NationStates

Kinda liked this test, that I found earlier in the thread: http://www.politiscales.net



My result



Neat flag imho.

This was kinda interesting too:

Pragmatism : politics objectively boil down to looking at where the problems are and trying to solve them according to the means available.

Veganism : Human beings must stop at all costs the consumption and exploitation of “sensible” being.

Monarchism : society should be organized around a king.

Missionnary : for you religon is important, especially yours. It is therefore appropriate to spread it as globally as possible.

I'd probably rather organize it around a queen honestly and the Dharma can be revealed in many shapes... but... yeah. Sounds a bit like me. "Ecology + Liberty + Family". Green liberal conservatism.

Titoism. Because Yuga and Tito stronk

I'm not really sure. I'm for sure pretty progressive and libertarian-ish and like democracy so usually I feel like social democracy is the best, but recently I've sort of been flipping between that and a sort of global libertarian socialism or anarcho-syndicalism.

Social Democracy, Social Liberalism, and American Liberalism

Right wing conservatism

American Pere Housh wrote:Right wing conservatism

Do you believe that censorship in music is good? Some right-wingers think it is.

My signature should say enough.

Ginicun wrote:

American Pere Housh wrote:Right wing conservatism

Do you believe that censorship in music is good? Some right-wingers think it is.

Actually no I don't. I'm actually on the left when it comes to conservationism.

http://www.politiscales.net/en_US/results/?s1=62&s0=14&e1=64&e0=21&m1=55&m0=10&p0=7&p1=90&j1=60&j0=17&t1=55&t0=33&b0=29&b1=50&c1=76&reli=100&prag=100

American Pere Housh wrote:

Ginicun wrote:Do you believe that censorship in music is good? Some right-wingers think it is.

Actually no I don't

http://www.politiscales.net/en_US/results/?s1=62&s0=14&e1=64&e0=21&m1=55&m0=10&p0=7&p1=90&j1=60&j0=17&t1=55&t0=33&b0=29&b1=50&c1=76&reli=100&prag=100

great that you aren't a reincarnation of tipper gore

Christian Conservatism

I think I should give more info:

9axes: https://9axes.github.io/results.html?a= ... &h=57&i=31

Political Compass:

PolitiScales: http://www.politiscales.net/en_US/resul ... 67&reli=67

For simplicity sake, I usually just say I'm a High Tory. Though I don't always fit in that box with everything, it's probably the closest to what I believe. Also a staunch monarchist.

I'd say I am a libertarian communist.

National Socialist

Ideally? I am a post capitalist, post national globalist.
In reality, I am a social democrat, for that is the greatest ideology to fulfill the purpose of the State.

Neo-Fascism, though I admit this a bit vague. I aspire to recreate a purer Fascism that is untainted by Right-wing influence so as to easily distinguish myself from the so-called "Fascists" and "Neo-Nazis" of the current era. Fascism and National Socialism had to make compromises to their ideological tenants in order to appeal to hard-liner Conservative and Traditionalist elements in Italy and Germany, respectively. I would see these compromises undone in order to return to the original roots cemented in the early Italian Fascist movement - free of Reactionary and Racialist influences. Of course I also recognize the need for Fascism to evolve to fit the current cultural and technological ages and have taken that into account in regards to my belief system. It is my hope that a purer form of Fascism can one day be put into practice without having to worry about pressure from either the Left or the Right to influence it's direction or policies. It is my belief that Fascism is best implemented when it is independent of outsider interference.

I am a social liberal.

Whatever ideology means taxing the rich and major corporations more to take care of the poor. Robin-Hoodism?

Badb Catha wrote:Neo-Fascism, though I admit this a bit vague. I aspire to recreate a purer Fascism that is untainted by Right-wing influence so as to easily distinguish myself from the so-called "Fascists" and "Neo-Nazis" of the current era. Fascism and National Socialism had to make compromises to their ideological tenants in order to appeal to hard-liner Conservative and Traditionalist elements in Italy and Germany, respectively. I would see these compromises undone in order to return to the original roots cemented in the early Italian Fascist movement - free of Reactionary and Racialist influences. Of course I also recognize the need for Fascism to evolve to fit the current cultural and technological ages and have taken that into account in regards to my belief system. It is my hope that a purer form of Fascism can one day be put into practice without having to worry about pressure from either the Left or the Right to influence it's direction or policies. It is my belief that Fascism is best implemented when it is independent of outsider interference.

