 17, 2019 1:50 pm

Unithonia wrote:
United Muscovite Nations wrote:Most Catholic clergy aren't involved in sex abuse, and even if bishops and archbishops covered stuff up, that's no reason to punish lowly priests and deacons who didn't know anything.

Understand who you are talking to here
This is someone who's literally advocating for the complete banishment of the Catholic faith, and the arrest of all members of the church. While I'm not a catholic, that's utterly ridiculous.
Was it Stalin that liked to do things like that? Shut down political parties that he opposed and arrest it's members?


The Catholic Church is an anti-American organization and all bishops should be arrested for espionage on behalf of the Vatican.
The Bear Stearns Companies, Inc. is a New York-based global investment bank, securities trading and brokerage firm. Its main business areas are capital markets, investment banking, wealth management and global clearing services. Bear Stearns was founded as an equity trading house on May Day 1923 by Joseph Ainslie Bear, Robert B. Stearns and Harold C. Mayer with $500,000 in capital.
383 Madison Ave,
New York, NY 10017
Vince Vaughn

User avatar
Great Old South
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 18
Founded: Sep 21, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Old South » Sun Feb 17, 2019 1:52 pm

Unithonia wrote:Know who else wanted to make everyone follow his ideology? Hitler
If you truly are advocating for forcing everyone to adhere to your ideology and/or its rules, you have reached a level of authoritarianism that can be only found in ideologies such as Stalinism, Fascism, Maoism, etc. Please, keep your 20th century dictatorial ideas away from me.

Yes, really, Hitler. The famous radical who wanted to eliminate sexism and racism...

No.
You know what the Nazis stood for? Treating women as second-class citizens, good for nothing but homemaking and birthing new settlers.
Not only were you barred from most jobs, but you would be fired even if you were capable. Hell, some of the shit reads like it came out of The Handmaid's Tale.

That said, I won't deny this is authoritiarian. Because you're right. It is. But progressives wouldn't have gotten very far if every time they were confronted, they would've waited for the other party to finally drop their reactionary views. (Slavery, Universal Suffrage, Marriage Equality, etc.)
And really, this is all very typical. A group expects to be treated as human beings judged only on their ability and content of their character, and reactionaries will cry it's a totalitarian dictatorship and their god-given rights are being infringed...

It also speaks volumes that no one that opposes this has so far tried to justify the temple's stance rationally. Only falling back on it being a "private" space (it isn't).
________________________________________________________________________________________

User avatar
DACOROMANIA
Envoy
 
Posts: 215
Founded: Mar 02, 2014
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby DACOROMANIA » Sun Feb 17, 2019 1:54 pm

El-Amin Caliphate wrote:
DACOROMANIA wrote:If religious entities promote a harmful breaking of the laws such as slavery over night or a suppression of the human rights because of a religious view (even aka "jihad") then the Anti-Discrimination Laws must apply compulsory.

Which kind of jihad? Greater or Lesser?


What if a cult alike a "Covenant of 12 apes" consider the human race as a threat or that the rest of humans than their cult are not worth to be equal nor free, but "serfs" to the Cult's followers just because of their dogma and that cult decides to start a "jihad" even on a large or lesser scale?
"Jihad" is a concept not only related to Muslims but to many other Cults/religions which see the rest of people as a threat for the world.
Jihad is also promoted by the Adepts of Kali and they had serious war with the British armies in Asia, however they're not extinct and their priests still dream for a world domination based on their "vampire" doctrine.
The "Cult of Hades" (mainly an American name for the cult) had similar doctrine and strong adepts in East Asia and some of them supported the Japanese invasion. This cult was eradicated by the US Army and by the Chinese Army in the same time with the Japans defeat.
Leader of DACOROMANIA, Founder of Roman Byzantine Union.

I want to save human race and to build a new nation/state, with ideals like human rights, peace and prosperity for all despite of any difference, avoiding the tyranny and preserving the liberty. Also you and we can save and unite the Earth, then going interstellar. Now I'm left alone even by family. Perhaps nobody cares. I wanted to do something important in life before to die, something that may really count.
I'm so alone man on Earth and I see how the world may fall into chaos. All looks irrational and immoral. It's a pain to not be able to do anything and to be surrounded by barbarians.

User avatar
Unithonia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 515
Founded: Jan 08, 2018
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Unithonia » Sun Feb 17, 2019 1:55 pm

Bear Stearns wrote:
Unithonia wrote:Understand who you are talking to here
This is someone who's literally advocating for the complete banishment of the Catholic faith, and the arrest of all members of the church. While I'm not a catholic, that's utterly ridiculous.
Was it Stalin that liked to do things like that? Shut down political parties that he opposed and arrest it's members?


The Catholic Church is an anti-American organization and all bishops should be arrested for espionage on behalf of the Vatican.

