Cerinda wrote:SD_Film Artists wrote:
An unstable Venezuela is still bad for America even if it's not a full-scale military threat. For example drug traffickers are increasingly taking advantage of the political situation there as a base to go into the Caribbean and onwards to America. Plus there's the migrants who will make it to America despite not sharing a land boarder.
America has been invited by the closest thing that Venezuela has to a democratic leader. And even if it wasn't, the term "Imperialism" is so overused and lost in hypocrisy nowadays that it's basically lost all meaning. I don't know many Venezuelans, but I suspect that they care more about ending the hyper-inflation and other dire socio-economic issues rather than getting worried about "billionaire Tycoons".
Guaidó is not the closest thing Venezuela has to a democratic leader, he's just some random guy who America likes because he serve their interests.
Some random guy who is also the President of the National Assembly and in light of failed/denied elections has worked in accordance with Venezuela's constitution to be interim President of Venezuela.
What you are advocating is the literal definition of imperialism.
Again it's difficult to be moved by that since the term has been so used & abused, especially considering that many of the self-proclaimed anti-Imperialists I've known are actually some of the worst offenders of supporting imperialism.
I'm fairly certain that most Venezuelans don't want their country invaded and their natural resources stolen to serve some rich people in another country.
I'm fairly certain that most Venezuelans don't want their country abused by a dictatorship and their natural resources stolen to serve some rich people in their own country.






