The of Japan wrote:Shofercia wrote:
He's not opposing the US; he's opposing a US-backed oil-driven coup. Let's say you have a friend, Mike Smith. You know that Mike has issues with alcohol. So you tell him "Mike, I oppose you drinking" - which is not the same as opposing Mike Smith on everything.
you actually think this is a us backed coup because of oil
Not what I actually said. My point was that opposing a country is not the same as opposing an intervention of said country. I never said that the coup was because of oil... but knowing that would require more reading skills and less smiley faces.
Proctopeo wrote:Shofercia wrote:
He's not opposing the US; he's opposing a US-backed oil-driven coup. Let's say you have a friend, Mike Smith. You know that Mike has issues with alcohol. So you tell him "Mike, I oppose you drinking" - which is not the same as opposing Mike Smith on everything.
imagine thinking it's a coup over oil, and not that everyone in their right mind (and some who aren't) deciding that Maduro is really, really terrible, and replacing him with a more legitimate and sane leader will at least prevent things from getting worse in Venezuela
Replacing him how? Through military intervention?
Yagon wrote:Shofercia wrote:
He's not opposing the US; he's opposing a US-backed oil-driven coup. Let's say you have a friend, Mike Smith. You know that Mike has issues with alcohol. So you tell him "Mike, I oppose you drinking" - which is not the same as opposing Mike Smith on everything.
I think that's unrealistic. Putin will clearly take sides, given how dependent the Russian Vodka industry is on Mike, with over 17% of exports being Mike or friends of Mike trying to keep up with Mike. China may also come into play since Mike is the last person in the US who drinks Tsingtao.
Where are you going with this?