Vistulange wrote:That's not the point there, though, is it? It's beautiful of you to try and hide the actual point behind a smokescreen: The point is, since you don't seem to get it, is that you seem to be expecting Israel to be held to different standards to other countries in the world, and are actually complaining that they get criticised for not adhering to such standards.
I actually hold the same standard on this particular issue. And, in most serious conflicts, other nations seem to assume that standard as well. The bombings in World War II provide a more visceral example than a blockade intended to prevent the importation of materials that could facilitate the manufacture of weapons. I have no issue with engaging in policies that may cause incidental harm to civilians to accomplish a fundamentally military or security goal so long as the point is not to deliberately target civilians and civilian needs are considered. The Palestinians in Gaza are having a bad time because their government is waging an unconventional war with a much stronger neighbor. Their lives'll get better when that stops.
Vistulange wrote:I'm all for Israel and its existence, but this hypocrisy is not doing the Israeli case any favours.
Again, "you're oppressing us by not letting us import weapons to use against you" is not a convincing argument to anyone who isn't already sympathetic of the Palestinians politically. I'm critical of Israel's policies in the West Bank but I'm not going to ask them to pull punches in a way that I wouldn't ask others to when it comes down to their national security.







