Yes, because he is a government minister with designated authority. He has the power to do that.
Advertisement
by Kustonia » Wed Feb 13, 2019 8:43 am
by Vassenor » Wed Feb 13, 2019 8:45 am
by Ifreann » Wed Feb 13, 2019 8:46 am
Kustonia wrote:Ifreann wrote:No, they didn't. The rescued people were on an Italian coast guard vessel. They had no authority over the captain of that vessel, nor did the captain of that vessel have the authority to take it wherever he felt like.
So the captain should be on trial for detaining the migrants, not Salvini.
by Vassenor » Wed Feb 13, 2019 8:48 am
by LiberNovusAmericae » Wed Feb 13, 2019 8:50 am
Vassenor wrote:I mean I know that conservatives have a hard-on for trying to force us to refer to refugees as illegal migrants because it makes it easier to demonise them and to pretend that governments don't have responsibilities towards them as enshrined in international law, but...
by Kustonia » Wed Feb 13, 2019 8:52 am
by Ifreann » Wed Feb 13, 2019 8:55 am
LiberNovusAmericae wrote:Italian law should be changed. This is ridiculous. Not allowing migrants to freely roam your country should not be illegal.
by Vassenor » Wed Feb 13, 2019 8:55 am
by Greater vakolicci haven » Wed Feb 13, 2019 8:57 am
by Kustonia » Wed Feb 13, 2019 8:59 am
by LiberNovusAmericae » Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:01 am
Ifreann wrote:LiberNovusAmericae wrote:Italian law should be changed. This is ridiculous. Not allowing migrants to freely roam your country should not be illegal.
If only there was some way that people on an Italian coast guard vessel could have been delivered into the custody of the relevant Italian government agency, who could have sorted out who among them could stay in Italy and who among them would have to be deported.
Alas, this is impossible, and the only way to keep migrants from freely roaming Italy is to hold them on Italian coast guard vessels until some other nations offer to take them in.
by Kustonia » Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:02 am
LiberNovusAmericae wrote:Ifreann wrote:If only there was some way that people on an Italian coast guard vessel could have been delivered into the custody of the relevant Italian government agency, who could have sorted out who among them could stay in Italy and who among them would have to be deported.
Alas, this is impossible, and the only way to keep migrants from freely roaming Italy is to hold them on Italian coast guard vessels until some other nations offer to take them in.
I would just send them all back to where they came from.
by Vassenor » Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:06 am
Kustonia wrote:Vassenor wrote:
Not really? Under what logic is he unlawfully detaining them?
The captain didn't say that the ship couldn't disembark, like Ifreann said. But since Italy closed its ports of entry, it couldn't disembark in Italy. Therefore, the captain should've taken them back to their point of disembarkment where they would be safe.
by Ifreann » Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:06 am
by Kustonia » Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:07 am
Vassenor wrote:Kustonia wrote:
The captain didn't say that the ship couldn't disembark, like Ifreann said. But since Italy closed its ports of entry, it couldn't disembark in Italy. Therefore, the captain should've taken them back to their point of disembarkment where they would be safe.
So you're asserting that the Italian Coast Guard is an NGO again?
by Greater vakolicci haven » Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:08 am
Ifreann wrote:Kustonia wrote:
So the captain could've taken them back to Libya, but he decided not to. Therefore, he's guilty of kidnapping the migrants.
No, he couldn't have taken them to Libya, because he can only take the ship he commands where he's told to take it. He would have needed permission from his superiors to go to Libya. And they would probably need to get the agreement of the Libyan authorities. And Salvini is not his superior.
by Vassenor » Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:08 am
by Kustonia » Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:10 am
Ifreann wrote:Kustonia wrote:
So the captain could've taken them back to Libya, but he decided not to. Therefore, he's guilty of kidnapping the migrants.
No, he couldn't have taken them to Libya, because he can only take the ship he commands where he's told to take it. He would have needed permission from his superiors to go to Libya. And they would probably need to get the agreement of the Libyan authorities. And Salvini is not his superior.
by Vassenor » Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:11 am
Kustonia wrote:Ifreann wrote:No, he couldn't have taken them to Libya, because he can only take the ship he commands where he's told to take it. He would have needed permission from his superiors to go to Libya. And they would probably need to get the agreement of the Libyan authorities. And Salvini is not his superior.
I don't know the exact process, but I would assume that the captain would've needed to make a decision at some point.
by Reichsstaaten von Germania » Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:11 am
by Trumptonium1 » Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:11 am
by Kustonia » Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:11 am
by Vassenor » Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:12 am
by Kustonia » Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:13 am
by Vassenor » Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:13 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: 0rganization, Dazchan, Dytarma, Eahland, Ineva, Majestic-12 [Bot], Maximum Imperium Rex, New Temecula, San Lumen, Shrillland, Statesburg, Tarsonis, Tesseris, The Kharkivan Cossacks, The Vooperian Union, Tiami, Verkhoyanska
Advertisement