Advertisement

by Christian Confederation » Wed Feb 06, 2019 10:00 am

by Slarvainian » Wed Feb 06, 2019 10:01 am

by Valrifell » Wed Feb 06, 2019 10:03 am
Slarvainian wrote:Ifreann wrote:America has never lived up to its foundational values, but it is rather closer now than at any point, I dare say, in the past.
What are you talking about? Freedom of speech has definitely held up. You just can't protest conscription because it would be irresponsible to yell fire in a crowded theatre!

by Genivaria » Wed Feb 06, 2019 10:04 am
Christian Confederation wrote:Our family values.
And I agree professional coffee is are but they only said coffee shop.

by Slarvainian » Wed Feb 06, 2019 10:05 am
Christian Confederation wrote:Our family values.
And I agree professional coffee is are but they only said coffee shop.

by Sicaris » Wed Feb 06, 2019 10:10 am

by Ifreann » Wed Feb 06, 2019 10:11 am
Freedom of speech has definitely held up. You just can't protest conscription because it would be irresponsible to yell fire in a crowded theatre!

by Slarvainian » Wed Feb 06, 2019 10:13 am
Ifreann wrote:Slarvainian wrote:What are you talking about?
The values set out in the Declaration of Independence. "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain rights, among these life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." When those words first slid into King George's DMs, only sufficiently-wealthy white Anglo-Saxon Protestant men enjoyed anything close to those rights. The situation has improved in the last two centuries, but you still have a ways to go.Freedom of speech has definitely held up. You just can't protest conscription because it would be irresponsible to yell fire in a crowded theatre!
You can protest conscription...

by Farnhamia » Wed Feb 06, 2019 10:24 am
Vojelneit wrote:Grenartia wrote:
Sure you don't.
I might've been born at night, but I wasn't born last night.
Sorry to burst your bubble, hon, but the only person who seems to be confused about my sexuality is you.
If it'll make you feel better to cry about my identity, you don't need my permission.
No worries, I'll save my tears for something with a little more importance, but believe me when I say it really is sad. I don't know why or how you grew up like this but I hope you get these issues sorted out soon and be able to live life at your fullest, because if you get upset when people refer to you as a certain pronoun there's clearly something wrong somewhere.

by Vassenor » Wed Feb 06, 2019 10:31 am

by The Emerald Legion » Wed Feb 06, 2019 10:47 am
Ifreann wrote:Slarvainian wrote:What are you talking about?
The values set out in the Declaration of Independence. "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain rights, among these life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." When those words first slid into King George's DMs, only sufficiently-wealthy white Anglo-Saxon Protestant men enjoyed anything close to those rights. The situation has improved in the last two centuries, but you still have a ways to go.

by Slarvainian » Wed Feb 06, 2019 10:50 am
The Emerald Legion wrote:Ifreann wrote:The values set out in the Declaration of Independence. "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain rights, among these life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." When those words first slid into King George's DMs, only sufficiently-wealthy white Anglo-Saxon Protestant men enjoyed anything close to those rights. The situation has improved in the last two centuries, but you still have a ways to go.
Not true in the least. But continue simplifying our history so as to ignore counter examples if you want.

by Christian Confederation » Wed Feb 06, 2019 10:51 am
Slarvainian wrote:Christian Confederation wrote:Our family values.
And I agree professional coffee is are but they only said coffee shop.
If the family values part was in response to me, what values? Family values is a loose conceptual term to describe the current or past generalized recommendations for raising a strong family. Hundread and fifty years ago that meant a husband had to be the property owner and there was even a practice of shaming the husband if he were to be abused by his wife. It's a nonsensical statement to use today as values range from Mormon polygamy to open-love relationships inspired by deconstructionist queer theory.

by The Emerald Legion » Wed Feb 06, 2019 10:56 am
Slarvainian wrote:The Emerald Legion wrote:
Not true in the least. But continue simplifying our history so as to ignore counter examples if you want.
I think Ifreann's language here is nuanced enough that this is actually quite correct. A certain class had most the power and over two centuries that has improved but we have a ways to go.
So are we still in 1776 or are we completely egalitarian now?

