What is your political ideology

[LiberNovusAmericae]

like 911 pearl harvor was an inside job, and everyone know it ecept the poor american people.

Any empirical evidence for those two claims (not a conspiratorial website)?

I wouldn't expect any. Some political views, such as Nazism are not backed up by facts.

[America the World Police]

Germany started the war and then the Allies declared war to protect Poland like they said they would

The Allies did not move to protect Poland like they said they would.

The Joke ——————>

> You ( ‘_’)

[Democratic Communist Federation]

I wouldn't expect any. Some political views, such as Nazism are not backed up by facts.

Usually when I have asked those questions in the past, I get links to a website (like Alex Jones) or a YouTube video. When I have repeated that I am looking for empirical evidence, most people don't reply.

[LiberNovusAmericae]

I wouldn't expect any. Some political views, such as Nazism are not backed up by facts.

Usually when I have asked those questions in the past, I get links to a website (like Alex Jones) or a YouTube video. When I have repeated that I am looking for empirical evidence, most people don't reply.

The guy you quoted is forum banned, so he can not reply anyway.

[El-Amin Caliphate]

Usually when I have asked those questions in the past, I get links to a website (like Alex Jones) or a YouTube video. When I have repeated that I am looking for empirical evidence, most people don't reply.

The guy you quoted is forum banned, so he can not reply anyway.

He can reply by telegram tho

[Democratic Communist Federation]

The guy you quoted is forum banned, so he can not reply anyway.

Okay. I didn't check to see if s/he was that person.

[America the World Police]

The guy you quoted is forum banned, so he can not reply anyway.

He can reply by telegram tho

He’s a Nazi, I don’t think he can comprehend that.

[Farnhamia]

He can reply by telegram tho

He’s a Nazi, I don’t think he can comprehend that.

He can't access the forums if he's logged in. To use the telegram option, he'd have to log out, read the post, log back in and send a TG with his answer. Seems unlikely to happen.

[VoVoDoCo]

I'm kind of a novice when it comes to Georgism. Most of my readings, while all being secondary sources, have been very convincing. I still want to read some unique primary materials first though.

Socially I'm as Libertarian as it gets.

[LiberNovusAmericae]

Unfortunately they take that too far now. If a crime happens to be committed by a refugee, the German police are hesitant to act on it; they're too politically correct.

It’s hard to blame them. They still get called Nazis by *ssholes and they’ve put the most effort possible to stop this. What we need is to recognize Germany is a new country. We need to accept their apology and have democratic nations strongly approve of them having power.

While we need to forgive them, they also need to forgive themselves to a certain degree. If the police are too politically correct to solve crime, then that is a massive problem, and they need to get their act together.

[Sovaal]

Radical centrism. That means oppressing everyone, majority or minority, mass executions of communists and fascists alike, etc./s

But seriously I have a severe dislike of all extremes.

[Hanafuridake]

So you want something akin to the old Germanic kingship's?

Something like what Tolkien envisioned.

Taking into account that Tolkien was a massive Angloboo, wouldn't be surprised if his ideal society were essentially based on ancient Germanic political notions. I have some serious concerns with it, most of them pragmatic, but it's not the worst political ideology ever created. Just not very realistic.

[Nordengrund]

I'm kind of a novice when it comes to Georgism. Most of my readings, while all being secondary sources, have been very convincing. I still want to read some unique primary materials first though.

Socially I'm as Libertarian as it gets.

Same here. I’m more of a Geolibertarian than anything else, but I’m slightly more conserbative on social issues. I’m pro-life on abortion, but I see both sides of the capital punishment debate.

[Unithonia]

Right-Leaning Capitalist Libertarian-Legalist. Although after doing some research Georgism is an interesting economic system, and something I may pursue in the future

I'm kind of a novice when it comes to Georgism. Most of my readings, while all being secondary sources, have been very convincing. I still want to read some unique primary materials first though.

Socially I'm as Libertarian as it gets.

Have you found any good primary sources?

[Unithonia]

I'm kind of a novice when it comes to Georgism. Most of my readings, while all being secondary sources, have been very convincing. I still want to read some unique primary materials first though.

Socially I'm as Libertarian as it gets.

Same here. I’m more of a Geolibertarian than anything else, but I’m slightly more conserbative on social issues. I’m pro-life on abortion, but I see both sides of the capital punishment debate.

I honestly can't see a good libertarian being pro-life...
Although we are not required to follow every teaching of the political system we believe in. Hence why I am a Libertarian-Legalist, rather than a normal Libertarian

[Hystaria]

Radical centrism. That means oppressing everyone, majority or minority, mass executions of communists and fascists alike, etc./s

But seriously I have a severe dislike of all extremes.

....No

It is having strong political stances, but not letting dogma block your way, and seeing the pros and cons to all parties.


That is Central Extremism

[Unithonia]

Radical centrism. That means oppressing everyone, majority or minority, mass executions of communists and fascists alike, etc./s

But seriously I have a severe dislike of all extremes.

That's a bit insane TBH
Why not just leave people alone? If they aren't breaking the law, why are you oppressing and/or murdering them? They've done literally nothing to you.

[Starblaydia]

Let's not retry Soviet Communism. It is a failure.

aksually it was the fault of gorbachev reeee

America the World Police: Unofficial warning for trolling. The "autistic screeching" meme constitutes trolling; don't use it.

[Glayji]

Far left although not a communist and my nation is not far left

[Nordengrund]

Same here. I’m more of a Geolibertarian than anything else, but I’m slightly more conserbative on social issues. I’m pro-life on abortion, but I see both sides of the capital punishment debate.

I honestly can't see a good libertarian being pro-life...
Although we are not required to follow every teaching of the political system we believe in. Hence why I am a Libertarian-Legalist, rather than a normal Libertarian

There are some libertarians who are pro-life because they see it as mirdering a child and therefore a violation of the non-aggression principle.

[Unithonia]

Far left although not a communist and my nation is not far left

So would you identify as a Socialist? Marxist (although that's communist I guess)?

[Unithonia]

I honestly can't see a good libertarian being pro-life...
Although we are not required to follow every teaching of the political system we believe in. Hence why I am a Libertarian-Legalist, rather than a normal Libertarian

There are some libertarians who are pro-life because they see it as mirdering a child and therefore a violation of the non-aggression principle.

True, but wouldn't a person's right to choose come before the non-aggression principle?
Although I am against the non-aggression principle in some ways.

[American Pere Housh]

Conservative values across the board

[Nordengrund]

There are some libertarians who are pro-life because they see it as mirdering a child and therefore a violation of the non-aggression principle.

True, but wouldn't a person's right to choose come before the non-aggression principle?
Although I am against the non-aggression principle in some ways.

You could define libertarianism as people being able to do whatever they want as long as they are nor hurting anyone, but some people would consider performing an abortion as harming someone.

[Unithonia]

True, but wouldn't a person's right to choose come before the non-aggression principle?
Although I am against the non-aggression principle in some ways.

You could define libertarianism as people being able to do whatever they want as long as they are nor hurting anyone, but some people would consider performing an abortion as harming someone.

True

But in some cases, the child could potentially harm the mother, so there's always that. Plus, the woman may not have wanted the baby. So we need to protect a woman's right to choose