*citation needed*
Trying to clean up the 'ol Flaming Act. Angry exactly 45.6% of the day.
Pro: IRA, GOP, Equal Rights, Libertarianism, Low Tax Rates, Militarism, Legalism, Fianna Fail, Brexit, LGBT rights
Anti: BLM, Violent protests, Socialism, Nazism, Alt-Right Groups.
Extremely Pro: United Ireland, Armed Forces, Free Markets, Scottish Independence, MAGA, Republic of Ireland.
Extremely Anti: Terrorism, Antifa, United Kingdom, PIRA, Communism, Socialism, Social Justice
STRAIGHT OUTTA DUBLIN
I SUPPORT A UNITED IRELAND
This
Conserative Morality wrote:You're supporting a sense of rationality over rational concerns, which would result in the conclusion that rationality is of no inherent benefit.

User avatar
Unithonia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 515
Founded: Jan 08, 2018
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Unithonia » Sun Feb 17, 2019 1:58 pm

Great Old South wrote:
Unithonia wrote:Know who else wanted to make everyone follow his ideology? Hitler
If you truly are advocating for forcing everyone to adhere to your ideology and/or its rules, you have reached a level of authoritarianism that can be only found in ideologies such as Stalinism, Fascism, Maoism, etc. Please, keep your 20th century dictatorial ideas away from me.

Yes, really, Hitler. The famous radical who wanted to eliminate sexism and racism...

No.
You know what the Nazis stood for? Treating women as second-class citizens, good for nothing but homemaking and birthing new settlers.
Not only were you barred from most jobs, but you would be fired even if you were capable. Hell, some of the shit reads like it came out of The Handmaid's Tale.

That said, I won't deny this is authoritiarian. Because you're right. It is. But progressives wouldn't have gotten very far if every time they were confronted, they would've waited for the other party to finally drop their reactionary views. (Slavery, Universal Suffrage, Marriage Equality, etc.)
And really, this is all very typical. A group expects to be treated as human beings judged only on their ability and content of their character, and reactionaries will cry it's a totalitarian dictatorship and their god-given rights are being infringed...

It also speaks volumes that no one that opposes this has so far tried to justify the temple's stance rationally. Only falling back on it being a "private" space (it isn't).

Nice buzzwords
You're still advocating for the suppression of an ideology. That is against everything I stand for, and, once again, a Nazi tactic.
Trying to clean up the 'ol Flaming Act. Angry exactly 45.6% of the day.
Pro: IRA, GOP, Equal Rights, Libertarianism, Low Tax Rates, Militarism, Legalism, Fianna Fail, Brexit, LGBT rights
Anti: BLM, Violent protests, Socialism, Nazism, Alt-Right Groups.
Extremely Pro: United Ireland, Armed Forces, Free Markets, Scottish Independence, MAGA, Republic of Ireland.
Extremely Anti: Terrorism, Antifa, United Kingdom, PIRA, Communism, Socialism, Social Justice
STRAIGHT OUTTA DUBLIN
I SUPPORT A UNITED IRELAND
This
Conserative Morality wrote:You're supporting a sense of rationality over rational concerns, which would result in the conclusion that rationality is of no inherent benefit.

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20764
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Sun Feb 17, 2019 1:59 pm

Great Old South wrote:
Unithonia wrote:Know who else wanted to make everyone follow his ideology? Hitler
If you truly are advocating for forcing everyone to adhere to your ideology and/or its rules, you have reached a level of authoritarianism that can be only found in ideologies such as Stalinism, Fascism, Maoism, etc. Please, keep your 20th century dictatorial ideas away from me.

Yes, really, Hitler. The famous radical who wanted to eliminate sexism and racism...

No.
You know what the Nazis stood for? Treating women as second-class citizens, good for nothing but homemaking and birthing new settlers.
Not only were you barred from most jobs, but you would be fired even if you were capable. Hell, some of the shit reads like it came out of The Handmaid's Tale.

That said, I won't deny this is authoritiarian. Because you're right. It is. But progressives wouldn't have gotten very far if every time they were confronted, they would've waited for the other party to finally drop their reactionary views. (Slavery, Universal Suffrage, Marriage Equality, etc.)
And really, this is all very typical. A group expects to be treated as human beings judged only on their ability and content of their character, and reactionaries will cry it's a totalitarian dictatorship and their god-given rights are being infringed...

It also speaks volumes that no one that opposes this has so far tried to justify the temple's stance rationally. Only falling back on it being a "private" space (it isn't).