by Major-Tom » Wed Feb 06, 2019 10:56 am
Christian Confederation wrote:Slarvainian wrote:If the family values part was in response to me, what values? Family values is a loose conceptual term to describe the current or past generalized recommendations for raising a strong family. Hundread and fifty years ago that meant a husband had to be the property owner and there was even a practice of shaming the husband if he were to be abused by his wife. It's a nonsensical statement to use today as values range from Mormon polygamy to open-love relationships inspired by deconstructionist queer theory.
I mean the Nuclear family. a Mother, Father, and kids.

by Dogmeat » Wed Feb 06, 2019 10:58 am
Christian Confederation wrote:Slarvainian wrote:If the family values part was in response to me, what values? Family values is a loose conceptual term to describe the current or past generalized recommendations for raising a strong family. Hundread and fifty years ago that meant a husband had to be the property owner and there was even a practice of shaming the husband if he were to be abused by his wife. It's a nonsensical statement to use today as values range from Mormon polygamy to open-love relationships inspired by deconstructionist queer theory.
I mean the Nuclear family. a Mother, Father, and kids.

by Vassenor » Wed Feb 06, 2019 11:00 am
The Emerald Legion wrote:Ifreann wrote:The values set out in the Declaration of Independence. "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain rights, among these life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." When those words first slid into King George's DMs, only sufficiently-wealthy white Anglo-Saxon Protestant men enjoyed anything close to those rights. The situation has improved in the last two centuries, but you still have a ways to go.
Not true in the least. But continue simplifying our history so as to ignore counter examples if you want.

by Christian Confederation » Wed Feb 06, 2019 11:07 am
Major-Tom wrote:Christian Confederation wrote:I mean the Nuclear family. a Mother, Father, and kids.
It's a traditional model that won't go away anytime soon. But, honestly, the single most consequential thing for the emotional and occupational success(es) of a child is a loving family and community. One can have a loving family with two fathers, two mothers, hell even grandparents, aunts, uncles, so long as the kids are taught the right values and life lessons.

by Ifreann » Wed Feb 06, 2019 11:07 am
The Emerald Legion wrote:Ifreann wrote:The values set out in the Declaration of Independence. "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain rights, among these life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." When those words first slid into King George's DMs, only sufficiently-wealthy white Anglo-Saxon Protestant men enjoyed anything close to those rights. The situation has improved in the last two centuries, but you still have a ways to go.
Not true in the least. But continue simplifying our history so as to ignore counter examples if you want.
The Emerald Legion wrote:Slarvainian wrote:
I think Ifreann's language here is nuanced enough that this is actually quite correct. A certain class had most the power and over two centuries that has improved but we have a ways to go.
So are we still in 1776 or are we completely egalitarian now?
Neither. However the WASP phenomenon is a relatively recent one. It's not something the nation was born with.

by Karu Nadu » Wed Feb 06, 2019 11:12 am
Christian Confederation wrote:Major-Tom wrote:
It's a traditional model that won't go away anytime soon. But, honestly, the single most consequential thing for the emotional and occupational success(es) of a child is a loving family and community. One can have a loving family with two fathers, two mothers, hell even grandparents, aunts, uncles, so long as the kids are taught the right values and life lessons.
I agree minus the first two.

by Christian Confederation » Wed Feb 06, 2019 11:40 am

by Vassenor » Wed Feb 06, 2019 11:42 am
Christian Confederation wrote:Karu Nadu wrote:Why?
Explain now, don't ignore.
Because you learn many things from your mother and father.
In my case my mom and grandfather/ Uncles because my dad left us for his girlfriend.
This forum has been interesting, now if anyone wants my telagram box is open for productive conversation like a few of y'all have already figured out.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Alcala-Cordel, All Wild Things, Arklatravar-Istertia, Bagiyagaram, Best Mexico, Buhers Mk II, Dazchan, Perikuresu, Shrillland, Spirit of Hope, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement