So what';s your solution then to helping these places come back? Putting thousands out of work because you see their jobs as unproductive?
Advertisement
by San Lumen » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:42 am
by Petrolheadia » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:43 am
by Petrolheadia » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:43 am
by Petrolheadia » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:45 am
by Novus America » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:47 am
by Novus America » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:49 am
Petrolheadia wrote:Novus America wrote:
Actually not really. It was trade, not wages.
And both Democrats and Republicans pushes the outsourcing.
If you do not allow unrestricted trade with places relying on low wages instead of a true comparative advantage, a wage race to the bottom does not happen.
And customers pay big bucks for shoddy stuff.Great Minarchistan wrote:Auto workersin the 70s for one? Amazon warehouse workers are another example.
If a car can leave the factory with bottles behind door panels or another model's dashboard trim, someone fucked up.
by Petrolheadia » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:50 am
Novus America wrote:Petrolheadia wrote:When it means that the workers can screw up whatever they want and receive big bucks for it, it is awful. Part of why US-made Japanese cars keep the quality up quite well is because they are built in factories where crappy employees can be sacked and unions don't drive up costs, 'cause the UAW is not there.
The US carmakers' decline was largely caused by the lefties at UAW and the ones who instituted Corporate Average Fuel Efficiency, penalizing the US carmakers for what they did well - building big cars.
Actually Japan has lower productivity than the US.
https://www.tokyoreview.net/2018/07/jap ... -overwork/
Japanese working conditions are poor.
They rely on overwork, not productivity.
by Great Minarchistan » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:51 am
Novus America wrote:Petrolheadia wrote:When it means that the workers can screw up whatever they want and receive big bucks for it, it is awful. Part of why US-made Japanese cars keep the quality up quite well is because they are built in factories where crappy employees can be sacked and unions don't drive up costs, 'cause the UAW is not there.
The US carmakers' decline was largely caused by the lefties at UAW and the ones who instituted Corporate Average Fuel Efficiency, penalizing the US carmakers for what they did well - building big cars.
Actually Japan has lower productivity than the US.
https://www.tokyoreview.net/2018/07/jap ... -overwork/
Japanese working conditions are poor.
They rely on overwork, not productivity.
by Great Minarchistan » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:51 am
by Novus America » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:52 am
by Novus America » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:53 am
Great Minarchistan wrote:Novus America wrote:
Actually Japan has lower productivity than the US.
https://www.tokyoreview.net/2018/07/jap ... -overwork/
Japanese working conditions are poor.
They rely on overwork, not productivity.
two sides of the same coin, if you have a low productivity while atst needing more income to feed your family (high dependency ratio) you'll need to work more
by Great Minarchistan » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:53 am
Novus America wrote:Great Minarchistan wrote:QED, if you are so uncompetitive then businesses will flee from your area. Most auto industries moved from the rust belt to the south for instance
Sure, excessive regulation and union power did play a role.
But it was not the auto industry alone that created the rust belt.
Detroit (in addition to defense industries) was the only one really hit by the automotive industry.
Also you ignore Japanese protectionism.
Japan never reciprocated, and did not rise up in the automotive industry by free market principles.
It was government industrial policy.
by Petrolheadia » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:53 am
Novus America wrote:Great Minarchistan wrote:QED, if you are so uncompetitive then businesses will flee from your area. Most auto industries moved from the rust belt to the south for instance
Sure, excessive regulation and union power did play a role.
But it was not the auto industry alone that created the rust belt.
Detroit (in addition to defense industries) was the only one really hit by the automotive industry.
Also you ignore Japanese protectionism.
Japan never reciprocated, and did not rise up in the automotive industry by free market principles.
It was government industrial policy.
by Great Minarchistan » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:53 am
by Petrolheadia » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:54 am
Novus America wrote:Petrolheadia wrote:And customers pay big bucks for shoddy stuff.
If a car can leave the factory with bottles behind door panels or another model's dashboard trim, someone fucked up.
Oh quality competition is good. It leads to higher quality.
Wage competition is bad, it leads to lower wages.
by Great Minarchistan » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:56 am
by Petrolheadia » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:56 am
by Novus America » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:56 am
Petrolheadia wrote:Novus America wrote:
Actually Japan has lower productivity than the US.
https://www.tokyoreview.net/2018/07/jap ... -overwork/
Japanese working conditions are poor.
They rely on overwork, not productivity.
If an employee makes a lot of cars because he works long, this is high productivity.
And no, Japan's gains weren't and aren't based on overwork. For example, do you think in the 70s Toyota outproduced British Leyland 8:1 based on working hours?
by Petrolheadia » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:59 am
San Lumen wrote:Great Minarchistan wrote:I just said it, burning down the UAW would grant a large advancement in talks to bring back the auto industry to the rust belt
and that's somehow going to help the poverty in Detroit or Baltimore? There ought to be unsafe conditions at the auto plants as well?
by Great Minarchistan » Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:59 am
Novus America wrote:You cannot increase productivity by working longer.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ban Oldern, Daphomir, Google [Bot], Hidrandia, Hurdergaryp, Ifreann, Lagene, Omphalos, Rogochevia, Siluvia, So uh lab here, The Black Forrest, The Two Jerseys, Tiami, Transitional Global Authority, Umeria
Advertisement