West Virginia Politician: "LGBTQ is a modern day KKK"

[El-Amin Caliphate]

Prove it. And you still haven't proven that people wouldn't care about a Muslim politician saying this.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.telegr ... it-aw/amp/

Here is an example. Muslims in Labor Party hosted a gender segregated meeting. That is the same Party that promotes feminism but for whites only. No politician called it out

Ok, you still haven't proven that a Muslim politician claiming LGBT people to be like the KKK won't receive negative remarks.

[Karu Nadu]

Thats fucking retarded.

That'd probably be the best way to describe this.

The guy sounds like a fucking moron.

[El-Amin Caliphate]

Are you going to answer my question or not?

I see you are unable to answer. You would wish to implement Sharia law.

Dude you haven't answered my question 1st. The person who asks the question first should get it answered first.

[Eastern Incion]

Well, heterosexual sex is disgusting, so wonk wonk.

I don't know how homosexuals perceive heterosexual sex in terms of disgust. I have heard some accounts of them finding it "gross", but it seemed to me that this was the "gross" expressed by preadolescent boys towards preadolescent girls, a sort of "not interested" aversion, but not the stronger sort of aversion that you would have to rotting meat.

I also assume that they see a lot of heterosexuality happening, since it's the overwhelming majority behavior, so they get used to it.

Can't be contrary to the laws of biology and psychology if people are born with their sexuality. It is something permitted and encouraged by the laws of science in all known species on Earth. Homosexuality, no matter how much you want to believe it, isn't this random idea humans have made up like they're just gonna make life harder for themselves by intentionally liking the same sex. It's evolution, mate, and we can see it across all species and throughout a long part of history.

Well, cancer is not contrary to the laws of biology or psychology, some people are born with it, and it is permitted and encouraged by the laws of science in all known species on earth. Cancer is not a random idea humans made up like they're just gonna make life harder for themselves by intentionally having cancer. Cancer is evolution, mate, and we can see it across all species and throughout a long part of history.

So, the fact that your statements about homosexuality are also true about cancer do not, by themselves, qualify very much about anything.

It is natural and inevitable for there to be rotting meat, and it is also natural and inevitable for people to be disgusted by it. This is the Tao.

[The Grims]

Well, heterosexual sex is disgusting, so wonk wonk.

I don't know how homosexuals perceive heterosexual sex in terms of disgust. I have heard some accounts of them finding it "gross", but it seemed to me that this was the "gross" expressed by preadolescent boys towards preadolescent girls, a sort of "not interested" aversion, but not the stronger sort of aversion that you would have to rotting meat.

I also assume that they see a lot of heterosexuality happening, since it's the overwhelming majority behavior, so they get used to it.

Can't be contrary to the laws of biology and psychology if people are born with their sexuality. It is something permitted and encouraged by the laws of science in all known species on Earth. Homosexuality, no matter how much you want to believe it, isn't this random idea humans have made up like they're just gonna make life harder for themselves by intentionally liking the same sex. It's evolution, mate, and we can see it across all species and throughout a long part of history.

Well, cancer is not contrary to the laws of biology or psychology, some people are born with it, and it is permitted and encouraged by the laws of science in all known species on earth. Cancer is not a random idea humans made up like they're just gonna make life harder for themselves by intentionally having cancer. Cancer is evolution, mate, and we can see it across all species and throughout a long part of history.

So, the fact that your statements about homosexuality are also true about cancer do not, by themselves, qualify very much about anything.

It is natural and inevitable for there to be rotting meat, and it is also natural and inevitable for people to be disgusted by it. This is the Tao.

But I am heterosexual and do not consider homosexual sex acts gross. In fact, me and the girlfriend very much enjoy doing anal, oral and kissing - just like gays; so being disgusted by such acts would be rather odd.

[Kannap]

Well, heterosexual sex is disgusting, so wonk wonk.

I don't know how homosexuals perceive heterosexual sex in terms of disgust. I have heard some accounts of them finding it "gross", but it seemed to me that this was the "gross" expressed by preadolescent boys towards preadolescent girls, a sort of "not interested" aversion, but not the stronger sort of aversion that you would have to rotting meat.

I also assume that they see a lot of heterosexuality happening, since it's the overwhelming majority behavior, so they get used to it.

Look, you're the one throwing around words like "disgust" first, I'm just matching. Also not very appreciative of you equating homosexuality to rotting meat.

Can't be contrary to the laws of biology and psychology if people are born with their sexuality. It is something permitted and encouraged by the laws of science in all known species on Earth. Homosexuality, no matter how much you want to believe it, isn't this random idea humans have made up like they're just gonna make life harder for themselves by intentionally liking the same sex. It's evolution, mate, and we can see it across all species and throughout a long part of history.