There's a world of difference between plantation owners owning other human beings and the government not letting people vote, and a religious group having organizational rules that don't allow women to lead their rituals.
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts Eastern Orthodox Christian. Christian Anarchist and Monarchist. Supporter of Pan-Arabism. 22-year old Doomer
Even the apologists of industrialism have been obliged to admit that some economic evils follow in the wake of the machines. These are such as overproduction, unemployment, and a growing inequality in the distribution of wealth. But the remedies proposed by the apologists are always homeopathic. They expect the evils to disappear when we have bigger and better machines, and more of them. Their remedial programs, therefore, look forward to more industrialism.
Pro and Anti: https://www.nationstates.net/nation=uni ... id=1166847

User avatar
DACOROMANIA
Envoy
 
Posts: 215
Founded: Mar 02, 2014
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby DACOROMANIA » Sun Feb 17, 2019 1:59 pm

Unithonia wrote:
DACOROMANIA wrote:1. In their place of worship? They can do whatever they do.
2. Killing or raping people from outside of their place of worship? killing a minister just because he's different? That's completely different.

That's not what the discussion is about tho. It's about banning people from their place of worship. Read the OP my lad

Then such law should not apply to them. Their place of worship should be only for themselves freely. The State should stand separate from religion.
Leader of DACOROMANIA, Founder of Roman Byzantine Union.

I want to save human race and to build a new nation/state, with ideals like human rights, peace and prosperity for all despite of any difference, avoiding the tyranny and preserving the liberty. Also you and we can save and unite the Earth, then going interstellar. Now I'm left alone even by family. Perhaps nobody cares. I wanted to do something important in life before to die, something that may really count.
I'm so alone man on Earth and I see how the world may fall into chaos. All looks irrational and immoral. It's a pain to not be able to do anything and to be surrounded by barbarians.

User avatar
El-Amin Caliphate
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15283
Founded: Apr 05, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby El-Amin Caliphate » Sun Feb 17, 2019 2:00 pm

DACOROMANIA wrote:
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:Which kind of jihad? Greater or Lesser?


What if a cult alike a "Covenant of 12 apes" consider the human race as a threat or that the rest of humans than their cult are not worth to be equal nor free, but "serfs" to the Cult's followers just because of their dogma and that cult decides to start a "jihad" even on a large or lesser scale?
"Jihad" is a concept not only related to Muslims but to many other Cults/religions which see the rest of people as a threat for the world.
Jihad is also promoted by the Adepts of Kali and they had serious war with the British armies in Asia, however they're not extinct and their priests still dream for a world domination based on their "vampire" doctrine.
The "Cult of Hades" (mainly an American name for the cult) had similar doctrine and strong adepts in East Asia and some of them supported the Japanese invasion. This cult was eradicated by the US Army and by the Chinese Army in the same time with the Japans defeat.

I was mistaken in asking you that question. You don't even know what jihad is.
Kubumba Tribe's sister nation. NOT A PUPPET! >w< In fact, this one came 1st.
Proud Full Member of the Council of Islamic Cooperation!^u^
I'm a (Pan) Islamist ;)
CLICK THIS
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people

Democracy and Freedom Index
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

User avatar
Greater vakolicci haven
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14236
Founded: May 09, 2014
Anarchy

Postby Greater vakolicci haven » Sun Feb 17, 2019 2:02 pm

Durzan wrote:
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:There's a key reason religious institutions don't pay taxes, in that they're charities and often fulfil other work within the community.

As for the actual question, no I don't think so. I don't even think that private organizations should have anti-discrimination law applied to them, if they have a religious objection.


Wrong reasoning. That's a PART of it, but not the whole reason. The real reason religious institutions are tax exempt (at least in the US) is because of the Freedom of Religion clause in the 1st Amendment in the US Constitution (Which, like it or not, many modern 1st world nations have based their constitutions off of to one degree or another). A government that can tax religions can use that power to favor one religion over another, use said power to effectively silence and persecute said religion, and otherwise help establish a state religion. This can (has happened in the past) in effect severely limit the right of individuals to believe and practice their religion freely.

Thus, Religions need to be free from taxation so as to ensure that individuals may not be persecuted by the IRS (or other similar organizations) limiting and regulating religious freedom through control and manipulation of their purse strings..

I was speaking from a purely British perspective.

User avatar
Great Old South
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 18
Founded: Sep 21, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Old South » Sun Feb 17, 2019 2:08 pm

El-Amin Caliphate wrote:Which civilized society? Civilixed societies exist all over the world, so wgich one ate you talking about?

Civilized society in general. That is, those society's founded upon human rights, rationality and other products of the enlightenment.
And mind, I think Kerala is an example of a civilized society - at least in it's aspirations - as one of the best governed and most progressive states in India. (The ruling here doesn't surprise me)

United Muscovite Nations wrote:Enlightenment philosophy isn't any better than pre-enlightenment philosophy.

Also, if you're making everyone conform to enlightenment philosophy, you're actually violating enlightenment principles.

