Was it the statists or a identity group? We'll never know.
Advertisement
by Slarvainian » Sun Feb 03, 2019 10:13 pm
by Thermodolia » Sun Feb 03, 2019 10:37 pm
by Western Vale Confederacy » Sun Feb 03, 2019 11:49 pm
Byzconia wrote:Internationalist Bastard wrote:Funny story
I know for a fact I the FBI under Hoover used to be on the Wikipedia page for historical secret police but I was looking just now and it’s gone
Lmao that's hilarious. Either way, Hoover's FBI were 100% a secret police force. Dude was basically a dictator.
by Mushet » Mon Feb 04, 2019 1:37 am
by Infected Mushroom » Mon Feb 04, 2019 1:57 am
by East Gondwana » Mon Feb 04, 2019 2:05 am
by An Alan Smithee Nation » Mon Feb 04, 2019 3:28 am
Infected Mushroom wrote:who doesn't want to run around, fire carbines at enemies and then say things like
"FOR THE PEOPLE!"
it would be a dream come true
by Pasong Tirad » Mon Feb 04, 2019 5:19 am
Communal concils wrote:The Working class aren't educated enough to control the state. There needs to be a responsible Oligarchy. One that challenges it's opposition, but also cleans it's self. This Oligarchy must be lead by a single party, and this party must lead a republic of self restriction .It should also consolidate power.
Communal concils wrote:5.State control over the economy is a desire. welfare, Mass production, Protectionism, subsides and public services are good policies.
Communal concils wrote:7.People must be unified. Secularism and Nationalism can be used to unite the people. World revolution is a utopia, and focusing on your nation is truly progressive.
by Western Vale Confederacy » Mon Feb 04, 2019 6:10 am
by Infected Mushroom » Mon Feb 04, 2019 6:54 am
by Evil Dictators Happyland » Mon Feb 04, 2019 6:59 am
Communal concils wrote:I'm a socialist, and I'm far-left. The historical socialist movements had things I like, as well as things I dislike. However, I agree with many policies of these movements.
The Fall of the Soviet Union was the beginning of both practical and ideological degeneracy of the movement. In my opinion it has allowed the right wingers to form unchallenged groups(Alt-Right is a example).The Democratic socialist policies aren't long lasting, the Marxist-Leninist have fantasies of a revolution that will never happen, the other Communist are too Liberal, and Anarchist believe in a pseudo-egalitarian utopia.In my opinion, their needs to be a new ideology. Here are the ideals I propose for the movement(if it was created).
1.The Socialist State is the only stage of Socialism required. There will be no transition to communism, and their will be no anarchist "society". Enemies would be every were, both foreign and domestic. Order and Stability is what all Socialist should be.
2.To defeat Capitalism and counter-Revolutionaries ,one must be populist. The Working class aren't educated enough to control the state. There needs to be a responsible Oligarchy. One that challenges it's opposition, but also cleans it's self. This Oligarchy must be lead by a single party, and this party must lead a republic of self restriction .It should also consolidate power.
3.Means justify the ends. It doesn't not matter how the party gains power, it must find a way of taking control. Elections, Military coup, and popular revolutions; these are only a few methods of gaining power.
4.Sectarianism is good,there is no "Left Unity".The Spanish civil war shows what Left unity is.
5.State control over the economy is a desire. welfare, Mass production, Protectionism, subsides and public services are good policies.
6.Complete rejection of consumerism and capitalist culture is important. Drugs,prositution and other hedonist desires should be banned.
7.People must be unified. Secularism and Nationalism can be used to unite the people. World revolution is a utopia, and focusing on your nation is truly progressive.
by The New California Republic » Mon Feb 04, 2019 7:23 am
by The New California Republic » Mon Feb 04, 2019 7:26 am
Evil Dictators Happyland wrote:Communal concils wrote:I'm a socialist, and I'm far-left. The historical socialist movements had things I like, as well as things I dislike. However, I agree with many policies of these movements.
The Fall of the Soviet Union was the beginning of both practical and ideological degeneracy of the movement. In my opinion it has allowed the right wingers to form unchallenged groups(Alt-Right is a example).The Democratic socialist policies aren't long lasting, the Marxist-Leninist have fantasies of a revolution that will never happen, the other Communist are too Liberal, and Anarchist believe in a pseudo-egalitarian utopia.In my opinion, their needs to be a new ideology. Here are the ideals I propose for the movement(if it was created).
1.The Socialist State is the only stage of Socialism required. There will be no transition to communism, and their will be no anarchist "society". Enemies would be every were, both foreign and domestic. Order and Stability is what all Socialist should be.
2.To defeat Capitalism and counter-Revolutionaries ,one must be populist. The Working class aren't educated enough to control the state. There needs to be a responsible Oligarchy. One that challenges it's opposition, but also cleans it's self. This Oligarchy must be lead by a single party, and this party must lead a republic of self restriction .It should also consolidate power.
