Communal concils wrote:The Fall of the Soviet Union was the beginning of both practical and ideological degeneracy of the movement.
Oh boy, a tanky.
In my opinion it has allowed the right wingers to form unchallenged groups(Alt-Right is a example).
Really? Cause it seems like the right was pretty active the world over before and during the lifespan of the USSR. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that some of the worst things that conservative ideology/capitalism has done was during the Cold War and as a direct response to Communist Russia.
The Democratic socialist policies aren't long lasting,
You gonna explain this more or just leave that hanging? Cause so far what you've said basically means nothing.
the Marxist-Leninist have fantasies of a revolution that will never happen,
...didn't they though? I mean, basically none survived and I'd go so far as to say they stood on shaky ideological ground to begin with, but there have been revolutions that succeeded. It really seems like you're approaching this whole topic from an incredibly western-oriented direction. How very bourgeoisie of you.
the other Communist are too Liberal, and Anarchist believe in a pseudo-egalitarian utopia.
... beg pardon? I mean, you're a tanky so I guess I'm not surprised, it's just that they usually try to hide the fact that they're fundamentally facists.
In my opinion, their needs to be a new ideology. Here are the ideals I propose for the movement(if it was created).
Please god, no.
1.The Socialist State is the only stage of Socialism required. There will be no transition to communism, and their will be no anarchist "society". Enemies would be every were, both foreign and domestic. Order and Stability is what all Socialist should be.
Ok, kinda worrying wording, but if you had just led with this I can see myself at least getting where you're coming from. Not too bad, I genuinely hope this is just a case of bad first impressions.
2.To defeat Capitalism and counter-Revolutionaries ,one must be populist. The Working class aren't educated enough to control the state. There needs to be a responsible Oligarchy.
Come the fuck on. You got literally one point before tipping your hat on this one.
One that challenges it's opposition, but also cleans it's self.
And you were throwing shade at anarchists for having unrealistic beliefs.
This Oligarchy must be lead by a single party, and this party must lead a republic of self restriction .It should also consolidate power.
You want to fucking chill out Adolf?
3.Means justify the ends.
Are you just LARPing a dictator now?
It doesn't not matter how the party gains power, it must find a way of taking control. Elections, Military coup, and popular revolutions; these are only a few methods of gaining power.
Gee, wonder where I've heard rhetoric like this before.4.Sectarianism is good,there is no "Left Unity".The Spanish civil war shows what Left unity is.
So we just going to ignore every other success and failure of leftism and just focus in on one example? I don't know if you were aiming for brevity, but I would have expanded on this more. I would have expanded on all of this more.
5.State control over the economy is a desire. welfare, Mass production, Protectionism, subsides and public services are good policies.
This isn't... too insane. These are pretty mainstream socialist beliefs. It only took you to point 5 to not sound like a Pinochet cosplayer.
6.Complete rejection of consumerism and capitalist culture is important. Drugs,prositution and other hedonist desires should be banned.
So anarchists striving for a egalitarian utopia is ridiculous, but the complete upending of a major social paradigm that almost the entire world subscribes to and a mass prohibition is somehow reasonable to you? Really?
Reaaaaaaaally?7.People must be unified. Secularism and Nationalism can be used to unite the people. World revolution is a utopia, and focusing on your nation is truly progressive.
This all means fucking nothing.
0/10, write it again and try harder next time.