Well, cancer is not contrary to the laws of biology or psychology, some people are born with it, and it is permitted and encouraged by the laws of science in all known species on earth. Cancer is not a random idea humans made up like they're just gonna make life harder for themselves by intentionally having cancer. Cancer is evolution, mate, and we can see it across all species and throughout a long part of history.

So, the fact that your statements about homosexuality are also true about cancer do not, by themselves, qualify very much about anything.

It is natural and inevitable for there to be rotting meat, and it is also natural and inevitable for people to be disgusted by it. This is the Tao.

1. Comparing homosexuality to cancer is a bad comparison and you know it. Do you compare persons of color and women to cancer for their also being minorities?
2. Comparing homosexuality to rotting meat and disgust is a bad comparison and you know it. Do you compare persons of color and women to rotting meat and disgust for their also being minorities?

[Karu Nadu]

How the fuck are gay people cross-burning terrorists?

[Purpelia]

How the fuck are gay people cross-burning terrorists?

He is probably being harassed by the insane modern left and in particular the homosexual minded part of their activists to the point where he has just labeled all of them as bad.

[Karu Nadu]

How the fuck are gay people cross-burning terrorists?

He is probably being harassed by the insane modern left and in particular the homosexual minded part of their activists to the point where he has just labeled all of them as bad.

If he says bullshit like this regularly, I can understand why he's being harassed.

[Purpelia]

He is probably being harassed by the insane modern left and in particular the homosexual minded part of their activists to the point where he has just labeled all of them as bad.

If he says bullshit like this regularly, I can understand why he's being harassed.

And if he is being harassed you should easily understand why he is saying it.

That's why harassment is not a good thing in a society. It leads to bad outcomes for EVERYONE.

[Caracasus]

How the fuck are gay people cross-burning terrorists?

He is probably being harassed by the insane modern left and in particular the homosexual minded part of their activists to the point where he has just labeled all of them as bad.

Hang on, so LGBTQ people are rounding up straight people and torturing and lynching them? Fucking hell... they're stopping them vote too? Driving them out of towns by force? Beating straight people up?

Damn. I did not know things were so bad in America. Straight people must be terrified to leave the house.

[Ifreann]

How the fuck are gay people cross-burning terrorists?

He is probably being harassed by the insane modern left and in particular the homosexual minded part of their activists to the point where he has just labeled all of them as bad.

He probably just hates LGBT people so much that them existing openly in public feels like terrorism to him.

[San Lumen]

What a idiotic and bigoted thing to say. I wouldn't be surprised if many in West Virginia state government have similar views.

[Karu Nadu]

He is probably being harassed by the insane modern left and in particular the homosexual minded part of their activists to the point where he has just labeled all of them as bad.

Hang on, so LGBTQ people are rounding up straight people and torturing and lynching them? Fucking hell... they're stopping them vote too? Driving them out of towns by force? Beating straight people up?

Damn. I did not know things were so bad in America. Straight people must be terrified to leave the house.

"Yeah, have you heard of the terrorist group LGBT?"
"Yeah, they're basically the modern KKK"

[Northern Java]

Look, you're the one throwing around words like "disgust" first, I'm just matching. Also not very appreciative of you equating homosexuality to rotting meat.

You should take this up with Scientific American. "Disgust" may be an emotionally charged term to you, but it is just the name of a psychological mechanism that triggers disease aversion behaviors.

1. Comparing homosexuality to cancer is a bad comparison and you know it. Do you compare persons of color and women to cancer for their also being minorities?

You made a statement about homosexuals which is also true about cancer.

If you make a statement about homosexuals which is not also true about cancer, I will not make that same statement about cancer.

2. Comparing homosexuality to rotting meat and disgust is a bad comparison and you know it. Do you compare persons of color and women to rotting meat and disgust for their also being minorities?

Again, you should take this up with the Scientific American.

It's very easy to act offended by this new information, and I'm sure that you will get lots of social support from other social progressives for expressing your politically correct, offended viewpoint.

Leaving you aside, I think that the introduction of this information, which can be regarded as "biological limits on human ability to accept homosexuals", should be considered objectively, especially by people who want more acceptance for homosexuality.

The realities of infectious disease and disgust/aversion will not change to meet your political goals, so you should check to see if those goals are realistic, and ask yourself if homosexuals can exist in a world in which a lot of people don't like them.

From my personal life, I can say that a lot of people don't like me because of my category, but I'm doing just fine. I have my rights, so I'm not looking to change anyone's mind. They can think what they want, and say it.

Additionally:

Dear moderation, I do not appreciate the thirty second delay caused by the deletion of Eastern Incion.

Please let me know if you are aware of the conversation I had with moderation in the thread about New Jersey.

No, I will not discuss those issues in the moderation subforum, though you are welcome to telegram me to discuss them further. All of my statements in that thread about moderation practices, and their consequences, are still valid.