I'd argue that philosophy that emphasizes human dignity as it's focus is - at least on some level - better than those that promote senseless suffering at the behest of some imagined deity, or because it's simply the established "order of things."

And mind; even Rousseau spoke in favor of revolution against the tyranny of absolutism.

Unithonia wrote:But we must eradicate all those who follow a different ideology, because they are lesser people! Wanting to allow private organizations to make their own choices is reactionary! I threw up just writing this!

I never said that.
________________________________________________________________________________________

User avatar
Avalon Ascendancy
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 7
Founded: Oct 14, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Avalon Ascendancy » Sun Feb 17, 2019 2:10 pm

This is something of a conflict of freedoms. What is more important, the freedom of religion of a particular sect, or the freedom from discrimination of the women the sect were discriminating against?
Which, when they are in direct conflict, is of greater priority? Freedom of religion or freedom from discrimination?

That is, and should be, a difficult question. I hope you find it so.
Personally, I think "freedom from discrimination" should take priority and "freedom of religion" should have the caveat that it "does not mean freedom to discriminate".

Also, what of the religious freedom of the women who wanted to worship at the temple but were being prevented from doing so? Wasn't their freedom of religion being trampled on to begin with?

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20764
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Sun Feb 17, 2019 2:11 pm

Great Old South wrote:
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:Which civilized society? Civilixed societies exist all over the world, so wgich one ate you talking about?

Civilized society in general. That is, those society's founded upon human rights, rationality and other products of the enlightenment.
And mind, I think Kerala is an example of a civilized society - at least in it's aspirations - as one of the best governed and most progressive states in India. (The ruling here doesn't surprise me)

United Muscovite Nations wrote:Enlightenment philosophy isn't any better than pre-enlightenment philosophy.

Also, if you're making everyone conform to enlightenment philosophy, you're actually violating enlightenment principles.

I'd argue that philosophy that emphasizes human dignity as it's focus is - at least on some level - better than those that promote senseless suffering at the behest of some imagined deity, or because it's simply the established "order of things."

And mind; even Rousseau spoke in favor of revolution against the tyranny of absolutism.

Pre-enlightenment philosophy also often emphasized human dignity. Hell, it was Roman Catholicism that started humanist philosophy.

Moreover, I don't see how not letting women visit certain monasteries or not allowing women to lead rituals (for reasons that are myriad) is "promoting senseless suffering."
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts Eastern Orthodox Christian. Christian Anarchist and Monarchist. Supporter of Pan-Arabism. 22-year old Doomer
Even the apologists of industrialism have been obliged to admit that some economic evils follow in the wake of the machines. These are such as overproduction, unemployment, and a growing inequality in the distribution of wealth. But the remedies proposed by the apologists are always homeopathic. They expect the evils to disappear when we have bigger and better machines, and more of them. Their remedial programs, therefore, look forward to more industrialism.
Pro and Anti: https://www.nationstates.net/nation=uni ... id=1166847

User avatar
Trollzyn the Infinite
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1504
Founded: Aug 22, 2018
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Trollzyn the Infinite » Sun Feb 17, 2019 2:20 pm

No, because that violates Separation of Church and State.

/thread
REJECT THE MAOIST OCCUPATION OF BEIJING; STAND WITH HONG KONG AND THE REPUBLIC OF CHINA IN TAIWAN

User avatar
Trollzyn the Infinite
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1504
Founded: Aug 22, 2018
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Trollzyn the Infinite » Sun Feb 17, 2019 2:27 pm

Bear Stearns wrote:
Unithonia wrote:Understand who you are talking to here
This is someone who's literally advocating for the complete banishment of the Catholic faith, and the arrest of all members of the church. While I'm not a catholic, that's utterly ridiculous.
Was it Stalin that liked to do things like that? Shut down political parties that he opposed and arrest it's members?


The Catholic Church is an anti-American organization and all bishops should be arrested for espionage on behalf of the Vatican.


Claims this bold and absurd require extensive amounts of evidence in order to be taken seriously. If you have some, please provide it.
REJECT THE MAOIST OCCUPATION OF BEIJING; STAND WITH HONG KONG AND THE REPUBLIC OF CHINA IN TAIWAN

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ameriganastan, Camelone, Cannot think of a name, Czechoslovakia and Zakarpatia, Dresderstan, Duhon, Eternal Lotharia, Google [Bot], Greed and Death, Grenartia, Heloin, Impaled Nazarene, Kassaran, Kubra, Luminesa, MSN [Bot], Muthia, New Bremerton, Saint Ryvern, Soviet Socialist States of Americ a, Terre Septentrionale, Totenborg, Trollgaard, Tuthina, Unstoppable Empire of Doom

Advertisement

Remove ads