Mussolini was speaking of the importance of maintain high birth rates for the Aryan race before he even took power. Trying to separate Italian fascism from racialism is just trying to rewrite history.

Constitutional nationalist

Badb Catha wrote:Neo-Fascism, though I admit this a bit vague. I aspire to recreate a purer Fascism that is untainted by Right-wing influence so as to easily distinguish myself from the so-called "Fascists" and "Neo-Nazis" of the current era. Fascism and National Socialism had to make compromises to their ideological tenants in order to appeal to hard-liner Conservative and Traditionalist elements in Italy and Germany, respectively. I would see these compromises undone in order to return to the original roots cemented in the early Italian Fascist movement - free of Reactionary and Racialist influences. Of course I also recognize the need for Fascism to evolve to fit the current cultural and technological ages and have taken that into account in regards to my belief system. It is my hope that a purer form of Fascism can one day be put into practice without having to worry about pressure from either the Left or the Right to influence it's direction or policies. It is my belief that Fascism is best implemented when it is independent of outsider interference.

This reminds me on my own experiences. The obsessive racialism and the overall mentality drove me rather quickly out of the far-right fringes, where I had foolishly hoped to find a place.

If anything my flirt with the right-wing solidified my own positions in the end.

Nowadays I consider myself being unideological with crypto-fascist tendencies.

Washington Resistance Army wrote:

Badb Catha wrote:Neo-Fascism, though I admit this a bit vague. I aspire to recreate a purer Fascism that is untainted by Right-wing influence so as to easily distinguish myself from the so-called "Fascists" and "Neo-Nazis" of the current era. Fascism and National Socialism had to make compromises to their ideological tenants in order to appeal to hard-liner Conservative and Traditionalist elements in Italy and Germany, respectively. I would see these compromises undone in order to return to the original roots cemented in the early Italian Fascist movement - free of Reactionary and Racialist influences. Of course I also recognize the need for Fascism to evolve to fit the current cultural and technological ages and have taken that into account in regards to my belief system. It is my hope that a purer form of Fascism can one day be put into practice without having to worry about pressure from either the Left or the Right to influence it's direction or policies. It is my belief that Fascism is best implemented when it is independent of outsider interference.

Mussolini was speaking of the importance of maintain high birth rates for the Aryan race before he even took power. Trying to separate Italian fascism from racialism is just trying to rewrite history.

Italian Fascism emphasized culture, not race. Biological race came tertiary to spirituality and culture.

Nakena wrote:

Badb Catha wrote:Neo-Fascism, though I admit this a bit vague. I aspire to recreate a purer Fascism that is untainted by Right-wing influence so as to easily distinguish myself from the so-called "Fascists" and "Neo-Nazis" of the current era. Fascism and National Socialism had to make compromises to their ideological tenants in order to appeal to hard-liner Conservative and Traditionalist elements in Italy and Germany, respectively. I would see these compromises undone in order to return to the original roots cemented in the early Italian Fascist movement - free of Reactionary and Racialist influences. Of course I also recognize the need for Fascism to evolve to fit the current cultural and technological ages and have taken that into account in regards to my belief system. It is my hope that a purer form of Fascism can one day be put into practice without having to worry about pressure from either the Left or the Right to influence it's direction or policies. It is my belief that Fascism is best implemented when it is independent of outsider interference.

This reminds me on my own experiences. The obesssive racialism and the overall mentality drove me rather quickly out of the far-right fringes, where I had foolishly hoped to find a place.

If anything my flirt with the right-wing solidified my own positions in the end.

Nowadays I consider myself being unideological with crypto-fascist tendencies.

An understandable move. I, too, was drawn to Far-Right ideologies at first but was appalled by the prevalence of racialist thought amongst them. It is why although I am Fascist I hold a somewhat dim view on National Socialism for it's Nordicism.

Right-wing Conservative. And a Monarchist. If I had to pick a political party, I would pick the Federalist Party under John Adams and Alexander Hamilton (preferably without those two at each others' throats). The current ones are, frankly, quite shit.

Badb Catha wrote:

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Mussolini was speaking of the importance of maintain high birth rates for the Aryan race before he even took power. Trying to separate Italian fascism from racialism is just trying to rewrite history.

Italian Fascism emphasized culture, not race. Biological race came tertiary to spirituality and culture.

Except when it came to Yugoslavs, who were seen as inferior and controlled by Jewish finance.