3.Means justify the ends. It doesn't not matter how the party gains power, it must find a way of taking control. Elections, Military coup, and popular revolutions; these are only a few methods of gaining power.
4.Sectarianism is good,there is no "Left Unity".The Spanish civil war shows what Left unity is.
5.State control over the economy is a desire. welfare, Mass production, Protectionism, subsides and public services are good policies.
6.Complete rejection of consumerism and capitalist culture is important. Drugs,prositution and other hedonist desires should be banned.
7.People must be unified. Secularism and Nationalism can be used to unite the people. World revolution is a utopia, and focusing on your nation is truly progressive.
Hi, Trotsky. Took you that long to recover from the ice pick, eh?
Jokes aside, this doesn't seem very practical as a means of supporting the working class. Any ideology that bases its decisions on the basic idea that the people don't know what's good for them is doomed to become an authoritarian dictatorship that serves nobody but the people in power.
by Thermodolia » Mon Feb 04, 2019 7:29 am
The New California Republic wrote:Evil Dictators Happyland wrote:Hi, Trotsky. Took you that long to recover from the ice pick, eh?
Jokes aside, this doesn't seem very practical as a means of supporting the working class. Any ideology that bases its decisions on the basic idea that the people don't know what's good for them is doomed to become an authoritarian dictatorship that serves nobody but the people in power.
It isn't even Trotskyism, it's more akin to someone very badly LARPing as a Trotskyite by garbling several important details.
by Thermodolia » Mon Feb 04, 2019 7:32 am
Infected Mushroom wrote:Thermodolia wrote:Why the fuck do you want those? I’d rather not have the granddaddy of the KGB breathing down my neck
I mainly want them because I think it would be really cool to join an organisation full of young people, wear a cool uniform complete with a cap and leather boots, and carry around a submachine gun (in 2019 it would probably be a carbine like an M4 or something)
its more cool than SWATs and special forces because you're not that well armed or equipped (so everything's on the line). You've got zero protection (no helmets, no vests or anything), only ideological fervour, numbers, and the weapon you carry.
who doesn't want to run around, fire carbines at enemies and then say things like
"FOR THE PEOPLE!"
it would be a dream come true
by DACOROMANIA » Mon Feb 04, 2019 7:50 am
by Kowani » Mon Feb 04, 2019 7:59 am
by DACOROMANIA » Mon Feb 04, 2019 8:01 am
Infected Mushroom wrote:Thermodolia wrote:Why the fuck do you want those? I’d rather not have the granddaddy of the KGB breathing down my neck
I mainly want them because I think it would be really cool to join an organisation full of young people, wear a cool uniform complete with a cap and leather boots, and carry around a submachine gun (in 2019 it would probably be a carbine like an M4 or something)
its more cool than SWATs and special forces because you're not that well armed or equipped (so everything's on the line). You've got zero protection (no helmets, no vests or anything), only ideological fervour, numbers, and the weapon you carry.
who doesn't want to run around, fire carbines at enemies and then say things like
"FOR THE PEOPLE!"
it would be a dream come true
by Slarvainian » Mon Feb 04, 2019 8:29 am
by Liriena » Mon Feb 04, 2019 8:58 am
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Cappuccina » Mon Feb 04, 2019 9:35 am
Communal concils wrote:I'm a socialist, and I'm far-left. The historical socialist movements had things I like, as well as things I dislike. However, I agree with many policies of these movements.
The Fall of the Soviet Union was the beginning of both practical and ideological degeneracy of the movement. In my opinion it has allowed the right wingers to form unchallenged groups(Alt-Right is a example).The Democratic socialist policies aren't long lasting, the Marxist-Leninist have fantasies of a revolution that will never happen, the other Communist are too Liberal, and Anarchist believe in a pseudo-egalitarian utopia.In my opinion, their needs to be a new ideology. Here are the ideals I propose for the movement(if it was created).
1.The Socialist State is the only stage of Socialism required. There will be no transition to communism, and their will be no anarchist "society". Enemies would be every were, both foreign and domestic. Order and Stability is what all Socialist should be.
2.To defeat Capitalism and counter-Revolutionaries ,one must be populist. The Working class aren't educated enough to control the state. There needs to be a responsible Oligarchy. One that challenges it's opposition, but also cleans it's self. This Oligarchy must be lead by a single party, and this party must lead a republic of self restriction .It should also consolidate power.
3.Means justify the ends. It doesn't not matter how the party gains power, it must find a way of taking control. Elections, Military coup, and popular revolutions; these are only a few methods of gaining power.
4.Sectarianism is good,there is no "Left Unity".The Spanish civil war shows what Left unity is.
5.State control over the economy is a desire. welfare, Mass production, Protectionism, subsides and public services are good policies.
6.Complete rejection of consumerism and capitalist culture is important. Drugs,prositution and other hedonist desires should be banned.