In my experience as moderator in other environments, respectful dialogue can be more effective than punishment. In this case, your mechanism for punishment does not work, so I encourage you to use your remaining tools of social grace, if any.

Have a nice day.

[The New California Republic]

Look, you're the one throwing around words like "disgust" first, I'm just matching. Also not very appreciative of you equating homosexuality to rotting meat.

You should take this up with Scientific American. "Disgust" may be an emotionally charged term to you, but it is just the name of a psychological mechanism that triggers disease aversion behaviors.

1. Comparing homosexuality to cancer is a bad comparison and you know it. Do you compare persons of color and women to cancer for their also being minorities?

You made a statement about homosexuals which is also true about cancer.

If you make a statement about homosexuals which is not also true about cancer, I will not make that same statement about cancer.

2. Comparing homosexuality to rotting meat and disgust is a bad comparison and you know it. Do you compare persons of color and women to rotting meat and disgust for their also being minorities?

Again, you should take this up with the Scientific American.

It's very easy to act offended by this new information, and I'm sure that you will get lots of social support from other social progressives for expressing your politically correct, offended viewpoint.

Leaving you aside, I think that the introduction of this information, which can be regarded as "biological limits on human ability to accept homosexuals", should be considered objectively, especially by people who want more acceptance for homosexuality.

The realities of infectious disease and disgust/aversion will not change to meet your political goals, so you should check to see if those goals are realistic, and ask yourself if homosexuals can exist in a world in which a lot of people don't like them.

From my personal life, I can say that a lot of people don't like me because of my category, but I'm doing just fine. I have my rights, so I'm not looking to change anyone's mind. They can think what they want, and say it.

Additionally:

Dear moderation, I do not appreciate the thirty second delay caused by the deletion of Eastern Incion.

Please let me know if you are aware of the conversation I had with moderation in the thread about New Jersey.

No, I will not discuss those issues in the moderation subforum, though you are welcome to telegram me to discuss them further. All of my statements in that thread about moderation practices, and their consequences, are still valid.

In my experience as moderator in other environments, respectful dialogue can be more effective than punishment. In this case, your mechanism for punishment does not work, so I encourage you to use your remaining tools of social grace, if any.

Have a nice day.

*Makes post and instantly ceases to exist*

Wow. Magic.

[Western Vale Confederacy]

You should take this up with Scientific American. "Disgust" may be an emotionally charged term to you, but it is just the name of a psychological mechanism that triggers disease aversion behaviors.



You made a statement about homosexuals which is also true about cancer.

If you make a statement about homosexuals which is not also true about cancer, I will not make that same statement about cancer.



Again, you should take this up with the Scientific American.

It's very easy to act offended by this new information, and I'm sure that you will get lots of social support from other social progressives for expressing your politically correct, offended viewpoint.

Leaving you aside, I think that the introduction of this information, which can be regarded as "biological limits on human ability to accept homosexuals", should be considered objectively, especially by people who want more acceptance for homosexuality.

The realities of infectious disease and disgust/aversion will not change to meet your political goals, so you should check to see if those goals are realistic, and ask yourself if homosexuals can exist in a world in which a lot of people don't like them.

From my personal life, I can say that a lot of people don't like me because of my category, but I'm doing just fine. I have my rights, so I'm not looking to change anyone's mind. They can think what they want, and say it.

Additionally:

Dear moderation, I do not appreciate the thirty second delay caused by the deletion of Eastern Incion.

Please let me know if you are aware of the conversation I had with moderation in the thread about New Jersey.

No, I will not discuss those issues in the moderation subforum, though you are welcome to telegram me to discuss them further. All of my statements in that thread about moderation practices, and their consequences, are still valid.

In my experience as moderator in other environments, respectful dialogue can be more effective than punishment. In this case, your mechanism for punishment does not work, so I encourage you to use your remaining tools of social grace, if any.

Have a nice day.

*Makes post and instantly ceases to exist*

Wow. Magic.

It appears he got Thanos snapped.

[Karu Nadu]

*Makes post and instantly ceases to exist*

Wow. Magic.

It appears he got Thanos snapped.

I blame the the extremist group "LGBTQ".

[Confederate States of German America]

West Virginia, true and strong.

[Karu Nadu]

West Virginia, true and strong.

What's that even supposed to mean?

[El-Amin Caliphate]

West Virginia, true and strong.

How?

[Western Vale Confederacy]

West Virginia, true and strong.

More like laughing stock and delusional, yeah.

[San Lumen]

West Virginia, true and strong.

what is that supposed to mean?

[Karu Nadu]

West Virginia, true and strong.

what is that supposed to mean?

Already said that.

[Caracasus]

It appears he got Thanos snapped.

I blame the the extremist group "LGBTQ".

They're like the modern day KKK dont you know. Terrifying.