7.People must be unified. Secularism and Nationalism can be used to unite the people. World revolution is a utopia, and focusing on your nation is truly progressive.
by Torrocca » Mon Feb 04, 2019 9:42 am
Cappuccina wrote:Communal concils wrote:I'm a socialist, and I'm far-left. The historical socialist movements had things I like, as well as things I dislike. However, I agree with many policies of these movements.
The Fall of the Soviet Union was the beginning of both practical and ideological degeneracy of the movement. In my opinion it has allowed the right wingers to form unchallenged groups(Alt-Right is a example).The Democratic socialist policies aren't long lasting, the Marxist-Leninist have fantasies of a revolution that will never happen, the other Communist are too Liberal, and Anarchist believe in a pseudo-egalitarian utopia.In my opinion, their needs to be a new ideology. Here are the ideals I propose for the movement(if it was created).
1.The Socialist State is the only stage of Socialism required. There will be no transition to communism, and their will be no anarchist "society". Enemies would be every were, both foreign and domestic. Order and Stability is what all Socialist should be.
2.To defeat Capitalism and counter-Revolutionaries ,one must be populist. The Working class aren't educated enough to control the state. There needs to be a responsible Oligarchy. One that challenges it's opposition, but also cleans it's self. This Oligarchy must be lead by a single party, and this party must lead a republic of self restriction .It should also consolidate power.
3.Means justify the ends. It doesn't not matter how the party gains power, it must find a way of taking control. Elections, Military coup, and popular revolutions; these are only a few methods of gaining power.
4.Sectarianism is good,there is no "Left Unity".The Spanish civil war shows what Left unity is.
5.State control over the economy is a desire. welfare, Mass production, Protectionism, subsides and public services are good policies.
6.Complete rejection of consumerism and capitalist culture is important. Drugs,prositution and other hedonist desires should be banned.
7.People must be unified. Secularism and Nationalism can be used to unite the people. World revolution is a utopia, and focusing on your nation is truly progressive.
I agree with most of your post, with the exception of #6, and somewhat with #7.
If socialism is to avoid failures of its past, it cannot repeat the economic program of the ex-soviet bloc. Command economies had always failed, and will do so in any future attempts to implement it.
by Kavagrad » Mon Feb 04, 2019 9:43 am
Cappuccina wrote:Communal concils wrote:I'm a socialist, and I'm far-left. The historical socialist movements had things I like, as well as things I dislike. However, I agree with many policies of these movements.
The Fall of the Soviet Union was the beginning of both practical and ideological degeneracy of the movement. In my opinion it has allowed the right wingers to form unchallenged groups(Alt-Right is a example).The Democratic socialist policies aren't long lasting, the Marxist-Leninist have fantasies of a revolution that will never happen, the other Communist are too Liberal, and Anarchist believe in a pseudo-egalitarian utopia.In my opinion, their needs to be a new ideology. Here are the ideals I propose for the movement(if it was created).
1.The Socialist State is the only stage of Socialism required. There will be no transition to communism, and their will be no anarchist "society". Enemies would be every were, both foreign and domestic. Order and Stability is what all Socialist should be.
2.To defeat Capitalism and counter-Revolutionaries ,one must be populist. The Working class aren't educated enough to control the state. There needs to be a responsible Oligarchy. One that challenges it's opposition, but also cleans it's self. This Oligarchy must be lead by a single party, and this party must lead a republic of self restriction .It should also consolidate power.
3.Means justify the ends. It doesn't not matter how the party gains power, it must find a way of taking control. Elections, Military coup, and popular revolutions; these are only a few methods of gaining power.
4.Sectarianism is good,there is no "Left Unity".The Spanish civil war shows what Left unity is.
5.State control over the economy is a desire. welfare, Mass production, Protectionism, subsides and public services are good policies.
6.Complete rejection of consumerism and capitalist culture is important. Drugs,prositution and other hedonist desires should be banned.
7.People must be unified. Secularism and Nationalism can be used to unite the people. World revolution is a utopia, and focusing on your nation is truly progressive.
I agree with most of your post, with the exception of #6, and somewhat with #7.
If socialism is to avoid failures of its past, it cannot repeat the economic program of the ex-soviet bloc. Command economies had always failed, and will do so in any future attempts to implement it.
On #7, though I agree that nationalism is the path for any viable socialist state in the future, secularism is not. Secularism enables hedonistic cultural trends, and Christian, Muslim, or other religious based socialist regime would be preferable to quell and reverse trends towards materialism and degenerative behavior.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Enormous Gentiles, Evpolitia, Federation Of Ochima, Google [Bot], Hekp, Locmor, Novarisiya, Nyoskova, Pale Dawn, Shamhnan Insir, Squirreltopia, The Black Forrest, The Holy Therns, The noospheres of Eterordia, Tungstan, Valrifall
Advertisement